A Functional Logic Programming Approach to Graphical User Interfaces

1. S. Antoy, R. Echahed, and M. Hanus. A Needed Narrowing Strategy. In Proc. 21st ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, pp. 268–279, 1994.

   Google Scholar 

2. M. Carlsson and T. Hallgren. Fudgets — A Graphical User Interface in a Lazy Functional Language. In Conference on Functional Programming and Computer Architecture (FPCA’93). ACM Press, 1993.

   Google Scholar 

3. K. Claessen, T. Vullinghs, and E. Meijer. Structuring graphical paradigms in TkGofer. In Proc. of the International Conference on Functional Programming (ICFP’97), pp. 251–262. ACM SIGPLAN Notices Vol. 32,No. 8, 1997.

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. L. Damas and R. Milner. Principal type-schemes for functional programs. In Proc. 9th Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, pp. 207–212, 1982.

   Google Scholar 

5. S. Finne and S. Peyton Jones. Composing Haggis. In Proc. of the Fifth Eurographics Workshop on Programming Paradigms for Computer Graphics. Springer, 1995.

   Google Scholar 

6. M. Hanus. The Integration of Functions into Logic Programming: From Theory to Practice. Journal of Logic Programming, Vol. 19&20, pp. 583–628, 1994.

   Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

7. M. Hanus. A Unified Computation Model for Functional and Logic Programming. In Proc. 24th ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, pp. 80–93, 1997.

   Google Scholar 

8. M. Hanus. Distributed Programming in a Multi-Paradigm Declarative Language. In Proc. of the International Conference on Principles and Practice of Declarative Programming (PPDP’99), pp. 376–395. Springer LNCS 1702, 1999.

   Google Scholar 

9. M. Hanus, S. Antoy, J. Koj, R. Sadre, and F. Steiner. PACS: The Portland Aachen Curry System. Available at http://www-i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/~hanus/pacs/, 1999.

10. M. Hanus and F. Steiner. Controlling Search in Declarative Programs. In Principles of Declarative Programming (Proc. Joint International Symposium PLILP/ALP’98), pp. 374–390. Springer LNCS 1490, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

11. M. Hanus (ed.). Curry: An Integrated Functional Logic Language (Vers. 0.5). Available at http://www-i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/~hanus/curry, 1999.

12. S. Janson, J. Montelius, and S. Haridi. Ports for Objects in Concurrent Logic Programs. In Research Directions in Concurrent Object-Oriented Programming. MIT Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

13. G. Krasner and S. Pope. A Cookbook for using the Model-View-Controller User Interface in Smalltalk-80. Journal of Object-Oriented Programming, Vol. 1,No. 3, pp. 26–49, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

14. J.K. Ousterhout. Tcl and the Tk toolkit. Addison Wesley, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

15. J. Peterson et al. Haskell: A Non-strict, Purely Functional Language (Version 1.4). Technical Report, Yale University, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

16. M. Renschler. Configuration Spreadsheet for Interactive Constraint Problem Solving. In Proc. of the ComputlogNet Industrial Conference on Advanced Software Applications, Manchester, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

17. V.A. araswat. Concurrent Constraint Programming. MIT Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

18. E. Shapiro and A. Takeuchi. Object Oriented Programming in Concurrent Prolog. In E. Shapiro, editor, Concurrent Prolog: Collected Papers, volume 2, pp. 251–273. MIT Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

19. T. Vullinghs, D. Tuijnman, and W. Schulte. Lightweight GUIs for Functional Programming. In Proc. 7th Int. Symp. on Programming Languages, Implementations, Logics and Programs (PLILP’95), pp. 341–356. Springer LNCS 982, 1995.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

20. P. Wadler. How to Declare an Imperative. ACM Computing Surveys, Vol. 29,No. 3, pp. 240–263, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references