Abstract
Brightness values of pixels in an image are related to image irradiance by a non-linear function, called the radiometric response function. Recovery of this function is important since many algorithms in computer vision and image processing use image irradiance. Several investigators have described methods for recovery of the radiometric response, without using charts, from multiple exposures of the same scene. All these recovery methods are based solely on the correspondence of gray-levels in one exposure to gray-levels in another exposure. This correspondence can be described by a function we call the brightness transfer function. We show that brightness transfer functions, and thus images themselves, do not uniquely determine the radiometric response function, nor the ratios of exposure between the images. We completely determine the ambiguity associated with the recovery of the response function and the exposure ratios. We show that all previous methods break these ambiguities only by making assumptions on the form of the response function. While iterative schemes which may not converge were used previously to find the exposure ratio, we show when it can be recovered directly from the brightness transfer function. We present a novel method to recover the brightness transfer function between images from only their brightness histograms. This allows us to determine the brightness transfer function between images of different scenes whenever the change in the distribution of scene radiances is small enough. We show an example of recovery of the response function from an image sequence with scene motion by constraining the form of the response function to break the ambiguities.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Belhumeur, P., Kriegman, D.: What is the set of images of an object under all possible illumination conditions? IJCV 28 (1998) 245–260
Eric, S.M.: Image-based brdf measurement (1998)
Zhang, R., Tsai, P., Cryer, J., Shah, M.: Shape from shading: A survey. PAMI 21 (1999) 690–706
Mitsunaga, T., Nayar, S.K.: Radiometric self calibration. In: Proc CVPR. Volume 2. (1999) 374–380
Mann, S., Picard, R.: Being ‘undigital’ with digital cameras: Extending dynamic range by combining differently exposed pictures. In: In Proceedings of IS&T, 46th annual conference. (1995) 422–428
Debevec, P.E., Malik, J.: Recovering high dynamic range radiance maps from photographs. In: Computer Graphics, Proc. SIGGRAPH. (1997) 369–378
Tsin, Y., Ramesh, V., Kanade, T.: Statistical calibration of the ccd imaging process. In: ICCV01. (2001) I: 480–487
Mann, S.: Comparametric imaging: Estimating both the unknown response and the unknown set of exposures in a plurality of differently exposed images. In: Proc. CVPR, IEEE Computer Society (2001)
Horn, B.: Robot Vision. The MIT Press (1986)
Jain, A.: Fundamentals Of Digital Image Processing. Prentice Hall, Engle wood Cliffs (1989)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Grossberg, M.D., Nayar, S.K. (2002). What Can Be Known about the Radiometric Response from Images?. In: Heyden, A., Sparr, G., Nielsen, M., Johansen, P. (eds) Computer Vision — ECCV 2002. ECCV 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2353. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47979-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47979-1_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43748-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47979-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive