Parameter-induced aliasing and related problems can be avoided

1. W.B. Ackerman. Data Flow Languages. IEEE Computer, 15(2):14–25, February 1982.

   Google Scholar 

2. Ada 95 Reference Manual. Intermetrics, Inc., 1995. ANSI/ISO/IEC-8652:1995.

   Google Scholar 

3. A.L. Ambler. GYPSY: A Language for Specification and Implementation of Verifiable Programs. ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 12(3): 1–10, March 1977.

   Google Scholar 

4. H.G. Baker. How to Steal from a Limited Private Account — Why Mode IN OUT Parameters for Limited Types must be Passed by Reference. ACM Ada Letters, XIII(3):91–95, May/June 1993.

   Google Scholar 

5. T. Birus, C. Cipriani, and D. Sutherland. Interprocedural call optimization. In Reliable Software Technologies — Ada-Europe 1996, volume 1088 of LNCS, pages 319–329. Springer, 1996.

   Google Scholar 

6. G. Booch. Software Engineering with Ada. The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Co., 2 edition, 1987.

   Google Scholar 

7. D.C. Cann. Retire Fortran? A Debate Rekindled. Technical Report UCRLJC-107018 Rev.2, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 1992.

   Google Scholar 

8. K.D. Cooper and K. Kennedy. Fast Interprocedureal Alias Analysis. In Sixteenth Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, pages 49–59, 1989.

   Google Scholar 

9. K.D. Cooper. Analyzing aliases of reference formal parameters. In Conference Record of the Twelfth Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, pages 281–290. ACM, 1985.

   Google Scholar 

10. R. Cordy, 1994. Discussion in newsgroup comp.lang.misc.

    Google Scholar 

11. J.E. Donahue. Locations considered unnecessary, acta informatica, 8:221–242, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

12. R.A. Finkel. Advanced Programming Language Design. Addison Wesley, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

13. István Forgács. Double iterative framework for flow-sensitive interprocedural data flow analysis. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 3(1):29–55, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

14. G. Goos and J. Hartmanis (eds). The Programming Language Ada Reference Manual. Springer, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

15. C. Ghezzi and M. Jazayeri. Programming Language Concepts. John Wiley and Sons, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

16. S.P. Harbison. Modula-3. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

17. J.J. Horning, R.W. Lampson, R.L. London, J.G. Mitchell, and G.J. Popek. Notes on the Design of Euclid. ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 12(3):1–77, March 1977.

    Google Scholar 

18. J.J. Horning, R.W. Lampson, R.L. London, J.G. Mitchell, and G.J. Popek. Report on the Programming Language Euclid. ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 12(2):1–79, February 1977.

    Google Scholar 

19. R.C. Holt, P.A. Matthews, J.A. Rosselet, and J.R.Cordy. The Turing Programming Language. Prentice Hall, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

20. C.A.R. Hoare. Hints on Programming Language Design, 1973. key note address at the ACM SIGACT/SIGPLAN Conference on Principles of Programming Languages; (reprinted in [Hoa89]).

    Google Scholar 

21. C.A.R. Hoare. Essays in Computing Science. International Series in Computer Science. Prentice Hall, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

22. J.J. Horning. A Case Study in Language Design: Euclid. In G. Goos and J. Hartmanis, editors, Program Construction, volume 69 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

23. M.O. Jokinen. The Effect of Parameter Passing and Other Implementation Dependent Mechanisms is Undecidable. ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 17(9): 16–17, September 1982.

    Google Scholar 

24. D.J. Kuck, J.R. McGraw, and M.J. Wolfe. A debate: Retire FORTRAN? Physics Today, 37(5):66–75, May 1984.

    Google Scholar 

25. C.H. Koelbel. The High Performance Fortran Handbook. MIT Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

26. M. Marcotty and H. Ledgard. The World of Programming Languages. Springer, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

27. M.Y. Mohd-Saman and D.J. Evans. Inter-Procedural Analysis for Parallel Computing. Parallel Computing, 21:315–338, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

28. H.G. Mayer and M. Wolfe. Interprocedural Alias Analysis: Implementation and Empirical Results. Software Practice and Experience, 23(11): 1202–1233, November 1993.

    Google Scholar 

29. R. Palimaradevi and R.K. Subramanian. Alias analysis for parallelization. In Proceedings of the ISCA International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Computing Systems 1996, volume I, pages 292–295. ISCA, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

30. E. Ruf. Context-Insensitive Alias Analysis Reconsidered. In Proceedings of the SIGPLAN '95 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, pages 13–22. ACM, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

31. S.K. Skedzielewski. Sisal. In B.K. Szymanski, editor, Parallel Functional Languages and Compilers, pages 105–157. Addison-Wesley, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

32. B. Stroustrup. Die C++-Programmiersprache. Addison-Wesley, 2. edition, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

33. W. Wulf and M. Shaw. Global Variables considered harmful. ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 8(2):28–34, February 1973. (summarized in [ML87]).

    Google Scholar 

34. C.K. Yuen. Which Model of Programming for Lisp: Sequential, Functional or Mixed? ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 26(10):83–92, Oktober 1991.

    Google Scholar 

35. H. Zima and B. Chapman. Supercompilers for Parallel and Vector Computers. Addison-Wesley, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

Download references