Abstract
A valuable source of field diagnostic information for equipment service resides in the text notes generated during service calls. Intelligent knowledge extraction from such textual information is a challenging task. The notes are characterized by misspelled words, incomplete information, cryptic technical terms, and non-standard abbreviations. In addition, very few of the total number of notes generated may be diagnostically useful. We present an approach for identifying diagnostically relevant notes from the many raw field service notes and information is presented in this paper. N-gram matching and supervised learning techniques are used to generate recommendations for the diagnostic significance of incoming service notes. These techniques have potential applications in generating relevant indices for textual CBR.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Uthurusamy, R., Means, L.G., Godden, K.S. and Lytinen, S.L., “Extracting Knowledge from Diagnostic Databases ”,1993, IEEE Expert pp.27–37.
Creecy, R.H., Masand B.M., Smith S.J., Waltz D.L., “Tradimg MIPS and Memory for Knowledge Engineering: Automatic classification of Census Returns on a Massively Parallel Supercomputer ”, Communications of the ACM, 1992, pp 48–64, V. 35 (8).
Varma, Anil, Wood, W.H. and Agogino, Alice M., “ A Machine Learning Approach to Automated Design Classification, Association and Retrieval”, Published in the Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Design, June 24-27, 1996, Stanford, CA
Liu, ZQ and Yan, F, “Case-based diagnostic systems using fuzzy neural network”, in IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks. 1995, IEEE: Perth, WA, Australia. pp. 3107–3112.
Mario Lenz, ‘Textual CBR and Information Retrieval — A Comparison’, in Proc. 6th German Workshop on CBR, 1998.
Wilson, D., and Bradshaw, S. (1999). CBR Textuality. In Proceedings of the Fourth UK Case-Based Reasoning Workshop
Brüninghaus, S., and Ashley, K. 1998. Developing Mapping and Evaluation Techniques for Textual Case-Based Reasoning. In Workshop Notes of the AAAI-98 Workshop on Textual CBR.
Stefanie Brüninghaus and Kevin D. Ashley (1998) Evaluation of Textual CBR Approaches. In: Proceedings of the AAAI-98 Workshop on Textual Case-Based Reasoning (AAAI Technical Report WS-98-12). Pages 30–34. Madison, WI. Copyright 1998 by AAAI.
Kamal Nigam, Andrew McCallum, Sebastian Thrun, and Tom Mitchell. Learning to Classify Text from Labeled and Unlabled Documents. AAAI-98, 1998.
Stefanie Brüninghaus and Kevin D. Ashley (1997) Finding Factors: Learning to Classify Case Opinions Under Abstract Fact Categories. In: L. Karl Branting (editor). Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-97). Pages 123–131. Melbourne, Australia. Copyright 1997 by ACM, Inc.
Stefanie Brüninghaus and Kevin D. Ashley (1998) How Machine Learning Can be Beneficial for Textual Case-Based Reasoning. In: Proceedings of the AAAI-98/ICML-98 Workshop on Learning for Text Categorization (AAAI Technical Report WS-98-05). Pages 71–74. Madison, WI. Copyright 1998 by AAAI.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Varma, A. (2001). Managing Diagnostic Knowledge in Text Cases. In: Aha, D.W., Watson, I. (eds) Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development. ICCBR 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2080. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44593-5_44
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44593-5_44
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42358-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44593-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive