Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Layout Migration

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multi-Net Optimization of VLSI Interconnect

Abstract

Designing high-end full-custom VLSI systems such as microprocessors is a very complex engineering task, involving hundreds of man-years’ effort. Hierarchical design methodology is essential for handling the complexity of the task. Fueled by Moore’s Law, market competition and economic considerations dictate the introduction of new products in the so-called “Tick-Tock” strategy. The Tick-Tock development strategy delivers a new product manufactured in the most advanced stable technology (named “old technology”). It is then followed by delivering chips of the same architecture, but in a new, scaled manufacturing process technology (named “new technology”), thus allowing higher production volumes, better performance, and lower cost. An essential part of the second phase is the conversion of the underlying physical layout, comprising billions of polygons, into the new technology. Such conversion is known in VLSI jargon as hard-IP reuse [Nitzan 02]. An enabler for this strategy is therefore the automation of layout conversion from older into newer technology. Such automation is a very challenging computational task that must satisfy complex geometric rules, hence translated into an optimization problem involving billions of variables and constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

eBook
USD 15.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. J.L. Burns, A.R. Newton, Efficient Constraint Generation for Hierarchical Compaction, IEEE International Conference on Computer Design, pp. 197–200, Oct. 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.L. Burns, J A. Feldman, C5M – A Control-Logic Layout Synthesis System for High-Performance Microprocessors, IEEE Trans. on CAD of Integrated Circuits and Systems, Vol. 17, No. 1, 1998, pp. 14–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Klau and P. Mutzel, Optimal compaction of orthogonal grid drawings, Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization, Vol. 1610, pp 304–319, Springer, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. Lengauer, On the solution of inequality systems relevant to IC-layout, Journal of Algorithms, Vol. 5, No. 3, 1984, pp. 408–421.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. T. Lengaur, Combinatorial Algorithms for Integrated Circuit Layout, Chapter 10: Compaction, pp. 579–643, John Wiley, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Nitzan and S. Wimer, AMPS and SiClone integration for implementing 0.18 um to 0.13 um design migration, Synoposys Users Group (SNUG) Conf., San Jose CA, March 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Patrignani, On the complexity of orthogonal compaction, Computational Geometry, Vol. 19, Issue 1, June 2001, pp. 47–67.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Reinhardt, Automatic Layout Modification: Including Design Reuse of the Alpha CPU in 0.13 Micron SOI Technology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Schlag, Y. Z. Liao and C.K. Wong, An algorithm for optimal two-dimensional compaction of VLSI layouts, Integration, the VLSI Journal, Vol. 1, Issues 2–3, Oct. 1983, pp. 179–209.

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. Shin, A. L. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli and C. H. Siquin, Two-dimensional compaction by zone refining, Proceeding of the 23rd ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference, 1986, pp. 115–122.

    Google Scholar 

  11. L-Y. Wang, Y-T Lai, Graph-Theory-Based Simplex Algorithm for VLSI Layout Spacing Problems with Multiple Variables Constraints, IEEE Trans. on CAD of Integrated Circuits and Systems, Vol. 20, No. 8, 2001, pp. 967–979

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Wimer, “Planar CMOS to multi-gate layout conversion for maximal fin utilization”, Integration, the VLSI Journal (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  13. S-Z. Yao, C-K. ChengT, D. Dutt, S. Nahar, C-Y. Lo, Cell-Based Hierarchical Pitch matching Compaction Using Minimal LP, 30th Design Automation Conf., 1993, pp. 395–400.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moiseev, K., Kolodny, A., Wimer, S. (2015). Layout Migration. In: Multi-Net Optimization of VLSI Interconnect. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0821-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0821-5_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-0820-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-0821-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics