User talk:Yann/archives 28

Hello, I am Eliad Bar, and I confirm that the portrait (aka "Eliad Bar portrait.jpg") is mine along with the pictures I uploaded before:

>  Genesis Eliad Bar.jpg
> Aztec Dancer Eliad Bar.jpg
> Legendary Runner Eliad Bar.jpg
> Sphinx EliadBar.jpg
> PromisedLand Eliad Bar.jpg

I emailed permissions-commons@wikimedia.org before but I didn't get help. Please help me re-upload all of those into my page.

I can also confirm myself with the email (also listed in my Official website) eliadbarart@gmail.com‏ Thank you

Eliad Bar — Preceding unsigned comment added by DodaRuti (talk • contribs) 9:11, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi: getting permission from a team to use their own low resolution logo on a wikipedia page set up to promote them and hockey in our province is too much work. If someone else besides the team benefited i could understand. Remove the logo, i don't care enpough o start sending all these emails for little graphics found all over the internet except here. user: Sherwood5030 9:11, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello Yann 63 files are awaiting review here: Category:Unreviewed files from Bollywood Hungama. Regards, Digvijay411 (talk) 9:11, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello Yann,

First of all, I would like to apologize for uploading forbidden files do to copyright. My intention is to simply show some audio and image examples of what I am trying to write about (computer generated music).

The files i´ve been trying to upload, I got it from public domains, sites and/or medias, such as Wikipedia, Educational web pages (like universities) or Youtube. I do not understand why am I breaking copyright standards.

Thanks for your attention, Greeting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amundo (talk • contribs)

Hi,

For all content previously published, or not directly made by you, a formal written permission is needed. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:27, 14 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Yann, hello! You wrote me "stop post" about the pictures I'd loaded. It seems you are not sure about copyrights. How can I prove to you my rights to this content? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108aum (talk • contribs)

@108aum: Hi,

For all content previously published elsewhere, or not directly created by you, a formal written permission is needed. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:06, 14 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Yann, thanx for info. Sorry, these rools I meet at the first time. Please, advise the text I need to provide. Is these text I need to send to OTRS email https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Email_templates ?

@108aum: Hi, Yes, that's the right one. Please be patient, the email queue is managed by volunteers only, and there is a backlog. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:30, 14 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks a lot! Bstrgrds!

About half the page of Commons:Deletion requests/2015/09/14 is more of that doodle art by students as you closed in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Swishesh. There are a few still to go around that first one you closed. Subsequently by seeing all the students, it became apparent that the teacher is at College of Engineering - University of Cincinnati and assigned the students to upload their homework to Commons. All the images are now uploaded to Wikipedia (!) and attached to an article pending review; he seems to think his student's work and his class worthy of a stand alone article. The whole thing seems more promotional than educational. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:40, 14 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

PS: All the ones with the "request to reconsider" such as Commons:Deletion requests/File:BuschleKG 1-1.png are part of this series as well. I just didn't know they were all from the same class until after that user left the notes and I read all about it. It appears the author of the article is the teacher of the class, etc. etc. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:44, 14 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi, It seems the article is going to stay, so these would be in scope. Well, that's not so bad. When I used to talk about Wikipedia in schools, people were very septic. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:19, 14 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

They uploaded the images to Wikipedia for the article, no? I looked at all of the ones in his gallery this AM and they were all 'pedia. That would make ours not needed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:22, 14 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Well, these files are under a free license, so they should be on Commons, not on Wikipedia. So the Wikipedia versions should be deleted. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:24, 14 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Ellin Beltz: Hi,

Seeing that the files might be deleted, these users uploaded them on the English Wikipedia. I think you should go slow on the deletion requests. These files are in fact OK here. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:33, 14 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

The problem with these files besides being large doodle art, is that they were uploaded as class assignment work. If we start letting every class upload every assignment, pretty soon the entire system will be nothing but homework of varying qualities uploaded by students of part-time professors trying to prove the relevance of their topic. Few to none of these images was categorized; some of them seem of reasonable quality - but only if the building is identified. At least one of the students seems to have uploaded and image from a book or other source and claimed own work. Typical classroom. But seriously, this isn't the point of Commons; Commons is not the place to upload homework. I'm really surprised they're not just putting it on the university servers, that's why it looks promotional to me. Professor is putting up stuff about his class to be noticed in a perish-or-publish environment. I really don't think that's the scope of Commons, but won't be too bent if I'm told I'm wrong. I feel it is promotional/self-promotional and out of scope - because otherwise just upload it on their own university servers. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:33, 14 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

I think we should wait for a week or two before nominating such files for deletion. If after that time, there are not used, then yes, I agree with you, there are out of scope. Actually, I am quite surprised that the article might be OK. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:38, 14 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,

why you have delete this and other related files?--Juandev (talk) 09:15, 15 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I don't see the point to have this. If anything like this is useful, it could easily be recreated properly in SVG format. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:22, 15 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

But I am talking about "process". Did you evaluated pros and contras, or did you just decided by yourself?--Juandev (talk) 10:05, 15 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello

I am working on Commons:WLA and have an issue. I have moved the main page of WLAf2014 to Commons:Wiki Loves Africa 2014. But the translations in various languages are still "attached" to the original page Commons:Wiki Loves Africa. How to "move" the translations so that they stay with the original page ? Anthere (talk)

After discussion with a translation Admin, the solution might be to start by deleting Commons:Wiki Loves Africa 2014. Can you do that please ? Anthere (talk) 18:20, 15 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

It is solved now. :-) Romaine (talk) 19:57, 15 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Please help me to upload the file to the 林涵 Hannah Lina's wiki page, Here is the photo file: https://www.facebook.com/cherhannahlin/photos/a.179015012219708.37780.179014608886415/748094598645077/?type=1&source=11

I can do this, plz — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flytothemoon55 (talk • contribs)

@Flytothemoon55: Hi,

You are not allowed to upload a picture taken by someone else, unless you have a formal written permission. See COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:26, 17 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour, je réponds ici, j’espère que c'est la bonne place cette fois.

je suis désolé si pour vous c'est évident, mais ces images ont été faites par l'auteur du logiciel en question et mis à disposition en Creative commons domaine publique, donc je ne comprends pas trop pourquoi il n'est pas possible de les utiliser ici...?

Le logo Sensomusic a lui aussi été effacé, or d'autres logiciels (ableton live, reaper...) ont leur logo sur leur page. je suis un utilisateur d'Usine Hollyhock et j'aimerai simplement aider à le faire connaitre un peu plus car c'est un logiciel de grande qualité.

merci pour toute explications. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tikitpok (talk • contribs)

@Tikitpok: Bonjour,

J'ai restauré 2 fichiers. Il faut indiquer correctement la source et la licence. Si c'est vous qui avez fait la copie d'écran, il faut une autorisation de l'auteur du logiciel. Voyez COM:OTRS pour la procédure. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:55, 17 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

I see that you deleted Xavier_vendrell.jpg as copyvio, and that another image of the same person was deleted some time ago - maybe the same photograph. I didn't see the image, but it might be copied from an official source to which Template:Attribution-gencat might apply. Can you check where has it been copied from? Merci.--Pere prlpz (talk) 16:02, 17 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Pere prlpz: Hi,

This picture was copied from Facebook. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:06, 17 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

This file has been deleted.

I have emailed OTRS, including the text below, copied from an email from Jonathan Fewtrell to me, with reference to File:Wiki-RW Tour 5 C.jpg. I hope that the details are sufficient.

To whom this may concern

RE: Rebecca Newman Wiki page.

I am the exclusive photographer for Soprano Rebecca Newman and own the copyright to all authorised publicity for the artist, including each image submitted for the Rebecca Newman wiki article.

I have sent you these files

Wiki-RW Tour 5 C.jpg Copyright (c) 2015 Jonathan Fewtrell

PBJFRNANC.jpg Copyright (c) 2014 Jonathan Fewtrell

WikiXPP RC2.jpg WikiXPP RC2L.jpg Copyright (c) 2013 Jonathan Fewtrell

I give you full permission to publish them under a Creative Commons licence.

Jonathan Fewtrell

Roy Lewis (talk) 11:55, 18 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Yann, could you help with File:Venturia.gif file. The uploder is trying to communicate with me but we do not share a common language. It seems to me that he will need help picking a license matching his circumstances or creating a new license template. --Jarekt (talk) 15:33, 18 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Thanks for your message. I added a word on his talk page, telling that he can contact me if needed. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:11, 18 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you.--Jarekt (talk) 00:54, 19 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi Yann. I think there might have been some confusion about this deletion request. According to the other DR I linked, the Cartoon Network logo "meets" the threshold of originality (i.e. it is subject to copyright). I just wanted to make sure that you interpreted me correctly - if you judged that it was not in fact above the TOO that's fine. BMacZero (talk) 16:45, 18 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi, No, I don't think so. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:10, 18 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I don't exactly understand what is it you doing. What is your goal? Why despite all reasons you decided to keep wrong, fantastic and misinforming files? Are you expert on Finnish military flags? Because I am. And I am telling you - you are wrong. Please, explain your actions. Sincerely, --Kwasura (talk) 08:01, 18 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Even "experts" have to follow rules here. That's all. Yann (talk) 09:55, 18 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

This is all your "explanation"? Not much for an "administrator". --Kwasura (talk) 11:22, 20 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

The full answer is here, and you know it. Yann (talk) 11:38, 20 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

This is not an answer to the question "why do you want to keep the wrong files?". --Kwasura (talk) 11:41, 20 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour Yann, pourrais-tu supprimer File:Oswald Englebin (-1944).jpg, je me suis gaufré dans toutes les longueurs dans l'identification de cette personne [Jean Theugels]. Bien à toi, --Madelgarius (talk) 18:18, 20 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Fait Yann (talk) 08:04, 21 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello friend, for photos that i uploaded, one of them is my own work, i photographed it with my mobile camera, the other two aren't mine but i said what is the source of photos, and i refer that these two are from Facebook page and i wrote the name of the author as the name of page, i thought it would be ok if i uploaded it and said what is its source,but if it was not ok, i am sorry i didn't know , and for the photo that is my own work,فدره، why it is deleted although it is my own work,, thanks friend Kemo aj (talk) 17:56, 20 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Kemo aj: Hi,

You need a formal written permission from the photographer before copying pictures from Facebook, or anywhere else. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:06, 21 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi friend, if i want to upload a photo which mine, how i will prove its mine, and how i can protect it from being deleted, i uploaded 3 photos one of them was my own work and it was deleted, i assure you that i won't upload any photo without permission from the owner, but what about my own work, how i can prove it is mine, thanks Kemo aj (talk) 11:03, 21 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Kemo aj: Hi,

For File:فدره.JPG, the EXIF data says that the author is Alexander. You wrote yourself that the source of File:ناحية البهلولية.jpg and File:البهلولية.jpg is the news network Al-Bahluliyah on Facebook. If you have a permission for these files, please send it to COM:OTRS (in English), or COM:OTRS/ar (in Arabic), then the files can be restored. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:59, 21 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi There,

It seems that you don't know every details of the uploaded files. I mean as you thought that the file is not own work of a person is not his/her own work in reality. How can you decide that? As you might know that where and what the person is working for. Just wrote this because some of (in fact all) my uploaded files are nominated for deletion because of the same reason that it not seems my own work. How can you decide that it is not my own work? I agree that one of them is screen capture, but some how I'm related to all those stuff what I've uploaded. As an assistant or as a partner. That means I have right to share it for the promotion of my team. And I think it's just you to nominate.

Hope to reply soon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhishek8150 (talk • contribs)

@Abhishek8150: Hi, It is quite obvious that the files you uploaded are not pictures taken by you. Please answer on Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Abhishek8150, not here if you have further comments. Thanks, Yann (talk) 12:50, 21 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

A screenshot of a twitter feed page would be copyrighted. But what about images like File:President Obama tweet to student Ahmed Mohamed.jpg? The text might be copyrights free, so is Obama's display pic given the US-Gov license. But there is something in the image which makes us realize that its a screenshot of twitter, like the fonts, retweet, favorite button, etc. So aren't such screenshots copyrighted? Just wanted second opinion. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:33, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks friend, for the photo which mine, فدره، yes it is true that the author is Alexander because i sent it from my computer device which i name it Alexander and i will send the prove to otrs, and for other two pictures i will work to get permission, thanks Kemo aj (talk) 11:49, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

You closed Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-NYCGov on the basis of "No consensus to delete" when there was no substantial evidence to support its retention. The "conditions of use" are not linked, and what is quoted refers to "documents" and "State information". Here is the http://www1.nyc.gov/home/terms-of-use.page which says none of that. On the other hand http://council.nyc.gov/html/pr/photos.shtml clearly states: All official New York City Council photographs are available at no charge to the public for personal or non-commercial use. Such photographs may not be manipulated in any way and may not be used in commercial materials, advertisements, emails, products or promotions that in any way suggest approval or endorsement of a product or service by the Council or its Members or employees. Any use or reprinting of Council photographs must use the following credit language: “Official NYC Council Photo by William Alatriste.” There is no mention of "public domain" anywhere, that I can find. Secondarywaltz (talk) 13:55, 23 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Secondarywaltz: Hi,

I already answered to Magog about this. I don't see why you posted this here, but I am fine with the reopening of the DR. It seems it gets more opinions, which is good and necessary for the deletion of a template. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:35, 24 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

I assumed, as being the administrator who closed the debate, that you would be interested in correcting a license tag which would allow pictures to be illegally uploaded to Commons. I reach out to you as someone who has more knowledge of procedures. Who else would I turn to? But the process continues. Secondarywaltz (talk) 15:18, 24 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

The uploader himself requested deletion. Thus it qualified as a speedy delete under criteria, request by uploader. I explained as much, in the detailed closing rationale. Thank you, -- Cirt (talk) 19:22, 25 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour , je suis étonné de voir que ma contribution a été supprimée sur la page "Eyes wide shut"! il s'agissait d'un tableau réalisé par mes soins. Je suis aussi surpris de ne pas en avoir été informé par mail ou message privé. J'aimerais connaitre la raison de cette suppression? Je ne la trouve pas.. merci! cdlt — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oll's bat (talk • contribs)

@Oll's bat: Bonjour,

Vous avez été informé par un message sur votre page de discussion. Vous pouvez recevoir un mail si vous le spécifiez dans vos préférences (onglet "Notifications", "Message de la page de discussion"). Vous n'avez pas donné votre avis ici : Commons:Deletion requests/File:"Vous etes en grand danger, vous devez partir".jpg. Pour les œuvres d'art récentes, une permission écrite formelle est nécessaire. Voyez COM:OTRS/fr pour la procédure. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 09:26, 26 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

This image, along with image "AZy1CSba.jpg" were my first contributions to Wikipedia commons. These two images were uploaded simultaneously and apparently were uploaded in the wrong manner. I am the copyright holder of both images. Please let me know how this deletion can be restored or how I can go about re-uploading with the appropriate copyright attributed. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikescala1415 (talk • contribs)

@Mikescala1415: Hi,

There are two issues: 1. you didn't provide a license, 2. the source mentioned is an external website. For all content previously published elsewhere, you need to provide a formal written license. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. The files can be restored once the the permission is received. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:27, 26 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

You know of any good download tools for the Google Art Project? Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:33, 25 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Adam Cuerden: Hi,

No sorry. Crisco uses several tools, but it is not so easy to get the files. Zhuyifei1999‎ has created a tool to get files from Gallica, and it would be great if a similar tool could be created to get files from GAP. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:26, 25 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

I just looked into it. The image requests to ggpht.com seem to have to authenticate to googleapis.com beforehand. And the majority of google search results on this matter are either "don't work anymore" or "search on Wikimedia Commons" (we should be proud of this) --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 03:04, 26 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Maybe this can be done with a en:Headless browser, but it might be beyond my ability to do this. (similar to or even harder than archiving flickr pages to archive.org) --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 08:13, 26 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello Yann!
User:Pitke has twice vandalized this file. Have a look, please.
With best regards, George -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:15, 25 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I reverted. I hope some serene discussion will take place. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:51, 25 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:32, 25 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Good job being civil and acknowledging my explanation provided in the edit summary, George Chernilevsky. /sarcasm --Pitke (talk) 09:47, 26 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hey Yann I think these images should be deleted as they are nominated for deletion from long. File:Parth Samthaan.jpg Regards, Rishika.dhanawade (talk) 12:04, 26 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Done Yann (talk) 12:09, 26 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

I take issue with how you closed the deletion debate concerning the "Wow! Signal" picture. If you believe that Ehman's handwriting (which is more than just the text it conveys) doesn't reach the threshold necessary for copyright protection, then please at least state so, rather than making a remark about copyrighting aliens and not making it clear whether that's just a facetious aside or whether that's your actual motivation in keeping the image. -- Dissident (talk) 21:10, 26 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello Yann, j'envisage d'importer cette photo de Flickr. Bien que la licence Flickr ne l'autorise pas explicitement, il s'agit de la reproduction d'une œuvre créée par une personne morte en 1907. Y vois-tu un problème ? Aurais-tu en tête un modèle à utiliser en pareil cas pour mentionner le nom du photographe ? D'avance merci. Cordialement, — Racconish^📥 12:42, 28 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Racconish: Bonjour, The licence qui convient est {{PD-Art-100}}. Pour les auteurs, tu peux mentionner le photographe (facultatif, mais c'est préférable) et le peintre avec Creator:Alfred Beau. Il faudrait retirer le cadre pour que l'image soit 2D uniquement. Ce compte Flickr est une source d'images intéressante, je vais le regarder de plus près. ;o) Cordialement, Yann (talk) 17:32, 28 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Merci. Cordialement, — Racconish^📥 18:22, 28 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

plaese dont delete my photo i didnt stole any photo all are free photos taken by my and the photos of pierre aldaher and dima sadek were send from lbci tv network lebanon to me to upload it on wiki im editor on wiki arabia rest of the photos are taken by me i didnt upload any copyright violations you can verify that thanks wisam yazeedoWisam yazeedo (talk) 14:21, 28 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

• File:جومانا بو عيد.jpg
• File:Staar saad.jpg
• File:ستار سعد.jpg
• File:ستار سعد 1.jpg
• File:Joumana bou eid.jpg
• File:Samer alsaeed.jpg
• File:Nawalk8a.jpg
• File:فراج.jpg

@Wisam yazeedo: Hi,

The copyright owner (LBCI TV network probably) needs to send a permission. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. For the images you take yourself, could you upload the original with the EXIF data. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:44, 28 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Yann, would it be ok to reupload this version over the existing file as it is of better resolution and likely a better option for projects? It is the same image obviously. Also the tag needs to be changed to {{PD-UK-Unknown}} as it appears to be taken during his time at London (1914-19), it's PD and shouldn't be listed as CC-By for sure. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 17:54, 28 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

@SpacemanSpiff: Hi, Yes, sure. I changed the license. Yann (talk) 18:04, 28 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Done, thanks. —SpacemanSpiff 19:15, 28 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

I really am confused. You said that I did not create the book cover for "Gualberto Castro: Ghosts, Gagsters, & Girls." I DID make the book cover, I wrote the book, I am also the pair of legs standing next to Gualberto. How do I prove that those are my legs, he was my husband, I created the book cover ...I own the rights? Why won't you believe me? Instead, it "off with her head" delete everything. Please answer my question.Chaos4tu (talk) 19:25, 28 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Chaos4tu: Hi,

For all content previously published, a formal written permission is needed. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:35, 29 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi Yann: In finding source at Commons:Deletion requests/File:107CavRegtCOA.jpg it turns out that the license of the source site is incompatible with commons being "official, non-commercial" as I put in my note. Is there some reason to close this kept even if the licenses don't match? Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:24, 28 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Ellin Beltz: Hi,

If this is a design of the United States Army, it is in the public domain, whatever the source says. I can't say, I am totally foreign both to heraldry and US Army stuff, but so far, nobody contested that the US Army is the author of this. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:32, 29 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Good, I've always wondered about these files. Can we get some kind of guidance/policy statement somewhere? Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:06, 29 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

There was one file that was questioned, but you & your friends removed all 75 of my files, Why? As some sort of punishment? Some of those files have been there since 2007. Now, if I want to get the files un-deleted you guys are forcing me to "prove" that I own them. Files do not have "birth certificates." It is by MY word that counts. And you have refused to believe me. For me, there is something that is very wrong here. And it must be true because you & your friend remove from your talk pages what I have been writing. Thus, occulting your conduct. Chaos4tu (talk) 10:08, 29 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Привет. Если сможешь - переведи.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gluchov1966 - ни чего не понял

Перенаправьте ваши сообщения русскоязычному администратору.

Спасибо.

С Уважением, Gluchov1966 (talk) 15:09, 29 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour Yann, j'ai initié une dr : Commons:Deletion requests/File:صالح البشير جعودة.jpg voulant en fait nominer tous les fichiers de l'utilisateur, chose que j'ai fais juste après : Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Nezar alhrari, question : est-ce que je peux retier manuelement le tag de la première deletion du premier fichier qui est tagué 2 fois : File:صالح البشير جعودة.jpg, quelle marche à suivre dans ce genre de cas ? --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:50, 30 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Christian Ferrer: Bonjour,

J'ai fermé la 1ère requête comme étant en double. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 12:54, 1 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Ok merci, cordialement --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:55, 1 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour Yann, je suis image rewiever et j'ai trouvé cette image. Regarde la licence, dois-je la remplacer par {{cc-zero}}, ou ai-je le droit de mettre ces 3 templates à la place : {{cc-by-2.0}}{{PD-scan|PD-old-70}}{{PD-1923}} comme sur cette image : File:A history of the birds of Europe, not observed in the British Isles (1862) (14750373905).jpg. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:43, 1 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

J'ai trouvé : {{cc-zero}}{{PD-scan|PD-old-70}}{{PD-1923}} est adéquate. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:49, 1 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

En fait cette image ne sera dans le domaine public que le 1er janvier prochain... si l'auteur est bien fr:Louis Moe. Bon, je ne vais pas demander la suppression, mais... Cordialement, Yann (talk) 19:51, 1 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Oups, merci pour la leçon, j'ai vérifié la date de publication qui me semblait si vieille, que je n'ai pas pensé à vérifier la date de la mort de l'auteur. Merci beaucoup. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:59, 1 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Merci bcp pour la suppr de l'image File:2-thiouracileessai.svg suite à Commons:Bistro#Comment_écraser_une_photo_.3F

En fait, si tu te rappelles, le prob c'est que:

1. il reste trois autres fichiers :

• File:2-thiouracile.svg qui redirige sur le suivant
• File:2-thiouracileessai2.svg
• File:2-thiouracile to-del.svg

La bonne disposition de la molécule est 2-thiouracileessai2.svg qu'il faudrait renommer, en l'écrasant 2-thiouracile.svg, tu comprends. Comme je l'expliquais si j'essaie de charger 2-thiouracileessai2.svg dans 2-thiouracile.svg, wiki détecte que l'image existe déjà (.File:2-thiouracileessai2.svg) et bloque le processus donc comme je l'expliquais encore, vaut mieux tout effacer, j'ai gardé outline 2-thiouracileessai2.svg et je le re uploaderai dès la suppression effective et ce avant le 7 nov car je vais rester hors connex pour plusieurs semaines ensuite et cette histoire commence à s'éterniser!

1. de la même façon

• File:N4-acetylcytosine.svg contient une mauvaise orientation
• File:N4-acetylcytosine2.svg contiente la bonne orientation

impossible de switcher leur nom => tout effacer

soit en image :

•  
  2-thiouracile.svg
  it's good
• 2-thiouracileessai2.svg bonne orientation à effacer
  2-thiouracileessai2.svg bonne orientation à effacer
• 2-thiouracile to-del.svg mauvaise orientationà effacer
  2-thiouracile to-del.svg mauvaise orientationà effacer
•  
  N4-acetylcytosine.svg
  it's good
• N4-acetylcytosine2.svg à effacer
  N4-acetylcytosine2.svg à effacer

toutes les autres en rouge c'est bon

•  
  4-Thiouracile
•  
  2-Thiocytosine
•  
  2-Thiouridine
•  
  4-Thiouridine
•  
  N⁴-Acétylcytidine
•  
  2-Thiocytidine

Merci de me notifier dès l'effacement général effectué pour que je recharge les bonnes dispo dans les bons noms. Je te remercie bcp de ton aide. Bonne soirée --Titou (talk) 20:29 , 28 September 2015 (Local)

@The Titou: Bonjour,

Tu peux demander le renommage en ajoutant {{Rename}} en haut de la description. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 17:46, 28 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

tu crois que je n'y avais pas pensé? impossible de renommer un fichier dans un nom qui existe déjà !!!! sans compter que ça laisse derrière plein de fichiers inutiles. Crois moi, stp, c'est plus simple de tout effacer et donc comme tu as la possibilité de le faire, s'il te plait, s'il te plait , fais le!! et si tu ne me crois pas , tu peux relire Commons:Bistro#Comment_écraser_une_photo_.3F qui traine depuis le 7 septembre! stp , j'aimerai bien pouvoir me débarrasser de cette histoire maintenant. --Titou (talk) 04:30, 29 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

@The Titou: Bonjour,

OK, c'est fait, sauf File:N4-acetylcytosine.svg, qui est utilisé. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 09:22, 29 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Oh merci bcp!! écoute, il faut effacer aussi File:N4-acetylcytosine.svg parce qd j'essaie maintenant de recharger dessus la bonne orientation stocké outline dans un fichier nommé N4-acetylcytosine2.svg => il me fait un wearning qui bloque le processus :

A file with this name already exists; please check the existing file if you are not sure whether you want to change it. Please choose another filename, unless you are uploading a technically improved version of the same file. Do not overwrite an image with a different one of the same topic (see file naming).

insert : une image de la molécule avec la mauvaise orientation donc File:N4-acetylcytosine.svg (!!!!???)

A file identical to this file (File:N4-acetylcytosine2.svg) has previously been deleted. You should check that file's deletion history before proceeding to re-upload it.

- et la meilleure est quand je change le nom du fichier outline genre acsineOUT.svg avant d'essayer de re-uploader=> la même erreur

A file with this name already exists; please check the existing file if you are not sure whether you want to change it. Please choose another filename, unless you are uploading a technically improved version of the same file. Do not overwrite an image with a different one of the same topic (see file naming).

A file identical to this file (File:N4-acetylcytosine2.svg) has previously been deleted. You should check that file's deletion history before proceeding to re-upload it.

et voilà donc le fameux paranormal de l'espace virtuel, ya des bugs. La seule solution que je vois donc est de continuer à tout effacer si ça ne marche tjrs pas demain = ça suffit pour aujourd'hui = ampy = c'est assez ^^ en malagasy. Bonne soirée et encore merci de ton aide - --Titou (talk) 18:40, 29 September 2015 (UTC) PS: "You should check that file's deletion history before proceeding to re-upload it.", ça veut dire quoi ????Reply

pour File:2-thiouracile.svg, j'ai upload sans prob la structure correcte sous le nom correct et qui est aussi effectivement utilisé sur https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/2-Thiouracile. Ouf! un de moins ... @Yann: Efface stp File:N4-acetylcytosine.svg qui n'est plus utilisé, rapidement, qu'on en finisse. --Titou (talk) 05:44, 30 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

@The Titou: Bonjour, C'est fait. Yann (talk) 12:59, 1 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Enfin FINI !!!!!!!!!!!! MERCI infiniment de ton aide --Titou (talk) 13:12, 2 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

I wonder if the bot is using the timestamp in the FPVotingPeriodFlag template. Perhaps Ralf copy/pasted an earlier nomination rather than create a new one? I've taken a timestamp from the next FPC candidate and used it here. Hope it is close enough in time to make no difference. -- Colin (talk) 19:05, 3 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

See Commons:Forum#user-zu-bl.C3.B6d-error, it's an "half" earlier nominatiojn, my error. --Ralf Roleček 20:38, 3 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Dear Yann

I am represent the company (Song Entertainment Ltd) of the Artist Simon On to edit the Wikipedia personal & Discography page So, for this photo, should be approved by Song Entertainment LTd.

Here also a photo rejected by Staff, Krdbot. Please help to approved the photo, If, there is still have problem of copyright, Please suggest us some way to provide/put the photo for wikipedia (eg. using the link which URL from our company website?)

Photos which rejected:

• File:安俊豪 Simon On.jpg
• File:Simon On Single-Friend icon720.jpg

Best Regard, Kayou — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vicl nict (talk • contribs)

@Vicl nict: Hi,

Song Entertainment Ltd, or its legal representative needs to send a permission via COM:OTRS, then the image can be restored. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:41, 5 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

How's that? Regards, nagualdesign (talk) 18:33, 9 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Sandvik-fish-side alt.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Sandvik-fish-side alt.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:39, 14 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Christian Ferrer: Salut,

Quand j'ai importé ce fichier, il était à l'adresse mentionnée avec une licence libre. Que fait-on ? Cordialement, Yann (talk) 13:32, 15 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Salut, rien. Si elle n'est plus disponible, on ne peux pas confirmer la licence. Le fichier devrait donc être supprimé autour du 21 octobre. C'est vraiment dommage, il y a 2 jours j'ai vu un autre cas similaire, regarde ma page de discussion. Peut-etre devrais on créer des sous-catégories à l'intérieur de celle-ci, pour classer les images en attente par ancienneté et ainsi traiter les plus ancienne en priorité. Cela pourrait limiter un peu ce genre de désagrément. Pour ma part, pour cette image, il n'y a rien à faire, à moins qu'en tant qu'utilisateur beaucoup plus expérimenté tu me puisse me suggérer une autre marche à suivre? --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:30, 15 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Christian Ferrer: Personnellement, je pense que ce fichier est OK. J'ai demandé d'autres opinions sur COM:VPC. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 16:37, 15 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

https://wikimedia.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_3wl7zNEQdp6z9Vb

This survey is intended to gauge community satisfaction with the technical support provided by the Wikimedia Foundation to Wikipedia, especially focusing on the needs of the core community. To learn more about this survey, please visit Research:Tech support satisfaction poll.

To opt-out of further notices concerning this survey, please remove your username from the subscription list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:51, 15 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sir, the following Images taken between 1930s and 1947 in India when the subjects first rose to office in British India and later in independent India (In 1947) have been wrongly deleted.These images are clearly PD-India and legitimately old enough (more than 74 years old) to be undeleted and kept.
File:Dr Rajendra Prasad PM Jahawar Lal Nehru Dr Anugrah Narayan Sinha Patna.jpg
File:Bihar Vibhuti Anugraha Narain Sinha portrait.jpg
File:Bihar Vibhuti Dr Anugrah Narain Sinha.jpg
File:Bihar Vibhuti Dr. Anugrah Narayan Sinha.jpg Request to kindly verify,As these images belong to the period 1930s-1947, they are certainly in PD-India and must be immediately undeleted and restored.Images already in PD India. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 223.176.3.118 (talk) 13:19, 10 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

These need to be before 1942 to be in the public domain in USA. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:15, 16 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour, je ne sais pas si je suis au bon endroit pour poster cette demande mais j'ai vu que tu étais admin sur commons. Les contributions de So62590 me semblent toutes des violations de droit d'auteur, exemple : ici pour File:Said Benrahma.jpg ou ici pour File:Farès Bahlouli.jpg. J'ai proposé à la suppression toutes les photos et les aient supprimé de wikipedia. Je ne sais pas si d'autres actions sont nécessaires d'où mon message  --Remy34 (talk) 07:32, 16 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Remy34: Bonjour,

Message pour ton message. En effet, ce sont clairement des violations du droit d'auteur. J'ai supprimé ces fichiers. Dans ce cas, tu peux même demander la suppression immédiate avec {{Copyvio}}. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 08:11, 16 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour, Yann -Les fichiers pdf sont des manuels scolaire de l'Arabie saoudite gratuits Pour le telechargement. L'autreur de les livres autorise la distrubtion gratuitement. -je telecharge les fichiers viideos de youtube, les convertir (online) et les transferer via url2commons il y a une outil sur wikimedia commons pour tranferer les video youtube, c'est legal. Je veux tranferer la rest des livres pour le niveau secondaire, Quelle license convient les livres gratuis a distribuer mais interdi a modifier ou etre utiliser dans autre oeuvre. merci pour m'avertir, je ne veux pas blocker mon compte — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noskilomaticha (talk • contribs) 13:04, 16 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Noskilomaticha: Bonjour,

"Gratuit" ne suffit pas. Merci de fournir une source donnant une licence libre, ou une permission via COM:OTRS. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 14:08, 16 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, but how can this page from 2015 be the source for an image uploaded in 2014 to Commons? --Túrelio (talk) 20:37, 16 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Túrelio: OK, that's not the source, but this is most probably a copyvio. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:40, 16 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

I agree. I suspect this too. However, I was just trying to find a likely source. --Túrelio (talk) 20:41, 16 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello

Thanks for the notification - I honestly say I don't know what the copyright rules on Wikipedia are. I think the best thing to do is quit uploading images, although I would like to know how to do it right.

I would be grateful if you would have sent me a link to simple and specific guidelines for sharing images on Wiki.

My username is Busbygoofy93 talk 15:34, 17 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Busbygoofy93: Hi,

It is quite simple: only upload images created by yourself. Otherwise, for all content previously published elsewhere, a formal written permission is needed. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:36, 17 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello Yann, il me semblait qu'en tant que reviewer je pouvais peut-être téléverser directement des images à partir de leur url. J'aimerais bien le faire pour les planches des Cahiers de tendance du MFA, comme par exemple [1], présentée ici. Y a-t-il un moyen ? Cordialement, — Racconish^📥 14:13, 17 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Racconish: Il faut que la source soit dans la liste des sites autorisés, ce qui n'est probablement pas le cas de amazonaws.com. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 14:20, 17 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Merci. Comment faire pour demander que ce site soit ajouté à ladite liste ? Cordialement, — Racconish^📥 14:47, 17 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Racconish: Il n'y a que les sites fiables ajoutés à cette liste, et je doute que amazonaws.com en fasse partie. :/ Désolé. Voir avec Steinsplitter sinon. Yann (talk) 14:51, 17 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour Yann.
Pour donner un coup de main à un contributeur débutant sur WP, je m'apprête à téléverser des fichiers sur Commons. Ces fichiers ont déjà été supprimés pour absence de licence valable.
Il semble, mais je voudrais en être sûr car je n'ai pas moi-même suivi l'affaire en amont, que le nécessaire ait été fait envers OTRS. Peux-tu me dire si les autorisations ont été accordées pour :

• Portrait Roxane Rodriguez - Photographie Florence Maeght - Libre de droits.jpeg
• Ladurée - Londres - Black Room - Hommage à Joris Carl Huysmans - Photographie Thierry Malty - Libre de droits.png
• Ladurée - Tokyo - Boudoir Marie Antoinette - Photographie Thierry Malty - Libre de droits.jpg
• Ladurée - Paris - Le Bar - Photographie Thierry Malty - Libre de droits.png
• Lydia Courteille - Bijouterie - Paris - Panoramique - Photographie Jacques Pépion - Libre de droits.jpg
• Appartement privé - Paris - Ligne bleue - Photographie Jacques Pépion - Libre de droits.jpg
• Cébès - Paris - Inexacte Instruction - Photographie Jacques Pépion - Libre de droits.jpg

Si c'est OK, je procède comment ? Je teléverse avec la mention "OTRS pending" et toi ou quelqu'un d'autre se charge de compléter ?
Bien cordialement, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arcyon37 (talk • contribs)

@Arcyon37: Bonjour,

En cherchant le nom des photographes, aucun résultat. Il faudrait être certain qu'une licence libre a bien été accordée avant d'importer les fichiers. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 22:24, 18 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Merci. Je n'importe pas les fichiers avant d'être sûr. --Arcyon37 (talk) 06:41, 19 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

I suppose I'm reaching a point of frustration and bewilderment here. I have sent Wikimedia Commons evidence of permission beginning in late 2013, the e-mails have continually been ignored and the pictures I've uploaded with the evidence of permission have been deleted anyways.

Would you like me to re-send you these e-mails?

Thank you,

Ben — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ben AZH9 (talk • contribs) 16:38, 17 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Ben AZH9: Do you have a ticket number for the emails you sent? Regards, Yann (talk) 20:41, 17 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

ticket:2012122810010589. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ben AZH9 (talk • contribs) 04:39, 19 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Ben AZH9: Hi,

There wasn't any answer to the last mail from OTRS. We don't have a permission for a free license. The copyright owner needs to send a copy of Commons:OTRS#Declaration of consent for all enquiries with the list of files. Sorry to insist, but this is to protect the rights of the creator. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:03, 19 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Geramany, who you gave a final warning for copyright violations in June [2], has uploaded at least one more copyvio: File:MAX (Perth light rail) Logo.jpg, which I've tagged for speedy deletion. Their other contributions since June may also need to be checked for copyvios. - Evad37 [talk] 01:52, 19 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Done User blocked, files tagged and/or deleted. Yann (talk) 15:55, 19 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

I just wanted to let you know that User:Pratikshapatil has uploaded another screenshot, File:Justdial Screensshot 19102015.png, despite your last warning. Aspects (talk) 13:25, 19 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Blocked by Eugene Zelenko. Yann (talk) 16:06, 19 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Everything is now clear to me about adding photos to wikimedia commons. I am a little bit busy, so I don't have a much time to take a photos of the stones, but I will be adding a lot of my own work here. That Tirolite you deleted was a photo of the one of my stones form my collection. The foto wasn't taken by me, but I think, when it's my stone I have a rights to this photo? Am I right? Everything about that photos you deleted is clear, I just wanted to tell you, I saw some photos on commons and there were a links under them, so i thought it is that simple, you just download photo, put a Link the Autor and everything is OK. Again I am very sorry. Have a nice day. GeologMax — Preceding unsigned comment added by GeologMax (talk • contribs) 21:18, 19 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@GeologMax: Hi,

The copyright belongs to the photographer, even if the stone is yours. You could certainly ask the photographer a permission. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:24, 19 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hey Yann,

Hope you're well. I noticed you recently took down one of the images I uploaded onto the Wikipedia page for Ricky Dillon's song: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BEAT_(Ricky_Dillon_song)

I acknowledge that I've made this mistake a few times, however, I want you to know that I'm still learning what technically qualifies under Wikipedia's guidelines. My question is, how does something like this get away with being uploaded, while a lot of my images (including cover art), continue to get deleted? Any help with this would be much appreciated.

Thank you. My user is CMCreator900 — Preceding unsigned comment added by CMCreator900 (talk • contribs)

@CMCreator900: Hi,

For all content previously published elsewhere, a formal written permission is needed. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:35, 17 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@CMCreator900: If you want to upload cover arts, you may upload them instead to other Wikimedia projects that can receive fair use content and supports local uploads (such as en.wikipedia). However, you need to include a fair use rationale to the file you will upload.

Well, the article that have a cover art image that you said that get away from being deleted, the image is uploaded on en.wikipedia, not on Commons. Also, the uploader of it added a fair use rationale. So that cover art image can be used, but only in a certain article (as it is fair use). So, Commons don't accept non-free content, but some other projects can. Pokéfan95 (talk) 10:01, 20 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi Yann, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited User:Yann/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 3 new jshint issues — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 00:13, 21 October 2015 (UTC).Reply

Bonjour Yann, the building is indeed recent. So my photograph should doubtless be deleted. Personally I find architects' interpretation of copyright law abusive. I don't like the idea of my everyday public environment being privatised. Hopefully that will change one day. If you look up other images by Art Grafix you will find other recent buildings. I have submitted a delete request to see how it works. As you'll have understood I'm new to Wikimedia. But as my interest is in contemporary architecture, I fear my collaboration with Wikimedia will be at best truncated, at worst short-lived. With best wishes, Art Grafix. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Art Grafix (talk • contribs) 16:01, 21 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Art Grafix: Bonjour,

Le mieux serait de transférer les images sur Wikipédia en français et en anglais, où elles sont acceptées. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 16:59, 21 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

I have responded to each of your three (3) nominations for deletion of content of mine. I agree delete on one, disagree keep on another, and a third probably needs more clarification from you in order to properly evaluate what you imagine the problem to be. - Thekohser (talk) 18:30, 21 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hola. Consulta. Yo subi varias fotos y bajo las condiciones que permite Commons para colocarlas en el sitio. Porque el mismo sitio justifica su uso de dominio publico. Hay algun otro problema para evitar utilizarlas? Quiciera informarme porque tengo fotos que quiero colocar en la pagina antes de seguir subiendo y que las borren. Gracias

Martin casm — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martin casm (talk • contribs) 00:30, 22 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Martin casm: Hi,

Sorry, I don't speak Spanish. Your images have been copied from the Internet, therefore you need a formal written permission before uploading them here. See COM:OTRS/es (in Spanish) for the procedure. You can get help in Spanish here: Commons:Café. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:49, 22 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi Yann,

I have permission to use all the files I have uploaded or own the files myself.

Thanks. Therealflea (talk) 12:29, 22 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Therealflea: Hi,

Some of your files are obviously copied from the Internet, so they are not yours. If you have a permission, please send it via COM:OTRS, then the files can be undeleted. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:41, 22 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

hi yann. first of all, i'm apologies about my writeing. English is not my mother tongue.

I noticed that you deleted a bunch of israeli prime-ministers and ministers photos but i didnt see any discussion about it. whay did you? Badidipedia (talk) 18:33, 22 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Badidipedia: Hi,

See [3]. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:23, 22 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

thanks Badidipedia (talk) 06:05, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

You deleted this file because it was falsely claimed that it ostensibly violated "PD-NYCGov". However, the file did not use that template as its license so it was erroneous to delete it for violating a license it did not claim. Please undelete ASAP. Illegitimate Barrister 11:53, 12 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Done Sorry, I overlooked that. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:16, 18 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

It's alright, no worries. Thanks for undeleting! Illegitimate Barrister 02:06, 24 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Why did you delete File:Pelotonfeuer.jpg? It was my own work, not a picture from the internet, so what's the problem with it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Imperator Orbis Terrarum (talk • contribs) 05:06, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Imperator Orbis Terrarum: Hi,

This is a game screenshot, therefore it is not your own work. See COM:DW. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:27, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour,

En référence à Commons:Deletion requests/File:Depardon 2012 b.jpg, oui, dire successivement "Je suis Claudine Nougaret" puis "Je suis Raymond Depardon" est pour le moins maladroit et forcément inexact. Mais Palmeraie et désert est la petite société de production de Nougaret et Depardon [4], palmeraieetdesert.fr est le site officiel de Depardon. Tout indique que Nougaret et Depardon souhaitent voir leurs photos respectives supprimées. Si c'est nécessaire, on peut demander une confirmation OTRS pour lier ce compte à Nougaret et Depardon mais le fait que ce soit le même compte qui demande la suppression des photos représentant ces deux personnes ne me parait pas être un vrai problème.

O.Taris (talk) 16:39, 24 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@O.Taris: Bonjour,

Merci pour ton message. Je serais d'accord pour supprimer les photos non utilisées si le photographe l'est également. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 07:28, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

Can you explain me why? --Scoopfinder^(d) 16:32, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Scoopfinder: Hi, This is a high resolution image with EXIF data, and there is already a regular DR. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:36, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour

Je ne vois pas trop de différence entre cette photo illustrant un vin (File:IGP Côtes-de-gascogne Tariquet et foie gras du Gers.JPG) et Coteaux du giennois, que conteste Scoopfinder et Pipi d'ange, que vous contesté tous deux. La première a été justement validé par toi Yann, après une âpre discussion, car elle ne met pas en valeur une étiquette mais un vin, ce qui est le cas des 2 autres prises dans un environnement. Cdlt --JPS68 (talk) 16:47, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@JPS68: Bonjour,

Dans le premier cas, on peut clairement argumenter que le logo sur la bouteille est accessoire par rapport à l'ensemble de l'image (même si Taivo n'est pas d'accord). Ici c'est plus difficile, à mon avis. Pour ce type de photo, il vaudrait mieux tourner la bouteille un peu vers la droite pour que le dessin soit moins central. Mais ça se discute, c'est pour ça je ne l'ai pas supprimée, mais j'ai créé une DR normale. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 16:59, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Et je t'en remercie. Par contre la discussion continue avec Scoopfinder [5]. As-tu les mêmes souvenirs que moi ? --JPS68 (talk) 17:09, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

This is neither nonsense nor vandalism. You are repeatedly adding a public domain licence tag that does not and cannot apply. The tag itself clearly states that details of any research carried out must be shown. There are no such details. No attempt has been made by anyone to ascertain the copyright status of the image. The image is one of a series of photographs taken while Alan was at Sherborne school (The full set has been seen at the school). As repeatedly stated, the Sherborne school archivist claims that they own the copyright on all photographs of all pupils taken while at the school. It is understood from her that the photographer died less than 70 years ago, so the image is definitely under copyright.

We have used (and are about to further use) a few of these images ourselves in one or two publications and in each case we have had to conform to the school's requirements with regard to copyright and attribution. The school has been so helpful to us, that unless, the image is removed, or you obtain permission to use it from the archivist of Sherborne school, I feel morally obliged to formally notify her of your violation of their copyright. 86.153.131.220 11:31, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@86.153.131.220: Can you say to us who is the photographer of the image? Also, the date of death doesn't affect whether this image will be in the public domain or not. It is the date when it is first published. It is published since 1923, and is more than 70 years ago and before 1945, so it is in the public domain. Please read first the text in the public domain tag. ★Poké⁹⁵ 11:41, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Not the case. Here in the UK, copyright subsists for the life of the photographer plus 70 years. So if (for example) the photographer died in (say) 1965, then copyright subsists in the image until 2035.^[1] The 70 years from the end of the year of first publication (not date of publication as you claim) only applies if the photographer really is unknown (and the act does require reasonable attempts to ascertain who the creator was). Section 12 paragraph 4 of the act goes on to state that an image where the creator was previously unknown is copyright if the creator is subsequently identified (and consequently a copyvio will have occurred). The date 1923 or 1945 does not appear in the relevant parts of the act anywhere. Regardless: I would be interested to see your evidence that a privately shot school photograph would have been 'published' before 1945, bearing in mind that the subject was completely unknown until 1973.

I did read the text in the public domain tag. Perhaps you should do the same. I am now sick and tired of pointing out that the tag (and by implication the CDPA) demands evidence of attempts to determine the originator of the image. I have repeatedly pointed out that no such evidence exists. 86.153.131.220 17:23, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi, First never removed a license, if there is a concern, you can bring this up in COM:VPC. Removing the license is vandalism. Second, as Pokéfan explained above, this license is valid until you prove it otherwise. This was discussed in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alan Turing Aged 16.jpg. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:50, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Since Pokéfan's understanding is wrong, the license is not valid. All anyone has to do is contact Sherborne school, and I'm sure that they will happily advise you of the copyright status. I very much doubt that a defence of a copyright violation on the grounds that, "the image is public domain because some unrelated third party told us who did own the copyright but we couldn't be bothered to follow it up'" is going to fly very far. In fact, I can guarantee that it won't. I'm afraid you are wrong. You are not ever entitled to assume that an image is in the public domain - especially when you have been provided information that someone is claiming copyright. It is not my responsibility to prove anything as I am not the one publishing the image in violation of the copyright holder's rights. No one would have a copyright violation case against me as I have not used this image for anything. As the entity using the image (and against whom any copyright violation lawsuit would be filed), it is your responsibility to verify if their claim is extant. 86.153.131.220 17:23, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

You are wrong on all points. Read the template again. Yann (talk) 17:52, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

The provision of your tag cannot override the law. The only possibly relevant bit in the tag is, "A photograph, which has never previously been made available to the public (e.g. by publication or display at an exhibition) and which was taken more than 70 years ago (before 1st January 1945);". Please show me where this provision is in the CDPA? 86.153.131.220 18:15, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

If I remember correctly, the new law is not retroactive, so what you say apply to pictures taken after the new law was enacted. Anyway, this was created by people who know quite a bit about copyright. If you don't agree, ask on COM:VPC. Until then...

Actually, the new law is retroactive because it replaces and incorporates the relevant provisions from all previous legislation. The older laws are no longer on the statute book. 86.153.131.220 18:32, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

As I said above, this template was written in 2007 by people who know quite a bit about copyright. End of discussion. Yann (talk) 19:06, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@86.153.131.220: My point is not wrong. I am just following what the public domain tag says. Since you haven't given the name of the photographer, it will still remain unknown and date of publication will only apply. When does the photographer died? You said it is less than 70 years ago, but that is not an enough evidence to say the photograph is not in the public domain. If you will read again the public domain tag, you won't find the photographer must be dead atleast 70 years ago or something like that. To finish this issue, please give the name of the photographer, and his/her date of death. ★Poké⁹⁵ 00:49, 26 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

I don't know the name of the photographer. But Sherborne school will. You are duty bound to ask them. I (and the copyright lawyers) don't give a fig what your tag says. What matters is what Section 12 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 says. It says that the photographer must have been dead for at least 70 years or must be unknown (and be impossible to assertain). The first publication date only comes into play if the photographer genuinely cannot be ascertained. Since the image cannot have been published prior to 1973, if it was published in that year, then the copyright expiry would be 1st Jauary 2044 (though there is no evidence that it was). A similar image taken as part of the same shoot was published in 1973.

I also find it curious that the tag is a "UK Public Domain" tag. There is no such thing as UK law. Not one single act of Parliament applies to the whole UK. For the purposes of this image, any tag would have to be an "English Public Domain" tag. Copyright law is different in Scotland and different again in Northern Ireland. 86.153.131.220 08:46, 26 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello, thanks for notifying me about copyright violations. I remember that I uploaded the two Berry Good photos long ago and the license changed before they were reviewed, but I can't recall File:Furukawa Airi.jpg and File:Takayanagi Akane.jpg. I seldom upload photos unrelated to Korean music. Are you able to retrieve a version of those photos and show them to me? --Chiyako92 (talk) 13:21, 26 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Chiyako92: Hi,

The first comes from [6], the second from [7]. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:09, 26 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

I'm pretty sure I've never uploaded those photos. --Chiyako92 (talk) 17:24, 26 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Chiyako92: Right, they were uploaded by Furukawa Churi4223 (talk · contribs). I don't know how the warnings came to your page. I removed them. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:26, 26 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello Yann, I'm still on a learning curve with images and Wikipedia, so please forgive me here. I thought everything was OK with these, but clearly not...

That said, quite a few of those images are actually mine, I took them, and say so in the respective information. Does this not count? How can anybody else give me written permission to use them? Do I really need to fill in one of those forms for every single image of my own I give myself permission to use? Is it not good enough just to say they are mine? If I must fill in a form for each of my own images I will do so, of course, and as soon as I work out what I need to do. This will also be a learning curve... I may try this now!

For the SCGroup page images, as I take my Wiki editing quite seriously and try to do it properly, I actually emailed the marketing and comms manager at SC Group, Mr Jamie Clarke, and in a conversation about my Wiki updates and use of images, he said they all images are SC Group owned and it should be clear as they'd not use images that were not their own to use on their website. But being efficient and answering emails even on a Sunday night, he's happy to sign them all off if that's what is required. That said, is there anyway we can do a blanket 'from SC Group website' or must they all be done individually?

Your answer for SCGroup will also be an answer for AMPV images as these were obtained via the same process (from RMMV/KMW)and will require the same solution.

Thank you --UndateableOne (talk) 18:47, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@UndateableOne: Hi,

There are 2 solutions: 1. the company adds a free license on its website, 2. they provide a permission via OTRS for a free license for the images hosted on Commons. The end result is the same: the images are available on the Internet under a free license. If the later solution is chosen, someone with the necessary authority (this depends of the company) has to send a mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org with the text here, and the list of images. Once the permission is sent, you can add the template {{OTRS pending}} to each image description, so the files won't be deleted for one month. This gives time to process the ticket, which can take some time, as there is always a backlog, and not enough volunteers. If nothing is done, the files will deleted after about a week, but they can be undeleted later. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:58, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi Yann, probably mot necessary, but thought I'd let you know how my learning curve is progressing with these images. The SC Group images will be dealt with tomorrow (28th) as the required person at the company will send of the relevant form. One of the images was acquired by SC Group from a photographer, and while the bought the rights to use it, his name is still in the metadata, so I'm assuming this might be an issue. I'm going to let that file delete and replace it with another. I'm also having issues with the KMW-sourced images (mostly of AMPV); as while they are happy to tell me they are most definitely their images, they're not prepared to take the time out to support that. They consider Wikipedia a waste of time. I will allow these to delete and source and load correctly (I hope) suitable replacements. All the other images that are mine will be sorted in the correct way in about 48hrs - just a bit busy right now. If anything I've suggested is wrong, please do let me know. Thanks.

PS: Some other Wiki user just dived in with both feet and, apparently at random and without any 'talk', just deleted some of the SC Group images. I shall advise him/her of our interaction and suggest that in future he/she takes a leaf out of your book, and talks before arbitrarily taking action.--UndateableOne (talk) 20:33, 27 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

TS Madison is the one providing the photo. so it's not an illegal photo of the owner of the photo is the person in the photo.pleaae stop removing her photos Ladysoalpr (talk) 12:20, 27 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

You recently removed my clients photo. the photo was provided by the client as was the previous photos. my name is Sharika Soal I am TS Madison's publicist. I can provide adequate proof that the photo and any photo I post belongs to my client TS Madison, Madison requested a photo be put on her Wikipedia page. please allow us her team to do so. you can email me or Madison directly but I am going to dispute the taking down of her photos. there is nothing illegal about a photo she took with her camera phone. thank you for your concern however. All the best — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.214.177.189 (talk) 12:25, 27 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Ladysoalpr: Hi,

Please the permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, then the file can be restored. See COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:40, 27 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hy Yann. I have a few questions about the pictures, you have blocked from my file: Contents

• File:EdgarsFoto 1010.jpg
• File:UPB LOC.jpg
• File:LOC logo.jpg

I am trying to create an article about the enterprise I work. These are our pictures, our logo`s and other pictures, from our information stocks (or how i could name theese files). I am not creator of these files, but our photographer is. Why you blocked these pictures? You can find them in our website, they are public! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anete m (talk • contribs) 13:35, 28 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Anete m: Hi,

Any content not created personally by you, or previously published elsewhere needs a formal written permission. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. The files can be restored once the permission is received. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:42, 28 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

But the logo of our enterprise is published in website www.loc.lv before I published it here. And this enterprise logo can use everyone, it is for public! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anete m (talk • contribs) 14:20, 28 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Anete m: Hi,

Yes, that's what I mean. Anything previously published outside Wikimedia needs a permission. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:08, 28 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello Yann, pourrais-tu jeter un coup d'oeil aux contributions de ‎Wedhoi (talk · contribs) ? Je l'ai averti à deux reprises de cesser de supprimer les bandeaux de suppression ou de modifier les contributions des autres, mais ça ne sert manifestement à rien. Cordialement, — Racconish^☎ 15:13, 28 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Done J'ai supprimé le GIF animé, et mis 2 avertissements. Yann (talk) 15:23, 28 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Merci. Cordialement, — Racconish^☎ 15:27, 28 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Recommence. Cordialement, — Racconish^☎ 16:18, 28 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Énième compte d'un banni, supprimé et bloqué. Thibaut120094 (talk) 16:26, 28 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Merci à toi aussi. Cordialement, — Racconish^☎ 16:27, 28 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi Yann, why should this be deemed a "Nonsense request"? Both IPs are from a provider in South Korea. A troll would hardly first write in Korean language. So it's at least plausible that the request comes from one of the depicted women. In regard to the scenario, the legal situation is totally clear. In Czech republic, where the image has been shot, even taking such a shot requires permission. The photographer has already stated that he did not ask the depicted. So, we are hosting an illegally taken image and we know it. If you aren't sure about the authenticy of the request, you might have asked for a mail to OTRS. I've done that now. --Túrelio (talk) 07:27, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

OK. I changed my closing statement, and I deleted the old version. Yann (talk) 09:51, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour, je reproduis une question que j'ai d'abord posée à user:VIGNERON, qui m'a orienté ici.

J'ai un doute sur une image pour laquelle une demande OTRS a été validée.

Christian Babonneau

En effet, il s'agit d'une partie d'une image publiée dans un article de la presse locale, mais il est indiqué comme source : archive de la Cambronnaise. C'est bien possible que cette photo figure dans les archives de ladite association, mais il faut que ce soit bien l'auteur de la photo (Denis Bourdeau, journaliste de P-O., on peut le retrouver par une recherche google) qui ait donné l'autorisation, il me semble. Est-ce que tu peux vérifier, d'autant que le contributeur qui a téléversé a déjà commis de nombreuses erreurs. Merci.--Rehtse (talk) 08:29, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Voir User talk:VIGNERON#Image et OTRS. Yann (talk) 09:54, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello Yann,

In relation to "Copyright violations" media files, I have received a permission email from the owner of the media files, The approved to use the media file "cc-by 4.0" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goodtiming8871 (talk • contribs) 09:08, 24 October 2015 (UTC) Are you asking me to update via COM:OTRS?Reply

Goodtiming8871 (talk) 09:05, 24 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Goodtiming8871: Yes, please send the permission to OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:14, 24 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello Yann, Thank you for your reply, I will send the permission to OTRS. If the files are confirmed by OTRS. Would you please delete the copy-right waring message on my talk page as it was created previously.

"Immediately stop uploading copyright violation"

Kind regards, Goodtiming8871 (talk) 21:51, 30 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I was going to open a deletion request about File:Satakunta Flight Fleet.svg, but page asks to contact the administrator who kept that file before re-nominating. I don't know if you've followed the FAF insignias, flags and pins lately, as sockpuppets of User:WPK~commonswiki (e.g. User:FAF Flags, User:Heraldia and User:FiCiW) have uploaded many inferior and misleading versions of those files. The file in question is also one. It is now a duplicate of File:Satakunnan Lennosto.svg, but the earlier versions are clearly not the squadron flag (see e.g. this image). So, is it possible to nominate it for deletion with these arguments? --Msaynevirta (talk) 14:59, 28 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Msaynevirta: Deleted as duplicate. Yann (talk) 15:23, 28 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Just noticed these files (all uploaded originally by sockpuppet Heraldia): File:Finnish Flight Force Staff.svg, File:Karelia Flight Fleet.svg and File:Laponia Flight Fleet.svg. They should be deleted for pretty much same reasons as Satakunta Flight Fleet.svg. --Msaynevirta (talk) 22:44, 30 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi ! @Yann: I have a question. Please tell me that, "Recent changes patrol" rights are enable in sa.wikipedia or not ? And how can I get those rights ? Thank you. NehalDaveND (talk) 09:08, 30 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@NehalDaveND: Hello, I don't know if recent changes patrol is possible on sa.wikipedia, but most Wikipedias don't have recent changes patrol enabled. If it is not enabled, you can only patrol new pages. And to get those rights on sa.wikipedia, you must request it at that wiki. But since you said before on COM:RFR that they are not responding, you may ask instead at m:Steward requests/Permissions#Miscellaneous. But make sure you asked every admin at sa.wikipedia on their talk page and they didn't respond before asking a Steward. Thanks, ★Poké⁹⁵ 13:08, 30 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

I think time I have seen the licence and then uploaded. But if it is not free, recommend for speedy deletion and inform me. Just let me know what should be written in the licence document of the website that so that I know it is free. Please teach me. But Don't block me.

Thanks (Imewhy26) 09:08, 30 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Imewhy26: Hi,

If the pictures are not taken by you, you can't add a license. You need a permission from the photographer. Please do not upload any more files unless you have a permission (see COM:L and COM:OTRS). Regards, Yann (talk) 10:40, 30 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello Yann, une condition à satisfaire pour ces fichiers est que la photo ait été prise par un photographe de Bollywood Hungama. Or, dans la plupart des cas, je ne vois pas de nom de photographe en suivant le lien donné. Qu'en penses-tu ? Cordialement, — Racconish^☎ 14:48, 30 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Racconish: Bollywood Hungama ne nomme (presque?) jamais ses photographes. En fait, au moins 99% des photos sont OK. Il suffit qu'elles aient été prises en Inde, et que ce ne soient ni une affiche, ni une copie d'écran d'un film. C'est une entreprise de paparazzis, qui prend des photos lors d'événements auxquels participent des acteurs/trices, réalisateurs, etc. de Bollywood. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:04, 30 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Merci ! Cordialement, — Racconish^☎ 16:43, 30 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi Yann, I'm really sorry, I have been trying to do it the correct way and I have tried my best to give as much information as possible, but it is my first time using Wikiversity and it is for an university assignment. I will remove the files you have highlighted, but could you please tell me if there were any others? — Preceding unsigned comment added by U3059210 (talk • contribs) 17:01, 30 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Could you please tell me how I can delete something that I have uploaded already? TIA — Preceding unsigned comment added by U3059210 (talk • contribs) 17:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@U3059210: Hi,

You can't delete files yourself. Only admins can do that. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:12, 30 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi Yann, I have a problem about this user; he re-uploaded the copyvio images, also he uploaded more images, and the warnings are futile for him. If you have any solutions please help. Thanks. --Taichi (talk) 20:19, 30 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

You have listed some of my uploads as possible copy write violations. I beg to differ. The picture in consideration was clicked by me and for all practical uses I have a written NOC from the performer. In case I am still missing something, please point me to it. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prts91 (talk • contribs) 06:57, 31 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Prts91: Hi,

This one is a montage made from [8] and [9]. You need a permission from the author(s) to be able to use them in this way. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:47, 31 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Why were File:Fastboot mode.jpg and File:Android 4.4.4 KitKat.png deleted? The Android content depicted in these screenshots are open source. ViperSnake151 (talk) 21:12, 1 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

@ViperSnake151: Are you sure? These were tagged as copyvios, and licensed as "own work". Yann (talk) 21:24, 1 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

The licensing tags should actually be as on File:Android 5.0-en.png (so this is more of a case of wrong license than actual copyvio) ViperSnake151 (talk) 23:07, 1 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Done Yann (talk) 08:58, 2 November 2015 (UTC)Reply