User talk:JuTa/Archive 48

Category:Peter_Torn-Petersen has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Rsteen (talk) 05:01, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Hallo,

du hast die beiden Dateien zusammengelegt, da es sich um ein Duplikat handelt. Klar, grundsätzlich richtig. Welches ist allerdings der Königsweg, wenn zwei Kommunen (hier die bisherige und die künftige Fusionsgemeinde) das gleiche Wappen führen? Ein "kombinierter" Dateinamen? Sprich - um es im Standard des WikiProjekt Wappen zu halten CHE Thurnen und Mühlethurnen COA.svg Oder doch irgendwo einen minimalsten Unterschied einbauen, damit Commons die Dateien nicht als Duplikat erkennt??

Gruß

Fränsmer (talk) 14:43, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi Fränsmer, beides ist möglich. Ich würde für einen gemeinsamen Dateinamen plädieren. Soll ich die Datei umbenennen? --JuTa 14:55, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Gerne. Hier, in dem Fall seh ich jetzt keinen Gewinn, extra eine zweite Datei wieder anzulegen. Fränsmer (talk) 15:16, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

OK, erledigt. --JuTa 15:31, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

How can we check whether a file has got the right OTRS-permission? This file seems to be still pending, and this uploader has (imo) a bad reputation in promising OTRS-permission, when permission never comes. I suggest replacing the No permission-template, or what would you suggest? Greeting, Eissink (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2019 (UTC).

Such Images falling automaticly into a "no permission" cat after some time depending on the lenght of the OTRS queue if no OTRS agent confirmes the release. Please just be patient. --JuTa 13:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

I was not aware of that, so thank you. Since my template obviously changed the date, I have added the pending date by hand. Eissink (talk) 14:06, 23 November 2019 (UTC).

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at Wikimedia Commons.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:05, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello,

I do not own this image. I uploaded it in order to add it to the UPC Insurance page on Wikipedia. My understanding was that it is OK to use a company's logo if only for it's Wikipedia page. Can you offer me some advice on how to properly label this image so that it can be used on the page and comply with copyright policies?

Thanks!

DaniaAlrehaili (talk) 18:30, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi every image on commons needs to be reuseable for anybody for any purpose (and not only in a wikidepia article). You may try to upload it locally to en: under en:Wikipadia:Fair use. regards --JuTa 19:18, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you! I just did that. This version on Wikipedia Commons can be deleted.

DaniaAlrehaili (talk) 19:26, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Why don't you ask the original uploader? --Filip (§) 23:01, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Because it should be mentioned in the OTRS ticket. --JuTa 06:49, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Why did you delete the photo that I uploaded? I send the permission on october 7th and I also got a ticket number 2019100710006909 for it with the explanation that it can take a while for the OTRS volunteers to review it but you deleted it with the explanation that no permission was sent and that is just not true. can you please upload it again? Carpatianlynx (talk) 22:47, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi, there was no confirmation on the file description page by an OTRS volounteer that the release was valid. After a month (or so) such images automaticly get sorted into some "please delete" categories. Please ask on Commons:OTRS noticeboard for your case. regards --JuTa 03:19, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Please, could You have an opinion to this nomination page? --2001:999:3:993B:8499:36BF:88BB:E422 18:47, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

 

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2019 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), Ukraine and France (active during November), but it's still open in all the other countries.

If you want to take part where WSC2019 is still open, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, please consider that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, i.e. "nature and wildlife".

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2020.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsuscribe from this list

Social media:   Science&Wiki   Science&Wiki   Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2019 #WikiScience #WikiScience2019

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--22:50, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

I got your ping. I didn't sleep all night so I'll answer you after 12 hours.--Kai3952 (talk) 22:35, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

You evidently quite misunderstand me in this matter. But now I discovered that Alexis Jazz was right because I realize that trying to explain things didn't work. What happened on 29 November 2019 that won't change because of what I do here. No-one will know what I went through during contributing to Wikimedia Commons(I have amassed over 35,000 hand-made edits since my time here). I was feeling unimportant and abandoned. I almost want to give up everything. Therefore, I don't want to explain anymore.--Kai3952 (talk) 12:09, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

You forgot a 0. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 12:30, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

@Alexis Jazz: Yes, thank you. The correct is "350,000" hand-made edits.--Kai3952 (talk) 13:34, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

@Kai3952: so sorry to read your comment. You should not feel unimportant and abondened. Thank you for sharing your time. :-) Lotje (talk) 15:48, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

@Lotje: I don't think I'd do very well working for Wikimedia Commons.--Kai3952 (talk) 18:04, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

You would do well now, because now you're autopatrolled. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 18:20, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

@Alexis Jazz: I won't be fooled!--Kai3952 (talk) 20:55, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Fooled how? - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 21:27, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Ask yourself. By the way, I don't care about autopatrolled because I am not editing anymore and its obvious you do not care about my feelings. Like you told me earlier, I shouldn't be autopatrolled for their own benefit, but I see that you forced me to accept autopatrol for your own benefit.--Kai3952 (talk) 21:50, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

How am I supposed to know? What do you think, that I would do your work again? Why would I? You're autopatrolled now, I won't be looking at your work. And why do you constantly quote me out of context? Why do you vilify me? You accepted autopatrol for the benefit of all 598 patrollers, not just me. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 21:57, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

If I leave Wikipedia Commons, I will not hinder your work. I'm really good for nothing.--Kai3952 (talk) 22:49, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Are you depressed? I don't think we could help you with that, family and medical professionals are better at that than random internet folk. But we don't want you to be unhappy. We are not asking you to leave. In fact, the only reason I'm still talking to you is to try to convince you to get back to work. Maybe you should have a good night's sleep and think about it? - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 23:04, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

@Alexis Jazz: I have a question: is patroller the same as autopatroller? Cause, looking to the list of patrollers as stated above... I found out my name is on that list and I do not think I have ever did on commons what I was expected/supposed to do. Some clarification would be nice. Thnks. Lotje (talk) 06:13, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

@Lotje: Not the same, Steinsplitter made you a patroller three years ago: Special:UserRights/Lotje. See Commons:Patrol for more information. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 09:51, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

@JuTa, Alexis Jazz, and Lotje: My heart is hurt because I lost my work. I realize now that I will have to leave Wikimedia Commons although I don't want to leave. The administrator only cares about why I "resist" the autopatrol and doesn't care what I say. He thinks I'm wasting everyone's time, so I told him that what's the point of you helping me if I want to leave Wikimedia Commons. It seems I have digressed from his original question or I have digressed from what I started to say. All in all, I screwed up and no one can help me anymore, so I feel abandoned.--Kai3952 (talk) 21:47, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Note: "I'm wasting everyone's time" is on the precondition that the person in question do not cooperate when others try to resolve the issue, resulting in fruitless time and energy spent --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 07:48, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

For those wondering, this is about User talk:Zhuyifei1999#For those who are trying to find the threads from Kai. I don't know what I can I do anymore. Kai, I do think you need help. Maybe from a family member or close friend, maybe from a psychologist, or maybe you just need some rest. You seem depressed and much of your self-value seems to depend on Wikimedia Commons. You seem to think everyone is angry with you, but we are really not. I don't think you see things clearly right now. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 22:17, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Because I spend a lot of time every day contributing to Wikimedia Commons. For me, it is everything. If I lose my work, it proves that I am useless. Suddenly stopped all work all at once catch me off guard. I have a lot of incomplete work that I need to complete. My main work on Wikimedia.Commons has been primarily devoted to editing all files, categories, and templates related to "Taiwan". Therefore, my work needs the user who can read Traditional Chinese and to be familiar with Taiwan. If I entrust you with my work, I worry that you are not competent enough to work on mine. Can anyone help me?--Kai3952 (talk) 01:53, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

I don't want to do your work! - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 04:52, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

I am sorry, I should not ask that question, but I was wondering who is qualified for this work.--Kai3952 (talk) 23:40, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi,

The user page deleted by you recently have some pages linked to it. Can you please check this conversion.-❙❚❚❙❙ JinOy ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 17:48, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

I restored it now. --JuTa 21:38, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Brummel (surname) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Rots61 (talk) 22:02, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) No longer empty. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 22:25, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi! Can you restore these images because there is an OTRS permission for them:

1. File:1. Galerija Rančićeva kuća, Centar za kulturu Grocka.jpg
2. File:1. Zorica Atić, Galerija Rančićeva kuća.jpg
3. File:1.2 Zorica Atić, otvaranje izložbe slika Miše Čolovića,2018 galerija opštine Vračar.jpg
4. File:2. Panorama Grocke, foto Dejan Vučetić.jpg
5. File:2.2 rančićeva kuća, foto Zorica Atić.jpg
6. File:3. grupni selfi posetilaca s panoramom u Grockoj.jpg
7. File:3. poseta đaka Rančićevoj kući, foto danica Trajković.jpg
8. File:3.2 Izložba Moje okruženje, stručno vođenje kroz izložbu za đake, galerija rančićeve kuće, foto danica Trajković.jpg
9. File:3.4 Posetioci,stručno vođenje,manifestacija Dane evropske baštine 2019, foto Danica Trajković.jpg
10. File:3.5 Posetioci,stručno vođenje,manifestacija Dane evropske baštine 2019,.jpg
11. File:4. Biblioteka Ilija Garašanin sa Legatom dr Aleksandra Kostića.jpg
12. File:4. Biblioteka Ilija Garašanin u Gročanskoj čaršiji, foto Zorica Atić.jpg
13. File:4.2 Legat dr Aleksandra Kostića, foto Danica Trajković.jpg
14. File:4.2Biblioteka Ilija Garašanin.jpg
15. File:4.3 poseta đaka Legatu dr Aleksandra Kostića.jpg
16. File:5. naslovnica brošure Grocka, mesto gde je sve počelo.jpg
17. File:6. naslovnica studije Toplina varoškog doma Grocke.jpg
18. File:7. Mural, foto Z. Atić.jpg
19. File:7.1 Mural, foto Z. Atić.jpg
20. File:8. foto s panoramom.jpg
21. File:8. Милица Матовић, Stara Grocka, slika sa 22. Likovne kolonije GO Grocka, selektor kolonije Z. Atić.jpg
22. File:9 izložba 3 objektiva, na slici Z. Atić i Toma Peternek, foto D Trajković.jpg
23. File:9.1 Otvaranje izložbe 3 objektiva, na slici autori i Zorica Atić, foto D. Trajković.jpg
24. File:9.3 Izložba 3 objektiva u Rančićevoj kući, na slici Goran Kukić, Igor Mandić, Tom Peternek, foto D. Trajković.jpg
25. File:9.4 Izložba 3 objektiva otvaranje, na slici Toma Peternek, foto D. Trajković.jpg
26. File:11. foto s otvaranja izložbe Miše Čolovića, Vračar.jpg
27. File:12.1 otvaranje izložbe Ivane Živić, Kolarac.jpg
28. File:13.1 Mika Lovrei Vesna Džakić .K. DJ. JAKSICA Drvo i ptica Foto Danica Trajković.jpg
29. File:15, Dvorac Eđšeg, izložba Ivane Živic.jpg
30. File:15.1Dvorac Eđšeg, izložba Ivane Živic.jpg
31. File:15.2 Dvorac Eđšeg, izložba Ivane Živic.jpg
32. File:15.3 Dvorac Eđšeg, izložba Ivane Živic.jpg
33. File:16. slikarka Milica Matović,Stara Grocka, rad sa 22. Likovne kolonije GO Grocka.jpg
34. File:16. Слађана Павловић, U voćnjaku, slika sa 22. likovne kolonije Go Grocka, selektor Z. Atić.jpg
35. File:12. Otvaranje izložbe KOLARAC Ivana Živić i Zorica Atić, Foto Miki Veličković.jpg
36. File:13 Mika Lovrei Vesna Džakić .K. DJ. JAKSICA Drvo i ptica Foto Miki Velickovic.jpg
37. File:14. Foto sa otvaranja, Prolećna izložba CV. ZUZORIC, Foto Miki Velickovic.jpg
38. File:14.1 Foto sa otvaranja, Prolećna izložba CV. ZUZORIC, Foto Miki Velickovic.jpg

Thanks, Miljan Simonović (talk) 09:31, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi Miljan Simonović,   Done. Now please complete your OTRS task. --JuTa 10:07, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi! So I am quite new here and I am not very familiar with how to properly source images. Which websites are "okay" to put as a source of the image?I read the tutorial, but I am still super confused as to where to find out whether a certain image has or hasn't this and that status or permission to use.

Only sources which clearly stating one on commons accepted licenses - see Commons:Licensing and Commons:Copyright tags. regards --JuTa 06:25, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

hiJuTa, I noticed the remark on my page (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Garnhami#Copyright_status%3A_File%3ATien_Vlaamse_houthakkers.jpg). However, I am not that good with changing the status of images. The image itself is from 1918, it is a scan I found online. I think it is free to use as it falls into this category: "Works published before 1924 are in the public domain." But I am not sure how I can change the status. All that is know about it: it is from 1918 and it is a postcard from Belgium and it is from "ons vaderland" (a newspaper). There are 10 soldiers on it. We know the names of the soldiers, but that is it.Garnhami (talk) 10:15, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi Garnhami. The "Works published before 1924 are in the public domain." is only valid for works published in the USA. When the image can be found online, you should link the source page. Is there any author listed? The status of such images depends on the death year of the photographer which is for Belgium 70 years (died before 1949). regards --JuTa 10:25, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

HiJuTa, oh, I see. The picture van be found here: https://schrijversgewijs.be/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Hermans-strafcompnie-aan-de-Orne.jpg There is no information about who took the picture. Since the image was taken in early 1918 during the first world war, it is possible that the person taking it died before 1949, but it is not sure as we do not know much about it. I can try to find something more about it, but most official databases have no further information on this picture.Garnhami (talk) 10:32, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Please use this link at the file description page in the source field. If you cannot find an author it may be {{PD-anon-70-EU}}. You can then use that license-template. regards. --JuTa 10:35, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

HiJuTa I added the template you gave here, I hope it is all fine now.Garnhami (talk) 19:17, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I removed the problem talk and did some other fixes now. regards --JuTa 19:20, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi JuTa!

I am trying to help GrosjeanVessot3: believe me or not, but he is 82 years old…

It is about File:Tombe de Noël Lacroix.jpg (Tomb of Noël Lacroix) that he uploaded. That file was removed because missing authorization of the author of the image.

He fist posted the authorization on the file page itself (see here) and on his own discussion page (see here)… I told him to send it to the OTRS.

He finally sent the authorization to the OTRS and the image has been restored. Almost good.

The message on the file page is now “An email containing details of the permission for this file has been sent in accordance with Commons:OTRS.”

Does he still have to do something?

I would like to avoid that the image is deleted a second time.

Only for info: discussion between GrosjeanVessot3 and me on the "Bistro" page (in French).

Thanks,

—— Dode^eric (talk) 12:30, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi Dode^eric, that looks OK to me for the moment. If the release will confirmed by an OTRS agent the file will be kept permanently of not it will likely get redeleted in a month or two. If he or the copyright holder receiives any anserback by OTRS (i.e. with question) they should replay and answer those questions. regards --JuTa 14:44, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

• Category:1948-09-21 — not empty anymore. (Pro tip: the only day categories you should delete are the likes of Category:1948-02-30 or Category:9876-09-21.) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 19:53, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

• Thanks! -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 15:58, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

• Category:Brown, orange, purple. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 15:39, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi Juta, noticing you comment, to tell you the truth, I was in the honest opinion it is easier for you to go through my sometimes messy categories if I leave them red.   Lotje (talk) 15:09, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi, if you cant find some sensefull parent cats to create them for them you should IMHO better not fill them up. --JuTa 20:43, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Okay thanks.

Can you give advise on Category:Antoni Comín i Oliveres, should it be Comín or Comin to categorize? Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 10:21, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

It should be Comín (with "special" character) cause thats his name. --JuTa 15:30, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

  Done and thanks! Lotje (talk) 17:41, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

The flag of a municipality is in the public domain, please undo the removal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gustavo Rasera (talk • contribs) 14:45, 22 December 2019 (UTC) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gustavo_Rasera#Copyright_status%3A_File%3ABandeira_S%C3%A3o_Mateus_MA.jpg

Then please add the corresponding license template to the file description page. See Commons:Copyright tags and linked pages. --JuTa 19:52, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi JuTa, I was wondering what should happen with von und zu like in Hans von und zu Aufseß. Thank you for your time. :-) Lotje (talk) 10:46, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Either ignore them completly or create a cat named Category:Von und zu Aufseß and put that into Category:Von (surname particle), Category:Zu (surname particle) and Category:Aufseß (surname). --JuTa 10:50, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

I prefer leaving that up to you. :-) Lotje (talk) 11:49, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, briefly blocked you by mistake. It's the "thanks" vandal. Rodhullandemu (talk) 18:16, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Smile --JuTa 18:17, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Why edits like this?? Someone may create the category when they have more files and more information... Can I revert? --Sailko (talk) 12:58, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

If you create the cat -> you are wellcome, but dont leave them red. They just senseless. --JuTa 13:00, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

No, it's not senseless. Ancient pottery painting is not a subject I have a deep knowledge of, so I just leave the creation to someone who can properly find the correct subcategorization. Leaving a red category is not problem, so I'm going to revert your edits. --Sailko (talk) 11:44, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Please find someone who can check if those painters are Attic, or Apulian or Etruscan, the YOU can create the category, just removing it is a pure vandalism. Thank you --Sailko (talk) 11:50, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Buenas noches, La imagen a la que hacia referencia se encontraba mal clasificada. le corresponde una Licencia 3.0. Por favor, le solicito modifique la acción realizada. Gracias User:Aitortxasko 21:12, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

I dont see a reason why this image is published under cc-by-sa-3.0 nor does the liked webpage helps, sorry. --JuTa 20:22, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Buenas tardes, la imagen en cuestión es una imagen que se corresponde con el programa de fiestas del año 1969. Publicado por el ayuntamiento de sestao tal y como se indica. Lo cierto es que no se puede añadir una fuente en la web dado que no se encuentra en internet. El archivo en cuestión es una foto del original que se encuentra en posesión de mi familia. Le ruego me ayude, con esta información que le facilito, a clasificar bien la imagen. No se bien como funciona la wikipedia y me gustaría que la imagen siguiese figurando en la misma.User:Aitortxasko 17:42, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

I dont think there is a suitable free license for this kind of work. It is likely still under copyright and definitly not cc-by-sa as you claimed. When I look to COM:TAG Spain there is nothing really fitting for it. --JuTa 20:32, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Entiendo lo que dice. Como le indico esta imagen no tiene protección, se trata de un panfleto de uso popular correspondiente al año 1969 y no sujeto a restricción. No puedo acreditar que no tenga protección y tampoco puede usted acreditar que la tenga. Usted puede pensar como quiera pero sin estar seguro de algo no puede borrar una imagen. User:Aitortxasko 23:15, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

No, without being sure that it is free, we cannot keep it. --JuTa 06:50, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

 

 

Hallo JuTa, in Deinem Archiv gibt es bereits eine Diskussion zu diesem Thema → File:Mühlethurnen-coat of arms.svg / File:Thurnen-coat of arms.svg. Es ist nicht so, wie dort beschrieben, dass es zweimal das gleiche Wappen ist. Im Artikel Mühlethurnen sollte das bisherige Wappen verwendet werden und in der neuen Gemeinde Thurnen das neue Wappen. Was am neuen Wappen anders ist als beim alten, wird in einem Zeitungsartikel beschrieben (Das fusionierte Thurnen hat ein Wappen, doch was ist überhaupt neu? Artikel auf bernerzeitung.ch vom 2. Juli 2019). Es wäre darum sinnvoll, wenn diese beiden „Bilder“ hier wider getrennt und mit den oben genannten „alten“ Dateinamen versehen werden. Danke und Gruss --Schofför (talk) 19:39, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi, Thx for the note. I've resplitted the file now. --JuTa 17:21, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Vielen herzlichen Dank und alles Gute für das neue Jahr! Gruss --Schofför (talk) 22:11, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Hello.I found today a lot of Wanted categories about Map data.Do you like creating them or am I creating them tomorrow? ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 11:36, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Pls. go ahead and have fun :) --JuTa 12:12, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

The sub-pages creator appears to have created them by himself ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 15:42, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi,

Could you undelete the files: File:Truskolasy - budynki szkolne (ok. 1930).jpg and File:Truskolasy - nieistniejący budynek szkoły.jpg ? A proper agreement has arrived to OTRS: ticket:2019122810004627. Cheers, Polimerek (talk) 21:43, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi Polimerek:   Done. Now please complete your OTRS task. --JuTa 00:32, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Thank you. Polimerek (talk) 22:43, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Familienname lautet "Żwański" musste/sollte also unter "Z" bzw "Ż" kategorisiert werden ... weil "Władysław" ein Vorname ist. Der Fehler steckt also im "Infobox" drin. Habe keine Ahnung wie das korriegiert wird, deswegen war dort "DEFAULTSORT" 77.6.157.221 18:09, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Wird es doch (inzwischen?). Gruß --JuTa 18:11, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello JuTa, I am grateful for your message. In truth, I am confused by the licensing rules. I got the image from a German website on women psychoanalysts and I gave their url on the upload. I think this is fair use as the picture relates only to the Wikipedia article on the subject. I shall contact the website and see if they are prepared to share the image under their licence, if they can do that. It depends on whether they answer within the time limit. Thank you again.--Po Mieczu (talk) 12:25, 5 January 2020 (UTC) PS. I have written to request permission of the publishers of the book which carries the picture of the subject. Hopefully they can reply shortly.--Po Mieczu (talk) 13:09, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Well, every image on commons needs a valid license template on its description page, which is missing here. A written persmission should be send by its author Marc Gerson to the commons support team - see [Commons:OTRS]], naming a license of his choice like {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}. --JuTa 18:58, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Hallo. Noch eine Bitte, Bild hat integriertes template. Person heisst mit dem Familiennamen "Kremes" und mit dem Vornamen "Stanisław". Falls Du das richtig ändern könntest, dann bedanke ich mich schon im voraus. Gruss 95.116.129.254 16:54, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi, bitte entweder {{DEFAULTSORT:Kremes, Stanilaw}} hinzufügen, oder auf Wikidata der Person Vor- und Nachnamen zuordnen. Versuch es selbst... Gruß --JuTa 18:54, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Good evening. What is the reason for deleting the file: Gederymove Pershe.png? This is 100% my work, like the whole map. --Finbin (talk) 20:35, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Such maps are likely copied from anywhere (in the internet). If you are indeed the author please try to conform this through Commons:OTRS. Thx, --JuTa 00:50, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

No, it's my own work. Whole map. Can you tell me in plain language what I need to do? Delete and download by specifying the type of license, or what? --Finbin (talk) 02:17, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Send a mail confirming your authorship to the commons support team (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org) as documented at Commons:OTRS. regards --JuTa 02:19, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Thanks! --Finbin (talk) 02:34, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Although I have many tasks, but due to this problem (Because of the problem of not being able to upload pictures), I want to leave (retire) Commons completely so I want my account to be permanently banned ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 15:30, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Well, you dont need to get blocked to retire. Just dont edit anymore. But I would like to ask you to continue your good work on categorizations and similar. Perhaps take a break and come back in some days/weeks/months. regards --JuTa 16:37, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi, you deleted a file years ago which is still used in a template. The template is used exact 50 times as template. I am not very active on commons but you are; can you care about what should happen with the template? Thanks --Keks by 16:14, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I removed it now within the template. --JuTa 17:45, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

I would like to challenge the deletion that you made here. It is false to say that this work had no source. The source whilst being inexact should clearly indicate that is a derived page of another work at Commons, at worst. The link should have been fixed to indicate the file, not deleted. As an experienced admin here, I would hope that you could be more considerate of the sister projects and not delete in scope, in use images.

In this case there is no requirement to undelete as the user has just gone through upload process again and with the same data (amended here). I would presume that it is similar to other uploads that they have done.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:35, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi, it seems I'm to too unfamiliar with wikisource. I couldn't find the source djvu according the given wikisource link. --JuTa 13:12, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Excuse me, but why have you deleted that photograph? It's marked as Public Domain here by the Queensland's State Archives.. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 11:28, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

The Flickr Public Domain mark ist not accepted on Commons - see here and here. regards --JuTa 12:59, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Excuse me JuTa, but still don't understand. On which ground is not accepted? Because a non-CC licence is revokable? Or what else? -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 16:22, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Yes, and the license dont has tro be set by the copyright holder. As fas as I understand flickr accepts that "just" because the uploader thinks its public domain. Anyhow those images are regularly marked as "no license since" by bots or directly by flickr2commons since years. regards --JuTa 18:35, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for bothering explaining. Actually, then, I did a little research and found out that this file was incorrectly licenced as PD because probably someone didn't notice the difference: actually is in cc-by-sa-3.0 by the Government of Queensland, as you can see here- Do you think it can be restored, on this ground? -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 22:40, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

OK,   Done. I restored the image and modified the description page. You can review the license now. --JuTa 06:20, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Neue Datei File:Venus Berlin 2019 291a.webm zum Verschieben nach File:Venus Berlin 2019 291.webm --C.Suthorn (talk) 15:03, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

  Done --JuTa 18:39, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Tim Abraham has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Estopedist1 (talk) 08:27, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi JuTa, what to do? Depending on the language, the name is written differently. I created a Category:Torosyan (surname) but also Category:Torosian (surname) --> Category:Jim Torosian seems to be needed. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 14:39, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Well, the important "value" is the english label on wikidata and/or the title of the en: article of the person. Commons categories are generally named based on the english version of their names. So Category:Torosian (surname) should be created as well. Its not a problem to have multiple name cats for different variants of the "same" name. There are i.e. Category:Meier (surname), Category:Maier (surname), Category:Meyer (surname) and Category:Mayer (surname). Greetings --JuTa 14:49, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Thank you very much JuTa Lotje (talk) 14:57, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

And here: Category:Sarkis Torosyan I screwd it up I guess? Lotje (talk) 15:02, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Well the english article is en:Sarkis Torossian. So the commons category should be renamed and Category:Torossian (surname) created. regards. --JuTa 15:04, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Curiously, what relation has English language to Armenian surname... --Infovarius (talk) 19:25, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Commons categories are generaly based on the english their variant. --JuTa 19:33, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Category:Al_Ani has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 12:37, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

File:قاعوششا .jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: Redirect to a deleted file. If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ हिन्दी ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

--- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 17:27, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Hei JuTa, der User:Rainerhaufe macht folgendes Problem: er stellt ständig Fotos nach Commons, die er aus irgendwelchen Büchern kopiert. Diese Fotos versieht er mit der Lizenz PD-EU-no author disclosure. Dort steht, wenn ich den englischen Text korrekt interpretiere, dass a) das Foto vor mindestens 70 Jahren erstellt worden sein muss und b) dass die tatsächliche Identität des ursprünglichen Autors im Zusammenhang mit diesem Bild innerhalb von 70 Jahren nach seiner Veröffentlichung nicht öffentlich bekannt gegeben wurde. Ich habe eine Menge solcher Eisenbahnbücher, da gibt es in der Regel eine Seite "Bildnachweis" und da werden die Namen der Bildautoren mit den Seitenzahlen gesammelt aufgeführt. Dieses Thema mit dem Bildnachweis umgeht er erstmal geschickt, unter dem Motto, da steht nichts unter dem Bild. Allerdings sind eine Menge Bilder nicht mindestens 70 Jahre alt, sondern höchsten 50 Jahre. Für die, die ich aktuell gefunden habe, habe ich einen Löschantrag gestellt. Die Sammlung der Löschanträge und der gelöschten Bilder siehe hier User_talk:Rainerhaufe. Dort kannst du auch erkennen, dass es kein Einzelfall ist. Dazu hat er das Bild File:KHD DG 2000 CCE.jpg, das am 28. Dez. 2019 gelöschte wurde, einfach wieder reingestellt. Unschlüssig bin ich bei mehreren Bildern wie File:HKB V30.png - fällt das unter Schöpfungshöhe? Ich will ihm nichts Böses, aber es geht nun schon jahrelang so, er wurde schon mehrfach informiert, auch in der de-WP, aber es ist immer das gleiche Schema, ich würde sagen "uneinsichtig". Was können wir denn da machen, dass das eingedämmt wird? Danke und viele Grüße --Mef.ellingen (talk) 21:21, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Du kannst auf die fraglichen Bilder mittels Help:VisualFileChange.js Massenlöschanträge stellen (vereinfacht und bündelt die Sache. Oder Du wirst auf Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems damit vorstellig. Dann kann das auf breiterer Ebene diskutiert werden. Gruß --JuTa 21:31, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello, JuTa, I already edited file's copyright and license that you told this may deleted due to copyright, I saved this image from blog and he ain't image's owner so this image is public, I don't know about copyright policy in Commons but I think I correctly edited this, if this file still not allows, please tell or introduce how to get correct methods, thank you --GRKMahawangsa (talk) 11:57, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi, every image is copyrighted except explicity stated by the author and/or copyright owner. You copied the image from a blog where the blog-owner likely did a copyright violation. So, this image likely cannot be kept on commons. Sorry. --JuTa 12:02, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

If I get permission from blog-owner, is my image still be in Commons? Thank you--GRKMahawangsa (talk) 12:10, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

If the blog-owner is the author of the image, which means he shot the image himself, and he confirmes the publication under a free license through Commons:OTRS by sending an email to the commons support team, yes. But I cant belive he is the author of the image. --JuTa 12:12, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

This image is late king of malaysia, but I think he took image without any strict about license or copyright, should I request permission to him who are blog-owner which published the image?, or I should request permission to Selangor royal family who may can claims this image, thank you --GRKMahawangsa (talk) 12:37, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

It needs to be the author and/or copyright holder of the image who gives the release. Nobody else has the right to do this. Not the owner of the blog and not the heirs of the depicted person. If you can find another source naming the author and if the author died before more than 70 years then you might apply the license {{PD-old}}, but if not you have to ask him or his heirs for permssions. --JuTa 12:44, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Nobody claims this photo, and the photographer may already died because this photo may took when he was early 20s (at least, before he enthroned as sultan), I think this photo is public property in right now, but if it's, is it still can be in Commons? --GRKMahawangsa (talk) 14:00, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Well I now found {{PD-Malaysia}}, which indicated its could be in public domain now if it was first published before 1970. But then you need to seach deeper, if you can find an author the source blog-page is not enough to assume it was published anonymously. --JuTa 17:03, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I've sent an email to media-medias@gnb.ca ( https://www2.gnb.ca/content/gnb/en/contacts/communicationsContact.html ) asking about the Public Domain license on their Flickr account photos. The {{No license}} tag on File:NB_Highland_Games_Festival_Festival_des_Jeux_Highland_du_Nouveau-Brunswick_(35852929270).jpg expires in 7 days. Is there a way to extend the deadline? Government responses are notoriously slow. Thank you. // sikander { talk } 🦖 02:17, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

You could convert them into regular deletion request(s) and ask on the DR page for more time. --JuTa 06:40, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Dear JuTa,

At nl.wiktionary we suddenly lost the picture mentioned in the title. I don't understand the reason for its removal. As the title indicates the picture is from a catalogue published in 1913. For this type of works where a collective (the Leonidas company) is the author, copyright expires 70 years after publication, which would be 1983. Is it possible to restore the image? --MarcoSwart (talk) 13:11, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Well, it was uploaded completly without a source, which is required. --JuTa 17:06, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

My guess is that at the time it was uploaded this requirement did not exist in its present form and the indication in the filename would have been considered sufficient. Adding this information to the description box appears a more reasonable solution than removing a file that has been in use for quite some time. If you would restore the image I would be happy to add information about the source. --MarcoSwart (talk) 00:07, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

If you have a source for it I will be happy to restore the image. regards --JuTa 06:39, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

The source for the picture is: Prijscourant voor 1913, Rijwielenfabriek Leonidas - Karel Lengs & Zonen, Tegelen. The publication itself is not online, there is a copy in the collection of the Oudheidkamer Rhoon/Poortugaal and there are several ads referring to it at the time, like this one. --MarcoSwart (talk) 12:02, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi MarcoSwart, I restored the file now... regards --JuTa 19:06, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi, Im not sure whether Im writing at the right place. You have probably by mistake deleted two images which I have uploaded. They have disappeared. Slovensko_ulice_pred_voľbami_jeseň_2019.jpg and Voľby_NR_SR_Piešťany_&_Bratislava_január_2020.jpg By what right did you delete them? There was no discussion about the issue. All photos used in collage were mine own and I could support the use of pictures by the permission from the political parties. Was the issue that those were collages? Its no real problem, I can upload the photos again, one by one. Thanks.--Belisarius~skwiki (talk) 08:10, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi Belisarius~skwiki, but the depicted election posters are copyrighted and now your own work and there is no so called freedom of panorama in Slovenia - see Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Slovenia#Freedom of panorama. regards. --JuTa 19:10, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi Belisarius~skwiki, I now see its in Slovakia not Slovenia - see COM:FOP Slovakia. But nevertheless election posters are not counted as permanently situated in public places. So the result is unfortunatly the same. --JuTa 19:22, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Many thanks for removing deletion tag for book uploaded after completion of due OTRS process - File:स्वशासनाची दिशा.pdf - and with proper source. The similar tag is applied for following files. This is not removed even after giving proper source. I kindly request you to look into this -

• File:सहभागी वन व्यवस्थापन.pdf
• File:सर्वसहमतीची निर्णय - प्रक्रिया.pdf
• File:वन आधारित शाश्वत विकास - गडचिरोली जिल्ह्याचा शोध अभ्यास.pdf
• File:मेंढा (लेखा).pdf
• File:निस्तार हक्क - जगण्याचा अधिकार.pdf
• File:ग्रामीणांच्या सहभागातून वन-व्यवस्थापन मसुदा.pdf
• File:ग्रामवन.pdf
• File:आपण आपला मार्ग शोधूया.pdf
• File:Village Forest.pdf
• File:Mendha (Lekha).pdf
• File:Consensus Decision-making.pdf

Thanks again for cooperation, --सुबोध कुलकर्णी (talk) 06:18, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

  Done --JuTa 08:14, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Thanks! Could you please look into this long pending matter - Restoration of File:शिल्पकार चरित्रकोश खंड २ – साहित्य.pdf

--सुबोध कुलकर्णी (talk) 05:07, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

A gentle reminder for the above file restoration. We have to bring it on Wikisource, the volunteers are waiting for the restoration. Thanks, --सुबोध कुलकर्णी (talk) 07:41, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi सुबोध कुलकर्णी, as long as there is no confirmation by an OTRS volouteer that there is a valid release for the file, likely no admin will restore it. Please ask on Commons:OTRS noticeboard for your case (best including the ticket number if you have one). regards. --JuTa 07:44, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi JuTa, the writer of the File:Musavver_Gazetesi_Serlevhası.png file has passed away in 1910. The state website that i have stated is the source that i have found. In there, there is a scanned version of the newspaper's issues that have been published between 1897-98. That is why i request this mistake to be corrected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Satirdan kahraman (talk • contribs) 13:56, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi it looks better now. I did 2 little fixes and removed the problem tag. regards. --JuTa 15:29, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi JuTa, Deinem Edit entnehme ich, dass Du für die o.g. Datei Schöpfungshöhe annimmst? Oder stört Dich nur (zu recht), dass kein Lizenz-Baustein zu finden ist? Danke und Gruß, --Emha (talk) 15:01, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Da war schlicht keine Lizenz-Vorlage auf der Dateibeschreibungsseite sondern {{Remove this line and insert a license instead}}. Solche Files markiere ich einmal die Woche (halb)automatsch mit VisualFileExchange. Gruß --JuTa 15:23, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Okay, verstehe. Du könntest in diesem Fall mit {{PD-textlogo}}{{Trademarked}} leben? Gruß, --Emha (talk) 16:10, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Yep. --JuTa 17:02, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi, this file was created by me in 1965 as an amateur director in Ethiopia and is now in the public domain because 54 years have passed as it is established by Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Ethiopia, the video is a show that recalls the lyrics and the music of the Ethiopian and Eritrean historical tradition created during the period of the Ethiopian Empire and Medri bahri, are historical songs of battle, love, friendship and unity among all the peoples that make up the Horn of Africa, as a source there is book "Secular verse and poetry in Ethiopian traditional music" by Professor Ashenafi Kebede who was one of the greatest Ethiopian composer, conductor, ethnomusicologist, historical musicologist, music educator, novelist, and Ethiopian poet. Sorry, i fix the date and add three other authors Timkehet Teffera "Ethiopian Popular Music History Chapter I - Part I-2-3", Kay Kaufman Shelemay is the G. Gordon Watts Professor of Music and Professor of African and African American Studies at Harvard University the books are: "Musical Scholarship and Ethiopian Studies: Past, Present, Future", "Ethiopian Christian Chant: An Anthology with Peter Jeffery (3 vols., 1993–97)", "Music, Ritual, and Falasha History A Song of Longing: An Ethiopian Journey (1991)" and Simeneh Betreyohannes "Scholarship on Ethiopian Music: Past Present and Future Prospects"--Bilissuummaa Duguma Jabarraa (talk) 17:00, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi Bilissuummaa Duguma Jabarraa, this looks much better now. Thou I'm not 100% convinced, I removed the problem tag now. regards --JuTa 18:18, 29 January 2020 (UTC)