User talk:Adeletron 3030
|
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
Review My Uploads
[edit]Hello, As a newcomer, there are a lot of things I don't know, but I am learning slowly from all the experienced Wikipedians here. The reason I am here is to request your help in reviewing my uploads because I think I have some confusion about copyright and licenses. Previously, three of my uploads were deleted, and recently an administrator removed one of my uploads from my draft. I will ask him about it, but first, I want to make sure that the uploads are correct. Can you help me with that? Thank you. Gj2020 (talk) 19:21, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Gj2020 Hi, thanks for leaving your message. Unfortunately, I don't think any of your current uploads are compatible with Commons. Almost all images you find on the web are copyrighted and are not accepted here. Please take a few minutes to read COM:LICENSING (this infographic might be especially helpful) to learn what is and is not allowed on Commons. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:51, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- So, does that mean I can't use them in an article? Also, I don't have any contact with these subjects, so I can't get permission directly. I have read all the guidelines, but they are very confusing, and I can't understand them clearly. Can you please guide me on when we can upload an image freely from any organization or company?
- For example,Urbansquaremall-logo.svg, this image I got from their official website, and a lot of other websites are using it. So I uploaded it too. Now, when or how will I be able to upload it? What kind of permission do I need to use this? Also, do I really need to contact them?
- Please reply when you have time. I appreciate your cooperation. Thank you. Gj2020 (talk) 14:39, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Gj2020 That's correct - you cannot use them and they will be deleted by an admin.
- The guidelines might seem confusing, but it's actually pretty simple: unless you took the photograph yourself, you probably can't use it. There are rare occasions when a photo isn't eligible for copyright protection (i.e., works of the US federal government, old images with expired copyrights), but almost everything you see on the web is copyrighted and cannot be used on Commons.
- Now, you mention that other websites are using it. But other websites are not free-license encyclopedias (and they likely have permission from the copyright owners). For us to use an image, the copyright owner needs to release the images under a free license, like Creative Commons Attribution license. This means the image can be freely shared without any restrictions on use or modifications. Most organizations are understandably unwilling to give up that much control over their works.
- In short, please don't upload an image unless you see that it is actually freely licensed (look for a Creative Commons license). Unless you see some kind of release, you should assume that it's copyrighted and not permitted here. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:41, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Understood. thank you for your help Gj2020 (talk) 14:46, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- ALl my uploaded images were created by adobe firefly AI and are in the public domain instantly . Federal law prevents anyone from copyrighting them. They were marketed and described as such in the upload. PLease inform yourself on these issues. TimeTreks (talk) 13:36, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
Gperez24.jpg
[edit]Hola de nuevo, Adeletron 3030, ¿me podrías explicar el motivo por el que se ha borrado esta foto?. Como recordarás, te comenté que la foto era mia. La había hecho hacias unas semanas. En principio, por lo que me dijiste, pensé que se eliminaría la solicitud de borrado. Y la verdad es que me he llevado una desagradable sorpresa al ver que la foto ha sido borrada. Sinceramente, me parece que no se está actuando correctamente. El hecho de borrar fotos cuya autoria está probada genera que perdamos todos mucho tiempo. ¿Podrías restaurar la foto, por favor? Si hay que aclarar cualquier aspecto sobre esa imagen, me tienes a tu disposiicón. Un cordial saludo, --Hard (talk) 07:32, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Hard I don't make the deletion decision so you'd need to address it with an admin. And I don't agree that your authorship is proven, considering you sourced it to your own Flickr account, and your edit history shows licensing other people's work as your own. I think your best bet is going through COM:UNDEL and submitting evidence of authorship to COM:VRT. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:02, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
You have been too fast
[edit]Regarding Special:Diff/951224064: You have been much too fast. You should grant some (more?) grace period, especially when a file like in this case has been uploaded with the bigChunkedUpload script, which is automatically stated in the upload comment (cannot be overwritten by the user). — Speravir – 02:56, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Speravir Thanks for reaching out here. I do the “no source” tagging to let uploaders know that they forgot to fill in the essential source info. “Source missing” isn’t a true speedy deletion so the image isn’t in any danger of being deleted. I’m usually looking at recent uploads, I’d rather inform uploaders earlier than later so I don’t forget and the uploader doesn’t disappear without fleshing out the info. In my mind, there’s no real downside to tagging an image missing source info (all the uploader has to do is fill out the infobox and remove the template), while there is a downside to waiting.
- Also, I have no idea what bigChunkedUpload is, but if you’re doing a automated uploads, wouldn’t you want to know that some stuff is missing?
- But I do hear your point of view and I appreciate your comment. Cheers. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 04:09, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- BTW, I usually try to find missing Flickr info myself, but none of my searches were turning anything up and the “no source” tag was my last resort. I see it’s gone from Flickr, which explains why I couldn’t find it. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 04:12, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- OK, in general I agree with you. It was just slightly annoying for me getting an edit conflict in the moment I wanted to update the description page and then I had to get back to recover my content. — Speravir – 23:54, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Speravir I can see how that's frustrating, and I'm sorry my edit was the cause. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:07, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Railway Museum, Saitama, 2015-07-21 DSC 3364 (19889167755).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Railway Museum, Saitama, 2015-07-21 DSC 3273 (19860093916).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Railway Museum, Saitama, 2015-07-21 DSC 3261 (19860062066).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:28, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Railway Museum, Saitama, 2015-07-21 DSC 3254 (19890934801).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:28, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Railway Museum, Saitama, 2015-07-21 DSC 3253 (19264993883).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:28, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Railway Museum, Saitama, 2015-07-21 DSC 3252 (19263268914).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:28, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Railway Museum, Saitama, 2015-07-21 DSC 3249 (19878447132).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:29, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Railway Museum, Saitama, 2015-07-21 DSC 3225 (19697236878).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:29, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Railway Museum, Saitama, 2015-07-21 DSC 3218 (19697219078).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:29, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Dotonbori at night 2020-01-27 6.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:38, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Dotonbori at night 2020-01-27 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:39, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Fuse Station interior Ebessan 20230624164625.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:39, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Desert Botanical Garden, Phoenix, Arizona, U.S.A.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:52, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
File:COVID-19 related signs Akashi, Hyogo 2021-11-28 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for solving the license problem
[edit]Dear @Adeletron 3030,
Thank you for solving the license problem. I am leaving this message here so we can talk in the foreseeable future.
Have a nice day.
Filipe46 (talk) 14:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
YOU ARE SPECIAL
[edit]OH NO 30 YEAR OLD PHOTOS THAT HAVE BEEN PUBLISHED MILLIONS OF TIMES!!!!!! MUH COPYRIGHT!!!!!! HOW DARE I UPLOAD THEM TO THE FREE AND PUBLIC WIKIPEDIA
Why dont you delete this photo? Its a Japanese government secret MAYBE 80 YEARS AGO, keep it consistent you internet copyright cop!
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Japanese_battleship_Yamato_fitting_out_at_the_Kure_Naval_Base,_Japan,_20_September_1941_(NH_63433).jpg#mw-jump-to-license Proffet123 (talk) 11:09, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
Licensing of my uploaded image
[edit]Hey, is this Licensing-block enough evidence of permission or is anything else needed? Arjab (talk) 13:49, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Arjab Hi, unless I’m missing something, the YouTube video does not have a Creative Commons license. CC-licensed videos on YouTube would have a licensing statement in the video description. I’m not seeing it. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:13, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hey @Adeletron 3030, the infobox of the video contains a licensing section at the very bottom saying "License Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)". Arjab (talk) 15:28, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Arjab You’re right - I didn’t realize that the license information doesn’t show on the mobile site. 🤦 Sorry about that - I’ve removed the no permissions tag. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:33, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Adeletron 3030 No problem, thanks! Arjab (talk) 15:42, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Arjab You’re right - I didn’t realize that the license information doesn’t show on the mobile site. 🤦 Sorry about that - I’ve removed the no permissions tag. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:33, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hey @Adeletron 3030, the infobox of the video contains a licensing section at the very bottom saying "License Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)". Arjab (talk) 15:28, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
Untitled message
[edit]ALl my uploaded images were created by adobe firefly AI and are in the public domain instantly . Federal law prevents anyone from copyrighting them. They were marketed and described as such in the upload. PLease inform yourself on these issues. TimeTreks (talk) 13:36, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- @TimeTreks You'll notice that the nomination says nothing about their license/copyright status, so there's no need for me to inform myself on those issues. However, you'll also notice that I wrote, Personal AI art with no apparent encyclopedic use, COM:SCOPE, COM:WEBHOST. Please inform yourself of those issues. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:39, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Also, there's no point responding to me here. If you want anyone to hear your arguments, please respond at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by TimeTreks. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:40, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
Hello
[edit]I have responded to your message on my talk page. Thanks in advance and let me know if im missing anything Pyraminxsolver (talk) 06:15, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Solving problems with my older uploads
[edit]Good morning, @Adeletron 3030.
Can you take a look at my old uploads that got deleted? All the ones from the French military should be Open License 2, and those from Italy should be PD-Italy. I didn't know how to place licenses back then. I didn't know how to do anything, actually. I didn't even know the messages I received - and only way later found - were from people. I thought they were bots.
Best regards.
Filipe46 (talk) 14:42, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
{{Japanyear2}}や{{Japanmonth2}}内で引数が必要な場合とそうでない場合
[edit]作成された{{Kanazawayear}}は{{{1|}}}
, {{{2|}}}
と引数が2つありますよね。こういう場合は、Template:Japanyear2
に入れる際はこの{{Japanyear2}}の中で引数を指定してやらないと、{{Higashiosakamonth}}の時と同じようにExpression error: Unexpected > operator and Error: Invalid time.と出ますよ。例えばCategory:2022 in Kanazawaを作成しようとするとき、{{Kanazawayear}}
と単にやっても駄目で、{{Kanazawayear|202|2}}
としなければならないのと同じことです。指定の仕方はこれです。{{Japanyear2/a}}と
{{Japanyear2/b}}
が引数{{{1|}}}
と{{{2|}}}
の代わりになります。上の方のKaruizawaが単に{{Karuizawayear}}
となっているのは、{{Karuizawayear}}自体が引数不要の仕様で作ってあり、そもそも不要なためです。ちなみにCategory:2022 in Kanazawaの例では、{{Kanazawayear|{{Japanyear2/a}}|{{Japanyear2/b}}}}
としても行けます。それを常に指定してあるのが{{Japanyear2}}というわけです。最初は誰でも分からないと思いますが、せめて理解しようとする努力はなさって下さい。よろしく。--トトト (talk) 11:05, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- @トトト 丁寧に説明してくださりありがとうございます。今後は気をつけます。 Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:06, 21 November 2024 (UTC)