Whatever Happened to Information Systems Ethics?

• Adam, A. “Computer Ethics in a Different Voice,” Information and Organization (11:4), 2001a, pp. 235–261.

  Google Scholar 

• Adam, A. “Gender and Computer Ethics,” in R. Spinello and H. Tavani (Eds.), Readings in Cyberethics, Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett, 2001b, pp. 63–76.

  Google Scholar 

• Adam, A., and Bell, F. “Critical Information Systems Ethics,” in C. H. C. Gilson, I. Grugulis, and H. Willmott (Eds.), Proceedings of the CMS3—Third International Critical Management Studies Conference, Lancaster University Management School, Bailrigg, Lancaster, UK, 2003 (available online at http://www.mngt.waikato.ac.nz/research/ejrot/cmsconference/2003/proceedings/exploringthemeaning/Adam.pdf).

• Alavi, M., and Leidner, D. E. “Research Commentary: Technology-Mediated Learning—A Call for Greater Depth and Breadth of Research,” Information Systems Research (12:1), 2001, pp. 1–10.

  Google Scholar 

• Anderson, R. E.; Engel, G.; Gotterbarn, D.; Hertlein, G. C.; Hoffman, A.; Jawer, B.; Johnson, D. G.; Lidtke, D. K.; Little, J. C.; Martin, D.; Parker, D. B.; Perrolle, J. A.; and Rosenberg, R. S. “ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct,” Communications of the ACM (35:5), 1992, pp. 94–99.

  Google Scholar 

• Anderson, R. E.; Johnson, D. G.; Gotterbarn, D.; and Perrolle, J. “Using the New ACM Code of Ethics in Decision-Making,” Communications of the ACM (36:2), 1993, pp. 98–107.

  Google Scholar 

• Archer, M., and Tritter, J. Rational Choice Theory, London: Routledge, 2000.

  Google Scholar 

• Ba, S. L.; Stallaert, J.; and Whinston, A. B. “Research Commentary: Introducing a Third Dimension in Information Systems Ddesign the Case for Incentive Alignment,” Information Systems Research (12:3), 2001, pp. 225–239.

  Google Scholar 

• Basu, A., and Kumar, A. “Research Commentary: Workflow Management Issues in EBusiness,” Information Systems Research (13:1), 2002, pp. 1–14.

  Google Scholar 

• Benbasat, I., and Weber, R. “Research Commentary: Rethinking ‘Diversity’ in Information Systems Research,” Information Systems Research (7:4), 1996, pp. 389–399.

  Google Scholar 

• Benhabib, S. Situating the Self, Gender, Community and Postmodern Contemporary Ethics, Cambridge, MA: Polity, 1992.

  Google Scholar 

• Berdichevsky, D., and Neunschwander, E. “Toward an Ethics of Persuasive Technology: Ask Yourself Whether Your Technology Persuades Users to Do Something You Wouldn’t Want to Be Persuaded to Do Yourself,” Communications of the ACM (42:5), 1999, Pp. 51–58.

  Google Scholar 

• Bowen, J. “The Ethics of Safety-Critical Systems,” Communications of the ACM (43:4), 2000, pp. 91–97.

  Google Scholar 

• Chatzoglou, P. D. “Use of Methodologies: An Empirical Analysis of Their Impact on the Economics of the Development Process,” European Journal of Information Systems (6:4), 1997, pp. 256–270.

  Google Scholar 

• Checkland, P., and Scholes, J. Soft Systems Methodology in Action, Chichester, England: Wiley, 1990.

  Google Scholar 

• Collins, W. R.; Miller, K. W.; Spielman, B. J.; and Wherry, P. “How Good Is Good Enough?,” Communications of the ACM (37:1), 1994, pp. 81–91.

  Google Scholar 

• Denning, P. J. “Plagiarism in the Web,” Communications of the ACM (38:12), 1995, pp. 29–29.

  Google Scholar 

• Duncan, G. T. “Is My Research Ethical?,” Communications of the ACM (39:12), 1996, pp. 67–68.

  Google Scholar 

• Ehn, P., and Kyng, M. “The Collective Resource Approach to Systems Design,” in G. Bjerknes, P. Ehn, and M. Kyng (Eds.), Computers and Democracy: A Scandinavian Challenge, Aldershot, England: Avebury, 1987, pp. 17–57.

  Google Scholar 

• Farber, D. J. “NSF Poses Code of Networking Ethics,” Communications of the ACM (32:6), 1989, pp. 688–688.

  Google Scholar 

• Fitzgerald, B. “Formalized Systems Development Methodologies: A Critical Perspective,” The Information Systems Journal (6:1), 1996, pp. 3–23.

  Google Scholar 

• Fitzgerald, B. “The Use of Systems Development Methodologies in Practice: A Field Study,” Information Systems Journal (7:3), 1997, pp. 201–212.

  Google Scholar 

• Floridi, L. Philosophy and Computing: An Introduction, London: Routledge, 1999.

  Google Scholar 

• Floyd, C. “Outline of a Paradigm Change in Software Engineering,” in G. Bjerknes, P. Ehn, and M. Kyng (Eds.), Computers and Democracy: A Scandinavian Challenge, Aldershot, England: Avebury 1987, pp. 191–210.

  Google Scholar 

• Goodland, M., and Slater, C. SSADM Version 4: A Practical Approach, New York: McGraw Hill, 1995.

  Google Scholar 

• Gotterbarn, D. “Software Engineering: A New Professionalism,” in C. Myers, T. Hall, and D. Pitt (Ed.), The Responsible Software Engineer: Selected Readings in IT Professionalism, London: Springer-Verlag, 1997, pp. 21–31.

  Google Scholar 

• Gotterbarn, D.; Miller, K.; and Rogerson, S. “Software Engineering Code of Ethics,” Communications of the ACM (40:11), 1997, pp. 110–116.

  Google Scholar 

• Gotterbarn, D.; Miller, K.; and Rogerson, S. “Software Engineering Code of Ethics is Approved,” Communications of the ACM (42:10), 1999, pp. 102–107.

  Google Scholar 

• Hirschheim, R., and Klein, H. K. “Four Paradigms of Information Systems Development,” Communications of the ACM (32:10), 1989, pp. 1199–1216.

  Google Scholar 

• Hirschheim, R., and Klein, H. K. Information System Development and Data Modeling. Conceptual & Philosophical Foundations, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995.

  Google Scholar 

• Hirschheim, R., and Klein, H. K. “Realizing Emancipatory Principles in Information-Systems Development: The Case For Ethics,” MIS Quarterly (18:1), 1994, pp. 83–109.

  Google Scholar 

• Huff, C., and Martin, C. D. “Computing Consequences: A Framework for Teaching Ethical Computing,” Communications of the ACM (38:12), 1995, pp. 75–84.

  Google Scholar 

• Iivari, J.; Hirschheim, R.; and Klein, H. K. “A Paradigmatic Analysis Contrasting Information Systems Development Approaches and Methodologies,” Information Systems Research (9:2), 1998, pp. 164–193.

  Google Scholar 

• Johnson, D. Computer Ethics, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1994.

  Google Scholar 

• Johnson, D. G. “Ethics Online,” Communications of the ACM (40:1), 1997, pp. 60–65.

  Google Scholar 

• Jonsson, S. “Action Research,” in H.-E. Nissen, H. K. Klein, and R. Hirschheim (Eds.), Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1991, pp. 371–396.

  Google Scholar 

• Khazanchi, D. “Unethical Behavior in Information Systems: The Gender Factor,” Journal of Business Ethics (14), 1995, pp. 741–749.

  Google Scholar 

• Klein, H. K., and Hirschheim, R. “Choosing between Competing Design Ideals in Information Systems Development,” Information Systems Frontiers (3:1), 2001, pp. 75–90.

  Google Scholar 

• Kreie, J., and Cronan, T. “How Men and Women View Ethics,” Communications of the ACM (41:9), 1998, pp. 70–76.

  Google Scholar 

• Kreie, J., and Cronan, P. “Making Ethical Decisions,” Communications of the ACM (43:12), 2000, pp. 66–71.

  Google Scholar 

• Kruchten, P. The Rational Unified Process: An Introduction, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 2000.

  Google Scholar 

• Lee, D. M. “The Place of Wisdom in Teaching,” Learning and Individual Differences (5:4), 1993, pp. 301–317.

  Google Scholar 

• Loch, K. D., and Conger, S. “Evaluating Ethical Decision Making and Computer Use,” Communications of the ACM (39:7), 1996, pp. 74–83.

  Google Scholar 

• Lyytinen, K., and Yoo, Y. “Research Commentary: The Next Wave of Nomadic Computing,” Information Systems Research (13:4), 2002, pp. 377–388.

  Google Scholar 

• March, S.; Hevner, A.; and Ram, S. “Research Commentary: An Agenda for Information Technology Research in Heterogeneous and Distributed Environments,” Information Systems Research (11:4), 2000, pp. 327–341.

  Google Scholar 

• Mason, R. O. “Applying Ethics to Information Technology Issues,” Communications of the ACM (38:12), 1995, pp. 55–57.

  Google Scholar 

• Mason, R. O., Mason, F. M., and Culnan, M. J. Ethics of Information Management, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1995.

  Google Scholar 

• Moores, T., and Dhillon, G. “Software Piracy: A View from Hong Kong,” Communications of the ACM (43:12), 2000, pp. 88–93.

  Google Scholar 

• Mumford, E. Systems Design: Ethical Tools for Ethical Change, London: Macmillan, 1996.

  Google Scholar 

• Mumford, E., Hirschheim, R., Fitzgerald, G., and Wood-Harper, A. T. Research Methods in Information Systems, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1985.

  Google Scholar 

• Orlikowski, W. J., and Baroudi, J. J. “The Information Systems Profession: Myth or Reality,” Office, Technology and People (4), 1989, pp. 13–30.

  Google Scholar 

• Orlikowski, W. J., and Iacono, C. S. “Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the ‘IT’ in IT Research—A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact,” Information Systems Research (12:2), 2001, pp. 121–134.

  Google Scholar 

• Pearson, J. M.; Crosby, L.; and Shim, J. P. “Measuring the Importance of Ethical Behavior Criteria,” Communications of the ACM (40:9), 1997, pp. 94–100.

  Google Scholar 

• Peppas, S. C., and Diskin, B. A. “College Courses in Ethics: Do They Really Make a Difference?,” International Journal of Education Management (15:7), 2001, pp. 347–353.

  Google Scholar 

• Robinson, F. Globalizing Care: Ethics, Feminist Theory, and International Relations, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1999.

  Google Scholar 

• Rogerson, S.; Weckert, J.; and Simpson, C. “An Ethical Review of Information Systems Development,” Information Technology & People (13:2), 2000, pp. 121–136.

  Google Scholar 

• Sambamurthy, V., and Zmud, R. W. “Research Commentary: The Organizing Logic for an Enterprise’s IT Activities in the Digital Era—A Prognosis of Practice and a Call for Research,” Information Systems Research (11:2), 2000, pp. 105–114.

  Google Scholar 

• Simon, H. A. Administrative Behavior, New York: The Free Press, 1976.

  Google Scholar 

• Sipior, J. C., and Ward, B. T. “The Ethical and Legal Quandary of Email Privacy,” Communications of the ACM (38:12), 1995, pp. 48–54.

  Google Scholar 

• Straub, D. W., and Watson, R. T. “Research Commentary: Transformational Issues in Researching IS and Net-Enabled Organizations,” Information Systems Research (12:4), 2001, pp. 337–345.

  Google Scholar 

• Tavani, H. Ethics and Technology: Ethical Issues in Information and Communication Technology, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2004.

  Google Scholar 

• Tong, R. Feminine and Feminist Ethics, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1993.

  Google Scholar 

• Wagner, I. “A Web of Fuzzy Problems: Confronting the Ethical Issues,” Communications of the ACM (36:6), 1993, pp. 94–101.

  Google Scholar 

• Walsham, G. “Ethical Issues in Information Systems Development: The Analyst as Moral Agent,” in D. Avison, J. E. Kendall, and J. I. DeGross (Eds.), Human, Organizational, and Social Dimensions of Information Systems Development, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1993, pp. 281–294.

  Google Scholar 

• Walsham, G. “Ethical Theory, Codes of Ethics and IS Practice,” Information Systems Journal (6:1), 1996, pp. 69–81.

  Google Scholar 

• Wand, Y., and Weber, R. “Research Commentary: Information Systems and Conceptual Modeling—A Research Agenda,” Information Systems Research (13:4), 2002, pp. 363–376.

  Google Scholar 

• Wastell, D. “The Fetish of Technique: Methodology as a Social Defense,” Information Systems Journal (6), 1996, pp. 25–40.

  Google Scholar 

• Weiss, E. A. “A Self-Assessment Procedure Dealing with Ethics in Computing,” Communications of the ACM (25:3), 1982, pp. 181–195.

  Google Scholar 

• Weiss, E. A.; Parker, D. B.; Swope, S.; and Baker, B. N. “Self-Assessment Procedure 22: The Ethics of Computing,” Communications of the ACM (33:11), 1990, pp. 110–132.

  Google Scholar 

• Wood-Harper, A. T.; Avison, D. E.; and Antill, L. Information Systems Definition: The Multiview Approach, Oxford: Blackwell Scientific, 1985.

  Google Scholar 

• Wood-Harper, A. T.; Corder, S.; Wood, J. R. G.; and Watson, H. “How We Profess: The Ethical Systems Analyst,” Communications of the ACM (39:3), 1996, pp. 69.

  Google Scholar 

• Wright, M. “Can Moral Judgement and Ethical Behavior Be Learned? A Review of the Literature,” Management Decision (33:10), 1995, pp. 17–28.

  Google Scholar 

Download references