Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Exceptions-based synthesis of Boolean functions as a core mechanism to perform concept learning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Topics in Artificial Intelligence (AI*IA 1995)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 992))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper, an alternative approach to the synthesis of Boolean functions is presented. Such an approach can be useful in the field of concept learning as well, provided that the semantics of non-specified instances is changed accordingly (i.e., from a don't-care to an unknown semantics). The underlying framework relies on the concept of exception, an exception being, for example, a 0 grouped together with 1's while performing the synthesis. It is shown that an exceptions-based synthesis can be adopted as a core mechanism to perform concept learning in an n-dimensional Boolean space. A learning system is sketched where the decision of re-calculating classification rules can be arbitrarily delayed, as new examples, not consistent with the current hypothesis, can be integrated within the system by temporarily storing them as exceptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akers, S.B., “Binary Decision Diagrams,” IEEE Trans. on Computers, 27 (6), pp. 509–516, Jun 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bryant, R.E., “Graph-Based Algorithms for Boolean Function Manipulation,” IEEE Trans. on Computers, 35 (8), pp. 677–691, Aug 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Michalski, R.S., “On the quasi-minimal solution of the general covering problem,” Proc. 5th Int. Symposium on Information Processing, Bled, Yugoslavia, pp. 125–128, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Quinlan, J.R., “Discovering rules from large collections of examples: a case study,” in Michie, D. (Ed.) “Expert systems in the microelectronic age,” Edinburgh University Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rivest, R., “Learning Decision Lists,” Machine Learning, 2, pp. 229–246, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carbonell, J., Michalski, R.S., and Mitchell, T.M., “An overview of machine learning,” in Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach, pp. 3–24, Morgan Kaufmann, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brayton, R.K., Hachtel, G.D., McMullen C.T., and Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A.L., “Logic Minimization Algorithms for VLSI Synthesis,” Kluwer, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Reiter, R., “A logic for default reasoning,” Artificial Intelligence, 13, pp. 81–132, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sandewall, E., “An Approach to the Frame Problem and Its Implementation,” in Machine Intelligence, 7, B. Meltzer and D. Michie (eds.), Edinburgh Univ. Press, Edinburgh, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pagallo, G., and Haussler, D., “Boolean Feature Discovery in Empirical Learning,” Machine Learning, 5, pp. 71–79, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Marco Gori Giovanni Soda

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Armano, G. (1995). Exceptions-based synthesis of Boolean functions as a core mechanism to perform concept learning. In: Gori, M., Soda, G. (eds) Topics in Artificial Intelligence. AI*IA 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 992. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60437-5_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60437-5_39

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60437-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47468-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics