Abstract
This paper presents an approach to the prediction of mineral prospectivity that provides an assessment of uncertainty. Two feed-forward backpropagation neural networks are used for the prediction. One network is used to predict degrees of favourability for deposit and another one is used to predict degrees of likelihood for barren, which is opposite to deposit. These two types of values are represented in the form of truth-membership and false-membership, respectively. Uncertainties of type error in the prediction of these two memberships are estimated using multidimensional interpolation. These two memberships and their uncertainties are combined to predict mineral deposit locations. The degree of uncertainty of type vagueness for each cell location is estimated and represented in the form of indeterminacy-membership value. The three memberships are then constituted into an interval neutrosophic set. Our approach improves classification performance compared to an existing technique applied only to the truth-membership value.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brown, W.M., Gedeon, T.D., Groves, D.I., Barnes, R.G.: Artificial neural networks: A new method for mineral prospectivity mapping. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences 47, 757–770 (2000)
Skabar, A.: Mineral potential mapping using feed-forward neural networks. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, vol. 3, pp. 1814–1819 (2003)
Fung, C., Iyer, V., Brown, W., Wong, K.: Comparing the performance of different neural networks architectures for the prediction of mineral prospectivity. In: Yeung, D.S., Liu, Z.-Q., Wang, X.-Z., Yan, H. (eds.) ICMLC 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3930, pp. 394–398. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Duckham, M., Sharp, J.: Uncertainty and geographic information: Computational and critical convergence. In: Representing GIS, pp. 113–124. John Wiley, New York (2005)
Fisher, P.F.: Models of uncertainty in spatial data. In: Geographical Information Systems: Principles, Techniques, Management and Applications, 2nd edn., vol. 1, pp. 69–83. John Wiley, Chichester (2005)
Wang, H., Madiraju, D., Zhang, Y.Q., Sunderraman, R.: Interval neutrosophic sets. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics 3, 1–18 (2005)
Wang, H., Smarandache, F., Zhang, Y.Q., Sunderraman, R.: Interval Neutrosophic Sets and Logic: Theory and Applications in Computing. Neutrosophic Book Series, No.5 (2005), http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0505014
MATHWORKS: MATLAB Mathematics Version 7. The MathWorks Inc., Natick (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kraipeerapun, P., Fung, C.C., Brown, W., Wong, K.W., Gedeon, T. (2006). Uncertainty in Mineral Prospectivity Prediction. In: King, I., Wang, J., Chan, LW., Wang, D. (eds) Neural Information Processing. ICONIP 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4233. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11893257_93
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11893257_93
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-46481-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46482-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)