Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Specifying the Merging of Desires into Goals in the Context of Beliefs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
EurAsia-ICT 2002: Information and Communication Technology (EurAsia-ICT 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2510))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Rao and Georgeff’s BDIctl logic is a popular specification and verification language for cognitive agent systems, in which desires and goals are unified into a single motivational attitude. In this paper desires and goals are distinguished to specify the merging of desires into goals, an important process in several agent systems such as Broersen et al.’s BOID system. We therefore introduce a BDGIctl logic. Moreover, we distinguish the merging of conflicting motivational attitudes such as desires into goals from the merging of conflicting informational attitudes such as knowledge bases or belief sources into beliefs, for which we use recent results in variants of belief revision known as semi-revision, fusion or merging. In particular, whereas belief merging is a generalization of revision, desire merging is a generalization of a kind of contraction known as (severe) withdrawal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Booth. Social contraction and belief negotiation. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR2002), pages 375–384. Morgan Kaufmann, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Broersen, M. Dastani, and L. van der Torre. Realistic desires. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. Chellas. Modal Logic: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Konieczny and R. Pino Pérez. Merging with integrity constraints. In Proceedings of the Fifth European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU’99), volume 1638 of LNCS, pages 135–144, 1999. Extended version: S. Konieczny and R. Pino Pérez. Merging information under constraints: a qualitative framework. Journal of Logic and Computation, to appear.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Konieczny and R. Pino Pérez. On the frontier between arbitration and majority. In Proceedings of the Eigth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR’02), 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Kraus, K. Sycara, and A. Evenchik. Reaching agreements through argumentation; a logical model and implementation. Articial Intelligence, 104:1–69, 1998.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Lang, L. van der Torre, and E. Weydert. Two types of conflicts between desires (and how to resolve them). In Proceedings of GTDT2001, AAAI Spring Symposium, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  8. T. Meyer. On the semantics of combination operations. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, 11(1–2):59–84, 2001.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Rao and M. Georgeff. The semantics of intention maintenance for rational agents. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-95), pages 704–710, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A.S. Rao and M.P. Georgeff. Decision procedures for BDI logics. Journal of Logic and Computation, 8(3):293–342, 1998.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. H. Rott and M. Pagnucco. Severe withdrawal (and recovery). Journal of Philosophical Logic, 28:501–547, 1999.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. K. Schild. On the relationship between BDI logics and standard logics of concurrency. Autonomous Agents and Multi agent Systems, 3(3):259–283, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wooldridge M. J. and Jennings N. R. Software Engineering with Agents: Pitfalls and Pratfalls. IEEE Internet Computing, 3(3):20–27, May/June 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dastani, M., van der Torre, L. (2002). Specifying the Merging of Desires into Goals in the Context of Beliefs. In: Shafazand, H., Tjoa, A.M. (eds) EurAsia-ICT 2002: Information and Communication Technology. EurAsia-ICT 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2510. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36087-5_95

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36087-5_95

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00028-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36087-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics