Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
create a website
Pedestrians-Cyclists Shared Spaces Level of Service: Comparison of Methodologies and Critical Discussion. (2021). Mikiki, Foteini ; Basbas, Socrates ; Nikiforiadis, Andreas ; Polymeroudi, Efrosyni ; Oikonomou, Aikaterini.
In: Sustainability.
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:1:p:361-:d:474059.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 4

Citations received by this document

Cites: 74

References cited by this document

Cocites: 33

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Identifying and Modeling the Factors That Affect Bicycle Users’ Satisfaction. (2023). Basbas, Socrates ; Papagiannakis, Apostolos ; Ketikidis, Kyriakos.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13666-:d:1238810.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Pedestrian Crossings as a Means of Reducing Conflicts between Cyclists and Pedestrians in Shared Spaces. (2023). Basbas, Socrates ; Nikiforiadis, Andreas ; Paschalidis, Evangelos ; Mastora, Chrysanthi.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9377-:d:1168019.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Managing Resources Based on Influential Indicators for Sustainable Economic Development: A Case Study in Serbia. (2022). Miloevi, Duan M ; Nikoli, Milo M ; Dimi, Violeta.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4795-:d:795571.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Abadi M.; Hurwitz D. Bicyclist’s perceived level of comfort in dense urban environments: How do ambient traffic, engineering treatments, and bicyclist characteristics relate?. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 40, 101-109.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Amprasi V.; Politis I.; Nikiforiadis A.; Basbas S. Comparing the microsimulated pedestrian level of service with the users’ perception: The case of Thessaloniki, Greece, coastal front. Transp. Res. Procedia 2020, 45, 572-579.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Asadi-Shekari Z.; Moeinaddini M.; Zaly Shah M. A pedestrian level of service method for evaluating and promoting walking facilities on campus streets. Land Use Policy 2014, 38, 175-193.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Asadi-Shekari Z.; Moeinaddini M.; Zaly Shah M. Disabled Pedestrian Level of Service Method for Evaluating and Promoting Inclusive Walking Facilities on Urban Streets. J. Transp. Eng. 2013, 139, 181-192.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  5. Asadi-Shekari Z.; Moeinaddini M.; Zaly Shah M. Non-motorised Level of Service: Addressing Challenges in Pedestrian and Bicycle Level of Service. Transp. Rev. A Transnatl. Transdiscipl. J. 2013, 33, 166-194.

  6. Aultman-Hall L.; LaMondia J. Evaluating the Safety of Shared-Use Paths: Results from Three Corridors in Connecticut. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2005, 1939, 99-106.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  7. Bai L.; Liu P.; Chan C.Y.; Li Z. Estimating level of service of mid-block bicycle lanes considering mixed traffic flow. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2017, 101, 203-217.

  8. Banerjee A.; Kumar Maurya A.; Lämmel G. A review of pedestrian flow characteristics and level of service over different pedestrian facilities. Collect. Dyn. 2018, 3, 1-52.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Basbas S.; Campisi T.; Canale A.; Nikiforiadis A.; Gruden C. Pedestrian level of service assessment in an area close to an under-construction metro line in Thessaloniki, Greece. Transp. Res. Procedia 2020, 45, 95-102.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Beura S.; Bhuyan P. Development of a bicycle level of service model for urban street segments in mid-sized cities carrying heterogeneous traffic: A functional networks approach. J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 2017, 4, 503-521.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Beura S.; Chellapilla H.; Bhuyan P. Urban road segment level of service based on bicycle users’ perception under mixed traffic conditions. J. Mod. Transp. 2017, 25, 90-105.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Beura S.; Manusha V.; Chellapilla H.; Bhuyan P. Defining Bicycle Levels of Service Criteria Using Levenberg–Marquardt and Self-organizing Map Algorithms. Transp. Dev. Econ. 2018, 4, 11.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Bivina G.R.; Parida M. Modelling perceived pedestrian level of service of sidewalks: A structural equation approach. Transport 2019, 34, 339-350.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Botma H. Method to determine level of service for bicycle paths and pedestrian-bicycle paths. Transp. Res. Rec. 1995, 1502, 38-44.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Campisi T.; Canale A.; Tesoriere G.; Lovric I.; Čutura B. The Importance of Assessing the Level of Service in Confined Infrastructures: Some Considerations of the Old Ottoman Pedestrian Bridge of Mostar. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Carter D.; Hunter W.; Zegeer C.; Stewart R.; Huang H. Pedestrian and Bicyclist Intersection Safety Indices: Final Report; Federal Highway Administration: McLean, VA, USA, 2006.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Chong S.; Poulos R.; Olivier J.; Watson W.; Grzebieta R. Relative injury severity among vulnerable non-motorised road users: Comparative analysis of injury arising from bicycle–motor vehicle and bicycle–pedestrian collisions. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2010, 42, 290-296.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Christopoulou P.; Pitsiava-Latinopoulou M. Development of a model for the estimation of pedestrian level of service in Greek urban areas. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2012, 48, 1691-1701.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Davis J. Bicycle Safety Evaluation; Auburn University, City of Chattanooga, and Chattanooga-Hamilton County Regional Planning Commission: Chattanooga, TN, USA, 1987.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Dixon L. Bicycle and Pedestrian Level-of-Service Performance Measures and Standards for Congestion Management Systems. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1996, 1538, 1-9.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Epperson B. Evaluating suitability of roadways for bicycle use: Toward a cycling level-of service standard. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1994, 1438, 9-16.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Foster N.; Monsere C.; Dill J.; Clifton K. Level-of-Service Model for Protected Bike Lanes. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2015, 2520, 90-99.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Frazila R.B.; Zukhruf F.; Ornando Simorangkir C.; Burhani J.T. Constructing pedestrian level of service based on the perspective of visual impairment person. MATEC Web Conf. 2019, 270, 03009.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Fruin J.J. Designing for pedestrians: A level-of-service concept. Highw. Res. Rec. 1971, 355, 1-15.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Gallin N. Quantifying pedestrian friendliness—guidelines for assessing pedestrian level of service. Road Transp. Res. 2001, 10, 47-55.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Grzebieta R.; McIntosh A.; Chong S. Pedestrian-Cyclist Collisions: Issues and Risk. Proceedings of the Australasian College of Road Safety National Conference, Melbourne, Australia, 1–2 September 2011, .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Guidelines for Developing and Implementing a Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan; Rupprecht Consult: Cologne, Germany, 2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Hamilton-Baillie B. Shared Space: Reconciling People, Places and Traffic. Built Environ. 2008, 34, 161-181.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Hamilton-Baillie B. Towards shared space. Urban Des. Int. 2008, 13, 130-138.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Hass-Klau C. The Pedestrian and City Traffic; Belhaven Press: London, UK, 1990.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Hidayat N.; Choocharukul K.; Kishi K. Investigating structural relationships among pedestrian perception, behavior, traffic, and level of service. Infrastruct. Plan. Rev. 2010, 27, 99-108.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Hidayat N.; Choocharukul K.; Kishi K. Pedestrian Level of Service Model Incorporating Pedestrian Perception for Sidewalk with Vendor Activities. J. East. Asia Soc. Transp. Stud. 2011, 9, 1012-1023.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Highway Capacity Manual; Transportation Research Board: Washington, DC, USA, 2000.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Highway Capacity Manual; Transportation Research Board: Washington, DC, USA, 2010.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Hummer J.; Rouphail N.; Toole J.; Patten R.; Schneider R.; Green J.; Hughes R.; Fain S. Evaluation of Safety, Design, and Operation of Shared-Use Paths—Final Report; Federal Highway Administration: McLean, VA, USA, 2006.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Jaskiewicz F. Pedestrian Level of Service Based on Trip Quality. Proceedings of the TRB Circular E-C019: Urban Street Symposium, Dallas, TX, USA, 28–30 June 1999, .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Jensen S. Pedestrian and Bicyclist Level of Service on Roadway Segments. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2007, 2031, 43-51.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Kang K.; Lee K. Development of a Bicycle Level of Service Model from the User’s Perspective. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 2012, 16, 1032-1039.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Kang L.; Xiong Y.; Mannering F. Statistical analysis of pedestrian perceptions of sidewalk level of service in the presence of bicycles. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2013, 53, 10-21.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  40. Kazemzadeh K.; Laureshyn A.; Winslott Hiselius L.; Ronchi E. Expanding the Scope of the Bicycle Level-of-Service Concept: A Review of the Literature. Sustainability 2020, 12.

  41. Landis B.; Vattikuti V.; Brannick M. Real-Time Human Perceptions: Toward a Bicycle Level of Service. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1997, 1578, 119-126.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Landis B.; Vattikuti V.; Ottenberg R.; McLeod D.; Guttenplan M. Modeling the Roadside Walking Environment: Pedestrian Level of Service. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2001, 1773, 82-88.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Liang X.; Xie M.; Jia X. Use of entropy to analyze level of service of dedicated bike lanes in China. Adv. Mech. Eng. 2017, 9, 1-12.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Macioszek E.; Świerk P.; Kurek A. The Bike-Sharing System as an Element of Enhancing Sustainable Mobility—A Case Study based on a City in Poland. Sustainability 2020, 12.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Majumdar B.; Mitra S. Development of Level of Service Criteria for Evaluation of Bicycle Suitability. J. Urban Plan. Dev. 2018, 144, 04018012.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Muraleetharan T.; Adachi T.; Uchida K.; Hagiwara T.; Kagaya S. A study on evaluation of pedestrian level of service along sidewalks and at crosswalks using conjoint analysis. Infrastruct. Plan. Rev. 2004, 21, 727-735.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Nag D.; Kishore Goswami A. Identification of Measures of Effectiveness (MOEs) for developing Pedestrian Level of Service (PLOS): A Theoretical Approach using Expert Opinion on a Fuzzy Likert (FL) Scale. Int. Rev. Spat. Plan. Sustain. Dev. 2019, 7, 56-82.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Nag D.; Kishore Goswami A.; Gupta A.; Sen J. Assessing urban sidewalk networks based on three constructs: A synthesis of pedestrian level of service literature. Transp. Rev. 2019, 40, 204-240.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Nag D.; Kishore Goswami A.; Sen J. Selection of Attributes for Pedestrian Level of Service Measure: A Screening Tool. Proceedings of the 99th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, USA, 12–16 January 2020, .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Nikiforiadis A.; Basbas S. Can pedestrians and cyclists share the same space? The case of a city with low cycling levels and experience. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2019, 46, 101453.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Nikiforiadis A.; Basbas S.; Garyfalou M.I. A methodology for the assessment of pedestrians-cyclists shared space level of service. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 254, 120172.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Nogal M.; Jiménez P. Attractiveness of Bike-Sharing Stations from a Multi-Modal Perspective: The Role of Objective and Subjective Features. Sustainability 2020, 12.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. O’Hern S.; Oxley J. Pedestrian injuries due to collisions with cyclists Melbourne, Australia. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2019, 122, 295-300.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Okon I.; Moreno C. Bicycle Level of Service Model for the Cycloruta, Bogota, Colombia. Rom. J. Transp. Infrastruct. 2019, 8, 1-33.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Parks J.; Tanaka A.; Ryus P.; Monsere C.; McNeil N.; Goodno M. Assessment of Three Alternative Bicycle Infrastructure Quality-of-Service Metrics. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2013, 2387, 56-65.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Petritsch T.; Ozkul S.; McLeod P.; Landis B.; McLeod D. Quantifying Bicyclists’ Perceptions of Shared-Use Paths Adjacent to the Roadway. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2010, 2198, 124-132.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Raghuram Kadali B.; Vedagiri P. Review of Pedestrian Level of Service: Perspective in Developing Countries. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2016, 2581, 37-47.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Said M.; Abou-Zeid M.; Kaysi I. Modeling Satisfaction with the Walking Environment: The Case of an Urban University Neighborhood in a Developing Country. J. Urban Plan. Dev. 2017, 143, 05016009.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Sdoukopoulos A.; Verani E.; Nikolaidou A.; Politis I.; Mikiki F. Traffic Calming Measures as a Tool to Revitalise the Urban Environment: The Case of Serres, Greece. Advances in Mobility-as-a-Service Systems; Nathanail E.G.; Adamos G.; Karakikes I. Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 770-779. OpenStreetMap Contributors.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Sdoukopoulos A.; Verani E.; Nikolaidou A.; Tsakalidis A.; Gavanas N.; Pitsiava-Latinopoulou M.; Mikiki F.; Mademli E.; Pallas C. Development and implementation of walkability audits in Greek medium-sized cities: The case of the Serres’ city centre. Transp. Res. Procedia 2017, 24, 337-344.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. Sisiopiku V.; Byrd J.; Chittoor A. Application of level-of-service methods for evaluation of operations at pedestrian facilities. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2007, 2002, 117-124.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. Sisiopiku V.; Byrd J.; Waid J. Pedestrian level of service comparison. Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Transport Research, Berkeley, CA, USA, 24–28 June 2007, .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  63. Song M.; Wang K.; Zhang Y.; Li M.; Qi H.; Zhang Y. Impact Evaluation of Bike-Sharing on Bicycling Accessibility. Sustainability 2020, 12.

  64. Stepan O.; Rotaru I. Street Design, Streetscape and Traffic Calming. Transport Learning Project, Training Module 5; Intelligent Energy Europe, European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2011.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  65. Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan. Final Version; Municipality of Serres: Serres, Greece, 2020.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. Tan D.; Wang W.; Lu J.; Bian Y. Research on Methods of Assessing Pedestrian Level of Service for Sidewalk. J. Transp. Syst. Eng. Inf. Technol. 2007, 7, 74-79.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  67. Tate L.E. Using Rapid Ethnography to Unpack Performances of Authentic Community: An Art Festival Case from Victoria, British Columbia. J. Plan. Educ. Res. 2020.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. Urban Mobility Study; Municipality of Serres: Serres, Greece, 2015.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  69. Vallejo-Borda J.A.; Ortiz-Ramirez H.A.; Rodriguez-Valencia A.; Hurtubia R.; de D. Ortuzar J. Forecasting the Quality of Service of Bogota’s Sidewalks from Pedestrian Perceptions: An Ordered Probit MIMIC Approach. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2020, 2674, 205-216.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  70. Vallejo-Borda J.A.; Rosas-Satizábal D.; Rodriguez-Valencia A. Do attitudes and perceptions help to explain cycling infrastructure quality of service?. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2020, 87, 102539.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  71. Varnild A.; Tillgren P.; Larm P. What types of injuries did seriously injured pedestrians and cyclists receive in a Swedish urban region in the time period 2003–2017 when Vision Zero was implemented?. Public Health 2020, 181, 59-64.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  72. Wang W.; Sun Z.; Wang L.; Yu S.; Chen J. Evaluation Model for the Level of Service of Shared-Use Paths Based on Traffic Conflicts. Sustainability 2020, 12. Hellenic Statistical Authority Homepage.

  73. Wicramasinghe V.; Dissanayake S. Evaluation of pedestrians’ sidewalk behavior in developing countries. Transp. Res. Procedia 2017, 25, 4072-4082.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  74. Zisopoulou T. Local Action Plan, Active Travel Network Project; Municipality of Serres: Serres, Greece, 2012.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Describing Micro-Mobility First/Last-Mile Routing Behavior in Urban Road Networks through a Novel Modeling Approach. (2023). Stavropoulou, Eirini ; Koliou, Katerina ; Mitropoulos, Lambros ; Tzouras, Panagiotis G ; Kepaptsoglou, Konstantinos ; Vlahogianni, Eleni I ; Karaloulis, Antonis ; Antoniou, Eleni ; Karolemeas, Christos.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3095-:d:1061871.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Addressing pedestrian perceived externalities influenced by motor vehicles: A perspective from curb space typologies. (2023). Barrero, German A ; Barchelot-Aceros, Laura Juliana ; Vallejo-Borda, Jose Agustin ; Silva-Fernandez, Claudia Susana ; Pabon-Poches, Daysy Katherine ; Ortiz-Ramirez, Hernan Alberto.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:178:y:2023:i:c:s0965856423002963.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Pursuing higher acceptability and compliance for electric two-wheeler standardization policy in China: The importance of socio-demographic characteristics, psychological factors, and travel habits. (2023). Pervez, Amjad ; Huang, Helai ; Han, Chunyang ; Li, Xintong ; Wei, Yulu ; Jiang, Qianshan ; Xu, Guangming.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:167:y:2023:i:c:s0965856422003007.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. A review of factors and benefits of non-motorized transport: a way forward for developing countries. (2022). Rahman, Syed Masiur ; Safi, Fazal Rehman ; Kashifi, Mohammad Tamim ; Mansoor, Umer.
    In: Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development.
    RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01531-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Towards an enriched framework of service evaluation for pedestrian and bicyclist infrastructure: acknowledging the power of users’ perceptions. (2022). Ortiz-Ramirez, Hernan Alberto ; Barrero, German A ; Vallejo-Borda, Jose Agustin ; Rodriguez-Valencia, Alvaro.
    In: Transportation.
    RePEc:kap:transp:v:49:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s11116-021-10194-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. An Approach to Model the Willingness to Use of E-Scooter Sharing Services in Different Urban Road Environments. (2022). Kepaptsoglou, Konstantinos ; Karolemeas, Christos ; Mitropoulos, Lambros ; Koliou, Katerina ; Tzouras, Panagiotis G ; Sorkou, Theodora.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15680-:d:983828.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Travel satisfaction of delivery electric two-wheeler riders: Evidence from Nanjing, China. (2022). Jialiang, Fan ; Blythe, Phil ; Yuqian, Zhang ; Huitao, LV ; Yanjie, JI ; Fan, Zhang.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:162:y:2022:i:c:p:253-266.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. The maximal covering bicycle network design problem. (2022). Montoya, Alejandro ; Botero-Fernandez, Veronica ; Duque, Juan C ; Ospina, Juan P.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:159:y:2022:i:c:p:222-236.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Quantifying walking capability: a novel aggregated index based on spatial perspective and analyses. (2022). Mostofi, Nikrouz ; Kaviari, Farnaz ; Motieyan, Hamid.
    In: Papers in Regional Science.
    RePEc:bla:presci:v:101:y:2022:i:2:p:483-503.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Evaluating pedestrian perceptions of street design with a 3D stated preference survey. (2021). Roorda, Matthew J ; Habib, Khandker Nurul ; Hawkins, Jason ; Hall, Brent G ; Luubert, Michael ; Kossowsky, David ; Adhikari, Sneha ; Kasraian, Dena.
    In: Environment and Planning B.
    RePEc:sae:envirb:v:48:y:2021:i:7:p:1787-1805.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. A Stated Preference Survey for Evaluating Young Pedestrians’ Preferences on Walkways. (2021). Mazzulla, Gabriella ; Forciniti, Carmen ; Bellizzi, Maria Grazia.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12434-:d:676452.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Pedestrians-Cyclists Shared Spaces Level of Service: Comparison of Methodologies and Critical Discussion. (2021). Mikiki, Foteini ; Basbas, Socrates ; Nikiforiadis, Andreas ; Polymeroudi, Efrosyni ; Oikonomou, Aikaterini.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:1:p:361-:d:474059.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Analyzing bicycle level of service using virtual reality and deep learning technologies. (2021). Jia, Xudong ; Xie, Meiquan ; Zhang, Tianyu ; Liang, Xiao.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:153:y:2021:i:c:p:115-129.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Multi-objective bike-way network design problem with space–time accessibility constraint. (2020). Zhu, Feng.
    In: Transportation.
    RePEc:kap:transp:v:47:y:2020:i:5:d:10.1007_s11116-019-10025-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Expanding the Scope of the Bicycle Level-of-Service Concept: A Review of the Literature. (2020). Hiselius, Lena Winslott ; Laureshyn, Aliaksei ; Kazemzadeh, Khashayar ; Ronchi, Enrico.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:7:p:2944-:d:342467.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Research on the Relationship between the Individual Characteristics of Electric Bike Riders and Illegal Speeding Behavior: A Questionnaire-Based Study. (2020). Yang, Dong ; Zhou, Jibiao ; Ma, Changxi ; Fan, Yuanyuan.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:799-:d:311752.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. A static bike repositioning model in a hub-and-spoke network framework. (2020). Lyu, Cheng ; Liu, Zhiyuan ; Chen, Xinyuan ; Huang, DI ; Wang, Shuaian.
    In: Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review.
    RePEc:eee:transe:v:141:y:2020:i:c:s1366554520306827.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Developing an urban bikeability index for different types of cyclists as a tool to prioritise bicycle infrastructure investments. (2020). Gonzalez, Virginia I ; Larraaga, Ana Margarita ; Saltarin, Maria ; Arellana, Julian ; Henao, Cesar Augusto.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:139:y:2020:i:c:p:310-334.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Bicycle superhighway: An environmentally sustainable policy for urban transport. (2020). Nagel, Kai ; Ziemke, Dominik ; Agarwal, Amit.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:137:y:2020:i:c:p:519-540.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Classifying the traffic state of urban expressways: A machine-learning approach. (2020). Xing, Xue ; Lu, Jian ; Wang, Wei ; Cheng, Zeyang.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:137:y:2020:i:c:p:411-428.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Evaluating cyclists’ perception of satisfaction using 360° videos. (2020). Iki, Kazuhisa ; Homma, Riken ; Liu, Qiang.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:132:y:2020:i:c:p:205-213.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Using best–worst scaling to identify barriers to walkability: a study of Porto Alegre, Brazil. (2019). Arellana, Julian ; Rizzi, Luis Ignacio ; Larranaga, Ana Margarita ; Bettella, Helena Beatriz ; Strambi, Orlando.
    In: Transportation.
    RePEc:kap:transp:v:46:y:2019:i:6:d:10.1007_s11116-018-9944-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Cycling comfort evaluation with instrumented probe bicycle. (2019). Zhu, Feng.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:129:y:2019:i:c:p:217-231.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Analysis of alternative treatments for left turn bicycles at tandem intersections. (2019). Wang, Jiawen ; Yan, Jiachao ; Zhao, Jing.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:126:y:2019:i:c:p:314-328.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Exploring the spatial variation of ridesourcing demand and its relationship to built environment and socioeconomic factors with the geographically weighted Poisson regression. (2019). Peng, Zhong-Ren ; Yu, Haitao.
    In: Journal of Transport Geography.
    RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:75:y:2019:i:c:p:147-163.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Urban Wasteful Transport and Its Estimation Methods. (2018). Tang, Qiang ; Zhou, Bingzhong ; Cao, Xiangyang ; Shi, Donghui ; Li, Jiaqi.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4562-:d:187397.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Estimation of crowd density applying wavelet transform and machine learning. (2018). Nagao, Koki ; Nishinari, Katsuhiro ; Yanagisawa, Daichi.
    In: Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.
    RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:510:y:2018:i:c:p:145-163.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Comparison on travel scheduling between driving and walking trips by habitual car users. (2017). Ferrer, Sheila ; Ruiz, Tomas.
    In: Transportation.
    RePEc:kap:transp:v:44:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s11116-015-9618-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Assessing the Bicycle Network in St. Louis: A PlaceBased User-Centered Approach. (2017). Crawford, Thomas ; Hall, Damon M ; Boettge, Bram .
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:241-:d:89832.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2024-12-30 05:42:15 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.