Abelson, P. (1990). Mechanisms for evaluating scientific information and the role of peer review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(3), 216-222.
Aghion, P., Dewatripont, M., & Stein, J. C. (2008). Academic freedom, private-sector focus, and the process of innovation. The RAND Journal of Economics, 39(3), 617-635.
Azoulay, P., Bonatti, A. & Krieger, J. L. (2015b): The career effects of scandal: Evidence from scientific retractions. Working paper.
Banal-Estañol, A., & Macho-Stadler, I. (2010). Scientific and commercial incentives in R&D: Research versus development?. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 19(1), 185-221.
- Bartlett, T. (2014). Replication crisis in psychology research turns ugly and odd. The Chronicle of Higher Education, June 23.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Baum, J. A., & Silverman, B. S. (2004). Picking winners or building them? Alliance, intellectual, and human capital as selection criteria in venture financing and performance of biotechnology startups. Journal of business venturing, 19(3), 411-436.
Borjas, G.J. & Doran, K.B. (2012). The collapse of the Soviet Union and the productivity of American mathematicians. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(3), 1143-1203.
- Broad, W., & Wade, N. (1982). Betrayers of the Truth. Fraud and Deceit in the Hall of Science. Simon and Schuster, New York.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Catalini, C., Lacetera, N. & Oettl, A. (2015). Beyond citation counts: Exploring negative citations in science. Working paper.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Collins, H. (1992). Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Ellison, G. (2002). Evolving standards for academic publishing: a q-r theory. Journal of Political Economy, 110 (5),994-1034.
- Giles, J. (2007). Breeding cheats. Nature, 445(18): 242—243
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Häussler, C., Jiang, L., Thursby, M. &Thursby, J. (2014). Specific and general information sharing among competing Academic researchers. Research Policy, 43(3), 465-75.
Hamermesh, D. S. (2007). Replication in economics. Canadian Journal of Economics, 40(3), 715-733.
- Hanson, R. (1990). Could gambling save science? Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Risk and Gambling, London, July.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hartemink, A. E. (2000). Publish or Perish (3)—Fraud and ethics. Bull Internat Union Soil Sci, 97, 36-45.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Henry, E. (2009). Strategic disclosure of research results: the cost of proving your honesty. The Economic Journal, 119, 1036-1064.
- Henry, E., & Ottaviani, M. (2013). Research and the approval process. Working paper.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Holmberg, S. D. (2008). Scientific Errors and Controversies in the HIV/AIDS Epidemic. Greenwood Publishing Group.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Howson, C., & Urbach, P. (1989). Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach. Open Court Publishing Co.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hull, L. D. (1988), Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Developments of Science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2014). How to make more published research true. PLOS Medicine, 11(10), e1001747
Jensen, R. & Thursby, M. (2001). Proofs and prototypes for sale: The licensing of university inventions. American Economic Review, 91(1), 240-259.
Lacetera, N., & Zirulia, L. (2011). The economics of scientific misconduct. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 27(3), 568-603.
Lacetera, N., & Zirulia, L. (2012). Individual preferences, organization, and competition in a model of R&D incentive provision. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 84(2), 550570.
Lakhani, K. R., & Von Hippel, E. (2003). How open source software works:“Free†user-to-user assistance. Research Policy, 32(6), 923-943.
- Livio, M. (2014). Brilliant Blunders. From Darwin to Einstein-Colossal Mistakes by Great Scientists that Changed our Understanding of Life and the Universe. Simon and Schuster.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Lu, S. F., Jin, G. Z., Uzzi, B., & Jones, B. (2013). The retraction penalty: Evidence from the Web of Science. Scientific Reports, 3, 3146.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Masten, S. E. (2006). Authority and commitment: Why universities, like legislatures, are not organized as firms. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 15(3), 649-684.
- Merck (2015). Experts in your field, close to your location: http://www.merck.com/licensing/contact-us/home.html (last accessed 04/10/2015).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Mialon, H. (2010). What’s in a title? Predictors of the productivity of publications. working paper.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Mirowski, P., & Sklivas, S. (1991). Why econometricians don’t replicate (although they do reproduce) . Review of Political Economy, 3(2), 146-163.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Mueller-Langer, F. & Andreoli-Versbach, P. (2014) Open access to research data: Strategic delay and the ambiguous welfare effects of mandatory data disclosure. Munich discussion paper 201432.
- Muma, J. R. (1993). The need for replication. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 36(5), 927.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Pfizer (2015). Innovative partnering models: http://www.pfizer.com/partnering/areas_of_interest/innovative_partnering_models (last accessed 04/10/2015).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Popper, K. R. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5 pt. 2), S71-S102.
- Rousseau, D. L., & Porto, S. P. S. (1970). Polywater: Polymer or artifact?. Science, 167(3926), 1715-1719.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Ryan, P.K. (2013). How Venture Capital Works. Rosen Publishing.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Sauermann, H. & Stephan, P. (2013). Conflicting logics? A multidimensional view of industrial and academic science. Organization Science, 24(3), 889-909.
- Schekman, R. (2013). How journals like Nature, Cell and Science are damaging science. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/dec/09/how-journals-nature-science-celldamage -science
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Sherwood, S. (2011). Science controversies past and present. Physics Today, 64(10), 39-44.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Stephan, P. (2013), How Economics Shapes Science. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Stern, S. (2004). Do scientists pay to be scientists?. Management Science, 50(6), 835-853.
- Taubes, G. (1993). Bad Science: The Short Life and Weird Times of Cold Fusion. London: Random House.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Wible, J. R. (2004). The Economics of Science: Methodology and Epistemology as if Economics Really Mattered. Routledge. A Proofs8 Proof or Proposition 1. To see that (ï¥ïŒ; ï®ï¶) can be a Nash equilibrium, note that ï¥ïŒ is the best response to ï®ï¶. If ï“ chooses ï¥ïŒ, then ïƒ prefers ï®ï¶ if (1−ï°)ï‚ïƒ âˆ’ï‚¯âˆ†ï¥ ï€¼ 0, i.e. âˆ†ï¥ ï€¾ (1−ï°)ï‚ïƒ ï‚¯ 
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now