An Introduction to Simulation-Based Inference for Spatial Point Processes

• Adler, R. (1981). The Geometry of Random Fields, Wiley, New York.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Baddeley, A. & Gill, R. D. (1997). Kaplan-Meier estimators of distance distributions for spatial point processes, Annals of Statistics 25: 263–292.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Baddeley, A. J., Moyeed, R. A., Howard, C. V. & Boyde, A. (1993). Analysis of a three-dimensional point patttern with applications, Applied Statistics 42: 641–668.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Baddeley, A. J. & van Lieshout, M. N. M. (1993). Stochastic geometry models in high-level vision, in K. V. Mardia & G. K. Kanji (eds), Statistics and Images, Advances in Applied Statistics, a supplement to the Journal of Applied Statistics, Vol. 20, Carfax Publishing, Abingdon, chapter 11, pp. 235–256.

  Google Scholar 

• Baddeley, A. J. & van Lieshout, M. N. M. (1995). Area-interaction point processes, Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 46: 601–619.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Baddeley, A. & Moller, J. (1989). Nearest-neighbour Markov point pro- cesses and random sets, International Statistical Review 2: 89–121.

  Google Scholar 

• Baddeley, A., Moller, J. & Waagepetersen, R. (2000). Non-and semi-parametric estimation of interaction in inhomogeneous point patterns, Statistica Neerlandica 54: 329–350.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Baddeley, A. & Silverman, B. W. (1984). A cautionary example for the use of second-order methods for analysing point patterns, Biometrics 40: 1089–1094.

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Baddeley, A. & Turner, R. (2000). Practical maximum pseudolikelihood for spatial point patterns, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics 42: 283–322.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Bartlett, M. S. (1963). The spectral analysis of point processes, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 29: 264–296.

  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Bartlett, M. S. (1964). The spectral analysis of two-dimensional point processes, Biometrika 51: 299–311.

  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Benes, V., Bodlak, K., Moller, J. & Waagepetersen, R. P. (2002). Bayesian analysis of log Gaussian Cox process models for disease mapping, Technical Report R-02–2001, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Aalborg University.

  Google Scholar 

• Berthelsen, K. K. & Moller, J. (2001a). Perfect simulation and inference for spatial point processes, Technical Report R-01–2009, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Aalborg University. Conditionally accepted for publication in the Scandinavian Journal of Statistics.

  Google Scholar 

• Berthelsen, K. K. & Moller, J. (2001b). A primer on perfect simulation for spatial point processes, Technical Report R-01–2026, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Aalborg University. To appear in Bulletin of the Brazilian Mathematical Society, 33, 2003.

  Google Scholar 

• Berman, M. & Turner, T. R. (1992). Approximating point process likelihoods with GLIM, Applied Statistics 41: 31–38.

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Berthelsen, K. K. & Moller, J. (2002). Spatial jump processes and perfect simulation, in K. Mecke & D. Stoyan (eds), Morphology of Condensed Matter, Lecture Notes in Physics, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg. To appear.

  Google Scholar 

• Besag, J. (1977a). Some methods of statistical analysis for spatial data, Bulletin of the Institute of International Statistics 47: 77–92.

  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Besag, J. E. (1974). Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems (with discussion), Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 36: 192–236.

  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Besag, J. E. (1975). Statistical analysis of non-lattice data, The Statistician 24: 179–195.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Besag, J. E. (1977b). Discussion on the paper by Ripley (1977), Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 39: 193–195.

  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Besag, J. E. (1994). Discussion on the paper by Grenander and Miller, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 56: 591–592.

  Google Scholar 

• Besag, J., Milne, R. & Zachary, S. (1982). Point process limits of lattice processes, Journal of Applied Probability 19: 210–216.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Breyer, L. A. & Roberts, G. O. (2000). From Metropolis to diffusions: Gibbs states and optimal scaling, Stochastic Processes and their Applications 90: 181–206.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Brix, A. (1999). Generalized gamma measures and shot-noise Cox processes, Advances in Applied Probability 31: 929–953.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Brix, A. & Chadoeuf, J. (2000). Spatio-temporal modeling of weeds and shot-noise G Cox processes. Submitted.

  Google Scholar 

• Brix, A. & Kendall, W. S. (2002). Simulation of cluster point processes without edge effects, Advances in Applied Probability 34: 267–280.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Brix, A. & Moller, J. (2001). Space-time multitype log Gaussian Cox processes with a view to modelling weed data, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 28: 471–488.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Chan, K. S. & Geyer, C. J. (1994). Discussion of the paper ‘Markov chains for exploring posterior distributions’ by Luke Tierney, Annals of Statistics 22: 1747–1747.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Christensen, O. F., Moller, J. & Waagepetersen, R. P. (2001). Geometric ergodicity of Metropolis-Hastings algorithms for conditional simulation in generalised linear mixed models, Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability 3: 309–327.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Christensen, O. F. & Waagepetersen, R. (2002). Bayesian prediction of spatial count data using generalised linear mixed models, Biometrics 58: 280–286.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Coles, P. & Jones, B. (1991). A lognormal model for the cosmological mass distribution, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 248: 1–13.

  Google Scholar 

• Cressie, N. A. C. (1993). Statistics for Spatial Data, second edn, Wiley, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Daley, D. J. & Vere-Jones, D. (1988). An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes, Springer-Verlag, New York.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Diggle, P. J. (1983). Statistical Analysis of Spatial Point Patterns, Academic Press, London.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Diggle, P. J. (1985). A kernel method for smoothing point process data, Applied Statistics 34: 138–147.

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Diggle, P. J., Lange, N. & Benés, F. (1991). Analysis of variance for replicated spatial point patterns in clinical neuroanatomy, Journal of the American Statistical Association 86: 618–625.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Diggle, P. J., Mateu, L. & Clough, H. E. (2000). A comparison between parametric and non-parametric approaches to the analysis of replicated spatial point patterns, Advances of Applied Probability 32: 331–343.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Fernandez, R., Ferrari, P. A. & Garcia, N. L. (1999). Perfect simulation for interacting point processes, loss networks and Ising models. Manuscript.

  Google Scholar 

• Fiksel, T. (1984). Estimation of parameterized pair potentials of marked and nonmarked Gibbsian point processes, Elektronische Informationsverarbeitung and Kypernetik 20: 270–278.

  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Gelfand, A. E. (1996). Model determination using sampling-based methods, in W. R. Gilks, S. Richardson & D. J. Spiegelhalter (eds), Markov chain Monte Carlo in Practice, Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 145–161.

  Google Scholar 

• Gelman, A. & Meng, X.-L. (1998). Simulating normalizing constants: from importance sampling to bridge sampling to path sampling, Statistical Science 13: 163–185.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Georgii, H.-O. (1976). Canonical and grand canonical Gibbs states for continuum systems, Communications of Mathematical Physics 48: 31–51.

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Georgii, H.-O. (1988). Gibbs Measures and Phase Transition, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Geyer, C. J. (1991). Markov chain Monte Carlo maximum likelihood, Computing Science and Statistics: Proceedings of the 23rd Symposium on the Interface, pp. 156–163.

  Google Scholar 

• Geyer, C. J. (1994). On the convergence of Monte Carlo maximum likelihood calculations, Journal of the Royal Society of Statistics Series B 56: 261–274.

  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Geyer, C. J. (1999). Likelihood inference for spatial point processes, in O. E. Barndorff-Nielsen, W. S. Kendall & M. N. M. van Lieshout (eds), Stochastic Geometry: Likelihood and Computation, Chapman and Hall/CRC, London, Boca Raton, pp. 79–140.

  Google Scholar 

• Geyer, C. J. & Moller, J. (1994). Simulation procedures and likelihood inference for spatial point processes, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 21: 359–373.

  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Geyer, C. J. & Thompson, E. A. (1992). Constrained Monte Carlo maximum likelihood for dependent data, Journal of the Royal Society of Statistics Series B 54: 657–699.

  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Goulard, M., Särkkä, A. & Grabarnik, P. (1996). Parameter estimation for marked Gibbs point processes through the maximum pseudo-likelihood method, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 23: 365–379.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Green, P. J. (1995). Reversible jump MCMC computation and Bayesian model determination, Biometrika 82: 711–732.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Gu, M. G. & Zhu, H.-T. (2001). Maximum likelihood estimation for spatial models by Markov chain Monte Carlo stochastic approximation, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 63: 339–355.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Häggström, O., van Lieshout, M. N. M. & Moller, J. (1999). Characterization results and Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms including exact simulation for some spatial point processes, Bernoulli 5: 641–659.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Heikkinen, J. & Arjas, E. (1998). Non-parametric Bayesian estimation of a spatial Poisson intensity, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 25: 435–450.

  Google Scholar 

• Heikkinen, J. & Penttinen, A. (1999). Bayesian smoothing in the estimation of the pair potential function of Gibbs point processes, Bernoulli 5: 1119–1136.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Jensen, E. B. V. & Nielsen, L. S. (2001). A review on inhomogeneous spatial point processes, in I. V. Basawa, C. C. Heyde & R. L. Taylor (eds), Selected Proceedings of the Symposium on Inference for Stochastic Processes, Vol. 37, IMS Lecture Notes & Monographs Series, Beachwood, Ohio, pp. 297–318.

  Google Scholar 

• Jensen, J. L. & Künsch, H. R. (1994). On asymptotic normality of pseudo likelihood estimates for pairwise interaction processes, Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 46: 475–486.

  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Jensen, J. L. & Moller, J. (1991). Pseudolikelihood for exponential family models of spatial point processes, Annals of Applied Probability 3: 445–461.

  Google Scholar 

• Kallenberg, O. (1975). Random Measures, Akadamie-Verlag, Berlin.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Kallenberg, O. (1984). An informal guide to the theory of conditioning in point processes, International Statistical Review 52: 151–164.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Karr, A. F. (1991). Point Processes and Their Statistical Inference, Marcel Dekker, New York.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Kelly, F. P. & Ripley, B. D. (1976). A note on Strauss’ model for clustering, Biometrika 63: 357–360.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Kendall, W. S. (1998). Perfect simulation for the area-interaction point process, in L. Accardi & C. Heyde (eds), Probability Towards 2000, Springer, pp. 218–234.

  Google Scholar 

• Kendall, W. S. & Moller, J. (2000). Perfect simulation using dominating processes on ordered spaces, with application to locally stable point processes, Advances in Applied Probability 32: 844–865.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Kerscher, M. (2000). Statistical analysis of large-scale structure in the Universe, in K. R. Mecke & D. Stoyan (eds), Statistical Physics and Spatial Statistics, Lecture Notes in Physics, Springer, Berlin, pp. 36–71.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Kerstan, J., Matthes, K. & Mecke, J. (1974). Unbegrenzt teilbare Punktprozesse, Akademie-Verlag, Berlin.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Kingman, J. F. C. (1993). Poisson Processes, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Lieshout, M. N. M. van (2000). Markov Point Processes and Their Applications, Imperial College Press, London.

  Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Lieshout, M. N. M. van & Baddeley, A. J. (1996). A nonparametric measure of spatial interaction in point patterns, Statistica Neerlandica 50: 344–361.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Loizeaux, M. A. & McKeague, I. W. (2001). Perfect sampling for posterior landmark distributions with an application to the detection of disease clusters, in I. V. Basawa, C. C. Heyde & R. L. Taylor (eds), Selected Proceedings of the Symposium on Inference for Stochastic Processes, Vol. 37, IMS Lecture Notes & Monographs Series, Beachwood, Ohio, pp. 321–331.

  Google Scholar 

• Lund, J., Penttinen, A. & Rudemo, M. (1999). Bayesian analysis of spatial point patterns from noisy observations. Available at http://www.math.chalmers.se/Stat/ Research/Preprints/.

• Lund, J. & Rudemo, M. (2000). Models for point processes observed with noise, Biometrika 87: 235–249.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Lund, J. & Thönnes, E. (2000). Perfect simulation for point processes given noisy observations. Research Report 366, Department of Statistics, University of Warwick.

  Google Scholar 

• Mase, S. (1995). Consistency of the maximum pseudo-likelihood estimator of continuous state space Gibbs processes, Annals of Applied Probability 5: 603–612.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Mase, S. (1999). Marked Gibbs processes and asymptotic normality of maximum pseudo-likelihood estimators, Mathematische Nachrichten 209: 151–169.

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Mase, S., Moller, J., Stoyan, D., Waagepetersen, R. P. & Döge, G. (2001). Packing densities and simulated tempering for hard core Gibbs point processes, Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 53: 661–680.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Matérn, B. (1960). Spatial Variation. Meddelanden frân Statens Skogforskningsinstitut, Band 49, No. 5.

  Google Scholar 

• Matérn, B. (1986). Spatial Variation, Lecture Notes in Statistics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Matheron, G. (1975). Random Sets and Integral Geometry, Wiley, New York.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Mecke, J. (1967). Stationäre zufällige Maße auf lokalkompakten Abelschen Gruppen, Zeitschrift für Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und verwandte Gebiete 9: 36–58.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Mecke, J., Schneider, R. G., Stoyan, D. & Weil, W. R. R. (1990). Stochastische Geometrie, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H. & Teller, E. (1953). Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines, Journal of Chemical Physics 21: 1087–1092.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Moller, J. (1989). On the rate of convergence of spatial birth-and-death processes, Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 3: 565–581.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Moller, J. (1999). Markov chain Monte Carlo and spatial point processes, in O. E. Barndorff-Nielsen, W. S. Kendall & M. N. M. van Lieshout (eds), Stochastic Geometry: Likelihood and Computation, Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability 80, Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, pp. 141–172.

  Google Scholar 

• Moller, J. (2001). A review of perfect simulation in stochastic geometry, in I. V. Basawa, C. C. Heyde & R. L. Taylor (eds), Selected Proceedings of the Symposium on Inference for Stochastic Processes, Vol. 37, IMS Lecture Notes & Monographs Series, Beachwood, Ohio, pp. 333–355.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Moller, J. (2002a). A comparison of spatial point process models in epidemiological applications, in P. J. Green, N. L. Hjort & S. Richardson (eds), Highly Structured Stochastic Systems, Oxford University Press, Oxford. To appear.

  Google Scholar 

• Moller, J. (2002b). Shot noise Cox processes, Technical Report R-02–2009, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Aalborg University.

  Google Scholar 

• Moller, J., Syversveen, A. R. & Waagepetersen, R. P. (1998). Log Gaussian Cox processes, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 25: 451–482.

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Moller, J. & Waagepetersen, R. P. (2002). Statistical inference for Cox processes, in A. B. Lawson & D. Denison (eds), Spatial Cluster Modelling, Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton.

  Google Scholar 

• Moller, J. & Waagepetersen, R. P. (2003). Statistical Inference and Simulation for Spatial Point Processes, Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton. In preparation.

  Google Scholar 

• Neyman, J. & Scott, E. L. (1958). Statistical approach to problems of cosmology, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 20: 1–43.

  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Nguyen, X. X. & Zessin, H. (1979). Integral and differential characteriza- tions of Gibbs processes, Mathematische Nachrichten 88: 105–115.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Ohser, J. & Mücklich, F. (2000). Statistical Analysis of Microstructures in Materials Science, Wiley, New York.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Peebles, P. J. E. (1974). The nature of the distribution of galaxies, Astronomy and Astrophysics 32: 197–202.

  Google Scholar 

• Peebles, P. J. E. & Groth, E. J. (1975). Statistical analysis of extragalactic objects. V. Three-point correlation function for the galaxy distribution in the Zwicky catalog, Astrophysical Journal 196: 1–11.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Penttinen, A. (1984). Modelling Interaction in Spatial Point Patterns: Parameter Estimation by the Maximum Likelihood Method, Number 7 in Jyväskylä Studies in Computer Science, Economics, and Statistics.

  Google Scholar 

• Penttinen, A., Stoyan, D. & Henttonen, H. M. (1992). Marked point processes in forest statistics, Forest Science 38: 806–824.

  Google Scholar 

• Preston, C. (1976). Random Fields, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 534. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg.

  Google Scholar 

• Preston, C. J. (1977). Spatial birth-and-death processes, Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute 46: 371–391.

  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Propp, J. G. & Wilson, D. B. (1996). Exact sampling with coupled Markov chains and applications to statistical mechanics, Random Structures and Algorithms 9: 223–252.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Quine, M. P. & Watson, D. F. (1984). Radial simulation of n-dimensional Poisson processes, Journal of Applied Probability 21: 548–557.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Rathbun, S. L. (1996). Estimation of Poisson intensity using partially observed concomitant variables, Biometrics 52: 226–242.

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Reiss, R.-D. (1993). A Course on Point Processes, Springer Verlag, New York.

  Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Ripley, B. D. (1977). Modelling spatial patterns (with discussion), Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 39: 172–212.

  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Ripley, B. D. (1979). Simulating spatial patterns: dependent samples from a multivariate density. Algorithm AS 137, Applied Statistics 28: 109–112.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ripley, B. D. (1981). Spatial Statistics, Wiley, New York.

  Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Ripley, B. D. (1988). Statistical Inference for Spatial Processes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Ripley, B. D. & Kelly, F. P. (1977). Markov point processes, Journal of the London Mathematical Society 15: 188–192.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Roberts, G. O., Gelman, A. & Gilks, W. R. (1997). Weak convergence and optimal scaling of random walk Metropolis algorithms, Annals of Applied Probability 7: 110–120.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Roberts, G. O. & Rosenthal, J. S. (1997). Geometric ergodicity and hybrid Markov chains, Electronic Communications in Probability 2: 13–25.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Roberts, G. O. & Rosenthal, J. S. (1998). Optimal scaling of discrete approximations to Langevin diffusions, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 60: 255–268.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Roberts, G. O. & Tweedie, R. L. (1996). Exponential convergence of Langevin diffusions and their discrete approximations, Bernoulli 2: 341–363.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Rossky, P. J., Doll, J. D. & Friedman, H. L. (1978). Brownian dynamics as smart Monte Carlo simulation, Journal of Chemical Physics 69: 4628–4633.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ruelle, D. (1969). Statistical Mechanics: Rigorous Results, W.A. Benjamin, Reading, Massachusetts.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Schladitz, K. & Baddeley, A. J. (2000). A third-order point process characteristic, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 27: 657–671.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Schlather, M. (2001). On the second-order characteristics of marked point processes, Bernoulli 7: 99–117.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Stoyan, D., Kendall, W. S. & Mecke, J. (1995). Stochastic Geometry and Its Applications, second edn, Wiley, Chichester.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Stoyan, D. & Stoyan, H. (1994). Fractals, Random Shapes and Point Fields, Wiley, Chichester.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Stoyan, D. & Stoyan, H. (2000). Improving ratio estimators of second order point process characteristics, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 27: 641–656.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Strauss, D. J. (1975). A model for clustering, Biometrika 63: 467–475.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Thönnes, E. (1999). Perfect simulation of some point processes for the impatient user, Advances in Applied Probability 31: 69–87.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Waagepetersen, R. & Sorensen, S. (2001). A tutorial on reversible jump MCMC with a view toward applications in QTL-mapping, International Statistical Review 69 (1): 49–61.

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Wolpert, R. L. & Ickstadt, K. (1998). Poisson/gamma random field models for spatial statistics, Biometrika 85: 251–267.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Wood, A. T. A. & Chan, G. (1994). Simulation of stationary Gaussian processes in [0,1)d, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 3: 409–432.

  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references