Abstract
Object-oriented analysis methods can incorporate the concept of constraints to express rules of the problem domain in the specification model, restricting the possible instances of the model. As such, constraints describe properties that must be true at each moment in time for the entire system, without determining how they are to be preserved. The ways in which these constraints are introduced in the model differ from method to method, and even between distinct constraint types in a single method. Different ways in which constraints can be described, are illustrated and compared.
Specifying constraints as informal annotations or by operational restrictions is too informal and low level for analysis. According to the properties, importance and influence of the constraint types on the object model, they ought to be described differently. Some constraints, such as connectivity constraints, should best be integrated in existing model concepts to focus on the constraint during the concept definition and as a reminder for these kind of constraints Others, such as attribute value constraints, are best introduced as independent items part of a separate concept grafted on a general model to get a consistent, unambiguous, symmetrical and general applicable constraint description. Yet others, such as relational and existential dependency constraints, should be expressed implicitly by a hierarchical model structure. This approach enriches the object model in such a way that it highlights the logical structure of the problem domain to its right extent
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Coad, P., and Yourdon, E., Object-Oriented Analysis Second Edition, Yourdon Press, Englewood Cliffs (New Jersey), 1991.
[Embley et al. 92] Embley, D.W., Kurtz, B.D., and Woodfield, S.N., Object-Oriented Systems Analysis, Yourdon Press, Englewood Cliffs (New Jersey), 1992.
[Lewi et al. 93] Lewi, J., Steegmans, E., and Van Baelen, S., EROOS: Entity-Relationship Object-Oriented Specifications, Department of Computer Science, K.U.Leuven, CW Report 111, 1990.
[Lewi et al. 93] Lewi, J., Steegmans, E., Dockx, J., Swennen, B., Van Baelen, S., and Van Riel, H., Object-Oriented Software Development with EROS: The Analysis Phase, Department of Computer Science, K.U.Leuven, CW Report 169, 1993.
[Rumbaugh et al. 91] Rumbaugh, J., Blaha, M., Premerlani, W., Eddy, F., and Lorenson, W., Object-Oriented Modeling and Design, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (New Jersey), 1991.
Shlaer, S., and Mellor, S. J., Object-Oriented Systems Analysis: Modeling the World in Data, Yourdon Press, Englewood Cliffs (New Jersey), 1988.
[Van Baelen et al. 92] Van Baelen, S, Lewi, J., Steegmans, E., and Van Riel, H., EROOS: An Entity-Relationship based Object-Oriented Specification Method, Technology of Object-Oriented Languages and Systems TOOLS 7, Heeg, G., Magnusson, B., and Meyer, B. (ed.), Prentice Hall, Hertsfordshire, UK, pp.103–117.
[Wirfs-Brock et al. 90] Wirfs-Brock, R., Wilkerson, B., and Wiener, L., Designing Object-Oriented Software, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (New Jersey), 1990.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Van Baelen, S., Lewi, J., Steegmans, E., Swennen, B. (1993). Constraints in object-oriented analysis. In: Nishio, S., Yonezawa, A. (eds) Object Technologies for Advanced Software. ISOTAS 1993. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 742. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57342-9_85
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57342-9_85
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-57342-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48075-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive