Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Supporting Electronic Design Reuse by Integrating Quality-Criteria into CBR-Based IP Selection

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Case-Based Reasoning (ECCBR 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2416))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The growing complexity of today’s electronic designs requires reusing existing design components, called Intellectual Properties (IPs). Experience management approaches can be used to support design reuse, particularly the process of selecting reusable IPs. For the IP selection, quality criteria concerning the IP code and the documentation must be considered in addition to functional requirements of the IP. We analyse IP quality criteria in detail and show different concepts for their integration into the retrieval process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bergmann, R (2001). Experience Management: Foundations, Development Methodology, and Internet-Based Applications. Habilitationsschrift, Universität Kaiserslautern.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bergmann, R., M. M. Richter, S. Schmitt, A. Stahl, & I. Vollrath (2001). Utility-oriented matching: A new research direction for case-based reasoning. In S. Schmitt, I. Vollrath, and U. Reimer (Eds.), 9th German Workshop on Case-based Reasoning.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burkhard, H. D. & Richter, M. M. (2001). On the Notion of Similarity in Case-Based Reasoning and Fuzzy Theory. In: S. Pal, T. S. Dillon, & D. S. Yeung (Eds.) Soft Computing in Case Based Reasoning. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bermann, R. & A. Stahl (1998). Similarity measures for object-oriented case representation. In B. Smyth & P. Cunningham (Eds.) Advances in Case-Based Reasoning (EWCBR’98), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Springer, 25–36.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bergmann, R. & Vollrath, I. (1999). Generalized cases: Representation and steps towards efficient similarity assessment. In W. Burgard, Th. Christaller & A. B. Cremers (Hrsg.) KI-99: Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 1701, Springer, 195–206.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lewis (1997). Lewis, J.: Intellectual Property (IP) Components. Artisan Components, Inc., http://www.artisan.com/ip.html, (1997).

  7. Oehler, P., Vollrath, I., Conradi, P., Bergmann, R., & Wahlmann, T. (1998). READEE-Decision support for IP selection using a knowledge-based approach. In IP98 Europe Proceedings, Miller Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Oehler, P., Vollrath, I., Conradi, P., & Bergmann, R. (1998). Are your READee for IPs?. In A. Kunzmann & R. Seepold (Hrsg.) Second GI/ITG/GMM Workshop “Reuse Techniques for VLSI Design”, FZI-Report 3-13-9/98, Universität Kalrsruhe.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Synopsis Inc., Mentor Graphics Corporation (2001). OpenMORE Assesment Program for Hard/Soft IP Version 1.0, http://www.openmore.com.

  10. Torroja, T., Casado, F., Machado, F. (2001). Guidelines and Standards Proposal for IP Quality at the RT Level. ToolIP-Tools and Methods for IP. Technical Report UPM-T1.2-Q4/01.

    Google Scholar 

  11. VSI AllianceTM, Virtual Component Transfer Development Working Group (2001). Virtual Component Attributes (VCA) With Formats for Profiling, Selection, and Transfer. Standard Version 2.2 (VCT 2.2.2).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wiig, K. (1997). Knowledge Management: Where Did It Come From and Where Will It Go?. Expert Systems with Applications (14). Pergamon Press / Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schaaf, M., Maximini, R., Bergmann, R., Tautz, C., Traphöner, R. (2002). Supporting Electronic Design Reuse by Integrating Quality-Criteria into CBR-Based IP Selection. In: Craw, S., Preece, A. (eds) Advances in Case-Based Reasoning. ECCBR 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2416. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46119-1_46

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46119-1_46

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44109-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46119-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics