Evolutionary Computation in Economics

• Agapie, A., & Agapie, A. (2001). Evolutionary computation for econometric modeling. Advanced Modeling and Optimization, 3, 1–5.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Alexandrova-Kabadjova, B. (2008). Evolutionary learning of the optimal pricing strategy in an artificial payment card market, Studies in computational intelligence (Vol. 100). Berlin: Springer.

  Google Scholar 

• Amin, M. (2002). Restructuring the electric enterprise: Simulating the evolution of the electric power industry with intelligent adaptive agents. In A. Faruqui, & K. Eakin, (Eds.), Market analysis and resource management (Chap. 3). Boston: Kluwer Publishers.

  Google Scholar 

• Andreoni, J., & Miller, J. H. (1995). Auctions with artificial adaptive agents. Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 39–64.

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Anthony, P., & Jennings, N. R. (2003). Developing a bidding agent for multiple heterogeneous auctions. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, 3, 185–217.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Arifovic, J. (1994). Genetic algorithm learning and the cobweb model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 18, 3–28.

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Arifovic, J. (1996). The behavior of the exchange rate in the genetic algorithm and experimental economics. Journal of Political Economy, 104, 510–541.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Arthur, W. B. (1991). Learning and adaptiver economic behavior. Designing economic agents that act like human agents: A behavioral approach to bounded rationality. American Economic Review, 81, 353–359.

  Google Scholar 

• Arthur, W. B. (1994). Inductive reasoning and bounded rationality: The El Farol problem. American Economic Review, 84, 406–411.

  Google Scholar 

• Arthur, W. B., Holland, J. H., LeBaron, B., Palmer, R. G., & Talyer, P. (1997). Asset pricing under endogenous expectations in an artificial stock market. In W. Brian Arthur, S. Durlauf, & D. Lane, (Eds.), The economy as an evolving complex system II. Menlo Park: Addison-Wesley.

  Google Scholar 

• Axelrod, R. (1987). The evolution of strategies in the iterated prisoner’s dilemma. In L. Davis (Ed.), Genetic algorithms and simulated annealing, Research notes in AI (Chap. 3, pp. 32–41). Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

  Google Scholar 

• Axelrod, R. (2003). Advancing the art of simulation in the social sciences. Japanese Journal for Management Information System, Special Issue on Agent-Based Modeling, 12 (3).

  Google Scholar 

• Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211, 1390–1396.

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Axelrod, R., & Tesfatsion, L. (2006). A guide for newcomers to agent-based modeling in the social sciences. In K. L. Judd, & L. Tesfatsion, (Eds.), Handbook of computational economics, Volume 2: Agent-based computational economics, Handbooks in economics (Appendix A, pp. 1647–1656). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

  Google Scholar 

• Axtell, R. (2000). Why agents? on the varied motivations for agent computing in the social sciences. Working Paper 17, Center on Social and Economic Dynamics.

  Google Scholar 

• Brenner, T. (2006). Agent learning representation – advice in modelling economic learning. In K. L. Judd, & L. Tesfatsion, (Eds.), Handbook of computational economics, Volume 2: Agent-based computational economics, Handbooks in economics (Chap. 18, pp. 895–948). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

  Google Scholar 

• Bullard, J., Arifovic, J., & Duffy, J. (1995). Learning in a model of economic growth and development. Working Paper 1995-017A, Federal Reserve Bank Of St. Louis.

  Google Scholar 

• Bullard, J., & Duffy, J. (1999). Using genetic algorithms to model the evolution of heterogeneous beliefs. Computational Economics, 13, 41–60.

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Byde, A. (2003). Applying evolutionary game theory to auction mechanism design. In ACM conference on electronic commerce (pp. 192–193). New York: ACM.

  Google Scholar 

• Chan, N. T., LeBaron, B., Lo, A. W., & Poggio, T. (2001). Agent-based models of financial markets: A comparison with experimental markets. MIT Sloan Working Paper 4195-01, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  Google Scholar 

• Chen, S.-H. (2007). Editorial: Computationally intelligent agents in economics and finance. Information Science, 177(5), 1153–1168.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Chen, S.-H., & Ni, C. C. (2000). Simulating the ecology of oligopolistic competition with genetic algorithms. Knowledge Information Systems, 2(2), 285–309.

  Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Chen, S.-H., & Yeh, C.-H. (1996). Genetic programming learning in the cobweb model with speculators. In International computer symposium (ICS’96). Proceedings of international conference on artificial intelligence (pp. 39–46), National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, R.O.C.

  Google Scholar 

• Cliff, D. (2003). Explorations in evolutionary design of online auction market mechanisms. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2, 162–175.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dawid, H. (1999). On the convergence of genetic learning in a double auction market. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 23, 1545–1567.

  Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Duffy, J. (2006). Agent-based models and human subject experiments. In K. L. Judd, & L. Tesfatsion, (Eds.), Handbook of computational economics, Volume 2: Agent-based computational economics, Handbooks in economics (Chap. 19, pp. 949–1012). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

  Google Scholar 

• Duffy, J., & Engle-Warnick, J. (2002). Using symbolic regression to infer strategies from experimental data. In S.-H. Chen (Ed.), Evolutionary computation in economics and finance (pp. 61–82). New York: Physica-Verlag.

  Google Scholar 

• Edmonds, B. (1999). Modelling bounded rationality in agent-based simulations using the evolution of mental models. In T. Brenner (Ed.), Computational techniques for modelling learning in economics (pp. 305–332). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  Google Scholar 

• Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

  Google Scholar 

• Heppenstall, A., Evans, A., & Birkin, M. (2006). Using hybrid agent-based systems to model spatially-influenced retail markets. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 9, 3.

  Google Scholar 

• Izumi, K., & Ueda, K. (2001). Phase transition in a foreign exchange market-analysis based on an artificial market approach. IEEE Transactions of Evolutionary Computation, 5(5), 456–470.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jin, N., & Tsang, E. P. K. (2006). Co-adaptive strategies for sequential bargaining problems with discount factors and outside options. In Proceedings of the IEEE congress on evolutionary computation (pp. 7913–7920). Washington, DC: IEEE Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Klemperer, P. (2004). Auctions: Theory and practice. The Toulouse lectures in economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Koza, J. (1992). A genetic approach to econometric modelling. In P. Bourgine, & B. Walliser, (Eds.), Economics and cognitive science (pp. 57–75). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Lucas, R. E. (1986). Adaptive behavior and economic theory. In R. M. Hogarth, & M. W. Reder, (Eds.), Rational choice: The contrast between economics and psychology (pp. 217–242). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Marimon, R., McGrattan, E., & Sargent, T. J. (1990). Money as a medium of exchange in an economy with artificially intelligent agents. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 14, 329–373.

  Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Martinez-Jaramillo, S., & Tsang, E. P. K. (2009). An heterogeneous, endogenous and coevolutionary gp-based financial market. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 13, 33–55.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mochon, A., Quintana, D., Sez, Y., & Isasi, P. (2005). Analysis of ausubel auctions by means of evolutionary computation. In IEEE congress on evolutionary computation (CEC 2005) (pp. 2645–2652). Edinburgh, Scotland.

  Google Scholar 

• Nash, J. (1950). The barganing problem. Econometrica, 18, 155–162.

  Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Östermark, R. (1999). Solving irregular econometric and mathematical optimization problems with a genetic hybrid algorithm. Computational Economics, 13(2), 103–115.

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Riechmann, T. (2002). Genetic algorithm learning and economic evolution. Studies in fuzziness and soft computing (pp. 45–59). Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.

  Google Scholar 

• Saez, Y., Quintana, D., Isasi, P., & Mochon, A. (2007). Effects of a rationing rule on the ausubel auction: A genetic algorithm implementation. Computational Intelligence, 23(2), 221–235.

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man: Social and rational. New York: John Wiley.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Maynard Smith, J. (1972). Game theory and the evolution of fighting (pp. 8–28). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Tesfatsion, L. (2006). Agent-based computational economics: A constructive approach to economic theory. In K. L. Judd & L. Tesfatsion, (Eds.), Handbook of computational economics, Volume 2: Agent-based computational economics, Handbooks in economics (Chap. 16, pp. 831–880). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

  Google Scholar 

• Tsang, E. P. K. (2008). Computational intelligence determines effective rationality. International Journal of Automation and Computing, 5, 63–66.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Vriend, N. J. (1995). Self-organization of markets: An example of a computational approach. Computational Economics, 8, 205–231.

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Witt, U. (2008). Evolutionary economics (2nd ed.). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

  Google Scholar 

• Wooldridge, M. (2002). An Introduction to multiagent systems. Chichester: Wiley.

  Google Scholar 

Download references