Abstract
The growing complexity of today’s electronic designs requires reusing existing design components, called Intellectual Properties (IPs). Experience management approaches can be used to support design reuse, particularly the process of selecting reusable IPs. For the IP selection, quality criteria concerning the IP code and the documentation must be considered in addition to functional requirements of the IP. We analyse IP quality criteria in detail and show different concepts for their integration into the retrieval process.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bergmann, R (2001). Experience Management: Foundations, Development Methodology, and Internet-Based Applications. Habilitationsschrift, Universität Kaiserslautern.
Bergmann, R., M. M. Richter, S. Schmitt, A. Stahl, & I. Vollrath (2001). Utility-oriented matching: A new research direction for case-based reasoning. In S. Schmitt, I. Vollrath, and U. Reimer (Eds.), 9th German Workshop on Case-based Reasoning.
Burkhard, H. D. & Richter, M. M. (2001). On the Notion of Similarity in Case-Based Reasoning and Fuzzy Theory. In: S. Pal, T. S. Dillon, & D. S. Yeung (Eds.) Soft Computing in Case Based Reasoning. Springer.
Bermann, R. & A. Stahl (1998). Similarity measures for object-oriented case representation. In B. Smyth & P. Cunningham (Eds.) Advances in Case-Based Reasoning (EWCBR’98), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Springer, 25–36.
Bergmann, R. & Vollrath, I. (1999). Generalized cases: Representation and steps towards efficient similarity assessment. In W. Burgard, Th. Christaller & A. B. Cremers (Hrsg.) KI-99: Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 1701, Springer, 195–206.
Lewis (1997). Lewis, J.: Intellectual Property (IP) Components. Artisan Components, Inc., http://www.artisan.com/ip.html, (1997).
Oehler, P., Vollrath, I., Conradi, P., Bergmann, R., & Wahlmann, T. (1998). READEE-Decision support for IP selection using a knowledge-based approach. In IP98 Europe Proceedings, Miller Freeman.
Oehler, P., Vollrath, I., Conradi, P., & Bergmann, R. (1998). Are your READee for IPs?. In A. Kunzmann & R. Seepold (Hrsg.) Second GI/ITG/GMM Workshop “Reuse Techniques for VLSI Design”, FZI-Report 3-13-9/98, Universität Kalrsruhe.
Synopsis Inc., Mentor Graphics Corporation (2001). OpenMORE Assesment Program for Hard/Soft IP Version 1.0, http://www.openmore.com.
Torroja, T., Casado, F., Machado, F. (2001). Guidelines and Standards Proposal for IP Quality at the RT Level. ToolIP-Tools and Methods for IP. Technical Report UPM-T1.2-Q4/01.
VSI AllianceTM, Virtual Component Transfer Development Working Group (2001). Virtual Component Attributes (VCA) With Formats for Profiling, Selection, and Transfer. Standard Version 2.2 (VCT 2.2.2).
Wiig, K. (1997). Knowledge Management: Where Did It Come From and Where Will It Go?. Expert Systems with Applications (14). Pergamon Press / Elsevier.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Schaaf, M., Maximini, R., Bergmann, R., Tautz, C., Traphöner, R. (2002). Supporting Electronic Design Reuse by Integrating Quality-Criteria into CBR-Based IP Selection. In: Craw, S., Preece, A. (eds) Advances in Case-Based Reasoning. ECCBR 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2416. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46119-1_46
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46119-1_46
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44109-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46119-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive