Additive Preference Model with Piecewise Linear Components Resulting from Dominance-Based Rough Set Approximations

1. Boros, E., Hammer, P.L., Ibaraki, T., Kogan, A., Mayoraz, E., Muchnik, I.: An Implementation of Logical Analysis of Data. IEEE Trans. on Knowledge and Data Engineering 12, 292–306 (2000)

   Article  Google Scholar 

2. Dembczyński, K., Pindur, R., Susmaga, R.: Generation of Exhaustive Set of Rules within Dominance-based Rough Set Approach. Electr. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 82(4) (2003)

   Google Scholar 

3. Dembczyński, K., Greco, S., Słowiński, R.: Second-order Rough Approximations in Multi-criteria Classification with Imprecise Evaluations and Assignments. In: Ślęzak, D., Wang, G., Szczuka, M., Düntsch, I., Yao, Y. (eds.) RSFDGrC 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3641, pp. 54–63. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

4. Frank, E., Witten, I.H.: Data Mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2005)

   MATH  Google Scholar 

5. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Słowiński, R.: Rough approximation of a preference relation by dominance relations. European Journal of Operational Research 117, 63–83 (1999)

   Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

6. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Słowiński, R.: Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 129, 1–47 (2001)

   Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

7. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Słowiński, R.: Axiomatic characterization of a general utility function and its particular cases in terms of conjoint measurement and rough-set decision rules. European Journal of Operational Research 158, 271–292 (2004)

   Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

8. Jacquet-Lagréze, E., Siskos, Y.: Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision making: The UTA method. European Journal of Operational Research 10, 151–164 (1982)

   Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

9. Jacquet-Lagréze, E.: An application of the UTA discriminant model for the evaluation of R&D projects. In: Pardalos, P.M., Siskos, Y., Zopounidis, C. (eds.) Advances in multicriteria analysis, pp. 203–211. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1995)

   Google Scholar 

10. Newman, D.J., Hettich, S., Blake, C.L., Merz, C.J. (eds.): UCI Repository of machine learning databases. Department of Information and Computer Science. University of California, Irvine (1998), http://www.ics.uci.edu/~mlearn/MLRepository.html

11. Skowron, A., Rauszer, C.: The discernibility matrices and functions in information systems. In: Slowinski, R. (ed.) Intelligent Decision Support. Handbook of Applications and Advances of the Rough Set Theory, pp. 331–362. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1992)

    Google Scholar 

12. Słowiński, R., Greco, S., Matarazzo, B.: Axiomatization of utility, outranking and decision-rule preference models for multiple-criteria classification problems under partial inconsistency with the dominance principle. Control & Cybernetics 31, 1005–1035 (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

13. Słowiński, R., Greco, S., Matarazzo, B.: Rough Set Based Decision Support. In: Burke, E., Kendall, G. (eds.) Introductory Tutorials on Optimization, Search and Decision Support Methodologies, ch. 16, Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

14. Vapnik, V.: The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer, New York (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

15. Zopounidis, C., Doumpos, M.: PREFDIS: a multicriteria decision support system for sorting decision problems. Computers & Operations Research 27, 779–797 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references