default search action
8th QoMEX 2016: Lisbon, Portugal
- Eighth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience, QoMEX 2016, Lisbon, Portugal, June 6-8, 2016. IEEE 2016, ISBN 978-1-5090-0354-9
- Sebastian Möller
, Jens Berger:
Towards a universal value scale for quantifying the quality of speech communication across services. 1-6 - Friedemann Köster, Dennis Guse, Christian Miethaner, Sebastian Möller:
Towards training naïve participants for a perceptual annotation task designed for experts. 1-6 - Benhur Ortiz Jaramillo, Asli Kumcu, Wilfried Philips:
Evaluating color difference measures in images. 1-6 - Alexander Stojanow, Judith Liebetrau:
A review on conventional psychoacoustic evaluation tools, methods and algorithms. 1-6 - Toinon Vigier, Yoann Baveye, Josselin Rousseau, Patrick Le Callet:
Visual attention as a dimension of QoE: Subtitles in UHD videos. 1-6 - Aleksandar Karadimce
Perception of quality in cloud computing based services. 1-6 - Werner Robitza, Alexander Raake
(Re-)actions speak louder than words? A novel test method for tracking user behavior in web video services. 1-6 - Yucheng Zhu, Guangtao Zhai, Ke Gu, Zhaohui Che:
Closing the gap: Visual quality assessment considering viewing conditions. 1-6 - Johannes Nowak, Kai-Peter Jurgeit, Judith Liebetrau:
Assessment of spherical microphone array auralizations using open-profiling of quality (OPQ). 1-6 - Ahmed Aldahdooh
Spatio-temporal error concealment technique for high order multiple description coding schemes including subjective assessment. 1-6 - Amnon Balanov, Arik Schwartz, Yair Moshe:
Reduced-reference image quality assessment based on DCT Subband Similarity. 1-6 - Karam Naser, Vincent Ricordel, Patrick Le Callet:
Estimation of perceptual redundancies of HEVC encoded dynamic textures. 1-5 - Saboya Yang, Gene Cheung, Patrick Le Callet, Jiaying Liu
Computational modeling of artistic intention: Quantify lighting surprise for painting analysis. 1-6 - Long Xu, Lin Ma, Zhuo Chen, Xianyou Zeng, Yihua Yan:
Perceptual image quality enhancement for solar radio image. 1-6 - Pierre R. Lebreton, Alexander Raake
Studying user agreement on aesthetic appeal ratings and its relation with technical knowledge. 1-6 - Glenn Van Wallendael
Perceptual quality of 4K-resolution video content compared to HD. 1-6 - Lukas Krasula, Karel Fliegel
On the accuracy of objective image and video quality models: New methodology for performance evaluation. 1-6 - Alex Wilson, Bruno Fazenda
Relationship between hedonic preference and audio quality in tests of music production quality. 1-6 - Thomas Zinner, Matthias Hirth
ERWIN - enabling the reproducible investigation of waiting times for arbitrary workflows. 1-6 - Michael Seufert
Impact of test condition selection in adaptive crowdsourcing studies on subjective quality. 1-6 - Sharath Chandra Guntuku, Sujoy Roy, Weisi Lin, Kelvin Ng, Wee Keong Ng, Vinit Jakhetiya:
Personalizing User Interfaces for improving quality of experience in VoD recommender systems. 1-6 - Ahmed Aldahdooh
Comparing simple video quality measures for loss-impaired video sequences on a large-scale database. 1-6 - Diego González-Zúñiga, Alberto Acuna-Silvera, Enric Martí-Godia, Jordi Carrabina Bordoll:
Exploring the introduction of stereoscopic depth in applications to change perceived quality. 1-6 - Philippe Hanhart, Martin Rerábek, Touradj Ebrahimi
Subjective and objective evaluation of HDR video coding technologies. 1-6 - Manri Cheon, Jong-Seok Lee:
Ambiguity-based evaluation of objective quality metrics for image compression. 1-6 - He Liu, Amy R. Reibman
Software to Stress Test Image Quality Estimators. 1-6 - Wei Zhou
3D-HEVC visual quality assessment: Database and bitstream model. 1-6 - Ines Saidi, Lu Zhang, Vincent Barriac, Olivier Déforges:
Interactive vs. non-interactive subjective evaluation of IP network impairments on audiovisual quality in videoconferencing context. 1-6 - Jon Francombe, Tim Brookes
Determining and labeling the preference dimensions of spatial audio replay. 1-6 - Dragana Sandic-Stankovic
Free viewpoint video quality assessment based on morphological multiscale metrics. 1-6 - Andrei I. Purica, Giuseppe Valenzise, Béatrice Pesquet-Popescu, Frédéric Dufaux:
Using region-of-interest for quality evaluation of DIBR-based view synthesis methods. 1-6 - Chen Wang, Jacqueline Wong
Quantifying audience experience in the wild: Heuristics for developing and deploying a biosensor infrastructure in theaters. 1-6 - Nadja Schinkel-Bielefeld:
Training listeners for multi-channel audio quality evaluation in MUSHRA with a special focus on loop setting. 1-6 - Vedad Hulusic
Perceived dynamic range of HDR images. 1-6 - Aditee Shrotre, Lina J. Karam
Visual quality assessment of reconstructed background images. 1-6 - Samuel Fuller Dodge, Lina J. Karam
Understanding how image quality affects deep neural networks. 1-6 - Colm Sloan, Naomi Harte
Bitrate classification of twice-encoded audio using objective quality features. 1-6 - Miguel Fidalgo-Fernandes, Marco V. Bernardo
A bag of words description scheme based on SSIM for image quality assessment. 1-6 - Rafael Rodrigues
MPEG DASH - some QoE-based insights into the tradeoff between audio and video for live music concert streaming under congested network conditions. 1-6 - Pedro Garcia Freitas
No-reference image quality assessment based on statistics of Local Ternary Pattern. 1-6 - Philippe Hanhart, Lukas Krasula, Patrick Le Callet, Touradj Ebrahimi
How to benchmark objective quality metrics from paired comparison data? 1-6 - Marwin Schmitt, Judith Redi, Pablo César
1Mbps is enough: Video quality and individual idiosyncrasies in multiparty HD video-conferencing. 1-6 - Maria Plakia, Michalis Katsarakis, Paulos Charonyktakis, Maria Papadopouli, Ioannis Markopoulos:
On user-centric analysis and prediction of QoE for video streaming using empirical measurements. 1-6 - Bo Hu, Leida Li, Jiansheng Qian, Yuming Fang:
Perceptual evaluation of Compressive Sensing Image Recovery. 1-6 - Darragh Egan, Sean Brennan, John Barrett, Yuansong Qiao
An evaluation of Heart Rate and ElectroDermal Activity as an objective QoE evaluation method for immersive virtual reality environments. 1-6 - Baris Konuk, Emin Zerman, Gokce Nur
Video content analysis method for audiovisual quality assessment. 1-6 - Nick Zacharov, Chris Pike, Frank Melchior, Thierry Worch
Next generation audio system assessment using the multiple stimulus ideal profile method. 1-6 - Nick Zacharov, Torben Pedersen, Chris Pike:
A common lexicon for spatial sound quality assessment - latest developments. 1-6 - Mirko Suznjevic, Ivan Slivar, Lea Skorin-Kapov:
Analysis and QoE evaluation of cloud gaming service adaptation under different network conditions: The case of NVIDIA GeForce NOW. 1-6 - Romain Cohendet, Anne-Laure Gilet, Matthieu Perreira Da Silva, Patrick Le Callet:
Using individual data to characterize emotional user experience and its memorability: Focus on gender factor. 1-6 - Michele A. Saad, Patrick McKnight
Consumer-photo quality assessment: Challenges and pitfalls in crowdsourcing. 1-6 - Alexandre F. Silva, Mylène C. Q. Farias
Annoyance models for videos with spatio-temporal artifacts. 1-6 - Arslan Ahmad
QoE-aware service delivery: A joint-venture approach for content and network providers. 1-6 - Stephan Werner
A summary on acoustic room divergence and its effect on externalization of auditory events. 1-6 - Bruno M. Fazenda
Perception and automated assessment of audio quality in user generated content: An improved model. 1-6 - Niall Murray, Brian Lee
The influence of human factors on olfaction based mulsemedia quality of experience. 1-6
manage site settings
To protect your privacy, all features that rely on external API calls from your browser are turned off by default. You need to opt-in for them to become active. All settings here will be stored as cookies with your web browser. For more information see our F.A.Q.
last updated on 2024-11-15 19:47 CET by the dblp team
all metadata released as open data under CC0 1.0 license
see also: Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Imprint
dblp was originally created in 1993 at:
since 2018, dblp has been operated and maintained by:
the dblp computer science bibliography is funded and supported by: