Student and expert modelling for simulation-based training: A cost effective framework

• L. Alem (1995), ITS design methodology based on a model of the activity, Proceedings of Computer in Education, Singapore.

  Google Scholar 

• L. Alem & R. Keeling (1996), Intelligent simulation environments: an application to air traffic control, Proceedings of SimTect'96, Melbourne, Australia.

  Google Scholar 

• L. Alem & M. Lee, 1994, “An intelligent tutoring system for sonar application in Australia”, Proceedings of The second World Congress on Expert Systems, Portugal.

  Google Scholar 

• J.R. Anderson (1988), The Expert Module, in Foundations of Intelligent Tutoring Systems, M. Polson & J. Richardson, Lawrence Erlbaum Associate Publishers, Hilldale, New Jersey.

  Google Scholar 

• A. Bisseret (1979), Utilisation de la theorie de la detection du signal pour l'etude de decisions operatives: effet de l'experience des operateurs, Rapport INRIA Rocquencourt CO 7911R60, France.

  Google Scholar 

• J.S. Brown, R.R. Burton & A.G. Bell (1975), SOPHIE: a step towards a reactive learning environment. International Journal Man-Machine Studies, 1975, vol 7, pp 675–696.

  Google Scholar 

• M.L Burger & J.F DeSoi (1992), The cognitive apprenticeship analogue: A strategy for using ITS technology for the delivery of instruction and as a research tool for the study of teaching and learning, International Journal of Man-machine Studies, 36, 775–795.

  Google Scholar 

• J.R. Carbonell (1970), Mixed-Initiative Man-Computer Instructional Dialogues, Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institutes of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  Google Scholar 

• R.W Chu, C.M, Mitchell & P.M Jones (1995), Using the Operator Function Model and OFMspert as the basis for an intelligent tutoring system: towards a tutor/aid paradigm for operators of supervisory control systems, IEEE transactions on systems, man and cybernetics, July 1995 vol 27, No 7.

  Google Scholar 

• M. Cialdea (1991), Meta-reasoning and student modelling, New directions for Intelligent Tutoring systems, E. Costa eds, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp 183–197.

  Google Scholar 

• M. Cox (1992), The cognitive aspects of the air traffic control task: a literature review, IAM report 718, RAF Institute of A viation Medicine, Farnborough, UK.

  Google Scholar 

• P. Eliot & B.P. Woolf (1994), Reasoning about the user within a simulation-based real-time training system, Proceedings of User Modeling.

  Google Scholar 

• T. de Jong (1991), Learning and Instruction with computer simulations, Education & Computing 6, pp 217–229.

  Google Scholar 

• P. Duchastel (1991). Instructional strategies for simulation-based training, Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 19, 265–276.

  Google Scholar 

• Eurocontrol Experimental Centre, B.P. 15, 91222 Bretigny sur Orge cedex, France.

  Google Scholar 

• L. Gugerty & K. Hicks (1993), Non-diagnostic intelligent tutoring systems, Proceedings of the 15th interservice/industry training systems and education conference, Orlando, Florida, pp 450–459.

  Google Scholar 

• J.D. Hollan, E.L. Hutchins & L. Weitzman (1984), STEAMER: an interactive inspectable simulation-based training system, The AI Magazine, Summer 1984, pp 15–27.

  Google Scholar 

• V.D. Hopkin (1980), The measurement of the air traffic controller, Human factors, 22(5), 547–560.

  Google Scholar 

• S. Katz, A. Lesgold, G. Eggan & M. Gordin (1992), Modelling the student in SHERLOCK II, Proceedings of AI and Education, vol 3, N. 4.

  Google Scholar 

• M. Leroux (1992), How to define a philosophy of automation in ATC, April 1992, CENA document AG-SO-008-T20D R 01.0, France.

  Google Scholar 

• B. Lucat (1998), A new approach to ACT simulation, ICAO Bulletin, May 1988, pp 30–32.

  Google Scholar 

• D. Newman, M. Grignetti, M. Gross & L.D. Massey (1989), Intelligent conduct of fire trainer: Intelligent technology applied to simulator-based training. Machine-Mediated Learning, 3, 29–39.

  Google Scholar 

• S. Ohlsson (1986), Some principles of intelligent tutoring, Instructional science 14 293–326, Amsterdam, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.

  Google Scholar 

• A. Paiva & J. Self (1995), TAGUS-A user and learner modeling workbench, User modeling and User-adapted interaction, 4:197–226, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  Google Scholar 

• M.C Polson & J. Richardson (1988), Foundations of Intelligent Tutoring systems, Hillsdale, New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

  Google Scholar 

• P. Reiman (1993), Supporting exploratory learning by providing remindings automatically, Proceedings of AI-ED 93 workshop: Simulations for Learning: Design, Development and Use.

  Google Scholar 

• S. Sebillotte & B. Alonso (1994), Description MAD de la tache de “controle aerien” executee par deux controleurs, Document Interne INRIA Rocquencourt, Le Chesnay, France.

  Google Scholar 

• J.A. Self (1989), The case of formalising student models (and intelligent tutoring generally). Proceedings of AI and Education, Amsterdam.

  Google Scholar 

• J. Self (1995), The ebb and flow of student modeling, Invited talk at Computer and Education Dec. 1995, Singapore.

  Google Scholar 

• E. Wenger (1987), Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring systems, Morgan Kaufmann publishers, Los Altos, CA.

  Google Scholar 

• D.D. Woods (1988), Coping with complexity: the psychlogy of human behavior in complex systems, Tasks, errors and mental models, Goodstein, Andersen and Olsen eds. London: Taylor & Francis, pp 128–148.

  Google Scholar 

• D. Zhang & L. Alem (1996), Case-based exercise design for ATC training, Proceedings of ITS'96 conference, Montreal, Canada.

  Google Scholar 

Download references