User talk:Yann/archives 17

Hi Yann, I'm talking about the File:GTV Logotipo.png, which is 100% my doing, I do not see where is the proof that the Internet service, or because it did, I just want to know one thing because it did and that evidence has to clear my image. Since not find any evidence that the internet kick, I request that I recover the file, which I will not be uploading more at Wikipedia. You see that is 100% mine, although I have Adobe Illustrator file where you think, if you sent it to you so you can see that if I did and I have administrator authority channel Genios Televisión to create your logo and put it on Wikipedia. Thank you.

Hola Yann, estoy hablando del Archivo GTV Logotipo, que es 100% mio, tengo los archivos Ilustrador y el permiso del administrador del canal de poder crear su Logotipo, solicito pruebas del porque borraron mi imagen y espero que me responda lo antes posible. Gracias --Matador3020 (talk) 03:42, 7 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi Yann, "Probably" is no reason to suggest removal! You must have VALID PROOFS - according to Wikipedia principles. In fact Dr. ERMIL NICHIFOR is my father and this picture was made BY ME in 1970.--Snichifor (talk) 18:53, 7 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi Yann, as the threshold for copyrightability varies between countries: would the UEFA logo in this image File:UEFA EURO 2016 FRANCIA.PNG likely be considered copyrighted in France? Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 08:35, 6 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hmm. Borderline. It all depends whether the drawing of the ball is original or not. I moved it to a proper DR. Yann (talk) 09:18, 6 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks.

Again threshold, but this time of an outside information panel in France including photos: File:Feigneux (60), carrière de l'église de Morcourt.jpg. The uploader has no idea [1] about the original photographer, but argued that it shouldn't be a copyvio due to the low quality. What's your opinion? Any chance? --Túrelio (talk) 16:49, 7 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

I don't think this is acceptable according to our current rules and practice. Yann (talk) 06:53, 12 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour Yann,

Suite à notre échange, le DRH de Sodern a envoyé un email à Commons pour donner la permission de leur utilisation en ligne, mais les images ont quand même été supprimées... Peux-tu m'indiquer ce que je dois faire ?

Les images n'apparaissent plus dans mon compte Commons, je peux à nouveau les mettre en ligne mais je ne sais pas ce que je dois faire pour qu'elles soient acceptées ?

C'est quand même plus agréable un article illustré, non ?

Bonne journée,

Isabelle Izy ze Frog (talk) 16:20, 13 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour, Yann. Je m'adresse à toi car échanger en français plutôt qu'en anglais m'est vraiment plus facile.

À l'occasion, pourrais-tu jeter un coup d'oeil aux images dont il est actuellement question sur User talk:Ismael zniber ? Note qu'Ismael zniber se déclare étudiant sur WP-fr, et que d'après ce que j'ai compris par ailleurs, il devrait avoir environ 15 ou 16 ans.

En dehors de quelques images identifiées comme étant des copyvios (en tant qu'images qu'on retrouve sur des livres protégés par le droit d'auteur), il est question d'images pour lesquelles j'ai apposé le modèle {{Wrong license}}. Comme déjà remarqué et expliqué à Ismael dans le cadre de WP-fr, il confondrait régulièrement scanneur ou téléchargeur et auteur (c'est pourquoi il indique, y compris pour des images anciennes, qu'il en est l'auteur, et comme date, celle de son téléchargement) ; par ailleurs, en matière de source, ce n'est pas toujours clair. Je lui aurais bien expliqué de nouveau ici, mais il m'a signalé sur WP-fr qu'il ne désirait plus que nous échangions (pour le contexte, voir par exemple [2], [3] et [4] et [5]).

Concernant les images pour lesquelles j'ai apposé le modèle {{Wrong license}}, il y a de très fortes chances qu'elles relèvent du domaine public. Pour en être sûr, il faudrait à mon avis que le modèle {{Information}} soit mieux renseigné. Pour le moment, Ismael a parfois enlevé le modèle sans tenir compte de la mention de messages types sur sa PDD (Si vous pensez que ce fichier a la bonne licence, veuillez expliquer pourquoi sur la page de discussion du fichier) ; modèle que j'ai remis en faisant référence à ladite mention en commentaire d'édition, tout en me disant que procéder ainsi sans véritablement échanger n'est vraiment pas la meilleure solution.

Pour le domaine public au Maroc, j'ai fourni il y a peu des indications dans Help:Public domain#Copyright terms by country - Morocco, et le modèle {{PD-Morocco}} ne me paraît pas convenir (mais à ce stade de mes contributions sur Commons, ne me sentant pas encore très à l'aise, je ne me vois pas le changer).

Bref, si tu en as envie et peux, ton aide serait la bienvenue. Cordialement. --Frenchinmorocco (talk) 09:42, 14 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

PS : Depuis, j'ai aussi proposé à la suppression des images provenant de pages web diverses et dont il dit être l'auteur, dont celle-ci qu'il a téléchargée en février dernier. Pour rappel, tu l'avais déjà bloqué une semaine, je crois, car après que des copyvios lui ont été signifiés, il avait recommencé. --Frenchinmorocco (talk) 20:06, 21 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour,

J'ai vu ce cas compliqué, mais je ne suis pas chez moi, et j'ai peu de temps en ce moment. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:13, 22 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Salut Yann,

unfortunately, I received the deletion information too late. To your requests, I like to object and ask how I can avoid a new deletion:

• "Probably not own work": Yes, this is my own work.
• "small size": It is a cropped image taken from a larger one including myself.
• "no EXIF": the image imformation got lost during editing/cropping.

Lieven (talk) 15:22, 20 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

It seems that INeverCry agrees with me. Please request undeletion at Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests‎. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:46, 22 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Actually, I don't really care. It was not a very good picture, but I thought I might want to share it with the community. I'm planning to get a better picture the next time I might meet him. -- Lieven (talk) 22:07, 22 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi Yann, regarding your comments at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Antoni Gutierrez Diaz.png/2 I want to ask for your opinion. I'm considering nominating not only as VI but as Quality Images the illustrations created by students of art. But reading Commons:Image guidelines and Commons:Quality images seems something for photography not for drawings or infographies. What do you think about it? Is worth promoting these nominations? --Dvdgmz (talk) 18:28, 26 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Yann. Check your email—you've got mail! You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

--Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:42, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Yann. Check your email—you've got mail! You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

--Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:44, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi: I have just noticed the erasing of image "Huevos de Relleno" from Wikimedia Commons. The image illustrates the article "Huevos de Relleno" from the Spanish (Español) section and was made by me so no Copyright violation was done. How can I avoid this? Ariôn (talk) 09:36, 20 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

This image is from [6] which has a statement saying "© 2002-2012 Fotolog, Inc.. Please request undeletion. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:18, 22 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Yann, there is also a notice stating: Title to this content and related rights are reserved by the respective copyright owner. What does that imply? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:11, 29 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi Yann- It was suggested that I ask for your input on how I might be able to improve the scope of Commons:Valued image candidates/School children (Lukhanyo Primary School, Zwelihle Township (Hermanus, South Africa) 03.jpg. Any suggestions would be welcome. Thank you.--Godot13 (talk) 06:34, 13 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

I am afraid others are right. I don't see how a scope could be made for this image. Instead of finding a scope for an image, it is much easier or better to do the opposite: finding an image for a scope. Find a subject which is interesting to you, define a scope, and find an image for it. BTW it is a nice image. Best regards, Yann (talk) 15:01, 22 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Understood. Thank you. --Godot13 (talk) 08:44, 31 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

• Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sex intercourse.jpg

You previously participated in a discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sex intercourse.jpg.

There is another discussion ongoing, again, at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sex intercourse.jpg.

Please if you wish to do so you may voice your opinions and comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sex intercourse.jpg.

Thank you for your time, -- Cirt (talk) 17:26, 7 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

According to EXIF metadata, it is an AP photo. Jespinos (talk) 16:59, 8 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Dear Yann, this file which you just deleted was created with permission from the New York Philharmonic archives and was stated as such on the file info. If this info needs to be clarified further or a different copyright tag used, please let me know as soon as possible. I would like this file restored as soon as possible. Please feel free to contact me on en.wikipedia.org as well as here. Jonyungk (talk) 15:11, 19 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

I once again nominate this image for deletion. It contains false information. It has been replaced by a file which shows the correct outline and is no longer in use.--Peulle (talk) 13:05, 29 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

J’ai à nouveau des problèmes avec cet utilisateur et là ça devient franchement pesant. Merci de bien vouloir jeter un œil sur le bistrot du jour. Cordialement, --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 21:25, 29 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

I tried the reduction of the red dominant, looking for an acceptable white balance, unfortunately the green channel had very low level, so, 'what is not there, it can't be created'. Look at the result and then, if is not satysfying, feel free to revert it.-- Fulvio ³¹⁴ 08:39, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

In 2011 you participated in Commons:Administrators/Requests/Jcb_(de-adminship 2). That discussion ended with User:Jcb losing his administrator privileges.

This note is to inform you that User:Odder proposed Jcb have unconconditional access to administrator privileges restored.

Commons:Administrators/Requests/Jcb (readmin) is scheduled to close on May 20th.

Cheers Geo Swan (talk) 23:34, 14 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi Yann, could you eventually take a short look at the b/w drawing/logo, that is requested for deletion in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Front de Libération de la Bretagne.jpg about whether it is above threshold of originality and/or would be considered copyrighted according to French jurisdiction. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 19:58, 16 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hey Yann I'm requesting your permission to use a quality photo taken by you of a small village girl in Madhya Pradesh for a online PSA. If yes, how should i attribute it to you? Thanking you

File:Om Navashivam, traditional hindu song, Kumaon, Uttarakhand.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Fulvio ³¹⁴ 17:14, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Om Navashivam, traditional hindu song, Kumaon, Uttarakhand.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Fulvio ³¹⁴ 17:21, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

I Copy the message I wrote in the discussion of User:Fastily: "I've seen that We have kept this file par "previous discussion". As stated in avery discusion, the file is poorly made, and gives confusing information. In the previous discussion it was kept beacuse was in use in 15 pages in at leat two proyects. But that was then, before people noticed that the map has mistaken info. Nowadays is in use only at :es, and in less than 15 pages, so its innacurate to keep the file par previous discussion when the condition given then are no longer fitting the file."--Coentor (talk) 10:14, 26 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Rahul Bott (talk) 08:20, 28 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Come On Fellows The U.S.O's for the U.S.A. - NARA - 514069.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 08:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour, Yann. J'ai enlevé Category:Yasmine Lafitte de Category:Sex business in Morocco car cette actrice est d'origine marocaine, mais vivrait en France depuis l'âge de 5 mois et y exerce, d'après l'article Yasmine (actrice). Cela ne m'a donc paru rien avoir à voir avec le sex business au Maroc. La catégorie est maintenant vide et continue de s'afficher dans Category:Commerce in Morocco. Que faut-il faire dans ce cas ? Demander sa suppression ? Si oui et si tu es d'accord avec mon changement, pourrais-tu t'en charger ? ou faire ce qui est nécessaire ? Cordialement. --Frenchinmorocco (talk) 19:25, 13 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

You participated at the earlier discussion on licence choice for Featured Pictures. A number of users felt that such restrictions should be made at policy level. Please comment at Commons:Requests for comment/AppropriatelyLicensed. This is a proposal to amend this licence policy to disallow future uploads where the sole licence is inappropriate for the media (e.g., GFDL for images). In earlier discussions there were a number of comments that, while reasonable opinions, did not align with Wikimedia's mission for free content. Please read the FAQ before commenting. Thanks -- Colin (talk) 22:54, 15 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Why did you delete that Wii Party logo? It was only simple text, and simple text logos aren't really copyrighted. EditorE (talk) 13:27, 21 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hallo. Some years ago you deleted this file as a copy vio. However, in an article in the German WP the file was used as a source. Could you please look up in the deleted description page, from where the image was taken and/or if there has been a somewhat more complete citation of the scanned article. TIA. --Matthiasb (talk) 22:26, 10 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Rowland Scherman is asking to be credited with images he created for NARA - see an e-mail I have forwarded to you and en:user talk:Motamanx. I see that you have a page user:Yann/NARA and wondered if you could help. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 11:33, 12 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

I am on Wiki Holiday for now. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:53, 13 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour,

Je suis en vacances du wiki for l'instant. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 08:53, 13 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Gandhi being carried to the prayer ground.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Gandhi being carried to the prayer ground.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 00:41, 6 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi, some time ago you deleted File:Complexity-map-overview.png, claiming it is a copyvio. Yet, the original is still at Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Complexity-map-overview.png uploaded User:Bcastel3, aka Brian Castellania, sociology professor who specializes in the study of complexity, who seems to be the designer of that work, and released it on Wikipedia. Am I missing something here? -- Mdd (talk) 15:03, 12 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Geronimo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Deanlaw (talk) 18:21, 20 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Gandhi and Nehru 1942.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Fowler&fowler (talk) 13:48, 11 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:MKGandhi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Fowler&fowler (talk) 23:17, 11 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Welcome back, Yann. --Túrelio (talk) 15:53, 24 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Glad to see you, back. JKadavoor Jee 15:35, 25 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. You closed this deletion request as deleted, but apparently forgot to delete the file. Taivo (talk) 14:03, 30 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Oops... Done. Yann (talk) 14:28, 1 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Yann. You have new messages at Eleassar's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Good evening, last february you deleted the file File:Vista de ventas de zafarraya.jpg, saying it had copyright, well it was a picture i took as far as i remember so i think there is no copyright at all. Could you restore it? --AMPERIO (talk) 17:03, 5 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

I restored it, and created a DR: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vista de ventas de zafarraya.jpg. Could you please explain why there is a copy on this website? Yann (talk) 17:13, 5 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. You started deleting files from this DR, but only got halfway and never closed the DR. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:45, 5 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

estimado usuario la imagen o archivo en cuestión fui co-autor en las mejoras o modificaciones que se le hicieron al escudo familiar, la imagen fue colocada después en la pagina de la fundación de los condes de Luxburg, debe tener en cuenta la imagen es de los condes de luxburg y era allí donde se encontraba en uso. es un emblema de una familia noble europea y en cuestión no se a violado ningún tipo de derechos de autor como usted indica., asi mismo le pido que levante el letrero que coloco en la la imagen encuestion y reistalar la misma--201.248.227.146 15:36, 7 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

user estimated or image file in question was co-author on the improvements or modifications that were made to the family coat of arms, the image was placed on the page after the founding of the counts of Luxburg, consider the image is the counts of Luxburg and was where it was in use. is an emblem of a European noble family and was concerned not violated any copyright as you indicate. likewise I ask to lift the sign placed on the image and reistalar ATISSUE it.--201.248.227.146 15:40, 7 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello, If that is the case, please send a permission. See COM:OTRS for details. Yann (talk) 15:41, 7 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

he solicitado los permisos pero o he recibido ningún mensaje, me podrías ayudar en eso de verdad se me a hecho muy difícil entender cono hacerlo --Von Luxburg (talk) 19:25, 7 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi, the file is from the website with permission. {{OTRS|ticket=https://ticket.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketID=3216837|nota=Autorització per utilitzar http://www.castellersdevilafranca.cat/ sota llicència CC-BY-SA. --[[Usuari:Vriullop|V.Riullop]] ([[Usuari_Discussió:Vriullop|parlem-ne]]) 20:00, 2 jul 2009 (CEST)}} = Autorization to use http://www.castellersdevilafranca.cat/ in CC-BY-SA.

Discussion page: [7] See this and please load again the picture. Thank's --Baggio (talk) 15:57, 7 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

• As an OTRS volunteer, I have checked the given ticket. I can confirm that the page/website [www.castellersdevilafranca.cat] is under a free license and material from there can be used on Wikipedia. Please confirm if the given image is from the website and the copyright belonged to the owner of the site. If so, it would also be free and have necessary licensing to be undeleted.

(P.S. If I confused anything, please contact me on my Enwiki talk page)

TheOriginalSoni (talk) 18:25, 7 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Restored, and ticket added. Yann (talk) 08:29, 8 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thank's.

Dionyssis Konstantopoulos 2 Αυγ (Πριν από2 ημέρες)

προς Εμένα Αγαπητέ Χρήστο,

με τιμά το ενδιαφέρον σου για τα εικαστικά μου πονήματα και φυσικά σου ΠΑΡΑΧΩΡΩ ΤΗΝ ΑΔΕΙΑ δημοσίευσης στη Βικιπαίδεια της επισυναπτόμενης φωτογραφίας μου, που προέρχεται από το προσωπικό μου αρχείο, είναι αναρτημένη στη σελίδα "προφίλ" μου στο facebook και έχει τραβηχτεί από τη Μάρθα Αγούλου στο εργαστήριό μου στη Ζάκυνθο. Στέλνω και κάποια έργα- αξιοποίησέ τα όπως επιθυμείς. Σχετικά με τα άλλα θέματα που έθεσες τηλεφωνικά να ξαναμιλήσουμε σύντομα. Ευχαριστώ Διονύσης. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChrisAmp (talk • contribs)

Hello, can someone please explain me, why is this files copyright violation? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jirka.h23 (talk • contribs)

Hi Yann,

You recently deleted a photo on the cover of the book of my brother Josep Font i Huguet. This book, Sentiment Català is available in google books and don't have any copyright restrictions. Anyway I am the administrator of the rights of the work of my brother and please, do not delete the new file I uploaded.

Thank you. Jaume font — Preceding unsigned comment added by Santiagofont (talk • contribs)

Image Source : I myself have designed, created and uploaded Virchand Gandhi photos. Hi sir. Appreciate your work on Wikipedia. Sir I myself have designed, created and I am owner of this photo. So please remove speedy deletion tag and I have uploaded same for free usage for educational and non-commercial use. I extend my complete permission. Please guide, how to add details if photos are designed by uploader. Same was published with my article published in NY's newspaper. I have sent you message also. Please extend your desired co-operation. Sir this photo is duly added with my article at NY's this link [8]. Which should help in proving my claims. You can verify with newspaper . Pankaz Jain (talk)

Hi, Yann,

May we use your WIPO headquarters photo from 2005 for our online newsletter? How would you like me to attribute it, if so?

Thanks, Arva

By the way, this is the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. I'll certainly send you an image of how we use your image before we post live, and we really will appreciate your permission. Mind contacting me directly?

Thanks, Arva — Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎Arvalarva (talk • contribs)

Hi Yann, thanks for your comment on the nomination page. I don't really know, how i can add this description correctly to the image descriptions - without this stupid google-tranlated text and how i can add the refferences correctly (linking, and so on). Maybe, you can give me some tips how i can do this correctly without doing any formating errors? Are there some template codes for such issues available? Thanks & greetings, Christoph (talk)

Just... thank you for your work ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ranndi7 (talk • contribs)

Hi there sir, you have filed a deletion to my After School images. I found them in a random sites such as google or any other sites. I've searched thoroughly to where the images came from and I've found out those images were taken from a Korean fan. The author of the images didn't forbid those sites to stop using his/her images to posted on their sites, but instead. He/She let them to use it as in free. I believed it's a free license. I've provided the image source and the author's blog. I put credits I'm not plagiarizing, I plagiarized if I didn't put the source at all. Hoped you understand it, please undo the deletion for the other images that are deleted. I'm not starting a contest here I'm only explaining my side, thanks have a good day.

Bonjour, Vous avez supprimé la photo "Finale de la Coupe de France RC Cannes-USSP Albi" sur l'article wikipedia "Virginie Jouault". Cette photo est tirée du site internet http://rc-cannes.pagesperso-orange.fr/ Ce site est abandonné. Je veux bien citer le site en référence. J'aurais dû le faire.

Cette photo a plusieurs intérêts : elle est très significative de sa carrière du poste auquel elle jouait, rares sont les photos de Virginie Jouault de cette époque précise où elle était professionnelle, la photo est originale et esthétiquement belle, pour une fois que c'est le cas pour ce sport.

Je me permets donc de revenir vers vous pour trouver une solution afin de réinsérer cette photo.

Cordialement. Emmanuel Lecomte

Hi - just seen your reasoned (but esoteric) comment on my Russell badge. I was very annoyed at its deletion on Russell (main Wiki) page and got into trouble when I admittedly over-reacted by deleting the whole page as a result. However, someone kindly elected me back in. Now, let's sort out the original. No photographer (of 50+ years ago) is going to object to this image on a badge, surely. And the badge is a unique (I use the word carefully) part of social and political history. Let's get it back there. My common-sense and respect of my youth(!) and judgement of copyright say we should do this. Despite my number of contributions to Wiki, I feel an admin amateur. Please help! - Tony

Hello, I have added the licence, and it is mine, but the page still says something is missing: File:Royal Park Towers Colombo.jpg. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Popthepuff (talk • contribs)

permission sent, please check OTRS. thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarahleann (talk • contribs)

Yann, you deleted this photo: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Peterfeaver.gif.

It was taken from this webpage:http://tiss.sanford.duke.edu/people/executive.php

I had the owner of the photo email wikimedia with permission for it to be uploaded for use in the commons. How do I get access to the photo again to use it for Peter Feaver's wikipedia page?

Yann,

This is the first time I have uploaded a image file to wikimedia commons. I made a mistake in selecting the licensing and copyright for this file. This file is "File:VanDiagram-updated.png" and it is not a copyrighted file and is free for public use. Plant With Purpose is the organization that I work for who created the file, but the file is neither copyright protected or trademarked. Let me know if you need any further information from me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cunningchrisw (talk • contribs)

Hi, This is Oriol, I've seen you added some info to a pic I uploaded (File:Escriptori cat.jpg). It is one of my first pict uploaded and as you've seen I have troubles... Could you info me about the licensces? I did just upload an image download from google images... What is the licensce, how can I know it?

Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oriol D (talk • contribs)

Hi Yann, Thanks a lot, i have seen your message. One question, what kind of liscense was I am supposed to choose? Which one did you choose? The next time I wonder to do it on my own :p Thanks again!

Bonjour! J'ai envoyé le formulaire d'autorisation à l'auteure de la photo de Daniel Paillé, soyez attentif à recevoir l'autorisation d'utiliser l'image. Merci! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samounet (talk • contribs)

Hi Yann. I see that you have posted a comment on this nomination for deletion page. But I think you probably wanted to delete the file. I could be wrong but I do find a month to be an unusual long amount of time for a delete nomination to be going on. Usually, these discussions only last a week. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.70.214.226 (talk • contribs)

Bonjour Yann,

Tu as effacé les images que j'avais uploadé sur l'article Mister Minit. Car copyrighté. Existe t'il quelques part un formulaire à soumettre pour informer Wiki que je possède les images et que l'entreprise m'a autorisé à utiliser les logos et images? Dernière question, quelle licence utilisé pour les images sensibles logos, merchandising par exemple qui a été déposé par l'entreprise? Ceci pour qu'il soit non utilisable et non intégrable ailleurs que sur Wikipedia?

Merci par avance pour ton aide.

Jette un oeuil à l'article si tu as un moment :) Assez peu de source malheureusement, pas faute d'avoir cherché :) A + http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilisateur:Anonymous12011987/Brouillon#Les_nouveaux_services_au_fil_des_ann.C3.A9es

<Apparent copyright violation.> REQUEST FOR SPEEDILY DELETION OF FILE I CREATED ABOVE. IT WAS A MISTAKE. STILL LEARNING TO EDIT. THANKS Ekhaya2000

Dear Yann,

Thank you for posting the image of Mahatma Gandhi and Shastri. I would like to use this image in an article I am submitting for publication on leprosy. I understand it is no longer copyright protected. Do you know where I can locate the original photograph at the optimal resolution? Thank you so much for your help. I really appreciate it.

Caroline

Caro Yann, os arquivos que carreguei foram excluídos da página do Sampaio Correa na Wikipedia (menos um) e fui notificado quanto à questão de direitos autorais. Concordo que em alguns arquivos que foram utilizados eu pus apenas como fonte a "Internet", porque entendo que já entraram em domínio público, uma vez que não dá pra saber quem são seus autores. Mas em outras ocasiões, eu citei a fonte de onde retirei, como são os casos da Revista Placar e do blog Futebol Maranhense Antigo. A figura de Samuel Rosa e Marcelo Adnet não é uma fotografia, não, são dois cliques que dei nos seus respectivos vídeos que estão divulgados no Youtube, fonte que foi devidamente citada. Eu fiz a montagem. Que falta, então? Que eu coloque o autor do vídeo do Youtube? Sinceramente, gostaria que me explicasse isso melhor. Já li a política do WikiCommons, mas acho que não compreendi bem. Em todo o caso, fiz com a melhor das intenções, pelo grande amor que tenho pelo time do meu coração. Peço que esta mensagem não esteja ao alcance de outras pessoas, pois que é de natureza muito pessoal. Atenciosamente. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clau Carvalho (talk • contribs)

Thanks for your cleanup of the fake Dschwen block. It was a proxy server with no other edits on Commons. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:12, 12 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello Yann,
The images and the content I am working on is of the organization I am working with and the use of images and logo is with their permission.
So, how do I proceed in this? (P.S. I am new here)

Warm Regards, Blessin — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blessinvarkey (talk • contribs)

Hello, Yann. I uploaded mage http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jmtindel&oldid=109562351 without copyright info. It is a company logo, and I have contacted the company to find out how they want to distribute it. I will add the appropriate tag once I have that info, or upload another copy, if it has been automatically deleted in the meantime. Thank you! --Mike (jmtindel)

Hi Yann, I tried to move the w:File:Complexity-map-overview.png from Wikipedia to Commons, but it seems you deleted this file in 2010. As far as I can see this file is original work by w:User:Bcastel3, who identified himself as Brian Castellani, sociology professor of the Kent State University, Kent Ohio. Could you explain, what I am missing here? And maybe how we could solve this? -- Mdd (talk) 15:20, 14 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

I just noticed I asked you this question 3 months ago (see here), and there was one argument back in 2010 (see here. -- Mdd (talk) 15:43, 14 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

I don't what's going on with this file. I restored it, and created a DR. I copied your messages there. Please comment here: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Complexity-map-overview.png. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:42, 14 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, it seems we can work this out. I did notice the image info here on commons was incomplete, and didn't (yet) link to w:User:Bcastel3/Brian Castellani. -- Mdd (talk) 18:23, 14 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Dear Yann, File:Ellen_Nisbeth.jpg has been deleted. I have the rights to use this photo. See http://www.ellennisbeth.com/#!gallery/c24vq where it is clearly stated that the photos are available for PR-usage. Please make it available again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philia85 (talk • contribs)

Unfortunately, PR-usage is not enough for us. We need a written permission for a free license. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:35, 18 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

At Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Constanza_Lüer.jpg we have a nonsense DR, my vk stating that file is in use and then poof, it is gone. What’s going on? -- Tuválkin ✉ 20:46, 18 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

As I wrote, it was deleted by Fastily. Please ask him, or request undeletion at COM:UR. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:50, 18 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

I’m asking you: As an admin, as opposed to a clerk or a robot, do you think that the DR above was done properly? -- Tuválkin ✉ 21:56, 18 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Whether a file is in use may be of interest if the scope is questioned. The reason for this deletion seems to be a suspected copyright violation, and here we cannot have existing use trump copyright. --Dschwen (talk) 22:04, 18 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Where is that copyvio mentioned in the DR? -- Tuválkin ✉ 22:44, 18 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nowhere. It should have been. But since you are asking what that was I'm answering you: "A probable copyvio". You can read the deletion rationale here. --Dschwen (talk) 22:56, 18 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Dschwen. My question («What was this?») was not about what was on the deleted image, but something like «what was this all about?», with «this» being the DR itself. -- Tuválkin ✉ 02:02, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

(Edit conflict)

Meanwhile I read JuTa’s notice (08:32, 12 November 2013) in the uploader’s talk page. All good, then. However, this exchange should be added to the DR (out side the blue area), because other users, like me, may expect DRs to be done in a transparent, clear fashion. -- Tuválkin ✉ 22:59, 18 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

OK, fine. I added "for copyright violation" in my closure comment. Yann (talk) 07:19, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Yann. Excuse me, as I am new user. You deleted the images I uploaded to Carlos León Escudero page. The images are artworks by the artist taken from the website of his gallery ( http://www.maxestrella.com/ ) and licensed by the artist for public communication with educational purposes through Wikipedia. Would it be possible, please, you undelete them? Best regards, thanks a lot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arneb2014 (talk • contribs)

Hello,

First there is no mention on the website of a free license. "Public communication with educational purposes" is not enough for us. We need an explicite written free license from the author. See COM:OTRS for details. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:53, 18 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi, can i know why you deleted image File:Henrique Luvannor.jpg uploaded by me? I uploaded it with soccer.ru template. This template has OTRS permission for materials from this site? So, wtf?
PS, how i see, you posted (Copyright violation: http://footballhd.ru/allnews/worldcupnews/39490-v-sbornoy-moldovy-mozhet-poyavitsya-etnicheskiy-brazilec.html). But this article has only 1 month. Article from where i get image is much older. Can you see the difference? I do not violated nobody's copyright. I uploaded this image legaly. For much info see {{Soccer.ru}}. Please undelete image. --XXN (talk) 01:29, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

footballhd.ru mentions the source as "Getty Images", so I don't think it is OK. What do you think? Yann (talk) 07:13, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

soccer.ru - You can use photos only from the gallery! --ManFromNord (talk) 09:48, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I have been looking through some past DRs and came across Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lema y yo.jpg. The deletion nomination does not appear to be a policy based reason to create a DR. Could you please add a meaningful closure statement to it? Thanks --Fæ (talk) 03:21, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

This image is completely out of scope, so it is very well within the policy. When I closed with as above, it means that I agree with the nominator (and eventually other comments). Isn't clear enough? Yann (talk) 07:05, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, no. The nomination stated "User contributions in spanish is only in her user page. Self promotion, low image quality, non enciclopedic value." I cannot see the image any more, as you have deleted it, however based on the hundreds of other DRs that The Photographer has created over the last few days, several that you have closed by deleting, that include non-policy nominations (see Photographer&withJS=MediaWiki%3AGadget-rightsfilter.js&lifilter=1&lifilterexpr=Starting+del&lifiltercase=1&withJS=MediaWiki%3AGadget-rightsfilter.js&lifilter=1&lifilterexpr=Starting+del&lifiltercase=1 list), this nomination is worth looking at again. The facts are:

1. You make reference to your closure relating to "eventually other comments", however there is none apart from the nomination.
2. I am not completely clear what "User contributions in spanish is only in her user page" means, however it appears to be nominating an image for deletion because one of our contributors does not use English on her user talk page. This would definitely not be a deletion rationale and would be troubling of itself.
3. "Self promotion" is unlikely, in the list of images up for deletion this have been used to describe "selfies" and similar profile photographs which were not against policy per se. One might argue that some of these were out of scope due to possible lack of educational value, but any closing admin should make that clear.
4. "low image quality", this would have to be bad enough to render the image out of scope to be a rationale for deletion, there are many cases in the above list where this was incorrectly mentioned in the nomination.
5. "non enciclopedic value", this is against Commons policy and no DR closure should agree with this as a deletion rationale.

Please amend your closure to explain the reasons you chose to delete the image. The nomination as it stands is not something that a closing admin should just take at face value and delete the image with the comment "as above". Thanks --Fæ (talk) 09:55, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

This is a personal image (portrait with his girl friend?) of poor quality, and not used. So your points 3, 4, and 5 above cover it. I don't see where is your problem. I think that point #2 means that if the only edits of a user would in his/her user page (not the case here), it would be a rationale for deletion. This gave me the opportunity to review other files from this user. Two of them are not own work, and have at least a wrong license, and may be a copyvio. I nominated them for deletion. Yann (talk) 10:20, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Could you please add a similar explanation to the closing statement of the DR? It is important that Administrators are not seen to support nominations on the basis of contributors writing in Spanish, or being "non-encyclopedic".

Done. Yann (talk) 11:18, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

You appear to be confirming that you believe that "non-encyclopedic value" is a reason to delete images from Commons, if that is the case then we should probably continue the conversation at COM:AN so that other Administrators can provide viewpoints on how to interpret policy. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 11:11, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

"non-encyclopedic value" doesn't mean anything in itself. You need to explain why a file would be, or not, of encyclopedic value. Yann (talk) 11:18, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

No, this is a frequent and fundamental misunderstanding of scope. Specifically, Commons differs from the English Wikipedia by having a scope that includes media with educational value, this is much broader than encyclopaedic value. DRs with these sort of nominations should be either corrected or the closing statement should clarify that difference as Commons should never delete images which have an educational rationale but happen to fail to have an encyclopaedic rationale. --Fæ (talk) 11:28, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, but this seems rather semantic. I think I agree with you that Commons' scope is broader than Wikipedia's. But in this case, I don't see the point you want to make. Above I mean "educational" rather than "encyclopedic". So I rewrite my statement as "non-educational value" doesn't mean anything in itself. You need to explain why a file would be, or not, of educational value. And in this case, the image is neither educational nor encyclopedic. Yann (talk) 11:33, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

The word encyclopedia comes from the Koine Greek ἐγκύκλιος παιδεία, transliterated enkyklios paideia, meaning "general education." Both words are just semantic for many. And for a Spanish speaker, there is not much meaning in sticking on the exact meaning of an English word. JKadavoor Jee 11:42, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for making the correction. Commons policies are written using words, to argue them away as being semantics is unhelpful. The same rationale of semantic equivalence can make almost any policy useless or inverted, for example you can argue that anything written on Commons can never be harassment, or that it is okay to delete all photographs of people who do not have Wikipedia biographies. Please stick to "educational" not "encyclopaedic", I do not want to waste everyone's time by asking for this to be clarified on noticeboards when our community policies are completely unambiguous. --Fæ (talk) 12:03, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Well, it seems simple, but it may not be. I wouldn't be surprised if The Photographer used "encyclopaedic" when he meaned "educational", and many non-native English speakers would do too. Did you ask him? Yann (talk) 12:13, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

No, the DR was closed and you had deleted the file. You are the closing admin for a DR with no comments apart from the nomination, so you must have been satisfied that The Photographer had correctly nominated it. The only relevant action to challenge the above discrepancies was to clarify your closing statement. --Fæ (talk) 13:16, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Même si tu as très probablement eu raison de supprimer cette photo, tu aurais quand même pu me prévenir... --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:56, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Désole, mais elle n'aurait jamais dû être déposée sur Commons. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:04, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Je ne dis pas le contraire. Mais quand on supprime un fichier, on en prévient l'utilisateur responsable.

Pour info je l'avais déposée à un moment où les règles étaient très floues à propos des photos d'écran pendant des évènements de type concert ou compétition sportive (en effet je précise que la photo que tu as supprimée était un écran diffusé en direct sur le lieu de la compétition et dont je doute qu'il ait été enregistré ni diffusé ailleurs).

D'ailleurs je me demande s'il y a désormais des règles claires à ce sujet, vu le nombre important de fichiers problématiques du même style dans Category:Video displays. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 10:11, 21 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

I don't appreciate messages like this on my talk page. It's not your place to tell me if I feel an issue has been explained properly. It's not even your place to tell me to stay away from another admin's talk page. If you have a problem with anything I've done and think I need to be stopped from doing something, then take it to a community noticeboard. Don't waste my time (or indeed yours) issuing pointless warnings like that, which you must be aware will only anger the recipient. If I catch you trying to intimidate another user like this over an issue of admin accountability again, I'll be doing the same. Ultra7 (talk) 16:28, 21 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your are wrong on all counts here. Yes, if you make problems, it is necessary to tell you. And yes, it is my work to tell you to stop bothering others. Nobody appreciate your bashing. Please stop. This is the last warning. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:33, 21 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your 'warning' was read and deleted - do not restore it again. This is your last warning to stay off my talk page - it is totally unacceptable for you to be reverting my talk page to restore messages I have read [9]. It's also pretty stupid to be posting this same message here, and then again on my talk page. I frankly don't care what you appreciate or not - if you think I cause problems, If you think you have a case, take it to a noticeboard. If you continue to try and intimidate users, I will report you. Ultra7 (talk) 16:41, 21 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

You really need to calm down, this behaviour is ridiculous. You are badgering people and it is getting on everyone's nerves. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:48, 21 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Yann,

Thank you for the reply regarding the LSU shield. I'm sure it's copyrighted similar to the University of Michigan "M", but it's not a big deal for me if it's removed. I thought it was an interesting picture from the stadium gate, so I took the picture. I'm actually writing to thank you for how you respond to my request to have it undeleted. It gave an explanation and also useful information. There are people who edit that give no explanation and decide to delete regardless of explanation or discussion. They do it in a rude fashion and actually harass and attack contributors. Your response was greatly appreciated. spatms (User talk:spatms) 10:23, 23 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Done. I added {{tl|PermissionOTRS|id=2013111610010253|Darkwind}} in all files where it has not been added yet, and put my father's name in "Author" (however not in "User") as you wrote. Am I allowed to delete all {{OTRS pending|year=2013|month=November|day=19}} or {{OTRS pending|year=2013|month=November|day=22}}? And, last but not least, should I upload any image more of the same kind, which is the rightest way for doing it? Thank you so much again for everything and kind regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Silvia Girometti (talk • contribs)

May I ask you what do you think of the changes I made to File:Senza_titolo_11.JPG before I make changes to all files? I do appreciate your suggestions very much, and hope having done in the right way, however it is not really easy to put a subject (in description?) for surrealistic works (at least some of them). Thanks a lot, --Silvia Girometti (talk) 22:17, 24 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Great! I'll do the same for all files! Thank you so much --Silvia Girometti (talk) 22:33, 24 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. I would appreciate you support for {{speedy|erro de carregamento} Regards, Rui Beja (talk) 18:33, 24 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

I have uploaded some images, however most of their images are promotional and not educational - most of them are not in our project scope. Yeah, there is some interesting photos like Korean GIrls' baseball league, however some of photos like

are potentially promotional. Do you think I should upload these photos? Regards, --레비Revi_D✉CM 08:00, 25 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

PS - Should I create category for these photos? --레비Revi_D✉CM 08:01, 25 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for looking into this. Of course, many of these images are promotional, and are not interesting for Commons. You need to select them. Think what could be used in Wikipedia. I think that providing an English description would make a huge difference about their possible use on Wikimedia. At least I think that images of sports ([10]), some electronics ([11], [12]), and some portraits ([13]) would be in scope. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:16, 25 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

  OK. Going to upload them..... --레비Revi_D✉CM 08:19, 25 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Uploaded links in example. However, last one is portrait of not notable person and may be in trouble with Personality rights. So I did not uploaded it. --레비Revi_D✉CM 08:39, 25 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

At least the portraits of modeles could be uploaded, as there is no issue with personality rights. We already need more portraits. Yann (talk) 08:46, 25 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

I have uploaded +20 photos today. I will do more tomorrow. :-D --레비Revi_D✉CM 08:58, 25 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

files in Category:Images from LGEPR. --레비Revi_D✉CM 09:40, 28 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Great! Thanks a lot! Yann (talk) 09:44, 28 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Yann, can you delete those files please. They are not used and according to our 'local specialist' they can not be identified properly. Moreover I'm the author and I want only properly id'ed images of mine published. Thanks.  B.p. 11:02, 25 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hmm. These images looks quite nice. Any way, I don't think they meet any criteria for speedy deletion, especialy because they are QI or VI. Please open a regular DR. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:05, 25 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi Yann, I live in Australia and I am making a documentary on humanitarian engineering. May I please have permission to use your image "File:Gandhi Juhu May1944.jpg" as I am featuring pictures of famous humanitarians? Or is this image already on the public domain in Australia? Thank you! Kind regards sheena — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sheena.2990 (talk • contribs)

Hello,

This image is in the public domain in India, and in all countries which apply the rule of shorter term. I am not sure about Australia. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:32, 28 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

I am working on description, maybe at least 10 minutes from uploading before you will take an action, please ! Vert (talk) 21:06, 29 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

You may rename it (by removing one extra File:) and re add it or just ignore it. It seems a critically endangered sp. JKadavoor Jee

  Done Back in after renaming. Thanks, Yann (talk) 09:05, 30 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Dear Yann I am daughter and heir of the sculptor Lev Razumovsky. On November 30, 2013 I sent an email to permissions-ru@wikipedia.org allowing the use of all images on pages Разумовский, Лев Самсонович and Lev Razumovsky, and attached a copy of his will. Please can you restore the images you have deleted or advise me how to do so. I have tried to upload the images again (having renamed them first), but the system hasn't accepted them. Many thanks, Maria Razumovskaya МЛР (talk) 06:46, 3 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

You recently deleted File:Seramahen.jpg due to my request at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Seramahen.jpg. It has been reuploaded with the same issues at File:Serama Hen.jpg. Regards, Chipmunkdavis (talk) 10:14, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Done Yann (talk) 11:58, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, Chipmunkdavis (talk) 00:51, 5 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

The file File:Alopekis_wirehaired.jpg was wrongly deleted. I am the original author of this photograph. It was published in my magazine in Greece (publications no longer active) and subsequently used and reproduced by many authors, with my permission, in articles about the Alopekis breed. It is also included in the article of the Greek wiki that I authored: el:Αρχείο:Alopekis_wirehaired.jpg and carries a FREE licence.

The file was wrongly deleted. I am the author of both articles and of the photo. I wish the photo re-instated.

Thank you Fainomenon (talk) 18:57, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Since this was previously published, we need a formal permission. Meanwhile, I restored the image and created a proper deletion request: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alopekis wirehaired.jpg. Please send a permission, or it will be deleted again. Thanks, Yann (talk) 19:13, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Dear Yann, I filed an un-delete request and I provided information about this image. It is published by the Greek wiki carrying a FREE licence. I provide the link to the Greek wiki and the file licence. What more do I need to do ? Fainomenon (talk) 19:24, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi Yan, you have deleted the bookcover on https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tim_Stryker&action=history due to alleged copyright violation. Working at a National Library I know that book covers are copyright free by most legislations. DO you have any reason to believe the opposite ? Svobodat (talk) 21:58, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Well, no. Most book covers do have a copyright. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:58, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi Yann, I need this file restored: File:Diane Gaidry with her dog Yatahey.jpg - It has the copyright tag on it, and I took this file from the site this person owns ( the person who is the subject of this wikipedia article) and I'm acting on her behalf. There's no specific content use section on this site, so images can be re-used freely. Can you restore this file soon, or what is it exactly that has to be done, to have this image restored? Everything is fine with the copyright for this image. that's the page I'm talking about https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diane_Gaidry — Preceding unsigned comment added by Indigo7771975 (talk • contribs)

Hello,

It seems you are not the photographer. The description mentions dianegaidry.com and "unknown author". We need a formal written permission to have this on Commons. See COM:OTRS for details. Regards. Yann (talk) 12:09, 3 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi,

I need files to be restored - I have images directly from my client (http://alvernia.com). Please help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Satch83 (talk • contribs)

Hello,

Since these files were made by a third party, we need a formal written permission. See COM:OTRS for details. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:12, 3 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

You closed Commons:Deletion requests/File:Joseph F. Smith family.png/2.

I'm sorry but you are 100% incorrect. Commons is very very clear. Any image that the author is unknown has to be 120 years old not 99 (see template:PD-US-unpublished. Even the source of the original image says that the image is Copyrighted. See: here] it reads "Patron Usage Instructions: c2002 Brigham Young University. All rights reserved. Except as provided above, or any use beyond what is allowed by fair use (Title 17, Section 107 U.S.C.).

How can you say there is no doubt that the image is Public Domain if there is no proof of publication prior to 1923, Author is unknown and the original source says it's copyrighted? If you don't believe me ask another administrator like Fastily. I known I'm right becuses when I first started uploading images about 10 got deleted due to this very issue.--ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 20:11, 3 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

I am sorry, but you are wrong. {{PD-US-unpublished}} is for unpublished works. Anonymous works published before 1923 are in the public domain in USA. The source of the image is not a proof of the copyright itself. In this case, it is called copyfraud. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:18, 3 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Yann. You have new messages on another wiki at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Squirrel posing.jpg#Discussion title. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

If you have Photoshop or some other software, could you please modify the brightness and re-upload the picture? Thanks. --Alex‘s SeeSide 05:53, 4 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

I took a photo which you require delete. NC.A — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dailyupmu (talk • contribs)

This looks like a screenshot. Yann (talk) 10:24, 4 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Please see my comments regarding your close of the above 2 DR's at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Abusive DR. LGA _talk^edits 09:20, 5 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi, some days ago you tried to rename a file in b:de:Das Schreiblernbuch/ Bilderalphabet h. Unfortunately the Abusefilter 11 prevented this change. By analyzing the filter conditions I found out that the sequence color:#ffffff was detected as vandalism as well as normal text fffff or any similar "keyboard test". Now I improved the filter conditions to reject this "false positive" check. -- Juetho (talk) 11:48, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi Juetho, Sorry, but I don't know which file you are talking about. Are you sure that it was me? Yann (talk) 11:54, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

b:de:Special:AbuseLog/1906 told me that you tried to change File:25-08-2008 002.JPG(FELIPE MOSTARDA SP BRASIL.JPG to File:25-08-2008 Conde Prates Building SP Brasil.jpg (16:32, 4 Dec. 2013 CET) but you weren't able to do so. You renamed this file at Commons; then CommonsDelinker changed at 16:36, 4 Dec. 2013 CET. My intention to store this message was to inform you why the abusefilter prevented your change. Everything's alright now.   -- Juetho (talk) 13:50, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 14:06, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

@Avocato: Thanks, but I am quite surprised because I don't know Arabic, and I don't think I will learn it any time soon. ;o) Yann (talk) 15:00, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Yann, I have uploaded this file to-day and I don't know what to do to get the necessary license. The file was found on the net, but if it's not publishable, I don't really mind if it's removed, although, of course, I'd rather we could keep it as it beautifully illustrates the last section of my article on Dickens's American Notes (Notes américaines). Thanks for your advice and help. Best wishes, --RF sub tegmine fagi (talk) 20:48, 7 December 2013 (UTC) (Robert Ferrieux).Reply

Le peintre est Leslie Arthur Wilcox, mort en 1982, cette peinture est donc sous droits d'auteur jusqu'en fin 2052. Désolé. Yann (talk) 20:57, 7 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Is it important for the images uploaded on wikipedia to be clicked by the editor? I recently came across some good quality images on a blog that suited an article I was editing but they were removed though I mentioned the site I was sourcing it from. I didn't know the work was copyrighted or not. I don't know how to show an image's license or the page where it's creator states that the image can be used by anybody. I have removed the images from the articles and they will be deleted after 8 days or so due to improper sourcing by me. So can I remove the copyright status messages from my talk page? Since I am not a professional photographer or someone who can produce an image's license from the page I sourced it from, will I never be able to upload an image at wikipedia? Ananya 2012 (talk) 06:00, 9 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Dear Yann, In continuation of your intimation regarding the need for a written permission to OTRS for use and undeletion of following files, I am informing you that, written permission from respective authors, publishers and websites have been sourced and mailed to OTRS permissions address. I hope these merit Wikipedia's expectations and the following files find speedy "undeletion" or removal from "impending deletion" lists.

File:Deevitigegalu by S. R. Ramaswamy.jpg, File:"Nagarikathegala Sangharsha" by S. R. Ramaswamy.jpg, File:Oswald Spengler on Indian Culture by Dr S.Srikanta Sastri.pdf and File:Geopolitics of India and Greater India by S. Srikanta Sastri.jpg.

With best regards --Rkkrupa (talk) 08:15, 9 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, hopefully this permission is OK. BTW, our rules are made to protect creators, and are not intimation. If your permission is right, you should be satisfied. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:26, 9 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Concerning the picture I uploaded, it refers to something happened on 5 september 1943 in the Netherlands, more than 70 years ago. To help you to understand, this is the wikipedia page in English: en:Dolle Dinsdag. I did not find any info about the author. So according to the EU rules about copyright it should be free to be pubblished: 70 years after the shot was taken if the author is unknown. The picture was downloaded from this website: Lis Neighborhood Rotterdam. If you feel that there is a violation of copyright, feel free to delete it, just let me know. Cheers Hypergio (talk) 20:30, 9 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

PS I am quite sure that in the info I associated to the image i put the mentioned website as source, that the author was unknown and the picture was taken on 5 sep 1943. Sorry if I miss to put any of these info. Cheers again. Hypegio.

@Hypergio: Hello,

First, there is a problem about the date: in the image description, it is "5 September 1943", but in the article, it is "5 September 1944". I understand that the later is correct.

Unfortunately, this could only be in the public domain 70 years, after its publication, which would be on 1st January 2015, supposing that it was published in 1944, right after this event.

Last, you forget to add a license. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:44, 10 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Sorry... I made a mistake. You are right, the correct date is 1944. I will upload the image again the next year. And sorry for not putting the license... Even if I reachead a good level in different wiki projects, I am still new (not even 6 months) and I can make mistakes. I am going to delete the link from it:Dolle Dinsdag, so if it is in your power, delete the image imediately. Cheers Hypergio (talk) 18:01, 10 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Done, added in Category:Undelete in 2015. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:53, 10 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello.  Please undelete this page; it is not an orphaned talk page, but an archive of Commons talk:Licensing (see link in bot archive box).  The project space page was no doubt added later by the drive-by editor.  Thank you.    Xeriphas1994 (talk) 05:02, 10 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

@Xeriphas1994 : Done, but I think this page should be moved somewhere else. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:35, 10 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, and you're probably right.    Xeriphas1994 (talk) 00:01, 11 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi! There used to be this image of Gandhi in Commons. If i remember it right, it also was Valued Image or Quality Image. I couldn't find any DR of it. Any idea where it vanished? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 11:22, 15 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

@Dharmadhyaksha: Yes, it was deleted because it is not free. Yann (talk) 11:24, 15 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

As in not in PD? URAA issues? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 17:57, 15 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Yes, not in the PD, and not in URAA either. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:MKGandhi.jpg. Yann (talk) 18:11, 15 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

I see. And File:MKGandhi.jpg redirects now. All the histories of article show the new image, instead of a redlink. That's probably why i couldn't locate it easily. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 07:00, 16 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

I have given the clear information about this picture. I don't know why you aim at deleting it. You are the most worst user I have ever seen! --991joseph (talk) 11:40, 15 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi, could you please restore this file. I got a OTRS-ticket ticket:2013121210009314. The permission is not sufficiant but it is hard for me to judge if this person is the copyrightholder when I can't see the file. Natuur12 (talk) 13:21, 15 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

@Natuur12: Done. Yann (talk) 13:28, 15 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Natuur12 (talk) 13:45, 15 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Bonsoir, il ne s'agit pas de fair play, mais de logique pour ne pas dire d'équité. J'ai déjà parlé du travail de retouche effectué par Jebulon, j'y ajoute un exemple récent, celui de Halavar. Il nous a fallu trois ou quatre semaines pour lui faire admettre que ses couleurs étaient trop saturées et qu'il était possible de rectifier la perspective de ses monuments. Peu à peu, il a modifié son point de vue. Je ne vois donc pas pourquoi une qualité de retouche minimum ne serait pas, elle aussi, exigible en VI pour ce qui concerne les photos ou cartes postales anciennes. Voilà le sens de mon intervention inhabituellement intempestive. Je viens d'y ajouter, puisque tu demandais de l'aide, un début de retouche de la photo de Marthe Brandès sur laquelle, bien sûr, on peut encore travailler mais qui me paraît suffisant étant donné la qualité de l'original.-- Cordialement. JLPC (talk) 17:30, 15 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

@JLPC : Bonsoir,

Merci pour tes modifications sur cette image, mais comme je l'ai dit dans la VIC, je ne fais pas ce type de retouche, car ce n'est personnellement pas "rentable" vu la qualité de l'original. J'aime retoucher des images, mais quand ça en vaut la peine (cf. deux d'entre elles qui sont des FP). Mais si tu veux le faire, vas-y, tu as carte blanche, mais je pense exagérer de me demander de le faire pour que ces images soient acceptées en VI. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 17:44, 15 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Caro Yann Em primeiro lugar me desculpe, mas não conheço como upar fotos minhas. Ou que sejam governamentais e estejam liberadas pois são de divulgação nao conheço o sistema da Wiki

Por favor me explique como liberar fotos, qual licença uso e onde devo colocar tal licença e qual? entre os colchetes da mesma foto?

As fotos estão nessa pagina https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Warney_Smith Como faço para liberar elas automaticamente, como coloco a sigla para que sejam liberadas??

--Warney Smith (talk) 03:33, 16 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello Yann,

I really don't understand what is wrong with me uploading the file to commons as I have got the rights from the production team to add these images online.

Please let me know how to take this forward as I'm new to wiki commons.

Regards, Vishwas — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.51.144.138 (talk • contribs)

As for all professional material, we require that you send a formal written permission. See COM:OTRS for details. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:33, 16 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Photo Максим_Олегович_Тимошенко.JPG was made special for wikipedia and was taken by http://ludinaroku.com.ua/archive/person/903 only after it was downloaded to wikipedia. Please, replace it back. Thanks for understanding and your assistance. Timosh2011 (talk) 17:22, 17 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Please stop that user; we've revert one picture he/she wrongly featured. Jee 14:16, 19 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

The deleted picture is under Licence: CC Attribution ShareAlike 3.0 --> https://wikipixel.fr/blog/wikipixel-senvole-a-seoul-et-tokyo-avec-la-ministre-fleur-pellerin/ May you undelete it?

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by DylanGoubin (talk • contribs)

@DylanGoubin: Done. Yann (talk) 21:54, 21 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

This file, as well as all the others about "William Girometti", reproduce painting of my father, who died 15 years ago. Since I am his only heir, now that my mother died too, I have the ownership of all the paintings whose pictures I uploaded. Probably I chose the wrong licence, but I wish that people enjoy my father's paintings. I am also working to a page in Wikipedia about my father, in which also a bibliography is available. I wrote to permission-commons@wikimedia.org too. Please tell me how I may upload the file again without problems. Thank you very much, Silvia Girometti

Hi Yann, sorry for bothering you again about the same topic. I would just like to ask you whether there is anything I can do while I am waiting, in order to support my request about the images being restored (request sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org about a week ago). Thank you very much again and best regards, Silvia Girometti — Preceding unsigned comment added by Silvia Girometti (talk • contribs)

Hello Yann, I added permission in the file: did I put it in the right place? And shall I do the same for all the other files you are restoring? Thank you so much, Silvia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Silvia Girometti (talk • contribs)

Please review my image https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Corona_(solitaire)_Layout.jpg, and let me know if it is up to Wikimedia Common's standards. I have added the link to the copyright information into the "permissions" area. I will proceed to change the rest of the images I have uploaded after you tell me if this is okay. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abehrle (talk • contribs)

There is no copyright violation on the serama image. It was taken by me and I allow its pubblication. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NCOCEO (talk • contribs)

AGAIN, I RELEASE MY IMAGE I TOOK OF MY BIRD INTO THE PUBLIC DOMAIN.

Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu logo.png Hi, I work at the Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, and I have a contribution when this logo was created. This is official logo of my university. Please let me use this logo. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eduard STOICA (talk • contribs)

I own the rights to this file. The JoeNanini.jpg file I do not own the rights to, so if you feel the need to remove it then do so, but the NinoDelPesco.jpg file is mine and belongs to no one but myself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ndelpesco (talk • contribs)

Ola Yann EU NAO SEI como colocar isso nas fotos São liberadas pra mim COmo faço pra colocar isso quue voce falou??? por favor me ensine. Coloco AONDE?? EM que campo?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Warney Smith (talk • contribs)

I did file a separate DR on this image by the uploader and he still says to keep in the DR above. Could you make a comment in the DR? PS: I also filed a flickr unfree message on the uploader's talkpage to tell him that images with a non-Commercial restriction is not OK. But he still thinks its acceptable in the above DR where the image has an NC restriction. As for the speedy delete, I thought the UAE image has major FOP issues--and it was not in use--so perhaps a speedy delete was OK in this case. That is why I did not file this DR. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:03, 22 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

@Leoboudv: As a principle, pictures taken by Commons contributors which have no-FOP issues should not be speedy deleted. Another admin will close it in due time. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:05, 22 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

OK. Thank you for telling me about this rule for pictures taken by Commons contributors with no non-FOP issues. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:24, 22 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

@Leoboudv: Speedy deletion nominations should only be used for "obvious copyright violations". No-FOP issues are nearly always not that obvious. There are many factors involved: age of the depicted object, whether it is de minimis or not, etc. Yann (talk) 10:44, 22 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

• Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:23, 22 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

This image has a big derivative poster. Perhaps you know if it should be passed or failed. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:34, 22 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Not sure, may be the poster does not have a copyright because it is not registered. Please create a deletion request. Yann (talk) 19:54, 22 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Yann. Check your email—you've got mail! You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

- Thanks in advance. LGA _talk^edits 07:25, 25 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour, Il serait préférable d'enlever l'avertissement de Google au début des scans avant d'importer les fichiers sur Commons. Je peux vous aider si nécessaire. Cordialement, Yann (d) 09:20, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Merci beaucoup de cette indication.

A vrai dire j'ai toujours laissé les avertissements tant pour les fichiers Google que pour les fichiers Gallica ou les fichiers des autres bibliothèques.

Je peux faire en sorte de les enlever désormais ; en revanche pour modifier les fichiers déjà corrigés en grande partie. par exemple File:Le Nivernois - Album, 1840, T1.djvu je pense que je devrais remplacer les pages d'avertissement par des pages vierges pour ne pas modifier la pagination. Par ailleurs, si je découvre après coup une page manquante, et que je doive la rajouter, je ne connais pas d'autre solution que de créer un nouveau fichier et de détruire l'ancien ensuite.

En tout cas merci de toute aide précieuse. Bien cordialement Pibewiki (talk) 10:29, 25 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

@Pibewiki: Oui, c'est ce que j'ai fait pour les fichiers que j'ai modifiés. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 10:34, 25 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Questions for you at:

• Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of the Commonwealth of Nations.svg‎
• Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Meyers Blitz-Lexikon‎

Thanks, .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:18, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi Yann, you have deleted two files, 09-39-gkchp.jpg and ABZ Moskau.jpg, which were clearly marked as PD-RU-exempt (news reports). Please read the template, and undelete both files. --Matrikelpartikel (talk) 13:02, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

@Matrikelpartikel: These are copyright violations. You need to read COM:L. Thanks, Yann (talk) 13:06, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi again, i have certainly read it. You should read the template PD-RU-exempt. News reports from Russia and USSR are exempt. --Matrikelpartikel (talk) 13:21, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

@Matrikelpartikel: These are NOT news reports, but pictures. Yann (talk) 13:24, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

News reports are in no way restricted to text-only. --Matrikelpartikel (talk) 13:33, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

So therefore, please undelete the two files. --Matrikelpartikel (talk) 13:49, 27 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

@Matrikelpartikel: Sorry, but no. As I said, these are NOT news reports. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:05, 27 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ok, RIA Novosti is a news agency and publishes news reports. Where can i appeal your decision? --Matrikelpartikel (talk) 14:44, 27 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

See Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests‎. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:37, 27 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi, could you please delete File:BSicon uvSTRr.svg and File:BSicon RP1q-.svg (redirects)? Other files need to be moved to that names. YLSS (talk) 12:32, 27 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

@YLSS:   Done Yann (talk) 12:34, 27 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, that was fast! YLSS (talk) 12:35, 27 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Bonsoir, J'ai bien reçu vos deux messages relatifs à la suppression des images importées (logos du Belk Bowl et du Pinstripe Bowl). Je dois probablement avoir mal rempli les données demandées lors de l'importation des fichiers. je n'en suis qu'à mes débuts sur Wiki et je trouve tout ca vraiment compliqué. Ces logos figurent déjà sur les pages anglaises de ces mêmes bowls. Je ne comprend donc pas pourquoi elles devraient e^tre retitrées sur les pages françaises ....Apparement sur les pages anglaises il ne faut pas d'autorisation pour copier ces images. En effet sur les sites officiels de ces évènements les logos peuvent etre "copier coler" (pas de copyright). Le "wiki cmmns ne concerne-t-il que les images "françaises" car lorsque je fais une recherche de ces images sur "commons FR" je ne les trouve pas ? Dans l'attente de vos nouvelles. Amicalement--Denvis1 (talk) 16:12, 28 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

@Denvis1: Bonjour,

Tous les logos ont un copyright par défaut, à moins qu'ils ne soient vraiment très simples (uniquement du texte et des figures géométriques simples). Sur WP en anglais, les logos peuvent être publiés sous "fair use", mais WM Commons n'accepte pas les fichiers sous "fair use". N’hésitez pas à me demander si nécessaire. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 16:16, 28 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Dear Admin Yann,

Can you please close this DR by JuTa as keep. JuTa has been away for several days. The uploader has updated the licenses for his other images. I have to sign off now and go to work but he saw my message to his talkpage 8 hours ago. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 17:11, 28 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Done Yann (talk) 17:20, 28 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

• Thank You. Sorry, I was away from home for work. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:56, 28 December 2013 (UTC)Reply