Incremental Case-Based Plan Recognition Using State Indices

1. Allen, J. F., and Perrault, C. R.: Analyzing intention in dialogues. Artificial Intelligence 15(3) (1980) 143–178.

   Article  Google Scholar 

2. Albrecht, D. W., Zukerman, I, and Nicholson, A. E.: Bayesian models for keyhole plan recognition in an adventure game. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 8 (1998) 5–47.

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Blythe, J.: Planning under uncertainty. Doctoral thesis. Technical Report, CMU-CS-98-147. Computer Science Dept., Carnegie Mellon University(1998).

   Google Scholar 

4. Bauer, M.: Machine learning for user modeling and plan recognition. In V. Moustakis J. Herrmann, editor, Proc. ICML’96 Workshop “Machine Learning meets Human Computer Interaction” (1996) 5–16.

   Google Scholar 

5. Bares, M., Canamero, D., Delannoy, J.-F., and Kodratoff, Y.: XPlans: Case-Based Reasoning for Plan Recognition. Applied Artificial Intelligence 8 (1994) 617–643.

   Google Scholar 

6. Carberry, S.: Plan Recognition in Natural Language Dialogue. MIT Press (1990).

   Google Scholar 

7. Carbonell, J. G., Blythe, J., Etzioni, O., Gil, Y., Joseph, J., Kahn, D., Knoblock, C., Minton, S., Perez, A., Reilly, S., Veloso, M., and Wang, X.: Prodigy4.0: The Manual and Tutorial. Technical Report, CMU-CS-92-150. Computer Science Dept., Carnegie Mellon University (1992).

   Google Scholar 

8. Fikes, R. and Nilsson, N.: STRIPS: A new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving. In James Allen, James Hendler, and Austin Tate, editors, Readings in Planning. Morgan Kaufmann (1990).

   Google Scholar 

9. Fish, D.: A Dynamic Memory Organization for Case-Based Reasoning Supporting Case Similarity Determination and Learning Via Local Clustering. Masters Thesis. Computer Science Dept., University of Connecticut (1995).

   Google Scholar 

10. Hammond, C.: Case-Based Planning: Viewing Planning as a Memory Task. Academic Press, San Diego (1989).

    Google Scholar 

11. Kautz, H.: A formal theory of plan recognition and its implementation. In J. Allen, H. Kautz, R. Pelavin and J. Tenenberg, Reasoning about plans, Morgan Kaufmann (1991).

    Google Scholar 

12. Lesh, N., and Etzioni, E.: Scaling up goal recognition. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Principles of knowledge Representation and Reasoning (1996) 178–189.

    Google Scholar 

13. Penberthy, J. S., and Weld, D. S.: UCPOP: A sound, complete, partial order planner for ADL. In Proceedings of KR-92 (1992) 103–114.

    Google Scholar 

14. Veloso, M.: Planning and learning by analogical reasoning. Springer-Verlag (1994).

    Google Scholar 

15. Veloso, M., Carbonell, J., Perez, A., Borrajo, D., Fink, E. and Blythe, J.: Integrating planning and learning: The PRODIGY architecture. Journal of Theoretical and Experimental Artificial Intelligence. 7(1) (1995) 81–120.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

16. Veloso, M. M., Pollack, M. E., and Cox, M. T.: Rationale-based monitoring for continuous planning in dynamic environments. In R. Simmons, M. Veloso, & S. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning Systems. Menlo Park, AAAI Press (1998) 171–177.

    Google Scholar 

17. Weida, R. and Litman, D.: Terminological plan reasoning and recognition. In Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on User Modeling (1992) 177–191.

    Google Scholar 

Download references