Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

First and Others credit-assignment schema for evaluating the academic contribution of coauthors

  • Published:
Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Credit-assignment schemas are widely applied by providing fixed or flexible credit distribution formulas to evaluate the contributions of coauthors of a scientific publication. In this paper, we propose an approach named First and Others (F&O) counting. By introducing a tuning parameter α and a weight β, two new properties are obtained: (1) flexible assignment of credits by modifying the formula (with the change of α) and applying preference to the individual author by adjusting the weights (with the change of β), and (2) calculation of the credits by separating the formula for the first author from others. With formula separation, the credit of the second author shows an inflection point according to the change of α. The developed theorems and proofs concerning the modification of α and β reveal new properties and complement the base theory for informetrics. The F&O schema is also adapted when considering the policy of ‘first-corresponding-author-emphasis’. Through a comparative analysis using a set of empirical data from the fields of chemistry, medicine, psychology, and the Harvard survey data, the performance of the F&O approach is compared with those of other methods to demonstrate its benefits by the criteria of lack of fit and coefficient of determination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbas, A.M., 2010. Generalized linear weights for sharing credits among multiple authors. arXiv:1012.5477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbas, A.M., 2011. Weighted indices for evaluating the quality of research with multiple authorship. Scientometrics, 88(1):107–131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0389-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abramo, G., Cicero, T., D’Angelo, C.A., 2012. How important is choice of the scaling factor in standardizing citations? J. Informetr., 6(4):645–654. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2012.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assimakis, N., Adam, M., 2010. A new author’s productivity index: p-index. Scientometrics, 85(2):415–427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0255-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boas, R.P., 1964. Mathematical authorship. Science, 145(3629):232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.145.3629.232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boxenbaum, H., Pivinski, F., Ruberg, S.J., 1987. Publication rates of pharmaceutical scientists: application of the waring distribution. Drug Metabol. Rev., 18(4):553–571. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/03602538708994132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M.W., Cudeck, R., 1992. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociol. Meth. Res., 21(2):230–258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buehring, G.C., Buehring, J.E., Gerard, P.D., 2007. Lost in citation: vanishing visibility of senior authors. Scientometrics, 72(3):459–468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1762-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caruso, E., Epley, N., Bazerman, M.H., 2006. The costs and benefits of undoing egocentric responsibility assessments in groups. J. Person. Soc. Psychol., 91(5):857–871. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J.R., Cole, S., 1973. Social Stratification in Science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong, Y., Johnson, R.A., Chawla, N.V., 2015. Will this paper increase your h-index? Scientific impact prediction. Proc. 8th ACM Int. Conf. on Web Search and Data Mining, p.149–158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2684822.2685314

    Google Scholar 

  • Du, J., Tang, X.L., 2013. Perceptions of author order versus contribution among researchers with different professional ranks and the potential of harmonic counts for encouraging ethical co-authorship practices. Scientometrics, 96(1):277–295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0905-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, Y.P., Yao, C.Q., Li, N., 2015. Using heterogeneous patent network features to rank and discover influential inventors. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 16(7): 568–578. http://dx.doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.1400394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egghe, L., Rousseau, R., van Hooydonk, G., 2000. Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries: consequences for evaluation studies. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol., 51(2):145–157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:2<145::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellwein, L.B., Khachab, M., Waldman, R.H., 1989. Assessing research productivity: evaluating journal publication across academic departments. Acad. Med., 64(6):319–325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001888-198906000-00008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endersby, J.W., 1996. Collaborative research in the social sciences: multiple authorship and publication credit. Soc. Sci. Q., 77(2):375–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauffriau, M., Larsen, P.O., Maye, I., et al., 2007. Publication, cooperation and productivity measures in scientific research. Scientometrics, 73(2):175–214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1800-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, N.T., 2010. Harmonic publication and citation counting: sharing authorship credit equitably—not equally, geometrically or arithmetically. Scientometrics, 84(3): 785–793. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0129-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, N.T., 2013. Harmonic coauthor credit: a parsimonious quantification of the byline hierarchy. J. Informetr., 7(4):784–791. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, B., Ding, Y., Yan, E.J., 2012. Mining patterns of author orders in scientific publications. J. Informetr., 6(3): 359–367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2012.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J.E., 2005. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. PNAS, 102(46):16569–16572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, S.E., Greenberg, D.A., 1981. Publication credit. Science, 213(4511):950–950. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.213.4511.950

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, X., 2009. Loads of special authorship functions: linear growth in the percentage of “equal first authors” and corresponding authors. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol., 60(11):2378–2381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, M.H., Lin, C.S., Chen, D.Z., 2011. Counting methods, country rank changes, and counting inflation in the assessment of national research productivity and impact. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol., 62(12):2427–2436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalyane, V.L., Vidyasagar Rao, K., 1995. Quantification of credit for authorship. ILA Bull., 30(3-4):94–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., Diesner, J., 2014. A network-based approach to coauthorship credit alloction. Scientometrics, 101(1):587–602. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1253-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., Kim, J., 2015. Rethinking the comparison of coauthorship credit allocation schemes. J. Informetr., 9(3): 667–673. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, P.O., 2008. The state of the art in publication counting. Scientometrics, 77(2):235–251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1991-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C.S., Huang, M.H., Chen, D.Z., 2013. The influences of counting methods on university rankings based on paper count and citation count. J. Informetr., 7(3):611–621. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey, D., 1980. Production and citation measures in the sociology of science: the problem of multiple authorship. Soc. Stud. Sci., 10(2):145–162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030631278001000202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X.Z., Fang, H., 2012. Fairly sharing the credit of multiauthored papers and its application in the modification of h-index and g-index. Scientometrics, 91(1):37–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0571-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukovits, I., Vinkler, P., 1995. Correct credit distribution: a model for sharing credit among coauthors. Soc. Ind. Res., 36(1):91–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01079398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maciejovsky, B., Budescu, D.V., Ariely, D., 2009. The researcher as a consumer of scientific publications: how do name-ordering conventions affect inferences about contribution credits? Market. Sci., 28(3):589–598. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1080.0406

    Google Scholar 

  • May, M., Brody, H., 2015. Nature index 2015 global. Nature, 522(7556):S1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/522S1a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narin, F., 1976. Evaluative Bibliometrics: the Use of Publication and Citation Analysis in the Evaluation of Scientific Activity. Computer Horizons, Mountain Lakes, p.206–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, D.S., 1981. Multiple authorship. Science, 212(4498): 986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.212.4498.986-a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stallings, J., Vance, E., Yang, J., et al., 2013. Determining scientific impact using a collaboration index. PNAS, 110(24):9680–9685. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1220184110

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Trueba, F.J., Guerrero, H., 2004. A robust formula to credit authors for their publications. Scientometrics, 60(2):181–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000027792.09362.3f

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M.E., Rand, T.A., et al., 2007. Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biol., 5(1):e18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Hooydonk, G., 1997. Fractional counting of multiauthored publications: consequences for the impact of authors. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol., 48(10):944–945. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199710)48:1 0<944::AID-ASI8>3.3.CO;2-K

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinkler, P., 1993. Research contribution, authorship and team cooperativeness. Scientometrics, 26(1):213–230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02016801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinkler, P., 2000. Evaluation of the publication activity of research teams by means of scientometric indicators. Curr. Sci., 79(5):602–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltman, L., 2012. An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship in scientific publishing. J. Informetr., 6(4):700–711. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2012.07.008

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Waltman, L., 2015. A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. arXiv:1507.02099.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weigang, L., Dantas, I.A., Saleh, A.A., et al., 2015. Influential analysis in micro scholar social networks. Proc. 1st Int. Workshop on Social Influence Analysis, p.22–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wren, J.D., Kozak, K.Z., Johnson, K.R., et al., 2007. The write position—a survey of perceived contributions to papers based on byline position and number of authors. EMBO Rep., 8(11):988–991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7401095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J., Ding, Y., Song, M., et al., 2016. Author creditassignment schemas: a comparison and analysis. J. Assoc. Inform. Sci. Technol., 67(8):1973–1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.23495

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y., Shan, C., Zhang, S., 2014. Counting methods and economist ranking based on ESI. J. Intell., 33(9):76–82 (in Chinese). http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-1965.2014.09.014

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, C.T., 2009. A proposal for calculating weighted citations based on author rank. EMBO Rep., 10(5):416–417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/embor.2009.74

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author thanks the platform of SCIENCENET and blogger Shuang-chun WEN, whose blog sparked the interest in in-depth research on this topic. The author also acknowledges support from Márcio SOUZA, Ícaro DANTAS, Tian-cheng LI, Yong-he HAN, Daniel LI, and especially Ms. Ya-qin YAN for assistance with English editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. TransLab, Department of Computer Science, University of Brasilia, Brasilia-DF, 70910-900, Brazil

    Li Weigang

Authors
  1. Li Weigang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li Weigang.

Additional information

Project supported by the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (No. 304903/2013-2)

ORCID: Li WEIGANG, http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1826-1850

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weigang, L. First and Others credit-assignment schema for evaluating the academic contribution of coauthors. Frontiers Inf Technol Electronic Eng 18, 180–194 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.1600991

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.1600991

Keywords

CLC number

Search

Navigation