Abstract
Designing high-end full-custom VLSI systems such as microprocessors is a very complex engineering task, involving hundreds of man-years’ effort. Hierarchical design methodology is essential for handling the complexity of the task. Fueled by Moore’s Law, market competition and economic considerations dictate the introduction of new products in the so-called “Tick-Tock” strategy. The Tick-Tock development strategy delivers a new product manufactured in the most advanced stable technology (named “old technology”). It is then followed by delivering chips of the same architecture, but in a new, scaled manufacturing process technology (named “new technology”), thus allowing higher production volumes, better performance, and lower cost. An essential part of the second phase is the conversion of the underlying physical layout, comprising billions of polygons, into the new technology. Such conversion is known in VLSI jargon as hard-IP reuse [Nitzan 02]. An enabler for this strategy is therefore the automation of layout conversion from older into newer technology. Such automation is a very challenging computational task that must satisfy complex geometric rules, hence translated into an optimization problem involving billions of variables and constraints.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
J.L. Burns, A.R. Newton, Efficient Constraint Generation for Hierarchical Compaction, IEEE International Conference on Computer Design, pp. 197–200, Oct. 1987.
J.L. Burns, J A. Feldman, C5M – A Control-Logic Layout Synthesis System for High-Performance Microprocessors, IEEE Trans. on CAD of Integrated Circuits and Systems, Vol. 17, No. 1, 1998, pp. 14–13.
G. Klau and P. Mutzel, Optimal compaction of orthogonal grid drawings, Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization, Vol. 1610, pp 304–319, Springer, 1999.
T. Lengauer, On the solution of inequality systems relevant to IC-layout, Journal of Algorithms, Vol. 5, No. 3, 1984, pp. 408–421.
T. Lengaur, Combinatorial Algorithms for Integrated Circuit Layout, Chapter 10: Compaction, pp. 579–643, John Wiley, 1990.
R. Nitzan and S. Wimer, AMPS and SiClone integration for implementing 0.18 um to 0.13 um design migration, Synoposys Users Group (SNUG) Conf., San Jose CA, March 2002.
M. Patrignani, On the complexity of orthogonal compaction, Computational Geometry, Vol. 19, Issue 1, June 2001, pp. 47–67.
M. Reinhardt, Automatic Layout Modification: Including Design Reuse of the Alpha CPU in 0.13 Micron SOI Technology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.
M. Schlag, Y. Z. Liao and C.K. Wong, An algorithm for optimal two-dimensional compaction of VLSI layouts, Integration, the VLSI Journal, Vol. 1, Issues 2–3, Oct. 1983, pp. 179–209.
H. Shin, A. L. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli and C. H. Siquin, Two-dimensional compaction by zone refining, Proceeding of the 23rd ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference, 1986, pp. 115–122.
L-Y. Wang, Y-T Lai, Graph-Theory-Based Simplex Algorithm for VLSI Layout Spacing Problems with Multiple Variables Constraints, IEEE Trans. on CAD of Integrated Circuits and Systems, Vol. 20, No. 8, 2001, pp. 967–979
S. Wimer, “Planar CMOS to multi-gate layout conversion for maximal fin utilization”, Integration, the VLSI Journal (2013).
S-Z. Yao, C-K. ChengT, D. Dutt, S. Nahar, C-Y. Lo, Cell-Based Hierarchical Pitch matching Compaction Using Minimal LP, 30th Design Automation Conf., 1993, pp. 395–400.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moiseev, K., Kolodny, A., Wimer, S. (2015). Layout Migration. In: Multi-Net Optimization of VLSI Interconnect. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0821-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0821-5_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-0820-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-0821-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)