Translations in Network Configurations

• Aanestad, M. (2003), “The Camera as an Actor: Design-in-Use of Telemedicine Infrastructure in Surgery”, in Computer Supported Cooperative Work 12: 1–20.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Akrich, M. (1992), “The De-Scription of Technical Objects”, in Shaping Technology/Building Society edited by W.E. Bijker and J. Law, The MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Callon, M., Latour, B. (1981), “Unscrewing the big Leviathan: how actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so”, in Advances in Social Theory and Methodology. Toward an Integration of Micro-and Macro-Sociologies, edited by K. Knorr-Cetina and A.V. Cicourel, Routledge & Kegan Paul.

  Google Scholar 

• Ciborra, C., (1996), “Introduction: what does groupware mean for for the organization hosting it?” in Groupware and Teamwork. Invisible aid or technical hindrance?, edited by C. Ciborra, J.Wiley and Sons.

  Google Scholar 

• Ciborra, C., Lanzara, G., (1994), “Formative Context and Information Technology: Understanding the Dynamics of Innovation in Organizations”, Accounting Management and Information Technology, 4(2).

  Google Scholar 

• Gallivan, M.J., (2001), “Organizational Adoption and Assimilation of Complex Technological Innovations: Development and Application of a New Framework”, The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, Vol. 32, No. 3.

  Google Scholar 

• Hanseth, O., Monteiro, E., Hatling, M., (1996), “Developing Information Infrastructure: The Tension between Standardization and Flexibility”, Science, Technology, & Human Values, Vol. 21, No.4.

  Google Scholar 

• Hanseth, O., Monteiro, E., (1997), “Inscribing behaviour in Information Infrastructure Standards”, Accounting, Management & Information Technology, Vol.7, No.4.

  Google Scholar 

• Heeks, R. & Davies, A. (1999), “Different approaches to information age reform”. In Heeks, R. (ED.), Reinventing government in the information age. International practice in IT-enabled public sector reform, (pp. 22–48). London and New York: Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Henfridsson, O., (1999), IT-adaptation as sensemaking, PhD Thesis, Umeå University.

  Google Scholar 

• Latour, B. (1987), Science in Action, Open University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Law, J. (1999). “After ANT: complexity, naming and topology” in Actor Network Theory and After ed. by J. Law and J. Hassard, Blackwell Publishers.

  Google Scholar 

• Lyytinen, K., Damsgaard, J., (2001), “What’s Wrong with the Diffusion of Innovation Theory? The case of a complex and networked technology” in Diffusing Software Product and Process Innovations, edited by M.A. Ardis and B.L. Marcolin, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  Google Scholar 

• Orlikowski, W.J., (1992), “The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organizations”, Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427.

  Google Scholar 

• Orlikowski, W.J., (1996), “Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective”, Information Systems Research, 7(1).

  Google Scholar 

• Rogers, E.M., (1995), Diffusion of Innovations, fourth edition, Free Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Swanson, E.B., (2001), “Telling an Innovation Story”, in Diffusing Software Product and Process Innovations, edited by M.A. Ardis and B.L. Marcolin, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  Google Scholar 

• Walsham, G., (1993), Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations. Chichester: Wiley.

  Google Scholar 

• Walsham, G., (1995), “Interpretive Case Study in IS Research. Nature and Method”, European Journal of Information Systems, 4, 74–81.

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references