Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Conceptual Diagrams: Representing Ideas in Design

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Diagrammatic Representation and Inference (Diagrams 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2317))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Studies in cognition [1],[2] have investigated the role of external visual representations in different domains in supporting reasoning, problem solving, and communication. These studies often are confined to domains that pose relatively well-defined problems [3], such as geometry [4] and physics [2], with fewer studies in domains where the problems are ill-defined [3], such as meteorology [5] and architecture [6].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhang, J. (1994). "Representations in distributed cognitive tasks." Cognitive Science Journal 18(1): 87–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Larkin, J. H. and H. A. Simon (1987). "Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words." Cognitive Science 11: 65–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Reitman, W. (1964). Heuristic decision procedures, open constraints, and the structure of ill-defined problem. Human Judgements and Optimality. M. Shelly and G. Bryan (Eds.). New York, Wiley: 282–315.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Koedinger, K. R. and J. R. Anderson (1995). Abstract planning and perceptual chunks. Diagrammatic reasoning: cognitive and computational perspectives. B. Chandrasekaran, J. Glasgow and N. H. Narayanan (Eds.). Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lowe, R. (2000). Animation of diagrams: an aid to learning? Theory and application of diagrams. M. Anderson, P. Cheng and V. Haarslev (Eds.). Berlin, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Do, E. Y.-L. and M. D. Gross (2001). "Thinking with diagrams in architectural design." Artificial Intelligence Review 15(1–2): 135–149.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Nersessian, N. (2002). Maxwell and "the Method of Physical Analogy": model-based reasoning, generic abstraction, and conceptual change. Reading natural history: essays in the history and philosophy of science and mathematics to honor Howard Stein on his 70th birthday. D. Malamet (Ed.). Lasalle, IL, Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Latour, A. (1991). Louis I. Kahn: writings, lectures, interviews. New York, Rizzoli.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dogan, F., Nersessian, N.J. (2002). Conceptual Diagrams: Representing Ideas in Design. In: Hegarty, M., Meyer, B., Narayanan, N.H. (eds) Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Diagrams 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2317. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46037-3_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46037-3_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43561-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46037-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics