Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Experience with Ripple-Down Rules

  • Conference paper
Applications and Innovations in Intelligent Systems XIII (SGAI 2005)

Abstract

Ripple-Down Rules (RDR) is an approach to building knowledge-based systems (KBS) incrementally, while the KBS is in routine use. Domain experts build rules as a minor extension to their normal duties, and are able to keep refining rules as KBS requirements evolve. Commercial RDR systems are now used routinely in some Chemical Pathology laboratories to provide interpretative comments to assist clinicians make the best use of laboratory reports. This paper presents usage data from one laboratory where, over a 29 month period, over 16,000 rules were added and 6,000,000 cases interpreted. The clearest evidence that this facility is highly valuable to the laboratory is the on-going addition of new knowledge bases and refinement of existing knowledge bases by the chemical pathologists.

This paper describes results generated by Labwizard, a software system produced by Pacific Knowledge Systems (PKS). The first author has a small shareholding in PKS, while the other authors are employees and hold shares and/or options in PKS; thus all may benefit from any increased reputation of Labwizard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buchanan, B. Expert systems: working systems and the research literature. Expert Systems 1986; 3: 32–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Compton, P., Horn, R., Quinlan, R., and Lazarus, L., Maintaining an expert system. In: Quinlan, J.R. (ed) Applications of Expert Systems, Addison-Wesley, 1989, pp 366–385

    Google Scholar 

  3. Edwards, G., Compton, P., Malor, R., Srinivasan, A., and Lazarus, L. PEIRS: a pathologist maintained expert system for the interpretation of chemical pathology reports. Pathology 1993; 25: 27–34

    Google Scholar 

  4. Compton, P. and Jansen, R. A philosophical basis for knowledge acquisition. Knowledge Acquisition 1990; 2: 241–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Richards, D. and Compton, P. Taking up the situated cognition challenge with ripple down rules. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 1998; 49: 895–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Beydoun, G. and Hoffmann, A. Theoretical basis for hierarchical incremental knowledge acquisition. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 2001; 54(3): 407–452

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Cao, T.M. and Compton, P. A simulation framework for knowledge acquisition evaluation. In: V. Estivill-Castro (ed) Twenty-Eighth Australasian Computer Science Conference (ACSC2005), Newcastle, 2005, pp 353–360

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yoshida, T., Motoda, H., and Washio, T. Adaptive ripple down rules method based on minimum description length principle. In: Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM 2002), IEEE Computer Society, 2002, pp 530–537

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kang, B., Compton, P., and Preston, P. Multiple classification ripple down rules. In: Mizoguchi, R. (ed) Proceedings of the Third Japanese Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop (JKAW’94), Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, 1994, pp 197–212

    Google Scholar 

  10. Compton, P., Edwards, G., Lazarus, L., Peters, L., and Harries, M., Knowledge based system, U.S Patent 6,553,361, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Compton, P., Preston, P., Kang, B., and Yip, T. Local patching produces compact knowledge bases. In: Steels, L. Schreiber, G. and Van de Velde (eds) W. A Future for Knowledge Acquisition: Proceedings of EKAW’94, Springer Verlag, 1994, pp 104–117

    Google Scholar 

  12. Suryanto, H., Richards, D., and Compton, P. The automatic compression of multiple classification ripple down rule knowledge base systems: preliminary experiments. In: Jain, L. (ed) Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information Engineering Systems. (IEEE Cat. No. 99TH8410), 1999, pp 203–206

    Google Scholar 

  13. Suryanto, H. and Compton, P. Discovery of ontologies from knowledge bases. In: Gil, Y. Musen, M. and Shavlik, J. (eds) Proceedings of the First International Conference on Knowledge Capture, ACM, New York, 2001, pp 171–178

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Compton, P., Peters, L., Edwards, G., Lavers, T.G. (2006). Experience with Ripple-Down Rules. In: Macintosh, A., Ellis, R., Allen, T. (eds) Applications and Innovations in Intelligent Systems XIII. SGAI 2005. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-224-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-224-1_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-223-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-224-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics