Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

An Analysis of Three Puzzles in the Logic of Intention

  • Conference paper
AI 2006: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4304))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 3035 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper, we generalize our formal approach to modelling PRS agents away from PRS-specific assumptions to more general theories of rationality, while not losing the concreteness of the connection between an agent’s mental states and formal models, using three “puzzles” in the logic of intention to motivate our extended approach. We show how the theory can be used to represent solutions to the puzzles and draw out insights into how agent architectures may be extended to handle these more complex scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bratman, M.E.: Two Faces of Intention. The Philosophical Review 93, 375–405 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bratman, M.E.: Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bratman, M.E.: What is Intention? In: Cohen, P.R., Morgan, J., Pollack, M.E. (eds.) Intentions in Communication, MIT Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen, P.R., Levesque, H.J.: Intention is Choice with Commitment. Artificial Intelligence 42, 213–261 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen, P.R., Levesque, H.J.: Rational Interaction as the Basis for Communication. In: Cohen, P.R., Morgan, J., Pollack, M.E. (eds.) Intentions in Communication, MIT Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Emerson, E.A., Clarke, E.M.: Using Branching Time Temporal Logic to Synthesize Synchronization Skeletons. Science of Computer Programming 2, 241–266 (1982)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Georgeff, M.P., Lansky, A.L.: Reactive Reasoning and Planning. In: Proceedings of the Sixth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 1987), pp. 677–682 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Harel, D.: First-Order Dynamic Logic. Springer, Berlin (1979)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Israel, D.J., Perry, J.R., Tutiya, S.: Actions and Movements. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1060–1065 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kyburg Jr., H.E.: Probability and the Logic of Rational Belief. Wesleyan University Press, Middletown (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pollack, M.E.: Overloading Intentions for Efficient Practical Reasoning. Noûs 25, 513–536 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pollock, J.L.: Cognitive Carpentry. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pratt, V.R.: Semantical Considerations on Floyd-Hoare Logic. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 109–121 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: Modeling Rational Agents within a BDI-Architecture. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 1991), pp. 473–484 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: Asymmetry Thesis and Side-Effect Problems in Linear-Time and Branching-Time Intention Logics. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 498–504 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wobcke, W.R.: An Operational Semantics for a PRS-Like Agent Architecture. In: Stumptner, M., Corbett, D., Brooks, M. (eds.) AI 2001: Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Springer, Berlin (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wobcke, W.R.: Modelling PRS-Like Agents’ Mental States. In: Ishizuka, M., Sattar, A. (eds.) PRICAI 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2417, Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wobcke, W.R.: Intention and Rationality for PRS-Like Agents. In: McKay, B., Slaney, J. (eds.) AI 2002: Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Springer, Berlin (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wobcke, W.R.: Model Theory for PRS-Like Agents: Modelling Belief Update and Action Attempts. In: Zhang, C., Guesgen, H.W., Yeap, W.-K. (eds.) PRICAI 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3157, Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wobcke, W.R., Chee, M., Ji, K.: Model Checking for PRS-Like Agents. In: Zhang, S., Jarvis, R. (eds.) AI 2005: Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Springer, Berlin (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wooldridge, M.J.: Reasoning About Rational Agents. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wobcke, W. (2006). An Analysis of Three Puzzles in the Logic of Intention. In: Sattar, A., Kang, Bh. (eds) AI 2006: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. AI 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4304. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11941439_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11941439_44

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-49787-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49788-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics