Data Replication

1. Aguilera MK, Terry DB. The many faces of consistency. IEEE Data Eng Bull. 2016;39(1):3–13.

   Google Scholar 

2. Almeida S, Leitão J, Rodrigues LET. Chainreaction: a causal+ consistent datastore based on chain replication. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGOPS/EuroSys European Conference on Computer Systems; 2013. p. 85–98.

   Google Scholar 

3. Alonso G, Charron-Bost B, Pedone F, Schiper A, editors. Seminar: a 30-year perspective on replication. Monte Verita; 2007.

   Google Scholar 

4. Bernstein PA, Hadzilacos V, Goodman N. Concurrency control and recovery in database systems. Reading: Addison Wesley; 1987.

   Google Scholar 

5. Breitbart Y, Komondoor R, Rastogi R, Seshadri S, Silberschatz A. Update propagation protocols for replicated databases. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data; 1999. p. 97–108.

   Google Scholar 

6. Budhiraja N, Marzullo K, Schneider FB, Toueg S. The primary-backup approach. In: Mullender S, editor. Distributed systems. 2nd ed. Reading: Addison Wesley; 1993. p. 199–216.

   Google Scholar 

7. Cabrera L-F, Pâris J-F, editors. In: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Management of Replicated Data; 1990.

   Google Scholar 

8. Corbett JC, Dean J, Epstein M, Fikes A, Frost C, Furman JJ, Ghemawat S, Gubarev A, Heiser C, Hochschild P, Hsieh WC, Kanthak S, Kogan E, Li H, Lloyd A, Melnik S, Mwaura D, Nagle D, Quinlan S, Rao R, Rolig L, Saito Y, Szymaniak M, Taylor C, Wang R, Woodford D. Spanner: Google’s globally distributed database. ACM Trans Comput Syst. 2013;31(3):8.

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. Kemme B, editor. Data consistency in the cloud. IEEE Data Eng Bull. 2015;38(1).

   Google Scholar 

10. Kemme B, editor. Data consistency across research communities. IEEE Data Eng Bull. 2016;39(1).

    Google Scholar 

11. Faleiro JM, Abadi DJ. FIT: a distributed database performance tradeoff. IEEE Data Eng Bull. 2015;38(1):10–7.

    Google Scholar 

12. Gilbert S, Lynch NA. Brewer’s conjecture and the feasibility of consistent, available, partition-tolerant web services. ACM SIGACT News. 2002;33(2): 51–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. Gray J, Helland P, O’Neil P, Shasha D. The dangers of replication and a solution. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data; 1996. p. 173–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. Guerraoui R, Pavlovic M, Seredinschi D-A. Trade-offs in replicated systems. IEEE Data Eng Bull. 2016;39(1):14–26.

    Google Scholar 

15. Li C, Porto D, Clement A, Gehrke J, Preguiça NM, Rodrigues R. Making geo-replicated systems fast as possible, consistent when necessary. In: Proceedings of the 10th USENIX Symposium on Operating System Design and Implementation; 2012. p. 265–78.

    Google Scholar 

16. Lin Y, Kemme B, Patiño-Martínez M, Jiménez-Peris R. Middleware based data replication providing snapshot isolation. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data; 2005. p. 419–30.

    Google Scholar 

17. Lv Q, Cao P, Cohen E, Li K, Shenker S. Search and replication in unstructured peer-to-peer networks. In: Proceedings of the 16th Annual International Conference on Supercomputing; 2002. p. 84–95.

    Google Scholar 

18. Mahmoud HA, Nawab F, Pucher A, Agrawal D, El Abbadi A. Low-latency multi-datacenter databases using replicated commit. Proc VLDB Endow. 2013;6(9):661–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

19. Röhm U, Böhm K, Schek H-J, Schuldt H. FAS - a freshness-sensitive coordination middleware for a cluster of OLAP components. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases; 2002. p. 754–65.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

20. Saito Y, Shapiro M. Optimistic replication. ACM Comput Surv. 2005;37(1):42–81.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

21. Satyanarayanan M, Kistler JJ, Kumar P, Okasaki ME, Siegel EH, Steere DC. Coda: a highly available file system for a distributed workstation environment. IEEE Trans Comput. 1990;39(4):447–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

22. Schneider FB. Replication management using the state-machine approach. In: Mullender S, editor. Distributed systems. 2nd ed. Reading: Addison Wesley; 1993. p. 169–98.

    Google Scholar 

23. Sivasubramanian S, Szymaniak M, Pierre G, van Steen M. Replication for web hosting systems. ACM Comput Surv. 2004;36(3):291–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

24. Sovran Y, Power R, Aguilera MK, Li J. Transactional storage for geo-replicated systems. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Symposium on Operating System Principles; 2011. p. 385–400.

    Google Scholar 

25. Terry DB, Theimer M, Petersen K, Demers AJ, Spreitzer M, Hauser C. Managing update conflicts in Bayou, a weakly connected replicated storage system. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM Symposium on Operating System Principles; 1995. p. 172–83.

    Google Scholar 

26. Wiesmann M, Schiper A. Comparison of database replication techniques based on total order broadcast. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng. 2005;17(4):551–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references