CERN Accelerating science

The comparisons of the predictions and observed data in the kinematic distributions of the \pt of the leading lepton (upper left), subleading lepton (upper right), leading jet (lower left), and subleading jet (lower right) in the \EM channels. The vertical bars on the markers of the observed data represent the statistical uncertainties. The shaded band in the predicted distributions includes statistical and systematic uncertainties. The last bin in each plot includes overflow events. The ratio of the data to the predictions from simulation is presented in the lower panel of each figure.

The comparisons of the predictions and observed data in the kinematic distributions of the \pt of the leading lepton (upper left), subleading lepton (upper right), leading jet (lower left), and subleading jet (lower right) in the \EM channels. The vertical bars on the markers of the observed data represent the statistical uncertainties. The shaded band in the predicted distributions includes statistical and systematic uncertainties. The last bin in each plot includes overflow events. The ratio of the data to the predictions from simulation is presented in the lower panel of each figure.

The comparisons of the predictions and observed data in the kinematic distributions of the \pt of the leading lepton (upper left), subleading lepton (upper right), leading jet (lower left), and subleading jet (lower right) in the \EM channels. The vertical bars on the markers of the observed data represent the statistical uncertainties. The shaded band in the predicted distributions includes statistical and systematic uncertainties. The last bin in each plot includes overflow events. The ratio of the data to the predictions from simulation is presented in the lower panel of each figure.

The comparisons of the predictions and observed data in the kinematic distributions of the \pt of the leading lepton (upper left), subleading lepton (upper right), leading jet (lower left), and subleading jet (lower right) in the \EM channels. The vertical bars on the markers of the observed data represent the statistical uncertainties. The shaded band in the predicted distributions includes statistical and systematic uncertainties. The last bin in each plot includes overflow events. The ratio of the data to the predictions from simulation is presented in the lower panel of each figure.

The comparisons of the predictions and observed data in the \pt distributions in the top quark (left) and antiquark (right) in the \EE (upper), \EM (middle) and \MM (lower) channels. The vertical bars on the markers of the observed data represent the statistical uncertainties. The shaded band in the predicted distributions includes statistical and systematic uncertainties. The last bin in each plot includes overflow events. The ratio of the data to the predictions from simulation is presented in the lower panel of each figure.

The comparisons of the predictions and observed data in the \pt distributions in the top quark (left) and antiquark (right) in the \EE (upper), \EM (middle) and \MM (lower) channels. The vertical bars on the markers of the observed data represent the statistical uncertainties. The shaded band in the predicted distributions includes statistical and systematic uncertainties. The last bin in each plot includes overflow events. The ratio of the data to the predictions from simulation is presented in the lower panel of each figure.

The comparisons of the predictions and observed data in the \pt distributions in the top quark (left) and antiquark (right) in the \EE (upper), \EM (middle) and \MM (lower) channels. The vertical bars on the markers of the observed data represent the statistical uncertainties. The shaded band in the predicted distributions includes statistical and systematic uncertainties. The last bin in each plot includes overflow events. The ratio of the data to the predictions from simulation is presented in the lower panel of each figure.

The comparisons of the predictions and observed data in the \pt distributions in the top quark (left) and antiquark (right) in the \EE (upper), \EM (middle) and \MM (lower) channels. The vertical bars on the markers of the observed data represent the statistical uncertainties. The shaded band in the predicted distributions includes statistical and systematic uncertainties. The last bin in each plot includes overflow events. The ratio of the data to the predictions from simulation is presented in the lower panel of each figure.

The comparisons of the predictions and observed data in the \pt distributions in the top quark (left) and antiquark (right) in the \EE (upper), \EM (middle) and \MM (lower) channels. The vertical bars on the markers of the observed data represent the statistical uncertainties. The shaded band in the predicted distributions includes statistical and systematic uncertainties. The last bin in each plot includes overflow events. The ratio of the data to the predictions from simulation is presented in the lower panel of each figure.

The comparisons of the predictions and observed data in the \pt distributions in the top quark (left) and antiquark (right) in the \EE (upper), \EM (middle) and \MM (lower) channels. The vertical bars on the markers of the observed data represent the statistical uncertainties. The shaded band in the predicted distributions includes statistical and systematic uncertainties. The last bin in each plot includes overflow events. The ratio of the data to the predictions from simulation is presented in the lower panel of each figure.

The comparisons of the predictions and observed data in \ObsOne in the \EE (upper left), \EM (upper right), and \MM (lower) channel. In this figure, the values of \ObsOne are divided by the fourth power of \mtop to provide better visibility. The vertical bars on the markers of the observed data represent the statistical uncertainties. The shaded band in the predicted distributions includes statistical and systematic uncertainties. The first and last bins in each plot includes underflow and overflow events, respectively. The ratio of the data to the predictions from simulation is presented in the lower panel of each figure. The solid blue line shows the ratio of predictions for \ImdtG = 2.6 and \ImdtG = 0, and the dashed red line represents the ratio \ImdtG = $-2.6$ and \ImdtG = 0, using the CEDM samples.

The comparisons of the predictions and observed data in \ObsOne in the \EE (upper left), \EM (upper right), and \MM (lower) channel. In this figure, the values of \ObsOne are divided by the fourth power of \mtop to provide better visibility. The vertical bars on the markers of the observed data represent the statistical uncertainties. The shaded band in the predicted distributions includes statistical and systematic uncertainties. The first and last bins in each plot includes underflow and overflow events, respectively. The ratio of the data to the predictions from simulation is presented in the lower panel of each figure. The solid blue line shows the ratio of predictions for \ImdtG = 2.6 and \ImdtG = 0, and the dashed red line represents the ratio \ImdtG = $-2.6$ and \ImdtG = 0, using the CEDM samples.

The comparisons of the predictions and observed data in \ObsOne in the \EE (upper left), \EM (upper right), and \MM (lower) channel. In this figure, the values of \ObsOne are divided by the fourth power of \mtop to provide better visibility. The vertical bars on the markers of the observed data represent the statistical uncertainties. The shaded band in the predicted distributions includes statistical and systematic uncertainties. The first and last bins in each plot includes underflow and overflow events, respectively. The ratio of the data to the predictions from simulation is presented in the lower panel of each figure. The solid blue line shows the ratio of predictions for \ImdtG = 2.6 and \ImdtG = 0, and the dashed red line represents the ratio \ImdtG = $-2.6$ and \ImdtG = 0, using the CEDM samples.

The comparisons of the predictions and observed data in \ObsThree in the \EE (upper left), \EM (upper right), and \MM (lower) channel. In this figure, the values of \ObsThree are divided by the fourth power of \mtop to provide better visibility. The vertical bars on the markers of the observed data represent the statistical uncertainties. The shaded band in the predicted distributions includes statistical and systematic uncertainties. The ratio of the data to the predictions from simulation is presented in the lower panel of each figure. The first and last bins in each plot includes underflow and overflow events, respectively. The solid blue line shows the ratio of predictions for \ImdtG = 2.6 and \ImdtG = 0, and the dashed red line represents the ratio \ImdtG = $-2.6$ and \ImdtG = 0, using the CEDM samples.

The comparisons of the predictions and observed data in \ObsThree in the \EE (upper left), \EM (upper right), and \MM (lower) channel. In this figure, the values of \ObsThree are divided by the fourth power of \mtop to provide better visibility. The vertical bars on the markers of the observed data represent the statistical uncertainties. The shaded band in the predicted distributions includes statistical and systematic uncertainties. The ratio of the data to the predictions from simulation is presented in the lower panel of each figure. The first and last bins in each plot includes underflow and overflow events, respectively. The solid blue line shows the ratio of predictions for \ImdtG = 2.6 and \ImdtG = 0, and the dashed red line represents the ratio \ImdtG = $-2.6$ and \ImdtG = 0, using the CEDM samples.

The comparisons of the predictions and observed data in \ObsThree in the \EE (upper left), \EM (upper right), and \MM (lower) channel. In this figure, the values of \ObsThree are divided by the fourth power of \mtop to provide better visibility. The vertical bars on the markers of the observed data represent the statistical uncertainties. The shaded band in the predicted distributions includes statistical and systematic uncertainties. The ratio of the data to the predictions from simulation is presented in the lower panel of each figure. The first and last bins in each plot includes underflow and overflow events, respectively. The solid blue line shows the ratio of predictions for \ImdtG = 2.6 and \ImdtG = 0, and the dashed red line represents the ratio \ImdtG = $-2.6$ and \ImdtG = 0, using the CEDM samples.

Asymmetries as a function of \ImdtG for \ObsOne (left) and \ObsThree (right), for the combined dilepton channels. The band corresponds to the uncertainties at the 68\% confidence level, of the linear fits. The square markers are the asymmetries measured using simulated samples corresponding to the different \ImdtG values. The horizontal line indicates the measured asymmetry, and the shaded region reflects the total statistical and systematic uncertainty.

Asymmetries as a function of \ImdtG for \ObsOne (left) and \ObsThree (right), for the combined dilepton channels. The band corresponds to the uncertainties at the 68\% confidence level, of the linear fits. The square markers are the asymmetries measured using simulated samples corresponding to the different \ImdtG values. The horizontal line indicates the measured asymmetry, and the shaded region reflects the total statistical and systematic uncertainty.