Abstract
Analysis and development techniques have played an important role in information systems, providing support for developers in structuring and directing tasks. They also provide cognitive support in collecting, collating, analyzing, and representing information about system requirements and attributes. However, by developing previous work further, in particular by classifying techniques into six generic types and transcribing these onto problem/solution space diagrams, this paper argues that by directing tasks and dictating what and how information is collected and represented, techniques can bias developers’ understanding of system requirements and attributes.
The 1984 IFIPWG8.2 conference showed how IS can be informed by literature in our foundation disciplines. By drawing on the psychology literature to develop a classification of techniques, this paper shows some of the potential biases inherent in techniques. The classification is applied to many techniques which have contributed to development activity. Through an understanding of the conceptual blocks embedded in them, the paper hopes to inform practice about the selection and mixing of development techniques. More generally, the paper suggests a reexamination of our assumptions when undertaking IS development.
The techniques that limit problem and solution scope most and also provide the most cognitive and conceptual biases are the more formal, objective ones, and we recommend that less formal techniques are also used in practice. Parallels can be drawn with the movement encouraging the use of qualitative research approaches in IS research inspired by the 1984 conference. Research methods and techniques also provide support in the form of directed tasks, activities, guidance on data collection, analysis, and representation. Drawing on this parallel, it could be argued that quantitative, formal research approaches may introduce more conceptual biases than less formal qualitative, approaches, and that the latter should be used instead of, or at least alongside, quantitative approaches.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Psychology Literature
- Information System Development
- Lateral Thinking
- Category Inclusion
- Problem Understanding
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Adams, C., and Avison, D. E. “Dangers Inherent in the Use of Techniques: Identifying Framing Influences,” IT and People (16:2), 2003, pp. 203–234.
Adams, C., and Avison, D. E. “Macro Analysis of Techniques to Deal with Uncertainty in Information Systems Development: Mapping Representational Framing Influences,” in D. Bustard, W. Liu, and R. Sterritt (Eds.), Soft-Ware 2002: Computing in an Imperfect World, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2002, pp. 280–299.
Adams, J. Conceptual Blockbusting: A Guide to Better Ideas, Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books, 1987.
Anderson, J. R. “Skill Acquisition: Compilation of Weak-Method Problem Solutions,” Psychological Review (94), 1987, pp. 192–210.
Anderson, J. R., and Bower, G. H. Human Associative Memory, Washington, DC: Winston, 1973.
Andrew, J., and Moss, T. Reliability and Risk Assessment, Harlow, England: Longman Scientific and Technical, 1993.
Avison, D.E., and Fitzgerald, G. Information Systems Development: Methodologies, Techniques and Tools (3 rd ed.), London: McGraw-Hill, 2003.
Batiste, J., and Jung, J. “Requirements, Needs, and Priorities: A Structured Approach for Determining MIS Project Definition,” MIS Quarterly (8:4), 1984, pp. 215–227.
Beard, R. Risk Theory, London: Methuen, 1969.
Bennet, P.; Cropper, S.; and Huxham, C. “Modeling Interactive Decision: The Hypergame Focus,” in J. Rosenhead (Ed.), Rational Analysis for a Problematic World: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and Conflict, Chichester, England: John Wiley and Sons, 1992, pp. 283–314.
Bicheno, J. The Quality 50: A Guide to Gurus, Tools, Wastes, Techniques and Systems, Buckingham, England: PICSIE Books, 1994.
Camden. Guidelines to the Establishment of Hazards Analysis and Critical Control Points, Technical Manual 19, Camden Food and Drink Association, Glouchestershire, UK, 1987.
Carley, M. Rational Techniques in Policy Analysis, Aldershot, England: Gower Publishing, 1980.
Chapman, C. B. “Model and Situation Specific OR Methods: Risk Engineering Reliability Analysis of LNG Facility,” Journal of Operational Research (35:1), 1984, page 27.
Chapman, C. B. “Risk Management,” Project Management (18), 1990, p. 5.
Checkland, P. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Chichester, England: John Wiley, 1981.
Clark, C. Brainstorming: The Dynamic New Way to Create Successful Ideas, Garden City, NY: Doubleday and Co, Inc., 1958.
Condon, R. J. Data Processing Systems Analysis and Design, Reston, VA: Reston Publishing Company, 1974.
Couger, D. Creative Problem Solving and Opportunity, Danvers, MA: Boyd and Fraser Publishing, 1995.
Couger, D.; Higgins, L.; and McIntyre, S. “(Un)Structured Creativity in Information Systems Organizations,” MIS Quarterly (18:4), December 1993, pp. 375–397.
Couger, J. D., and Knapp R. W. (Eds.). System Analysis Techniques, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1974.
Daniels, A., and Yeates, D. Basic Training in Systems Analysis (2 nd ed.), London: Pitman Publishing, 1971.
de Bono, E. Lateral Thinking: A Textbook of Creativity, Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books Ltd., 1977.
de Bono, E. The Mechanism of Mind, Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books Ltd., 1969.
de Bono, E. The Use of Lateral Thinking, Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books Ltd., 1970.
Eden, C. “Using Cognitive Mapping for Strategic Options Development and Analysis (SODA),” in J. Rosenhead (Ed.), Rational Analysis for a Problematic World: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and Conflict, Chichester, England: John Wiley and Sons, 1992, pp. 21–42.
Fagan, M. “Design and Code Inspections to Reduce Errors in Program Development,” IBM Systems Journal (15:3), 1976, pp. 182–211.
FitzGerald, J. Fundamentals of Systems Analysis (2 nd ed.), Chichester, England: John Wiley and Sons, 1981.
Flynn, D. J. Information Systems Requirements: Determination and Analysis, London: McGraw-Hill, 1992.
Fortune, J., and Peters, G. Learning from Failure: The Systems Approach, Chichester England: John Wiley and Wiley, 1995.
Friend, J. K., and Hickling, A. Planning Under Pressure: The Strategic Choice Approach, Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1997.
Gabbay, D., and Hunter, A. “Making Inconsistency Respectable: A Logical Framework for Inconsistency Reasoning,” Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (535), 1991, London: Imperial College, London, 1991, pp. 19–32.
Gane, C. P. Structured Systems Analysis: Tools and Techniques, London: Prentice-Hall, 1979.
Gajpal, P. P.; Ganesh, L. S.; and Rajendran, C. “Criticality Analysis of Spare Parts Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process,” International Journal of Production Economics (35), 1994, pp. 293–297.
Geschka, H. “Creativity Techniques in Germany,” Creativity and Innovation Management (5:2), 1996, pp. 87–92.
Gillam, B “The Status of Perceptual Grouping: 70 Years after Wertheimer,” Australian Journal of Psychology (44:3), 1992, pp. 157–162.
Grey, S. Practical Risk Assessment for Project Management, Chichester, England: John Wiley and Sons, 1995.
Groth, J., and Peters, J. “What Blocks Creativity? A Managerial Perspective,” Creativity and Innovation Management (8:3), 1999, pp. 179–187.
Honderich, T. (Ed.). The Oxford Companion to Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
Howard, N. “Metagame Analysis,” in J. Rosenhead (Ed.), Rational Analysis for a Problematic World: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and Conflict. Chichester, England: John Wiley and Sons, 1992, pp. 249–265.
Jantsch, E. Technological Forecasting in Perspective, Report for the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Paris, 1967.
Kerr, N. L.; MacCoun, R. J.; and Kramer, G. P. “Bias in Judgement: Comparing Individuals and Groups,” Psychological Review (103:4), 1996, pp. 687–719.
Kindred, A. R. Data Systems and Management: An Introduction to Systems Analysis and Design (2nd ed.), London: Prentice-Hall, 1980.
Land, F. “Adapting to Changing User Requirements,” Information and Management (5), 1982, pp. 59–75.
Lederer, A., and Nath, R. “Managing Organizational Issues in Information System Development,” Journal of Systems Management (42:11), 1991, pp. 23–39
Lee, B. Basic Systems Analysis (2 nd ed.), London: Hutchinson, 1984.
Lee, B. (Ed.). Introducing Systems Analysis and Design, Manchester, England: NCC Publications, 1979.
Lott, R. W. Basic Systems Analysis, London: Canfield Press, 1971.
Martin, C.; Vu, H.; Kellas, G.; and Metcalf, K. “Strength of Discourse Context as a Determinant of the Subordinate Bias Effect,” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (52A:4), 1999, pp. 813–839.
Mayer, R. E. Thinking, Problem Solving, Cognition (2 nd ed.), New York: W. H. Freeman and Company, 1996.
Mulligan, N. W. “The Effects of Perceptual Inference at Encoding on Organization and Order: Investigating the Roles of Item-Specific and Relational Information,” Journal of Experimental Psychology (25:1), 1999, pp. 54–69.
NCC. From the White Heat of Technology to the Knowledge E-conomy, 1966–2001, National Computer Centre: Manchester, England: NCC Publications, 2001 (available online at http://www.ncc.co.uk/aboutncc/pdfs/ncc351.pdf).
NCC. Introducing Systems Analysis and Design, Volume 1, National Computing Centre, Manchester, England: NCC Publications, 1978.
Obolensky, N. Practical Business Re-engineering: Tools and Techniques for Achieving Effective Change, London: Kogan Page, 1995.
Pinto, J., and Slevin, D. “Critical Success Factors in Successful Project Implementation,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management (EM 34:1), 1987, pp. 22–27.
Poole, M.S. “Do We Have Any Theories of Group Communication?,” Communication Studies (41:3), 1990, pp. 237–247.
Puccio, G. “Creative Problem Solving Preferences: Their Identification and Implications,” Creativity and Innovation Management (8:3), 1999, pp. 171–178.
Rosenhead, J. “Robustness Analysis: Keeping your Options Open,” in J. Rosenhead (Ed.), Rational Analysis for a Problematic World: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainly and Conflict, Chichester, England: John Wiley and Sons, 1992, pp. 193–218.
Rosenhead, J., and Mingers, J. (Eds.). Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity and Conflict (2 nd ed.), Chichester, England: John Wiley and Sons, 2001.
Sauer, C. Why Information Systems Fail: A Case Study Approach, Henley, England: Alfred Waller, 1993.
Senn, J. A. Analysis and Design of Information Systems (2 nd ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill, 1989.
Sloman, S. A. “Categorical Inference Is Not a Tree: The Myth of Inheritance Hierarchies,” Cognitive Psychology (35), 1998, pp. 1–33
Stanovich, K. E., and West, R. F. “Discrepancies between Normative and Descriptive Models of Decision-Making and the Understanding/Acceptance Principle,” Cognitive Psychology (38), 1999, pp. 349–385.
Teigen, K. H. “The Language of Uncertainty,” Acta Psychologica (68), 1988, pp. 27–38.
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. “The Framing of Decision and the Rationality of Choice,” Science (221), 1981, pp. 453–458.
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. “Judgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases,” Science (185), 1974, pp. 1124–1131.
Vesely, S. “A Time-Dependent Methodology for Fault Tree Evaluation,” Nuclear Engineering and Design (13), 1970, pp. 337–360.
Vollmeyer, R.; Burns, B. D.; and Holyoak, K. J. “The Impact of Goal Specificity on Strategy Use and the Acquisition of Problem Structure,” Cognitive Science (20), 1996, pp. 75–100.
Waddington, C. H. Tools for Thought, St. Albans, UK: Paladin, Frogmore, 1977.
Wertheimer, M. “Untersuchunngen zur lehre von der Gestalt,” Psychologischo Forshung (4), 1923, pp. 301–350.
Wetherbe. J. C. Systems Analysis for Computer-Based Information Systems, St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company, 1979.
Yourdon, E., and Constantine, T. Structure Design: Fundamentals of a Discipline of Computer Program and Systems Design, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1979.
Yeates, D. An Introduction to Systems Analysis and Design, Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press, 1973.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Adams, C., Avison, D.E. (2004). Reflection on Development Techniques Using the Psychology Literature: Over Two Decades of Bias and Conceptual Blocks. In: Kaplan, B., Truex, D.P., Wastell, D., Wood-Harper, A.T., DeGross, J.I. (eds) Information Systems Research. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, vol 143. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-8095-6_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-8095-6_27
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8094-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8095-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive