Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

On Reducing Linearizability to State Reachability

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 9135))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Efficient implementations of atomic objects such as concurrent stacks and queues are especially susceptible to programming errors, and necessitate automatic verification. Unfortunately their correctness criteria — linearizability with respect to given ADT specifications — are hard to verify. Even on classes of implementations where the usual temporal safety properties like control-state reachability are decidable, linearizability is undecidable.

In this work we demonstrate that verifying linearizability for certain fixed ADT specifications is reducible to control-state reachability, despite being harder for arbitrary ADTs. We effectuate this reduction for several of the most popular atomic objects. This reduction yields the first decidability results for verification without bounding the number of concurrent threads. Furthermore, it enables the application of existing safety-verification tools to linearizability verification.

This work is supported in part by the VECOLIB project (ANR-14-CE28-0018).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdulla, P.A., Haziza, F., Holík, L., Jonsson, B., Rezine, A.: An integrated specification and verification technique for highly concurrent data structures. In: Piterman, N., Smolka, S.A. (eds.) TACAS 2013 (ETAPS 2013). LNCS, vol. 7795, pp. 324–338. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alur, R., McMillan, K.L., Peled, D.: Model-checking of correctness conditions for concurrent objects. Inf. Comput. 160(1–2) (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bouajjani, A., Emmi, M., Enea, C., Hamza, J.: Verifying concurrent programs against sequential specifications. In: Felleisen, M., Gardner, P. (eds.) ESOP 2013. LNCS, vol. 7792, pp. 290–309. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bouajjani, A., Emmi, M., Enea, C., Hamza, J.: Tractable refinement checking for concurrent objects. In: POPL 2015. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bouajjani, A., Emmi, M., Enea, C., Hamza, J.: On reducing linearizability to state reachability. CoRR, abs/1502.06882 (2015). arxiv.org/abs/1502.06882

  6. Dodds, M., Haas, A., Kirsch, C.M.: A scalable, correct time-stamped stack. In: POPL 2015. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Esparza, J.: Decidability and complexity of petri net problems—an introduction. Lectures on Petri Nets I: Basic Models. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Filipovic, I., O’Hearn, P.W., Rinetzky, N., Yang, H.: Abstraction for concurrent objects. Theor. Comput. Sci. 411(51–52) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gibbons, P.B., Korach, E.: Testing shared memories. SIAM J. Comput. 26(4) (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hamza, J.: On the complexity of linearizability. CoRR, abs/1410.5000 (2014). arxiv.org/abs/1410.5000

  11. Henzinger, T.A., Sezgin, A., Vafeiadis, V.: Aspect-oriented linearizability proofs. In: D’Argenio, P.R., Melgratti, H. (eds.) CONCUR 2013 – Concurrency Theory. LNCS, vol. 8052, pp. 242–256. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Herlihy, M., Wing, J.M.: Linearizability: A correctness condition for concurrent objects. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 12(3) (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vafeiadis, V.: Automatically proving linearizability. In: Touili, T., Cook, B., Jackson, P. (eds.) CAV 2010. LNCS, vol. 6174, pp. 450–464. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jad Hamza .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bouajjani, A., Emmi, M., Enea, C., Hamza, J. (2015). On Reducing Linearizability to State Reachability. In: Halldórsson, M., Iwama, K., Kobayashi, N., Speckmann, B. (eds) Automata, Languages, and Programming. ICALP 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9135. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47666-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47666-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-47665-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-47666-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics