Abstract
In this paper we introduce three methods to approach philosophical problems informationally: Minimalism, the Method of Abstraction and Constructionism. Minimalism considers the specifications of the starting problems and systems that are tractable for a philosophical analysis. The Method of Abstraction describes the process of making explicit the level of abstraction at which a system is observed and investigated. Constructionism provides a series of principles that the investigation of the problem must fulfil once it has been fully characterised by the previous two methods. For each method, we also provide an application: the problem of visual perception, functionalism, and the Turing Test, respectively.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bechtel, W., Mundale, J.: Multiple realizability revisited: Linking cognitive and neural states. Philosophy of Science 66, 175–207 (1999)
Brooks, R.A.: Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence 47(1-3), 139–159 (1991)
Chalmers, D.J.: The Conscious Mind: in Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1996)
Child, A.: Making and knowing in hobbes, vico, and dewey. University of California Publications in Philosophy 16(13), 271–310 (1953)
Cordeschi, R.: The Discovery of the Artificial: Behavior, Mind, and Machines Before and Beyond Cybernetics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)
Floridi, L.: What is the philosophy of information? Metaphilosophy 33(1-2), 123–145 (2002)
Floridi, L.: On the logical unsolvability of the gettier problem. Synthese 142(1), 61–79 (2004)
Floridi, L.: Open problems in the philosophy of information. Metaphilosophy 35(4), 554–582 (2004)
Floridi, L., Sanders, J.W.: The method of abstraction. In: Negrotti, M. (ed.) Yearbook of the Artificial. Nature, Culture and Technology. Models in contemporary sciences, vol. 2, pp. 177–220. P. Lang, Bern (2004)
Gibson, J.J.: The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1979)
Greco, G.M., Paronitti, G., Turilli, M., Floridi, L.: The philosophy of information - a methodological point of view. In: Althoff, K.D., Dengel, A., Bergmann, R., Nick, M., Roth-Berghofer, T. (eds.) WM 2005: Professional Knowledge Management. Experiences and Visions, pp. 563–570. DFKI GmbH, Kaiserslautern (2005)
Grim, P.: Computational modeling as a philosophical methodology. In: Floridi, L. (ed.) The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Computing and Information, pp. 337–349. Blackwell, Oxford (2003)
Adams, M.M.: William Ockham. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame (1987)
Newell, A., Simon, H.A.: Computer science as empirical enquiry: Symbols and search. Communications of the ACM 19(3), 113–126 (1976)
Noé, A., Thompson, E. (eds.): Vision and Mind: Selected Readings in the Philosophy of Perception. MIT Press, Cambridge (2002)
Pérez-Ramos, A.: Francis Bacon’s Idea of Science and the Maker’s Knowledge Tradition. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1988)
Putnam, H.: Psychological predicates. In: Captain, W.H., Merrill, D.D. (eds.) Art, Mind and Religion. Pittsburgh University Press, Pittsburgh (1967)
Quine, W.V.O.: Two dogmas of empiricism. The Philosophical Review 60(1), 20–43 (1951)
Raftopoulos, A.: Cartesian analysis and synthesis. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part A 34(2), 265–308 (2003)
Rasmussen, S., Barrett, C.L.: Elements of a theory of simulation. In: Moràn, F., Moreno, J.J., Merelo, P., Chacòn, P. (eds.) ECAL 1995. Advances in Artificial Life: Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Artificial Life, pp. 515–529. Springer, Berlin (1995)
de Roever, W.P., Engelhardt, K.: Data Refinement: Model-oriented Proof Methods and their Comparison. Cambridge tracts in theoretical computer science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)
Turing, A.M.: Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 49(236), 433–460 (1950)
Zeigler, B.P.: Theory of Modelling and Simulation. Wiley, New York (1976)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Greco, G.M., Paronitti, G., Turilli, M., Floridi, L. (2005). How to Do Philosophy Informationally. In: Althoff, KD., Dengel, A., Bergmann, R., Nick, M., Roth-Berghofer, T. (eds) Professional Knowledge Management. WM 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3782. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11590019_70
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11590019_70
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-30465-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31620-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)