Abstract
Large scale microscopic (i.e. vehicle-based) traffic simulations pose high demands on computational speed in at least two application areas: (i) real-time traffic forecasting, and (ii) long-term planning applications (where repeated “looping” between the microsimulation and the simulated planning of individual person's behavior is necessary). As a rough number, a real-time simulation of an area such as Los Angeles (ca. 1 million travellers) will need a computational speed of much higher than 1 million “particle” (= vehicle) updates per second. This paper reviews how this problem is approached in different projects and how these approaches are dependent both on the specific questions and on the prospective user community. The approaches reach from highly parallel and vectorizable, single-bit implementations on parallel supercomputers for Statistical Physics questions, via more realistic implementations on coupled workstations, to more complicated driving dynamics implemented again on parallel supercomputers.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. Cohen and F. Kelly. A paradox of congestion in a queueing network. J. Appl. Probability, 27:730–734, 1990.
M. Williams. Personal communication.
L. Smith, R. Beckman, D. Anson, K. Nagel, and M. Williams. Transims: Transportation analysis and simulation system. In Proc. 5th Nat. Transportation Planning Methods Applications Conference, Seattle, 1995.
J. Morrison and V. Loose. Transims model design criteria as derived from federal legislation. Technical report, Los Alamos National Laboratory, 1995.
C. Barrett, K. Berkbigler, L. Smith, V. Loose, R. Beckman, J. Davis, D. Roberts, and M. Williams. An operational description of transims. Technical report, Los Alamos National Laboratory, 1995.
L.L. Smith. TRANSIMS Travelogue. Travel model improvement program newsletter, 2–5, 1995–1996.
TRANSIMS web page, http://www-transims.tsasa.lanl.gov/.
R. Schwarzmann. Das EUROTOPP Modell, SCOPE/VIKTORIA-Bericht. Technical report, Institut für Verkehrswesen, TH Karlsruhe, July 1992.
K. Nagel. Freeway traffic, cellular automata, and some (self-organizing) criticality. In R.A. de Groot and J. Nadrchal, editors, Physics Computing '92, page 419. World Scientific, 1993.
K. Nagel and M. Schreckenberg. A cellular automaton model for freeway traffic. J. Phys. I France, 2:2221, 1992.
K. Nagel. Particle hopping models and traffic flow theory. Phys. Rev. E, 53(5):4655, 1996.
M. Rickert, K. Nagel, M. Schreckenberg, and A. Latour. Two lane traffic simulations using cellular automata. Physica A, 1996. In press.
P. Wagner. Traffic simulations using cellular automata: Comparison with reality. In D.E. Wolf, M. Schreckenberg, and A. Bachem, editors, Traffic and Granular Flow. World Scientific, Singapore, 1996.
P. Wagner, S. Krauss, and C. Gawron. A continuous limit of the Nagel-Schreckenberg model. Phys. Rev. E, 1996. Submitted.
D.W. Heermann. Computer simulation methods in theoretical physics. Springer, Heidelberg, 1986.
D. Stauffer. Computer simulations of cellular automata. J. Phys. A, 24:909–927, 1991.
K. Nagel and A. Schleicher. Microscopic traffic modeling on parallel high performance computers. Parallel Computing, 20:125–146, 1994.
N. Ito. Non-equilibrium critical relaxation and interface energy of the Ising model. Physica A, 1:196, 93.
M. Rickert, P. Wagner, and Ch. Gawron. Real-time traffic simulation of the German Autobahn Network. In Proceedings of the 4th PASA Workshop, 1996. In press.
M. Rickert. Estimating parallel efficiency of large-scale traffic simulations. In preparation, 1996.
M. Rickert and P. Wagner. Parallel real-time implementation of large-scale, route-plan-driven traffic simulation. Int.J.Mod.Phys.C, 1996. In press.
R. Lüling, B. Monien, and F. Ramme. Load balancing in large networks: A comparative study. In 3rd IEEE Symposium On Parallel And Distributed Processing, pages 686–689, 1991.
M.W. Olesen. Personal communication.
D. Roberts. Personal communication.
C.L. Barrett. Personal communication.
T. Blanchard and T. Lake. Conservative spatial simulation. In A. Pave, editor, European Simulation Multiconference, page 515. The Society for Computer Simulation, Istanbul, 1993. See also other papers in the same proceedings.
C.L. Barrett, S. Eubank, K. Nagel, J. Riordan, and M. Wolinsky. Issues in the representation of traffic using multi-resolution cellular automata. LA-UR 95-2658, Los Alamos, 1995.
R. Wiedemann. Personal communication.
P. Wagner. Personal communication.
G.D.B. Cameron and C.I.D. Duncan. PARAMICS-Parallel microscopic simulation of road traffic. J.Supercomputing, 1996. In press.
C.I.D. Duncan. PARAMICS wide area microscopic simulation of ATT and traffic management. In J.I. Soliman and D. Roller, editors, Proceedings of the 28th International Symposium on Automotive Technology and Automation (ISATA), page 475. Automotive Automation Ltd, Croydon, England, 1995. Paper No. 95ATS044.
PARAMICS Web site, http://www.epcc.ed.ac.uk/epcc-projects/paramics/.
U.S.Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. TRAF user reference guide, 1992. Publication No. FHWA-RD-92-060.
H.S. Mahmassani, R. Jayakrishnan, and R. Herman. Network traffic flow theory: Microscopic simulation experiments on supercomputers. Transpn. Res. A, 24A (2):149, 1990.
R. Wiedemann. Simulation des Straßenverkehrsflusses. Heft 8, Institut für Verkehrswesen der Universität Karlsruhe, 1974.
T. Benz. The microscopic traffic simulator AS (Autobahn Simulator). In A. Pave, editor, European Simulation Multiconference, page 486. The Society for Computer Simulation, Istanbul, 1993.
R. Wiedemann. Modelling of RTI-elements on multi-lane roads. In Advanced telematics in road transport, Proceedings of the DRIVE conference, volume 2. Elsevier, 1991.
R. Wiedemann. Simulation des Verkehrsablaufs — Beschreibung des Staus. In Beiträge zur Theorie des Straβenverkehrs. Forschungsgesellschaft für Straßen-und Verkehrswesen, Köln, 1995.
M. Fellendorf. VISSIM. PTV system GmbH, Pforzheimer Str. 15, 76277 Karlsruhe, Germany.
W.P. Niedringhaus and P. Wang. IVHS traffic modeling using parallel computing. In IEEE — IEE Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conference VNIS '93, Ottawa, 1993.
SISTM. Transportation Research Laboratory, Old Wokingham Rd, Crowthorne, Berkshire RG11 6AU.
M. McDonald and M. A. Brackstone. Simulation of lane usage characteristics on 3 lane motorways. In Proceedings of the 27th International Symposium on Automotive Technology and Automation (ISATA), 1994.
M. Van Aerde, B. Hellinga, M. Baker, and H. Rakha. INTEGRATION: An overview of traffic simulation features. Transportation Research Records, in press.
M. Van Aerde et al. INTEGRATION (Release 2) User's Guide, 1995.
H.J. Payne. FREEFLO: A macroscopic simulation model of freeway traffic. Transportation Research Record 722, 1979.
R.D. Kuehne and R. Beckschulte. Non-linearity and stochastics of unstable traffic flow. In C.F. Daganzo, editor, Proceedings of 12th Int. Symposium on the Theory of Traffic Flow and Transportation, page 367. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1993.
B.S. Kerner and P. Konhäuser. Cluster effect in initially homogenous traffic flow. Phys. Rev. E, 48(4):R2335–2338, 1993.
D. Helbing. Improved fluid-dynamic model for vehicular traffic. Phys. Rev. E, 51(4):3164, 1995.
C.F. Daganzo. Requiem for second-order fluid approximations fo traffic flow. Transpn. Res. B, 29B(4):277, 1995.
M. Kuwahara M and G.F. Newell. Queue evolution on freeways leading to a single core city during the morning peak. In Gartner N H and Wilson N H, editors, Transportation and traffic theory. Elsevier, 1987.
R.H.M. Emmerink, K.W. Axhausen, P. Nijkamp, and P. Rietveld. Effects of information in road transport networks with recurrent congestion. Transportation, 22:21, 1995.
H.P. Simão and W.B. Powell. Numerical methods for simulating transient, stochastic queueing networks. Transportation Science, 26:296, 1992.
T. Schwerdtfeger. Makroskopisches Simulationmodell für Schnellstraβennetze mit Berücksichtigung von Einzelfahrzeugen (DYNEMO). PhD thesis, TH Karlsruhe, 1987.
H.S. Mahmassani, T. Hu, and R. Jayakrishnan. Dynamic traffic assignment and simulation for advanced network informatics (DYNASMART). In N.H. Gartner and G. Improta, editors, Urban traffic networks: Dynamic flow modeling and control. Springer, Berlin/New York, 1995.
Transportation Systems Research Group, Queens' University and M. Van Aerde and Associates, Ltd. INTEGRATION: A model for simulating IVHS in integrated traffic networks, User's guide for model version 1.5e, 1994.
R. Jayakrishnan and H.S. Mahmassani. Dynamic simulation-assignment methodology to evaluate in-vehicle information strategies in urban traffic networks. In O. Balci, R.P. Sadowski, and R.E. Nance, editors, Proceedings of the 1990 Winter Simulation Conference, 1990.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Nagel, K., Rickert, M., Barrett, C.L. (1997). Large scale traffic simulations. In: Palma, J.M.L.M., Dongarra, J. (eds) Vector and Parallel Processing — VECPAR'96. VECPAR 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1215. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-62828-2_131
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-62828-2_131
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-62828-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68699-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive