Abstract
Graphical representations such as maps and diagrams play an important role in everyday communication settings by serving as an effective means of exchanging information. In such communication, graphical representations work not only as “windows” through which we can see the target situations the graphics describe, but also serve as information processing “sites” because we can take advantage of their handiness. Though the final aim of speakers is to exchange information about the target situation, graphical representations are so deeply a part of information processing that they may affect the way people grasp the target situations. This paper presents an empirical investigation of language usage in graphical communication. Drawing on the HCRC Map Task Corpus data, we demonstrate that the existence of graphics affects linguistic expressions of motion when people collaboratively work on a task. This effect demonstrates that the use of graphical representations has an influence on movement event conceptualizations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fillmore, C. J. (1997). Lectures on Deixis. Stanford, CA.: CSLI Publications.
Lee, J., and H. Zeevat (1990). Integrating Natural Language and Graphics in Dialogue. In Diaper, D., Gilmore, D., Cockton, G., and B. Schackel. (Eds.) Human Computer Interaction—INTERACT’90, 211–234. Amsterdam.
Neilson, I., and J. Lee (1994). Conversations with Graphics: Implications for the Design of Natural Language/Graphics Interfaces. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 40, 509–541.
Schwartz, D. L. (1995). Reasoning about the Referent of a Picture versus Reasoning about the Picture as the Referent: An Effect of Visual Realism. Memory & Cognition 23, 709–722.
Suwa, M., and B. Tversky (1997). How Do Designers Shift Their Focus of Attention in their Own Sketches? Papers from the AAAI-97 Fall Symposium, 102–108. AAAI Press.
Tversky, B. (1981). Distortions in Memory for Maps. Cognitive Psychology 13, 407–433.
Umata, I., Shimojima, A., and Y. Katagiri (2000). Talking through Graphics: An Empirical Study of the Sequential Integration of Modalities. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 529–534.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Umata, I., Katagiri, Y., Shimojima, A. (2002). Movement Conceptualizations in Graphical Communication. In: Hegarty, M., Meyer, B., Narayanan, N.H. (eds) Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Diagrams 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2317. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46037-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46037-3_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43561-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46037-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive