Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Static Monotonicity Analysis for λ-definable Functions over Lattices

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Verification, Model Checking, and Abstract Interpretation (VMCAI 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2294))

Abstract

We employ static analysis to examine monotonicity of functions defined over lattices in a λ-calculus augmented with constants, branching, meets, joins and recursive definitions. The need for such a verification procedure has recently arisen in our work on a static analyzer generator called Zoo, in which the specification of static analysis (input to Zoo) consists of finite-height lattice definitions and function definitions over the lattices. Once monotonicity of the functions is ascertained, the generated analyzer is guaranteed to terminate.

This work is supported by Creative Research Initiatives of the Korean Ministry of Science and Technology.

On leave from Nicholas Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland.

ROPAS - Research On Program Analysis System (http://ropas.kaist.ac.kr), National Creative Research Initiative Center, KAIST, Korea.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alfred V. Aho, Ravi Sethi, and Jeffrey D. Ullman. Compilers: Principles, Techniques, and Tools. Addison-Wesley, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Patrick Cousot and Radhia Cousot. Abstract interpretation: A unified lattice model for static analysis of programs by construction or approximation of fixpoints. In Proceedings of The ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, pages 238–252, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Patrick Cousot and Radhia Cousot. Abstract interpretation frameworks. Journal of Logic Computation, 2(4):511–547, 1992. Also as a tech report: Ecole Polytechnique, no. LIX/RR/92/10.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Patrick Cousot and Radhia Cousot. Compositional and inductive semantic definitions in fixpoint, equational, constraint, closure-condition, rule-based and game-theoretic form. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, volume 939, pages 293–308. Springer-Verlag, proceedings of the 7th international conference on computer-aided verification edition, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yevgeniy Dodis, Oded Goldreich, Eric Lehman, Sofya Raskhodnikova, Dana Ron, and Alex Samorodnitsky. Improved testing algorithms for monotonicity. Number Report TR99-107 in Electronic Colloquium on Computational Compleity, June 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Oded Goldreich, Shafi Goldwasser, Eric Lehman, and Dand Ron. Testing monotonicity. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. Le Charlier and P. Van Hentenryck. A universal top-down fixpoint algorithm. Technical Report TR-CS-92-25, Brown University, Dept. of Computer Science, May 1992. (also as a technical report of Institute of Computer Science, University of Namur).

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. Le Charlier and P. Van Hentenryck. Experimental Evaluation of a Generic Abstract Interpretation Algorithm for Prolog. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 16(1):35–101, January 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Florian Martin. PAG — an efficient program analyzer generator. International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, 2(1):46–67, 1998.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. J. A. Robinson. A machine-oriented logic based on the resolution principle. Journal of the ACM, 12(1):23–41, 1965.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. D.E. Rutherford. Introduction to Lattice Theory. Hafner Publishing Company, New York, 1965.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Winfrid G. Schneeweiss. A necessary and sufficient criterion for the monotonicity of boolean functions with deterministic and stochastic. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 45(11):1300–1302, November 1996.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Jean-Pierre Talpin and Pierre Jouvelot. Type, effect and region reconstruction in polymorphic functional languages. In Proceedings of Functional Programming Languages and Computer Architecture, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jean-Piere Talpin and Pierre Jouvelot. Polymorphic type, region and effect inference. Journal of Functional Programming, 2(3):245–271, July 1992.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Mads Tofte and Jean-Pierre Talpin. A theory of stack allocation in polymorphically typed languages. Technical Report Technical Report 93/15, Department of Computer Science, Copenhagen University, July 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mads Tofte and Jean-Pierre Talpin. Implementation of the typed call by-value λ-calculus using a stack of regions. In Proceedings of The ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, pages 188–201, January 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Andrei Voronenko. On the complexity of the monotonicity verification. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, pages 4–7, July 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kwangkeun Yi and Williams Ludwell Harrison III. Automatic generation and management of interprocedural program analyses. In Proceedings of The ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, pages 246–259, January 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kwangkeun Yi. Program Analysis System Zoo. Research On Program Analysis: National Creative Research Center, KAIST, July 2001. http://ropas.kaist.ac.kr/zoo/doc/rabbit-e.ps.

  20. Kwangkeun Yi. System Zoo: towards a realistic program analyzer generator, July 2001. Seminar talk at ENS, Paris. http://ropas.kaist.ac.kr/~kwang/talk/ens01/ens01.ps.

  21. Kwangkeun Yi and Sukyoung Ryu. Towards a cost-effective estimation of uncaught exceptions in SML programs. In Proceedings of the 4th International Static Analysis Symposium, volume 1302 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 98–113. Springer-Verlag, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kwangkeun Yi and Sukyoung Ryu. A cost-effective estimation of uncaught exceptions in Standard ML programs. Theoretical Computer Science, 273(1), 2001. (to appear).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Murawski, A.S., Yi, K. (2002). Static Monotonicity Analysis for λ-definable Functions over Lattices. In: Cortesi, A. (eds) Verification, Model Checking, and Abstract Interpretation. VMCAI 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2294. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47813-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47813-2_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43631-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47813-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics