Abstract
The role of subject and search knowledge in query expansion (QE) is an unmapped terrain in research on information retrieval. It is likely that both have an impact on the process and outcome of QE. In this paper our aim is an analytical study of the connections between subject and search knowledge and term selection in QE based both on thesaurus and relevance feedback. We will also argue analytically how thesaurus, term suggestion in interactive QE and term extraction in automatic QE support users with differing levels of subject knowledge in their pursuit of search concepts and terms. It is suggested that in QE the initial query concepts representing the information need should not be treated as separate entities, but as conceptually interrelated. These interrelations contribute to the meaning of the conceptual construct, which the query represents, and this should be reflected in the terms identified for QE.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anick, P. & Tiperneni, S. The paraphrase search assistant: terminological feedback for iterative information seeking. In Proceedings of the SIGIR’99. ACM, New York (1999) 153–159
Bates, M. Subject access to online catologs: A design model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 37 (6) (1986) 357–376
Bates, M. Indexing and access for digital libraries and the internet: Human, database, and domain factors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49 (13) (1998) 1185–1205
Belkin, N. & Cool, C. & Head, J. & Jeng, J. Kelly, D. & al., Relevance Feedback versus Local Context Analysis as term suggestion devices: Rutgers’ TREC-8 interactive track experience. In: Proceedings of TREC-8. Available from: (20001)
Blair, D. & Maron, M. An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document retrieval system. Communications of the ACM. 28 (3) (1985) 289–299
Borgman, C. Why are online catologs still hard to use? Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47 (1996) 493–503.
Brajnik, G., Mizzarro, S. & Tasso, C. Evaluating user interfaces to information retrieval systems. A case study. In Proceedings of the SIGIR’96. ACM, New York (1996) 128–136
Croft, B. & Das, R. Experiment with query acquisition and use in document retrieval systems. In: Proceedings of the SIGIR’90. Springer, Berlin (1990) 368–376
Eftimiadis, E. Query expansion. In: M.E. Williams (ed), Annual review of information science and technology, vol 31. N.J.: Information Today, Medford (1996) 121–187
Eftimiadis, E. Interactive query expansion: A user-based evaluation in relevance feedback environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51 (11) (2000) 989–1003
Fenichel, C. The process of searching online bibliographic databases. Library Research 2 (1981) 107–127
Fidel, R. Searchers’ selection of search keys: III searching styles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42 (1991) 515–527
Fowkes, H., & Beaulieu, M. Interactive searching behavior: Okapi experiment for TREC-8. In Proceedings of the BCS-IRSG: 22nd Annual Colloquium on Information Retrieval Research. Cambridge (2000)
Greenberg, J. Automatic query expansion via lexical-semantic relationships. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 52(2) (2001a) 402–415
Greenberg, J. Optimal query expansion processing methods with semantically encoded structured thesauri terminology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 52(6) (2001b) 487–498
Hahn, U., & Chater, N. Concepts and similarity. In K. Lamberts, & D. Shanks (Eds.), Knowledge, concepts and categories. Psychology Press, Hove (1997) 43–92
Hancock-Beaulieu, M. & Fieldhouse, M. & Do, T. An evaluation of interactive query expansion in an online library catalogue with graphical user interface. Journal of Documentation. 51(3) (1995) 225–243
Harter, S. Online information retrieval. Academic Press, Orlando (1986)
Hawking, D. & Thistlewaite, P. & Bailey, B. ANU/ACSys TREC-5 experiments. In: E. Voorhees & D. Harman (eds), Information technology: The fifth text retrieval conference (TREC-5). MD, Gaithersburg (1997) 359–375
Heit, E. Knowledge and concept learning. In K. Lamberts, & D. Shanks (Eds.), Knowledge, Concepts and Categories. Psychology Press, Hove (1997) 7–41
Hsieh-Yee, I. Effects of search experience and subject knowledge on the search tactics of novice and experienced searchers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 44 (1993) 161–174
Ingwersen, P. Information retrieval interaction. Taylor Graham, London (1992)
Isenberg, D. Thinking and managing: a verbal protocol analysis of managerial problem solving. Academy of Management Journal. 20 (1986) 775–788.
Jones, S & Gatford, M. & Robertson, S. & Hancock-Beaulieu, M. & Secker, J. Interactive thesaurus navigation: Intelligence rules OK? Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 46 (1) (1995) 52–59
Järvelin, K. & Kekäläinen, J., IR evaluayion methods for highly relevant documents. Proceedings of the SIGIR’00. ACM, New York (2000) 41–48
Kekäläinen, J. The effects of query complexity, expansion and structure on retrieval performance in probabilistic text retrieval. Doctoral Dissertation. Tampere University Press, Tampere (1999)
Kekäläinen, J. & Järvelin, K. The impact of query structure and query extension on retrieval performance. In: Proceedings of the SIGIR’98. ACM, New York (1998) 130–137
Koenemann, J. & Belkin, N. A case for interaction: A study of interactive information retrieval behavior and effectiveness. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors in Computing Systems Conference (CHI’96). ACM Press, New York (1996) 205–212
Kuhlthau, C. Seeking Meaning. Norwood, N.J. Ablex (1993)
Lancaster, W & Warner, A. Information retrieval today. VA: Information Resources Press, Arlington (1993)
Lormand, E. How to be a meaning holist. The Journal of Philosophy. 93 (1996)
Marchionini, G. Information seeking in electronic environments. Cambridge University Press (1995)
Mitra, M.. & Singhal, A. & Buckley, C. Improving automatic query expansion. In Proceedings of the SIGIR’98. ACM, New York (1998) 206–214
Partridge, D., & Hussain K. Knowledge based information-systems. McGraw-Hill, London (1995)
Patel, V. & Ramoni, M. Cognitive models of directional inference in expert medical reasoning. In P. Feltovich, & K. Ford, & R. Hoffman (Eds.), Expertise in context: human and machine. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (Calif.) (1997) 67–99
Sormunen, E. A method of measuring wide range performance of Boolean queries in fulltext databases. Acta Universitatis Tamperensis 748. Doctoral Dissertation. Tampere University Press, Tampere (2000)
Sormunen, E. & Kekäläinen, J. & Koivisto, J. Järvelin, K. Document text characteristics affect the ranking of the most relevant documents by expanded structured queries. Journal of Documentation. 57 (3) (2001) 358–376.
Spink, A., Greisdorf, R., & Bateman, J. From highly relevant to non-relevant: examining different regions of relevance. Information Processing & Management. 34 (1998) 599–622
Stinchcombe, A. Constructing Social Theories. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1987)
Sutcliffe, A., & Ennis, M. Towards a cognitive theory of IR. Interacting with Computers. 10 (1998) 321–351
Sutcliffe, A., Ennis, M., & Watkinson, S. Empirical studies of end-user information searching. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51 (2000) 1211–1231
Swanson, D. Historical note: Information retrieval and the future of an illusion. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 39 (4) (1988) 92–98
Turtle, H. & Croft, W. Evaluation of inference network-based retrieval model. ACM transactions on information systems. 9 (3) (1991) 187–222
Vakkari, P. Cognition and changes of search terms and tactics during task performance. Proceedings of the RIAO’2000 Conference Paris: C.I.D. (2000) 894–907. Also: http://www.info.uta.fi/informaatio/vakkari/Vakkari_Tactics_RIAO2000.html
Vakkari, P. A Theory of the Task-based Information Retrieval. Journal of Documentation. 57 (1) (2001) 44–60
Vakkari, P., & Hakala, N. Changes in relevance criteria and problem stages in task performance. Journal of Documentation. 56 (2000) 540–562
Vakkari, P. & Pennanen, M. & Serola, S. Changes of search terms and tactics while writing a research proposal: A longitudinal case study. Submitted for publication (2002)
Wang, P. User’s information needs at different stages of a research project: a cognitive view. In P. Vakkari, R. Savolainen, & B., Dervin (Eds.), Information Seeking in Context. Taylor, London & Los Angeles (1997) 307–318
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Vakkari, P. (2002). Subject Knowledge, Source of Terms, and Term Selection in Query Expansion: An Analytical Study. In: Crestani, F., Girolami, M., van Rijsbergen, C.J. (eds) Advances in Information Retrieval. ECIR 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2291. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45886-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45886-7_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43343-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45886-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive