Abstract
This paper presents and motivates an extended ontology conceptual model which represents explicitly semantic information about concepts. This model results from explicitly representingin formation which precisely characterises the concept’s properties and expected ambiguities, including which properties are prototypical of a concept and which are exceptional, the behaviour of properties over time and the degree of applicability of properties to subconcepts. This enriched conceptual model permits a precise characterisation of what is represented by class membership mechanisms and helps a knowledge engineer to determine, in a straightforward manner, the meta-properties holding for a concept. Moreover, this enriched semantics facilitates the development of reasoningm echanisms on the state of affairs that instantiate the ontologies. Such reasoning mechanisms can be used in order to solve ambiguities that can arise when ontologies are integrated and one needs to reason with the integrated knowledge.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
A. Bernaras, I. Laresgoiti, and J. Corera. Buildingan d reusingon tologies for electrical network applications. In Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), pages 298–302, 1996.
V.K. Chaudhri, A. Farquhar, R. Fikes, P.D. Karp, and J.P. Rice. OKBC: A programmatic foundation for knowledge base interoperability. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth American Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-98), pages 600–607, Madison, Wisconsin, 1998. AAAI Press/The MIT Press.
N. Fridman Noy and M.A. Musen. SMART: Automated support for ontology merging and alignment. In Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management (KAW), Banff, Canada, 1999.
N. Guarino, M. Carrara, and P. Giaretta. An ontology of meta-levelcategories. In Principles of Knowledge representation and reasoning: Proceedings of the fourth international conference (KR94). Morgan Kaufmann, 1994.
M. Goldszmidt and J. Pearl. Qualitative probabilistic for default reasoning, belief revision, and causal modelling. Artificial Intelligence, 84(1–2):57–112, 1996.
A. Gómez-Pérez. Knowledge sharing and reuse. In J. Liebowitz, editor, The Handbook of Applied Expert Systems. CRC Pres LLC, 1998.
A. Gómez-Pérez. Ontological engineering: A state of the arta. Expert Update, 2(3):33–43, Autumn 1999.
N. Guarino and C. Welty. A formal ontology of properties. In R. Dieng, editor, Proceedings of the 12th EKAW Conference, volume LNAI 1937. Springer Verlag, 2000.
S.A. Kripke. Naming and necessity. Harvard University Press, 1980.
R. Kowalski and M. Sergot. A logic-based calculus of events. New Generation Computing, 4:67–95, 1986.
O. Lassila and D. McGuinness. The Role of Frame-Based Representation on the Semantic Web, volume Vol. 6(2001), number not yet determined of Linkping Electronic Articles in Computer and Information Science. ISSN 1401-9841. 2001.
D.L. McGuinness. Conceptual modellingfor distributed ontology environments. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Conceptual Structures Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues (ICCS 2000), 2000.
D.L. McGuinness, R.E. Fikes, J. Rice, and S. Wilder. An environment for merging and testing large ontologies. In Proceedings of KR-2000. Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. Morgan-Kaufman, 2000.
H.S. Pinto, A. Gómez-Pérez, and J.P. Martins. Some issues on ontology integration. In V.R. Benjamins, editor, Proceedings of the IJCAI’99 Workshop on Ontology and Problem-Solving Methods: Lesson learned and Future Trends, volume 18, pages 7.1–7.11, Amsterdam, 1999. CEUR Publications.
E.H. Rosch. Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104:192–233, 1975.
E.H. Rosch. Reclaimingcon cepts. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(11-12):61–77, 1999.
R. Studer, V.R. Benjamins, and D. Fensel. Knowledge engineering, principles and methods. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 25(1–2):161–197, 1998.
J.R. Searle. Intentionality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983.
V.A.M. Tamma and T.J.M Bench-Capon. Supportingi nheritance mechanisms in ontology representation. In R. Dieng, editor, Proceedings of the 12th EKAW Conference, volume LNAI 1937, pages 140–155. Springer Verlag, 2000.
P.R.S. Visser, D.M. Jones, T.J.M. Bench-Capon, and M.J.R. Shave. Assessing heterogeneity by classifying ontology mismatches. In N. Guarino, editor, Formal Ontology in Information Systems. Proceedings FOIS’98, Trento, Italy, pages 148–182. IOS Press, 1998.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tamma, V.A.M., Bench-Capon, T.J.M. (2001). Characterising Concept’s Properties in Ontologies. In: Esposito, F. (eds) AI*IA 2001: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. AI*IA 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2175. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45411-X_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45411-X_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42601-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45411-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive