Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

create a website
How Do Households Adjust to Trade Liberalization? Evidence from Chinas WTO Accession. (2018). Zhang, Yifan ; Huang, Wei ; Dai, MI.
In: IZA Discussion Papers.
RePEc:iza:izadps:dp11428.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 8

Citations received by this document

Cites: 44

References cited by this document

Cocites: 33

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Human Capital and International Capital Flows: Evidence from China. (2022). Sun, Dongqi ; Pan, Yinghao ; Yang, Zhenshan ; Ma, LI.
    In: International Regional Science Review.
    RePEc:sae:inrsre:v:45:y:2022:i:1:p:74-107.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Globalization blueprint and households’ fintech debt: Evidence from China’s One Belt One Road initiative. (2022). Chen, Xin ; Zhang, Yifei ; Liu, Yun.
    In: International Review of Economics & Finance.
    RePEc:eee:reveco:v:79:y:2022:i:c:p:38-55.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Trade Liberalization and the Gender Employment Gap in China. (2020). Zhou, Minghai ; Kis-Katos, Krisztina ; Wang, Feicheng.
    In: GLO Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:zbw:glodps:638.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Trade liberalization and the gender employment gap in China. (2020). Zhou, Minghai ; Kis-Katos, Krisztina ; Wang, Feicheng.
    In: Center for European, Governance and Economic Development Research Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:cegedp:399.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Foreign direct investment and inequality: Evidence from Chinas policy change. (2020). Johansson, Anders ; Liu, Dan.
    In: The World Economy.
    RePEc:bla:worlde:v:43:y:2020:i:6:p:1647-1664.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Globalization, Gender, and the Family. (2019). Utar, Hale ; Keller, Wolfgang.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_7735.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Globalization, Gender, and the Family. (2018). Utar, Hale ; Keller, Wolfgang.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:25247.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Globalization, Gender, and the Family. (2018). Utar, Hale ; Keller, Wolfgang.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:13317.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. , , and Itay Saporta-Eksten, “Consumption Inequality and Family Labor Supply,” American Economic Review, February 2016, 106 (2), 387–435.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. , , Beyza Ural Marchand, and Junsen Zhang, “Market structure, imperfect tariff passthrough, and household welfare in Urban China,” Journal of International Economics, 2016, 100, 220–232.

  3. 15We use the expenditure share in 2002 because the categorization of consumption goods in the UHS changed in 2002 due to questionnaire design change. In addition, consumption data are missing for many of the goods before
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Arkolakis, Costas and Federico Esposito, “Endogenous labor supply and the gains from international trade,” Processed, Yale University, 2014.

  5. Attanasio, Orazio, Pinelopi K Goldberg, and Nina Pavcnik, “Trade reforms and wage inequality in Colombia,” Journal of development Economics, 2004, 74 (2), 331–366.

  6. Autor, David H, David Dorn, Gordon H Hanson, and Jae Song, “Trade adjustment: Workerlevel evidence,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2014, 129 (4), 1799–1860.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Autor, David H., David Dorn, and Gordon H. Hanson, “The China Syndrome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United States,” American Economic Review, October 2013, 103 (6), 2121–68.

  8. Blundell, Richard, Luigi Pistaferri, and Ian Preston, “Consumption Inequality and Partial Insurance, ” American Economic Review, December 2008, 98 (5), 1887–1921.

  9. Borjas, George J, “The analytics of the wage effect of immigration,” Technical Report, National Bureau of Economic Research 2009.

  10. Card, David, “Is the new immigration really so bad?,” The Economic Journal, 2005, 115 (507).

  11. Costa, Francisco, Jason Garred, and João Paulo Pessoa, “Winners and losers from a commodities-for-manufactures trade boom,” Journal of International Economics, 2016, 102, 50–69.

  12. David, H, David Dorn, and Gordon H Hanson, “The China syndrome: Local labor market effects of import competition in the United States,” The American Economic Review, 2013, 103 (6), 2121–2168.

  13. Dix-Carneiro, Rafael and Brian K Kovak, “Trade liberalization and the skill premium: A local labor markets approach,” The American Economic Review, 2015, 105 (5), 551–557.

  14. Edmonds, Eric V., Nina Pavcnik, and Petia Topalova, “Trade Adjustment and Human Capital Investments: Evidence from Indian Tariff Reform,” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, October 2010, 2 (4), 42–75.

  15. Expit Lit 14This strategy has been used in Facchini et al. (2017). Alternatively, Erten and Leight (2017) used regional employment weights instead of export weights. We experiment with both and find similar results. Where i,c,tindicates industry, city, and year, respectively. Expit Lit measures exports per worker in each industry. We weigh these industry-level export shocks by the share of this industry in the regional employment in the initial period ( Lic0 Lc0 ), and then aggregate up to the prefecture-year level.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Fajgelbaum, Pablo D and Amit K Khandelwal, “Measuring the unequal gains from trade,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2016, 131 (3), 1113–1180.

  17. Fan, Haichao, Yao Amber Li, and Stephen R Yeaple, “Trade liberalization, quality, and export prices,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 2015, 97 (5), 1033–1051.

  18. Fang, Hanming, Quanlin Gu, Wei Xiong, and Li-An Zhou, “Demystifying the Chinese housing boom,” NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 2016, 30 (1), 105–166.

  19. Goldberg, Pinelopi Koujianou and Nina Pavcnik, “Trade, wages, and the political economy of trade protection: evidence from the Colombian trade reforms,” Journal of International Economics, 2005, 66 (1), 75–105.

  20. Gorbachev, Olga, “Has the Increased Attachment of Women to the Labor Market Changed a Family’s Ability to Smooth Income Shocks?,” American Economic Review, May 2016, 106 (5), 247–51.

  21. Grossman, Gene M and Elhanan Helpman, “Protection for Sale,” American Economie Review, 1994, 84 (4), 833–850.

  22. Hakobyan, Shushanik and John McLaren, “Looking for local labor market effects of NAFTA,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 2016, 98 (4), 728–741.

  23. Han, Jun, Runjuan Liu, and Junsen Zhang, “Globalization and wage inequality: Evidence from urban China,” Journal of International Economics, 2012, 87 (2), 288–297.

  24. Handley, Kyle and Nuno Limao, “Policy Uncertainty, Trade, and Welfare: Theory and Evidence for China and the United States,” American Economic Review, September 2017, 107 (9), 2731– 83.

  25. Hasan, Rana, Devashish Mitra, Beyza P Ural et al., “Trade liberalization, labor-market institutions and poverty reduction: Evidence from Indian states,” in “India Policy Forum,” Vol. 3 National Council of Applied Economic Research 2007, pp. 71–122.

  26. In table 6, we choose the average of 1998-2001 as the initial period, while we also experimented with using 1998 or 2001 in unreported regressions.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Jr, Melvin Stephens, “Worker displacement and the added worker effect,” Journal of Labor Economics, 2002, 20 (3), 504–537.

  28. Kaplan, Greg, “Moving back home: Insurance against labor market risk,” Journal of Political Economy, 2012, 120 (3), 446–512.

  29. Kochar, Anjini, “Smoothing Consumption by Smoothing Income: Hours-of-Work Responses to Idiosyncratic Agricultural Shocks in Rural India,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1999, 81 (1), 50–61.

  30. Kovak, Brian K, “Regional effects of trade reform: What is the correct measure of liberalization?,” The American Economic Review, 2013, 103 (5), 1960–1976.

  31. McCaig, Brian, “Exporting out of poverty: Provincial poverty in Vietnam and US market access,” Journal of International Economics, 2011, 85 (1), 102–113.

  32. Morduch, Jonathan, “Income smoothing and consumption smoothing,” The journal of economic perspectives, 1995, 9 (3), 103–114.

  33. Paxson, Christina H, “Using weather variability to estimate the response of savings to transitory income in Thailand,” The American Economic Review, 1992, pp. 15–33.

  34. Pierce, Justin R and Peter K Schott, “The surprisingly swift decline of US manufacturing employment, ” The American Economic Review, 2016, 106 (7), 1632–1662.

  35. Porto, Guido G, “Using survey data to assess the distributional effects of trade policy,” Journal of International Economics, 2006, 70 (1), 140–160.

  36. Regional consumption-weighted tariff We capture the expenditure channel of tariff cuts by the regional consumption-weighted tariff. We construct the consumption-weighted tariff in each prefecture and year as follows: ConsumTarif fct = ∑ g sgc,2002τgt Where g is a good in the UHS data, c is city, t is year. sgc,2002 is the expenditure share of good g is prefecture c’s good consumption in year 2002.15 The UHS reports the consumption of 74 tradable goods, including food, clothing, furniture, home appliances, telecommunication equipment, etc. We manually map these goods to HS 8-digit codes. Then we calculate the tariff of each good as the simple average of the tariff of all HS codes within this good. We have also experimented with including services into total consumption, and set the tariff changes of the service sector to 0. The results are qualitatively similar for the alternative consumption tariff measures.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Regional exports We construct a regional export measure for each city and year, following Autor et al. (2013). Specifically, the regional export measure (RegExpct) is a employment-weighted averages of exports per worker in each industry. In equations: RegExpct = ∑i Lic0 Lc0 ∗
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Regional tariff uncertainty The recent literature finds that tariff uncertainty reduction resulting from the US granting permanent normal trade relations (PNTR) to China after China’s WTO entry has substantially increased Chinese exports (Handely and Limao, 2017; Pierce and Schott, 2016). Therefore, we construct regional level tariff uncertainty measures to capture the export effects.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Revenga, Ana, “Employment and wage effects of trade liberalization: the case of Mexican manufacturing, ” Journal of labor Economics, 1997, 15 (S3), S20–S43.

  40. scg,2000GAPg This regional GAP variable captures the degree of tariff uncertainty of each city in the PreWTO year. We interact this variable with a post-WTO dummy (Post −WTO) which equals 1 for years later than (including) 2002. Theoretically, cities facing larger tariff uncertainty pre-WTO will experience larger reductions in tariff uncertainty after China’s WTO entry. Therefore, we expect exports to growth faster in these regions in the Post-WTO years.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Topalova, Petia, “Factor immobility and regional impacts of trade liberalization: Evidence on poverty from India,” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2010, 2 (4), 1–41.

  42. Utar, Hale, “Workers beneath the Floodgates: Impacts of Low-Wage Import Competition and Workers’ Adjustment,” Browser Download This Paper, 2014.

  43. We construct regional tariff uncertainty measures as follows. First, following Handely and Limao (2017) and Pierce and Schott (2016), we define tariff uncertainty for each HS 8-digit product as the difference between the MFN tariff and the US “Column 2” tariff in year 2000. We call this tariff uncertainty measure “GAP”: GAPg = Tarif fcolumn2,g −Tarif fMFN,g Second, we map HS 8-digit goods to 4-digit CIC industry, and calculate the CIC industry level GAP as the simple average of the GAP for all HS products within this industry. Third, we calculate the GAP for each city as the weighted average of GAP across all industries in the city, where we use the share of an industry’s export value in the city’s total export value in 2000 as weights.14 GAPc = ∑ g
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Yu, Miaojie, “Processing trade, tariff reductions and firm productivity: evidence from Chinese firms,” The Economic Journal, 2015, 125 (585), 943–988. Online Appendix A1 The impact of tariff reduction on firm-level outcomes In this appendix section we investigate how tariff reduction affect firm performance, using Chinese firm-level data. The purpose of doing this is two folded. First, we can check whether the wage effects we found using household data are also present in the firm-level data. If so, they provide cross-validation for the wage results presented in the main text. Second, we can explore how other firm performance, such as investment, sales, and profit, are affected by tariff change, and whether such changes are consistent with the wage effects. In other words, examining the response of these firm performance variables are useful in revealing the mechanism underlying the impact of tariff on wages.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Importer price effects of tariffs in the context of preferential trade agreements: The case of poultry in South Africa. (2024). Edwards, Lawrence ; Chien, Jing-Woei ; Hlatshwayo, Ayanda.
    In: WIDER Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:unu:wpaper:wp-2024-17.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Impact of carbon tariffs on price competitiveness in the era of global value chain. (2023). Yan, Xiaoxuan ; Yang, Changjiang.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:336:y:2023:i:c:s0306261923001691.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. The Incidence of the U.S.-China Solar Trade War. (2022). Wang, Wenjun ; Houde, Sbastien.
    In: CER-ETH Economics working paper series.
    RePEc:eth:wpswif:22-372.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Globalization blueprint and households’ fintech debt: Evidence from China’s One Belt One Road initiative. (2022). Chen, Xin ; Zhang, Yifei ; Liu, Yun.
    In: International Review of Economics & Finance.
    RePEc:eee:reveco:v:79:y:2022:i:c:p:38-55.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Lerner meets Metzler: Tariff pass-through of worldwide trade. (2022). Mukunoki, Hiroshi ; Hayakawa, Kazunobu ; Ito, Tadashi.
    In: Journal of the Japanese and International Economies.
    RePEc:eee:jjieco:v:63:y:2022:i:c:s0889158321000526.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Impacts of an international bridge on households: Evidence from Thailand. (2022). Keola, Souknilanh ; Hayakawa, Kazunobu ; Yamanouchi, Kenta ; Sudsawasd, Sasatra.
    In: Journal of Asian Economics.
    RePEc:eee:asieco:v:83:y:2022:i:c:s1049007822000926.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Tariff Pass-through in Wholesaling: Evidence from Firm-level Data in Japan?. (2021). Urata, Shujiro ; Hayakawa, Kazunobu ; Baek, Youngmin ; Yamanouchi, Kenta ; Tsubota, Kenmei.
    In: Journal of the Japanese and International Economies.
    RePEc:eee:jjieco:v:62:y:2021:i:c:s0889158321000435.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. How do households adjust to tariff liberalization? Evidence from Chinas WTO accession. (2021). Huang, Wei ; Zhang, Yifan ; Dai, MI.
    In: Journal of Development Economics.
    RePEc:eee:deveco:v:150:y:2021:i:c:s0304387821000055.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. An eye for an eye? The trade and price effects of Chinas retaliatory tariffs on U.S. exports. (2021). Ma, Hong ; Xu, Mingzhi ; Ning, Jingxin.
    In: China Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:chieco:v:69:y:2021:i:c:s1043951x21001036.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Globalization and workforce composition in Indian formal manufacturing: New evidence on product market competition channel. (2020). Bose, Ritabrata ; Ramaswamy, K V.
    In: Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai Working Papers.
    RePEc:ind:igiwpp:2020-036.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. The impact of globalization on youth education: Empirical evidence from Chinas WTO accession. (2020). Lin, Faqin ; Long, Cheryl X.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:178:y:2020:i:c:p:820-839.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. The hidden cost of trade liberalization: Input tariff shocks and worker health in China. (2020). Lin, Faqin ; Fan, Haichao.
    In: Journal of International Economics.
    RePEc:eee:inecon:v:126:y:2020:i:c:s0022199620300659.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. The environmental effect of trade liberalization: Evidence from Chinas manufacturing firms. (2020). Cui, Jingbo ; Zhang, Yan ; Wang, Bei ; Tam, On Kit.
    In: The World Economy.
    RePEc:bla:worlde:v:43:y:2020:i:12:p:3357-3383.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. WTO accession, trade expansion, and air pollution: Evidence from China’s county‐level panel data. (2020). Lin, Faqin ; Chen, Shuai ; Zhang, Peng ; Yao, XI.
    In: Review of International Economics.
    RePEc:bla:reviec:v:28:y:2020:i:4:p:1020-1045.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Inequality and Trade Policy: Pro-Poor Bias of Contemporary Trade Restrictions. (2019). Ural Marchand, Beyza.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ris:albaec:2019_004.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Responses to Trade Opening: Evidence and Lessons from Asia. (2019). Mitra, Devashish.
    In: ADBI Working Papers.
    RePEc:ris:adbiwp:0913.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Inequality and Trade Policy: Pro-Poor Bias of Contemporary Trade Restrictions. (2019). Ural Marchand, Beyza.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp12199.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Tariff Pass-through in Wholesaling: Evidence from Firm-level Data in Japan. (2019). Hayakawa, Kazunobu ; Kenta, Yamanouchi ; Shujiro, Urata ; Kenmei, Tsubota ; Kazunobu, Hayakawa ; Baek, Youngmin.
    In: Discussion papers.
    RePEc:eti:dpaper:19064.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Trade liberalization and local labor market adjustment in South Africa. (2019). Erten, Bilge ; Tregenna, Fiona ; Leight, Jessica.
    In: Journal of International Economics.
    RePEc:eee:inecon:v:118:y:2019:i:c:p:448-467.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Inequality and Trade Policy: The Pro‐Poor Bias of Contemporary Trade Restrictions. (2019). Ural Marchand, Beyza.
    In: Review of Income and Wealth.
    RePEc:bla:revinw:v:65:y:2019:i:s1:p:s123-s152.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Food for fuel: The effect of the US biofuel mandate on poverty in India. (2018). Ural Marchand, Beyza ; Hubert, Marie-Hélène ; Chakravorty, Ujjayant.
    In: Discussion Papers Series, Department of Economics, Tufts University.
    RePEc:tuf:tuftec:0825.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Food for fuel: The effect of the US biofuel mandate on poverty in India. (2018). Ural Marchand, Beyza ; Hubert, Marie-Hélène ; Chakravorty, Ujjayant.
    In: TSE Working Papers.
    RePEc:tse:wpaper:32694.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Economy and Market in China: The State, Wage Labour and the Construction of the ‘China Price’. (2018). Bayari, Celal.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:100900.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Food for Fuel: The Effect of the US Biofuel Mandate on Poverty in India. (2018). Ural Marchand, Beyza ; Hubert, Marie-Hélène ; Chakravorty, Ujjayant.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp11784.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. How Do Households Adjust to Trade Liberalization? Evidence from Chinas WTO Accession. (2018). Zhang, Yifan ; Huang, Wei ; Dai, MI.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp11428.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. The Great Opening up and the Roadmap for the Future: The Story of Chinas International Trade. (2018). Du, Yan ; Lu, YI.
    In: China & World Economy.
    RePEc:bla:chinae:v:26:y:2018:i:2:p:68-93.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. How does international trade affect household welfare?. (2017). Ural Marchand, Beyza.
    In: IZA World of Labor.
    RePEc:iza:izawol:journl:2017:n:378.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Tariffs and the organization of trade in China. (2017). Brandt, Loren ; Morrow, Peter M.
    In: Journal of International Economics.
    RePEc:eee:inecon:v:104:y:2017:i:c:p:85-103.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Retailers and Consumers: The Pass-through of Import Price Changes. (2017). Birg, Laura ; Boddin, Dominik ; Berner, Eike.
    In: The World Economy.
    RePEc:bla:worlde:v:40:y:2017:i:7:p:1314-1344.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Retailers and Consumers: The pass-through of import price changes. (2016). Boddin, Dominik ; Birg, Laura ; Berner, Eike.
    In: Center for European, Governance and Economic Development Research Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:cegedp:133r.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. The effect of the US biofuels mandate on poverty in India. (2016). Ural Marchand, Beyza ; Hubert, Marie-Hélène ; Chakravorty, Ujjayant.
    In: Economics Working Paper Archive (University of Rennes 1 & University of Caen).
    RePEc:tut:cremwp:2016-13.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Import tariff pass-through effect and the spatial distribution of domestic consumer goods prices: Zimbabwe (2009-2014). (). Bhorat, Haroon ; Mugocha, Everisto.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:rza:wpaper:879.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2024-12-24 20:07:42 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.