Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

On the Sum Constraint: Relaxation and Applications

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming - CP 2002 (CP 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2470))

Abstract

The global constraint sum can be used as a tool to implement summations over sets of variables whose indices are not known in advance. This paper has two major contributions. On the theoretical side, we present the convex hull relaxation for the sum constraint in terms of linear inequalities, whose importance in the context of hybrid models is then justified. On the practical side, we demonstrate the applicability of the sum constraint in a scheduling problem that arises as part of the development of new products in the pharmaceutical and agrochemical industries. This problem can be modeled in two alternative ways: by using the sum constraint in a natural and straightforward manner, or by using the element constraint in a trickier fashion. With the convex hull relaxation developed earlier, we prove that the linear relaxation obtained from the former model is tighter than the one obtained from the latter. Moreover, our computational experiments indicate that the CP model based on the sum constraint is significantly more efficient as well.

Supported by the William Larimer Mellon Fellowship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. Balas. Disjunctive programming: Properties of the convex hull of feasible points. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 89:3–44, 1998.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. J. F. Benders. Partitioning procedures for solving mixed-variables programming problems. Numerische Mathematik, 4:238–252, 1962.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Blau, B. Mehta, S. Bose, J. Pekny, G. Sinclair, K. Keunker, and P. Bunch. Risk management in the development of new products in highly regulated industries. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 24:659–664, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Bockmayr and T. Kasper. Branch and infer: A unifying framework for integer and finite domain constraint programming. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 10(3):287–300, 1998.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Honkomp, G. Reklaitis, and J. Pekny. Robust planning and scheduling of process development projects under stochastic conditions. Presented at the AICHE annual meeting, Los Angeles, CA, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. N. Hooker. Logic-Based Methods for Optimization. Wiley-Interscience Series in Discrete Mathematics and Optimization, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. N. Hooker and M. A. Osorio. Mixed logical/linear programming. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 96–97(1–3):395–442, 1999.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. IC-Parc, Imperial College, London. The ECLiPSe Constraint Logic Programming System. http://www.icparc.ic.ac.uk/eclipse.

  9. V. Jain and I. Grossmann. Resource-constrained scheduling of tests in new product development. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 38(8):3013–3026, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. C. Schmidt and I. Grossmann. Optimization models for the scheduling of testing tasks in new product development. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 35(10):3498–3510, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. E. S. Thorsteinsson. Branch-and-Check: A hybrid framework integrating mixed integer programming and constraint logic programming. In Toby Walsh, editor, Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming, volume 2239 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 16–30. Springer-Verlag, November 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. Tsang. Foundations of Constraint Satisfaction. Academic Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yunes, T.H. (2002). On the Sum Constraint: Relaxation and Applications. In: Van Hentenryck, P. (eds) Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming - CP 2002. CP 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2470. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46135-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46135-3_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44120-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46135-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics