Abstract
Policy makers and public managers want and need to know how well government programs perform, but few have the information to accurately and continuously evaluate them. Performance measurement and performance-based decisions can be improved by more sophisticated information systems designed to support analysis and decision making. However, such systems demand close and continuing involvement of program staff, attention to programmatic context, and much better understanding of business processes and the data they generate. Through the example of the prototype Homeless Information Management System, this paper highlights how challenging these issues are and how attention to them can lead to useful and usable performance analysis and evaluation systems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
De Lancer Julnes, P.D., Holzer, M.: Promoting the utilization of performance measures in public organizations: an empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation. Public Administration Review 61(6), 693–709 (2001)
Newcomber, K.E.: Evaluating public programs. In: Perry, J.L. (ed.) Handbook of Public Administration, 2nd edn. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1998)
Drucker, P.: Management: tasks, responsibilities, practices. Harper & Row, New York (1973)
Thompson, J.R.: The dual potentialities of performance measurement: the case of the Social Security Administration. Public Productivity and Management Review 23(3), 267–281 (2000)
Nyhan, R.C., Martin, L.L.: Comparative Performance Measurement: A Primer on Data Envelopment Analysis. Public Performance and Management Review 22(3), 348–364 (1999)
Flynn, P., Curran, K., Lunne, T.: A decision support system for telecommunications. International Journal of Network Management 12, 69–80 (2002)
Liang, L.Y., Miranda, R.: Dashboards and Scorecards: Executive Information systems for the Public Sector. Government Finance Review (2001)
Cloete, F.: Assessing governance with electronic policy management tools. Public Performance and Management Review 26(3), 276–290 (2003)
Goddard, S., et al.: Geospatial Decision Support for Drought Risk Management. Communications of the ACM 46(1), 35–37 (2003)
Lee, S.M., Eom, H.B.: Multiple Criteria Decision Support Systems: The Powerful Tool for Attacking Complex, Unstructured Decisions. Systems Practice 3(1), 51–65 (1990)
Keen, P., Scott Morton, M.S.: Decision Support Systems: An Organizational Perspective. Addison Wesley, Reading (1978)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dawes, S.S., Pardo, T.A. (2006). Maximizing Knowledge for Program Evaluation: Critical Issues and Practical Challenges of ICT Strategies. In: Wimmer, M.A., Scholl, H.J., Grönlund, Å., Andersen, K.V. (eds) Electronic Government. EGOV 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4084. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11823100_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11823100_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-37686-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-37687-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)