How to Overcome Stumbling Blocks of Traditional Personalization Paradigms

1. Ardissono L., Gena C., Torasso P., Bellifemine F., Difino A. and Negro B. User modeling and recommendation techniques for personalized electronic program guides. In Personalized Digital Television: Targeting Programs to Individual Viewers, pages 3 — 26. Kluwer Academics Publishers, 2004.

   Google Scholar 

2. Basu C., Hirsh H. and Cohen W. Recommendation as classification: using social and content-based information in recommendation. In 15th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-98), pages 714–720, 1998.

   Google Scholar 

3. Baudisch P. and Bruekner L. TV Scout: guiding users from printed TV program guides to personalized TV recommendation. In 1st Workshop on Personalization in Future TV, pages 151 – 160, 2001.

   Google Scholar 

4. Beckett D. RDF Syntax Specification. Disponible en http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar. 2004.

5. Berners-Lee T., Hendler J. and Lassila O. The Semantic Web: A new form of Web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities. The Scientific American, 279(5):34–43, 2001.

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Blanco-Fernández Y., Pazos-Arias J., Gil-Solla A., Ramos-Cabrer M., López-Nores M., García-Duque J., Díaz-Redondo R., Fernández-Vilas A., Bermejo-Muñoz, J. A flexible semantic inference methodology to reason about user preferences in knowledge-based recommender systems. Knowledge-Based Systems Journal, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2007.07.004. In press.

7. Blanco Fernández Y., Pazos Arias J. J., Gil Solla A., Ramos Cabrer M., López Nores M. and Bermejo Múñoz J. AVATAR: Enhancing the personalized television by semantic inference. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 21(2):397–422, 2007.

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. Brickley D. and Guha R. RDF vocabulary description language 1.0: RDF Schema. Disponible en http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema. 2004.

9. Burke R. Hybrid recommender systems: survey and experiments. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 12(4):331–370, 2002.

   Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

10. DAML: The DARPA Agent Markup Language. Disponible en http://www.daml.org. 2000.

11. Das D. and ter Horst H. Recommender systems for TV. In Recommender Systems: Papers from the AAAI Workshop. Technical Report WS-98-08, pages 151 – 160. American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, California, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

12. Fensel D., van Harmelen F., Horrocks I., McGuinness D. and Patel-Schneider P. SOIL: An ontology infrastructure for the Semantic Web. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 16(2):38–45, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. Ganesan P., Garcia-Molina H. and Widom J. Exploiting hierarchical domain structure to compute similarity. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 21(1):64–93, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. Hill W., Stead L., Rosenstein M. and Furnas G. Recommending and evaluating choices in a virtual community of use. In Proceedings of International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI-95), pages 194–201, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

15. Lin D. An information-theoretic definition of similarity. In 15th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-98), pages 296–304, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

16. López Nores M., Pazos Arias J., Blanco Fernández Y., García Duque J., Tubío Pardavila R., Rey López M. The MiSPOT System: Personalized Publicity and Marketing over Interactive Digital TV. E-Business and Telecommunication Networks. Springer-Verlag, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

17. McGuinness D. and van Harmelen F. OWL Web Ontology Language Overview. W3C Recommendation. 2004.

    Google Scholar 

18. Miller B., Albert I., Lam S., Konstan J. and Riedl J. Movielens unplugged: experiences with an occasionally connected recommender system. In ACM Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pages 263–266, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

19. Moviefinder Recommender System. Available information in http://www.moviefinder.com

20. O'Sullivan D., Smyth B., Wilson D. and McDonald K. Improving the quality of the personalized Electronic Program Guide. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 14(1):5–36, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

21. Pazos-Arias J., López-Nores M., García-Duque J., Díaz-Redondo R., Blanco-Fernández Y., Ramos-Cabrer M., Gil-Solla A., Fernández-Vilas A. Provision of distance learning services over Interactive Digital TV with MHP. Computers & Education.

    Google Scholar 

22. Pazzani M. A framework for collaborative, content-based and demographic filtering. Artificial Intelligence Review, 13(5):393–408, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

23. Rada R., Mili H., Bicknell E. and Blettner M. Development and application of a metric on semantic nets. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 19(1):17–30, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

24. Resnik P. Semantic similarity in a taxonomy: an information-based measure and its application to problems of ambiguity in natural language. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 11(4):95–130, 1999.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

25. Sarwar B., Karypis G., Konstan J. and Riedl J. Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In 10th International WWW Conference (WWW-01), pages 285–295, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

26. TiVo, Inc. TiVo: TV your way. Available in http://www.tivo.com, 2002.

27. Zimmerman J., Kurapati K., Buczak A., Schafer D., Gutta S. and Martino J. TV personalization system: design of a TV show recommender engine and interface. In Personalized Digital Television: Targeting Programs to Individual Viewers, pages 27 – 51. Kluwer Academics Publishers, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

Download references