Rule Quality Measures in Creation and Reduction of Data Rule Models

1. Ågotnes, T., Komorowski, J., Løken, T.: Taming Large Rule Models in Rough Set Approaches. In: Żytkow, J.M., Rauch, J. (eds.) PKDD 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1704, pp. 193–203. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

2. An, A., Cercone, N.: Rule quality measures for rule induction systems: Description and evaluation. Computational Intelligence 17(3) (2001)

   Google Scholar 

3. Bayardo, R.J., Agrawal, R.: Mining the most interesting rules. In: Proc. of the Fifth ACM-SIGKDD Int’l Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 145–154 (1999)

   Google Scholar 

4. Bruha, I.: Quality of Decision Rules: Definitions and Classification Schemes for Multiple Rules. In: Nakhaeizadeh, G., Taylor, C.C. (eds.) Machine Learning and Statistics, The Interface. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (1997)

   Google Scholar 

5. Brzezińska, I., Słowiński, R.: Monotonicity of Bayesian confirmation measure in rule support and confidence. In: Proc. of the AI-METH, Gliwice, November 16-18 (2005)

   Google Scholar 

6. Grzymała-Busse, J.: LERS – a system for learning from examples based on rough sets. In: Słowiński, R. (ed.) Intelligent Decision Support, pp. 3–18. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1992)

   Google Scholar 

7. Greco, S., Pawlak, Z., Slowinski, R.: Can Bayesian confirmation measures be useful for rough set decision rules. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 17, 345–361 (2004)

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Słowiński, R.: Rough Membership and Bayesian Confirmation Measures for Parameterized Rough Sets. In: Ślęzak, D., Wang, G., Szczuka, M.S., Düntsch, I., Yao, Y. (eds.) RSFDGrC 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3641, pp. 314–324. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

9. Kaufman, K.A., Michalski, R.S.: Learning in Inconsistent World, Rule Selection in STAR/AQ18, Machine Learning and Inference Laboratory Report P99-2 (1999)

   Google Scholar 

10. MLDB, http://www.ics.uci.edu/~mlearn/MLRepository.html

11. Nguyen, H.S., Nguyen, S.H.: Some Efficient Algorithms for Rough Set Methods. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference, Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems, Granada, Spain, vol. 2, pp. 1451–1456 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

12. Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets. Theoretical aspects of reasoning about data. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

13. Sikora, M.: An algorithm for generalization of decision rules by joining. Foundation on Computing and Decision Sciences 30(3) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

14. Sikora, M.: Approximate decision rules induction algorithm using rough sets and rule-related quality measures. Archives of Theoretical and Applied Informatics (4) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

15. Sikora, M.: Filtering of decision rules sets using rules quality measures. Studia Informatica, Gliwice 46(4) (2001)

    Google Scholar 

16. Sikora, M., Proksa, P.: Induction of decision and association rules for knowledge discovery in industrial databases. In: DM-IEEE, Workshop – Alternative Techniques of Data Mining, Brighton, November 01-04 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

17. Skowron, A., Stepaniuk, J.: Tolerance approximation spaces. Fundamenta Informaticae 27, 245–253 (1996)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

18. Stefanowski, J.: Rules induction algorithms in knowledge discovery. Habilitation thesis. Poznan University of Technology, Dissertations No. 361 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

19. Zhong, N., Skowron, A.: A rough set-based knowledge discovery process. Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. 11(3), 603–619 (2001)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references