Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Randomness versus Nondeterminism for Read-Once and Read-k Branching Programs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
STACS 2003 (STACS 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2607))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Recent breakthroughs have lead to strong methods for proving lower bounds on the size of branching programs (BPs) with quite weak restrictions. Nevertheless, lower bounds for the randomized and nondeterministic variants of the established BP models still offer many challenges. Here, the knowledge on the randomized case is extended as follows:

(i) The so-far open problem of proving that randomization with arbitrary bounded error can be weaker than nondeterminism for read-once BPs is solved in the following strong sense: It is shown that the so-called “weighted sum function” requires strongly exponential size for randomized read-once BPs with error bounded by any constant smaller than 1/2, while both the function and its complement have polynomial size for nondeterministic read-once BPs.

(ii) For randomized read-k BPs, an exponential lower bound for a natural, graph-theoretical function that is easy to compute nondeterministically is presented. This is the first such bound for the boolean BP model. The function cl3,n deciding whether an n-vertex graph contains a triangle is obviously easy for nondeterministic read-once BPs while its complement is known to require strongly exponential size in this model. It is proved here that the function still requires size 2ω(k -22-4kn) for randomized read-k BPs with error at most 2-c2 2k for some positive constant c.

Supported by DFG grant We 1066/9.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. F. Ablayev. Randomization and nondeterminism are incomparable for polynomial ordered binary decision diagrams. In Proc. of ICALP, LNCS 1256, 195–202. Springer, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Ajtai. Determinism versus non-determinism for linear time RAMs with memory restrictions. In Proc. of 31st STOC, 632–641, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Ajtai. A non-linear time lower bound for boolean branching programs. In Proc. of 40th FOCS, 60–70, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. Babai. The Fourier transform and equations over finite abelian groups. Lecture Notes, version 1.2, Dec. 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. Babai, P. Frankl, and J. Simon. Complexity classes in communication complexity theory. In Proc. of 27th FOCS, 337–347, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Beame, T. S. Jayram, and M. Saks. Time-space tradeoffs for branching programs. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 63(4):542–572, 2001.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. P. Beame, M. Saks, X. Sun, and E. Vee. Super-linear time-space tradeoff lower bounds for randomized computation. In Proc. of 41st FOCS, 169–179, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Beame and E. Vee. Time-space tradeoffs, multiparty communication complexity, and nearest neighbor problems. In Proc. of 34th STOC, 688–697, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  9. B. Bollig, M. Sauerho., I. Wegener. On the nonapproximability of boolean functions by OBDDs and read-k-times branching programs. Information and Computation, 178:263–278, 2002.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Borodin, A. A. Razborov, and R. Smolensky. On lower bounds for read-k-times branching programs. Computational Complexity, 3:1–18, 1993.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. P. Duriš, J. Hromkovič, S. Jukna, M. Sauerho., and G. Schnitger. On multipartition communication complexity. In Proc. of 18th STACS, LNCS 2010, 206–217. Springer, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Hromkovič and M. Sauerho.. Tradeoffs between nondeterminism and complexity for communication protocols and branching programs. In Proc. of 17th STACS, LNCS 1770, 145–156. Springer, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Jukna and G. Schnitger. On multi-partition communication complexity of triangle-freeness. Combinatorics, Probability amp; Computing 11(6):549–569, 2002.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. I. Kremer, N. Nisan, and D. Ron. On randomized one-round communication complexity. Computational Complexity, 8(1):21–49, 1999.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. I. Newman. Private vs. common random bits in communication complexity. Information Processing Letters, 39(2):67–71, 1991.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. E. A. Okol’nishnikova. On lower bounds for branching programs. Siberian Advances in Mathematics, 3(1):152–166, 1993.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Sauerhoff. Lower bounds for randomized read-k-times branching programs. In Proc. of 15th STACS, LNCS 1373, 105–115. Springer, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Sauerhoff. Complexity Theoretical Results for Randomized Branching Programs. PhD thesis, Univ. Dortmund. Shaker, Aachen, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. Sauerhoff. Approximation of boolean functions by combinatorial rectangles. ECCC, Technical Report 58, 2000. To appear in Theoretical Computer Science.

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Sauerhoff. On the size of randomized OBDDs and read-once branching programs for k-stable functions. Computational Complexity, 10:155–178, 2001.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. P. Savický and S. Žák. A read-once lower bound and a (1,+k)-hierarchy for branching programs. Theoretical Computer Science, 238(1–2):347–362, 2000.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. J. Simon and M. Szegedy. A new lower bound theorem for read-only-once branching programs and its applications. In J.-J. Cai, editor, Advances in Computational Complexity Theory, DIMACS Series in Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science 13, 183–193. American Mathematical Society, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. Thathachar. On separating the read-k-times branching program hierarchy. In Proc. of 30th STOC, 653–662, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  24. I. Wegener. Branching Programs and Binary Decision Diagrams-Theory and Applications. Monographs on Discrete and Applied Mathematics. SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sauerhoff, M. (2003). Randomness versus Nondeterminism for Read-Once and Read-k Branching Programs. In: Alt, H., Habib, M. (eds) STACS 2003. STACS 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2607. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36494-3_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36494-3_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00623-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36494-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics