Design and implementation of a general purpose parallel programming system

1. J. Auerbach, A. Goldberg, G. Goldszmidt, A. Gopal, M. Kennedy, J. Russell, and S. Yemini. Concert/C Specification and Reference, Definition of a Language for Distributed C Programming. IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, January 1995.

   Google Scholar 

2. G. Agha and C. Houck. HAL: A high level actor language and its distributed implementation. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Parallel Processing, pages 158–165, 1992.

   Google Scholar 

3. A. Appel. Compiling with Continuations. Cambridge University Press, 1992.

   Google Scholar 

4. G. Blelloch. NESL: A nested data parallel language. Technical Report CMU-CS-92-103, CMU, 1990.

   Google Scholar 

5. W. Brainerd. Programmer's Guide to Fortran 90. McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1990.

   Google Scholar 

6. G. Chaitin, M. Auslander, A. Chandra, J. Cocke, M. Hopkins, and P. Markstein. Register allocation via coloring. Computer Languages, Jan 1981.

   Google Scholar 

7. M. Chu-Carroll. Programming Language and Compiler Tools for General Purpose Parallelism. PhD thesis, University of Delaware, May 1996.

   Google Scholar 

8. Nicholas Carriero and David Gelernter. How to Write Parallel Programs. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1990.

   Google Scholar 

9. A. Chien. Concurrent Aggregates: Supporting Modularity in Massively Parallel Programs. MIT Press, 2nd edition, 1992.

   Google Scholar 

10. M. Carroll and L. Pollock. Composites: trees for data parallel programming. In 1994 International Conference on Computer Languages. IEEE, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

11. W. D. Hillis. The Connection Machine. MIT Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

12. S. Hiranandani, K. Kennedy, and C. W. Tseng. An overview of the fortran-D programming system. In Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Languages and Compilers for Parallel Computing, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

13. P. Hatcher and M. Quinn. Data parallel programming on MIMD computers. MIT Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

14. M. Jones and P. Hudak. Implicit and explicit parallel programming in Haskell. Technical Report YALEU/DCS/RR-982, Yale University, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

15. K. Landry and J. Arthur. Achieving asynchronous speedup while preserving synchronous semantics: an implementation of instruction footprinting in Linda. In Proceedings of the 1994 International Conference on Computer Languages, pages 55–63. IEEE, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

16. J. Larus, B. Richards, and G. Viwsanathan. C^**: A large grain, object-oriented, dataparallel programming language. Technical report, University of Wisconsin, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

17. S. Murer, J. Feldman, and C. Lim. pSather: Layered extensions to an object-oriented language for efficient parallel computation. Technical report, ICSI, University of California at Berkeley, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

18. C. Makowski and L. Pollock. Efficient register allocation via parallel graph coloring. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Programming Languages Track, February 1995.

    Google Scholar 

19. MPI: A message-passing interface standard. Technical report, Message Passing Interface Forum, May 1994.

    Google Scholar 

20. M. Rosing, R. Schnabel, and R. Weaver. The DINO parallel programming language. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 13(1):30–42, Sept 1991.

    Google Scholar 

21. H. Schmidt. Data-parallel object-oriented programming. In Proceedings of the Fifth Australian Supercomputing Conference, pages 263–272, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

22. V. S. Sundcram, G. S. Geist, J. Dongarra, and R. Mancheck. PVM concurrent computing system. evolution, experiences, and trends. Parallel Computing, 20(4), April 1994.

    Google Scholar 

23. C^*Reference Manual. Thinking Machines Corp., 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references