Abstract
There are certain problems inherent in teaching in controversial domains. In this paper, we present a prototype of an intelligent tutoring system called OLIA which addresses some of these problems. We focus here on OLIA's Devil's advocate strategy which is a method for teaching through a debate between the user and the system.
This paper takes advantage of existing work using a meta-level argumentation framework for knowledge representation in controversial domains. In this framework statements are linked by primitive relations such as disagreement, equivalence and justification, and higher order meta-level ones such as counter-arguments and corroborations. We investigate the use of this framework as the basis for the OLIA system.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S. Bull, H. Pain and P. Brna. (1995). Mr. Collins: A A Collaboratively Constructed, Inspectable Student Model for Intelligent Computer Assisted Language Learning. Instructional Science, 23:65–87.
The Columbia Encyclopedia. Columbia University Press, 1950.
M. Haggith. Towards a formal analysis of dissagreement. Discussion Paper 128, 1993.
M. Haggith. A meta-level framework for exploring conflicting knowledge bases. In J.Hallam, editor, Hybrid Solution, Hybrid problem. IOS Press, 1995.
M. Minsky. The Society of mind. Simon and Schuster, New York, 1988.
D. Nicols. Intelligent Student Systems: An Application of Viewpoints to Intelligent Learning Environments. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Lancaster, 1993.
S. Retails. Investigating the use of a meta-level argumentation framework as a basis for tutoring in controversial domains. Unpublished M.Sc. thesis, Edinburgh University, 1995.
F. Spensley and M.T. Elsom-Cook. Dominie: Teaching and assessment strategies. Technical Report 37, Milton Keynes, UK: Centre for Information Technology in Education, The Open University, 1988.
D. Suthers and A. Weiner. Belvedere: Engaging students in critical discussion of science and public policy issues. In Proc. 7th World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AI-ED 95). Washington, D.C, 1995.
T. Treasure-Jones. Support and exploration of disagreement within intelligent tutoring systems. First Year PhD Report. Computing Department Lancaster University, 1995.
B. Woolf. Theoretical frontiers in building a machine tutor. In Kearsley G., editor, Artificial Intelligence and Instruction. Applications and Methods, pages 229–265. Addison-Wesley, 1987.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Retails, S., Pain, H., Haggith, M. (1996). Arguing with the Devil: Teaching in controversial Domains. In: Frasson, C., Gauthier, G., Lesgold, A. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1086. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61327-7_166
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61327-7_166
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61327-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68460-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive