Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Discounted Cumulated Gain

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Database Systems

Synonyms

Discounted cumulated gain (DCG); Normalized discounted cumulated gain (nDCG)

Definition

Discounted cumulated gain (DCG) is an evaluation metric for information retrieval (IR). It is based on non-binary relevance assessments of documents ranked in a retrieval result. It assumes that, for a searcher, highly relevant documents are more valuable than marginally relevant documents. It further assumes that the greater the ranked position of a relevant document (of any relevance grade), the less valuable it is for the searcher, because the less likely it is that the searcher will ever examine the document and at least has to pay more effort to find it. DCG formalizes these assumptions by crediting a retrieval system (or a query) for retrieving relevant documents by their (possibly weighted) degree of relevance which, however, is discounted by a factor dependent on the logarithm of the document’s ranked position. The steepness of the discount is controlled by the base of the logarithm...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 4,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Recommended Reading

  1. Losee RM. Text retrieval and filtering: analytic models of performance. Boston: Kluwer Academic; 1998.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Hull D. Using statistical testing in the evaluation of retrieval experiments. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval; 1993. p. 329–38.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sakai T. On the reliability of information retrieval metrics based on graded relevance. Inf Process Manag. 2007;43(2):531–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Voorhees E. Evaluation by highly relevant documents. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval; 2001. p. 74–82.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A suggestion by Susan Price (Portland State University, Portland), May 2007, (private communication).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sakai T. Average gain ratio: a simple retrieval performance measure for evaluation with multiple relevance levels. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval; 2003. p. 417–18.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bompada T, Chang C, Chen J, Kumar R, Shenoy R. On the robustness of relevance measures with incomplete judgments. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval; 2007. p. 359–66.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Järvelin K, Kekäläinen J. IR evaluation methods for retrieving highly relevant documents. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval; 2000. p. 41–8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Järvelin K, Kekäläinen J. Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques. ACM Trans Inf Syst. 2002;20(4):422–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kekäläinen J. Binary and graded relevance in IR evaluations – comparison of the effects on ranking of IR systems. Inf Process Manag. 2005;41(5):1019–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kekäläinen J, Järvelin K. Using graded relevance assessments in IR evaluation. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2002;53(13):1120–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kalervo Järvelin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Järvelin, K., Kekäläinen, J. (2018). Discounted Cumulated Gain. In: Liu, L., Özsu, M.T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Database Systems. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8265-9_478

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics