CERN Accelerating science

Distributions of events passing the selection requirements in the muon (left) and electron channels (right). Each plot also presents in the lower part a ratio of simulation over data. Only statistical uncertainties are shown as error bars on the data points, whereas the ratio presents the statistical uncertainty in the simulation and the data. The plots show the number of events without normalization to the bin width. The different background contributions are discussed in the text.

Distributions of events passing the selection requirements in the muon (left) and electron channels (right). Each plot also presents in the lower part a ratio of simulation over data. Only statistical uncertainties are shown as error bars on the data points, whereas the ratio presents the statistical uncertainty in the simulation and the data. The plots show the number of events without normalization to the bin width. The different background contributions are discussed in the text.

Distributions of events passing the selection requirements in the electron channel as a function of the dilepton \pt in five ranges of invariant mass: 50 to 76\GeV (upper left), 76 to 106\GeV (upper right), 106 to 170\GeV (middle left), 170 to 350\GeV (middle right), and 350 to 1000\GeV (lower). More details are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:reco-level-leptons}.

Distributions of events passing the selection requirements in the electron channel as a function of the dilepton \pt in five ranges of invariant mass: 50 to 76\GeV (upper left), 76 to 106\GeV (upper right), 106 to 170\GeV (middle left), 170 to 350\GeV (middle right), and 350 to 1000\GeV (lower). More details are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:reco-level-leptons}.

Distributions of events passing the selection requirements in the electron channel as a function of the dilepton \pt in five ranges of invariant mass: 50 to 76\GeV (upper left), 76 to 106\GeV (upper right), 106 to 170\GeV (middle left), 170 to 350\GeV (middle right), and 350 to 1000\GeV (lower). More details are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:reco-level-leptons}.

Distributions of events passing the selection requirements in the electron channel as a function of the dilepton \pt in five ranges of invariant mass: 50 to 76\GeV (upper left), 76 to 106\GeV (upper right), 106 to 170\GeV (middle left), 170 to 350\GeV (middle right), and 350 to 1000\GeV (lower). More details are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:reco-level-leptons}.

Distributions of events passing the selection requirements in the electron channel as a function of the dilepton \pt in five ranges of invariant mass: 50 to 76\GeV (upper left), 76 to 106\GeV (upper right), 106 to 170\GeV (middle left), 170 to 350\GeV (middle right), and 350 to 1000\GeV (lower). More details are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:reco-level-leptons}.

Estimates of the uncertainties in inclusive differential cross sections in \PTll in various invariant mass ranges: \mrangea (upper left), \mrangeb (upper right), \mrangec (middle left), \mranged (middle right), and \mrangee (lower). The black line is the quadratic sum of the colored lines.

Estimates of the uncertainties in inclusive differential cross sections in \PTll in various invariant mass ranges: \mrangea (upper left), \mrangeb (upper right), \mrangec (middle left), \mranged (middle right), and \mrangee (lower). The black line is the quadratic sum of the colored lines.

Estimates of the uncertainties in inclusive differential cross sections in \PTll in various invariant mass ranges: \mrangea (upper left), \mrangeb (upper right), \mrangec (middle left), \mranged (middle right), and \mrangee (lower). The black line is the quadratic sum of the colored lines.

Estimates of the uncertainties in inclusive differential cross sections in \PTll in various invariant mass ranges: \mrangea (upper left), \mrangeb (upper right), \mrangec (middle left), \mranged (middle right), and \mrangee (lower). The black line is the quadratic sum of the colored lines.

Estimates of the uncertainties in inclusive differential cross sections in \PTll in various invariant mass ranges: \mrangea (upper left), \mrangeb (upper right), \mrangec (middle left), \mranged (middle right), and \mrangee (lower). The black line is the quadratic sum of the colored lines.

Estimates of the uncertainties in inclusive differential cross section ratios in \PTll for invariant mass ranges with respect to the peak region \mrangeb: \mrangea (upper left), \mrangec (upper right), \mranged (lower left), and \mrangee (lower right). The black line is the quadratic sum of the colored lines.

Estimates of the uncertainties in inclusive differential cross section ratios in \PTll for invariant mass ranges with respect to the peak region \mrangeb: \mrangea (upper left), \mrangec (upper right), \mranged (lower left), and \mrangee (lower right). The black line is the quadratic sum of the colored lines.

Estimates of the uncertainties in inclusive differential cross section ratios in \PTll for invariant mass ranges with respect to the peak region \mrangeb: \mrangea (upper left), \mrangec (upper right), \mranged (lower left), and \mrangee (lower right). The black line is the quadratic sum of the colored lines.

Estimates of the uncertainties in inclusive differential cross section ratios in \PTll for invariant mass ranges with respect to the peak region \mrangeb: \mrangea (upper left), \mrangec (upper right), \mranged (lower left), and \mrangee (lower right). The black line is the quadratic sum of the colored lines.

Differential cross sections in \PTll in various invariant mass ranges: \mrangea (upper left), \mrangeb (upper right), \mrangec (middle left), \mranged (middle right), and \mrangee (lower). The error bars on data points (black dots) correspond to the statistical uncertainty of the measurement and the shaded bands around the data points correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared with \MGaMC (0, 1, and 2 jets at NLO) + \PYTHIA8 (blue dots), \minnlo (green diamonds) and \MGaMC (0 jet at NLO)+ PB (\cascade) (red triangles).

Differential cross sections in \PTll in various invariant mass ranges: \mrangea (upper left), \mrangeb (upper right), \mrangec (middle left), \mranged (middle right), and \mrangee (lower). The error bars on data points (black dots) correspond to the statistical uncertainty of the measurement and the shaded bands around the data points correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared with \MGaMC (0, 1, and 2 jets at NLO) + \PYTHIA8 (blue dots), \minnlo (green diamonds) and \MGaMC (0 jet at NLO)+ PB (\cascade) (red triangles).

Differential cross sections in \PTll in various invariant mass ranges: \mrangea (upper left), \mrangeb (upper right), \mrangec (middle left), \mranged (middle right), and \mrangee (lower). The error bars on data points (black dots) correspond to the statistical uncertainty of the measurement and the shaded bands around the data points correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared with \MGaMC (0, 1, and 2 jets at NLO) + \PYTHIA8 (blue dots), \minnlo (green diamonds) and \MGaMC (0 jet at NLO)+ PB (\cascade) (red triangles).

Differential cross sections in \PTll in various invariant mass ranges: \mrangea (upper left), \mrangeb (upper right), \mrangec (middle left), \mranged (middle right), and \mrangee (lower). The error bars on data points (black dots) correspond to the statistical uncertainty of the measurement and the shaded bands around the data points correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared with \MGaMC (0, 1, and 2 jets at NLO) + \PYTHIA8 (blue dots), \minnlo (green diamonds) and \MGaMC (0 jet at NLO)+ PB (\cascade) (red triangles).

Differential cross sections in \PTll in various invariant mass ranges: \mrangea (upper left), \mrangeb (upper right), \mrangec (middle left), \mranged (middle right), and \mrangee (lower). The error bars on data points (black dots) correspond to the statistical uncertainty of the measurement and the shaded bands around the data points correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared with \MGaMC (0, 1, and 2 jets at NLO) + \PYTHIA8 (blue dots), \minnlo (green diamonds) and \MGaMC (0 jet at NLO)+ PB (\cascade) (red triangles).

Comparison to Monte Carlo predictions based on a matrix element with parton shower merging. The ratio of \MGaMC (0, 1, and 2 jets at NLO) + \PYTHIA8 (left) and \minnlo (right) predictions to the measured differential cross sections in \PTll are presented for various \Mll ranges. The error bars correspond to the statistical uncertainty of the measurement and the shaded bands to the total experimental uncertainty. The light color band corresponds to the statistical uncertainty of the simulation and the dark color band includes the scale uncertainty. The largest bands include PDF and \alpS uncertainties, added in quadrature.

Comparison to Monte Carlo predictions based on a matrix element with parton shower merging. The ratio of \MGaMC (0, 1, and 2 jets at NLO) + \PYTHIA8 (left) and \minnlo (right) predictions to the measured differential cross sections in \PTll are presented for various \Mll ranges. The error bars correspond to the statistical uncertainty of the measurement and the shaded bands to the total experimental uncertainty. The light color band corresponds to the statistical uncertainty of the simulation and the dark color band includes the scale uncertainty. The largest bands include PDF and \alpS uncertainties, added in quadrature.

Comparison to TMD based predictions. The ratio of \MGaMC (0 jet at NLO) + PB (\cascade) (left) and \artemide (right) predictions to the measured differential cross sections in \PTll are presented for various \Mll ranges. The error bars correspond to the statistical uncertainty of the measurement and the shaded bands to the total experimental uncertainty. The light (dark) green band around \artemide predictions represent the nonperturbative (QCD scale) uncertainties, the darker green representing the QED FSR correction uncertainties. The range of invalidity is shaded with a gray band. The light color band around \cascade prediction corresponds to the statistical uncertainty of the simulation and the dark color band includes the scale uncertainty. The largest bands include TMD uncertainty, added in quadrature.

Comparison to TMD based predictions. The ratio of \MGaMC (0 jet at NLO) + PB (\cascade) (left) and \artemide (right) predictions to the measured differential cross sections in \PTll are presented for various \Mll ranges. The error bars correspond to the statistical uncertainty of the measurement and the shaded bands to the total experimental uncertainty. The light (dark) green band around \artemide predictions represent the nonperturbative (QCD scale) uncertainties, the darker green representing the QED FSR correction uncertainties. The range of invalidity is shaded with a gray band. The light color band around \cascade prediction corresponds to the statistical uncertainty of the simulation and the dark color band includes the scale uncertainty. The largest bands include TMD uncertainty, added in quadrature.

Comparison to resummation based predictions. The ratio of \GE-$\tau$ (left) and \GE-\qt (right) predictions to the measured differential cross sections in \PTll are presented for various \Mll ranges. The error bars correspond to the statistical uncertainty of the measurement and the shaded bands to the total experimental uncertainty. The light color bands around the predictions represents the statistical uncertainties and the middle color bands represents the scale uncertainties. The dark outer bands of \GE-\qt prediction represent the resummation uncertainties.

Comparison to resummation based predictions. The ratio of \GE-$\tau$ (left) and \GE-\qt (right) predictions to the measured differential cross sections in \PTll are presented for various \Mll ranges. The error bars correspond to the statistical uncertainty of the measurement and the shaded bands to the total experimental uncertainty. The light color bands around the predictions represents the statistical uncertainties and the middle color bands represents the scale uncertainties. The dark outer bands of \GE-\qt prediction represent the resummation uncertainties.

Ratios of differential cross sections in \PTll for invariant mass ranges with respect to the peak region \mrangeb: \mrangea (upper left), \mrangec (upper right), \mranged (lower left), and \mrangee (lower right). Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0} caption.

Ratios of differential cross sections in \PTll for invariant mass ranges with respect to the peak region \mrangeb: \mrangea (upper left), \mrangec (upper right), \mranged (lower left), and \mrangee (lower right). Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0} caption.

Ratios of differential cross sections in \PTll for invariant mass ranges with respect to the peak region \mrangeb: \mrangea (upper left), \mrangec (upper right), \mranged (lower left), and \mrangee (lower right). Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0} caption.

Ratios of differential cross sections in \PTll for invariant mass ranges with respect to the peak region \mrangeb: \mrangea (upper left), \mrangec (upper right), \mranged (lower left), and \mrangee (lower right). Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0} caption.

Comparison to Monte Carlo predictions based on a matrix element with parton shower merging. The distributions show the ratio of differential cross sections as a function of \PTll for a given \Mll range to the cross section at the peak region \mrangeb. The predictions are \MGaMC (0, 1, and 2 jets at NLO) + \PYTHIA8 (left) and \minnlo (right). Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0a} caption.

Comparison to Monte Carlo predictions based on a matrix element with parton shower merging. The distributions show the ratio of differential cross sections as a function of \PTll for a given \Mll range to the cross section at the peak region \mrangeb. The predictions are \MGaMC (0, 1, and 2 jets at NLO) + \PYTHIA8 (left) and \minnlo (right). Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0a} caption.

Comparison to TMD based predictions. The distributions show the ratio of differential cross sections as a function of \PTll for a given \Mll range to the cross section at the peak region \mrangeb. The predictions are \MGaMC (0 jet at NLO) + PB (\cascade) (left) and \artemide (right). Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0b} caption.

Comparison to TMD based predictions. The distributions show the ratio of differential cross sections as a function of \PTll for a given \Mll range to the cross section at the peak region \mrangeb. The predictions are \MGaMC (0 jet at NLO) + PB (\cascade) (left) and \artemide (right). Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0b} caption.

Comparison to resummation based predictions. The distributions show the ratio of differential cross sections as a function of \PTll for a given \Mll range to the cross section at the peak region \mrangeb. The predictions are \GE-$\tau$ (left) and \GE-\qt (right). Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0c} caption.

Comparison to resummation based predictions. The distributions show the ratio of differential cross sections as a function of \PTll for a given \Mll range to the cross section at the peak region \mrangeb. The predictions are \GE-$\tau$ (left) and \GE-\qt (right). Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0c} caption.

Differential cross sections in \PTll for one or more jets in various invariant mass ranges: \mrangea (upper left), \mrangeb (upper right), \mrangec (lower left), and \mranged (lower right). The measurement is compared with \MGaMC (0, 1, and 2 jets at NLO) + \PYTHIA8 (blue dots), \minnlo (green diamonds) and \MGaMC (1 jet at NLO)+ PB (\cascade) (red triangles). Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0} caption.

Differential cross sections in \PTll for one or more jets in various invariant mass ranges: \mrangea (upper left), \mrangeb (upper right), \mrangec (lower left), and \mranged (lower right). The measurement is compared with \MGaMC (0, 1, and 2 jets at NLO) + \PYTHIA8 (blue dots), \minnlo (green diamonds) and \MGaMC (1 jet at NLO)+ PB (\cascade) (red triangles). Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0} caption.

Differential cross sections in \PTll for one or more jets in various invariant mass ranges: \mrangea (upper left), \mrangeb (upper right), \mrangec (lower left), and \mranged (lower right). The measurement is compared with \MGaMC (0, 1, and 2 jets at NLO) + \PYTHIA8 (blue dots), \minnlo (green diamonds) and \MGaMC (1 jet at NLO)+ PB (\cascade) (red triangles). Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0} caption.

Differential cross sections in \PTll for one or more jets in various invariant mass ranges: \mrangea (upper left), \mrangeb (upper right), \mrangec (lower left), and \mranged (lower right). The measurement is compared with \MGaMC (0, 1, and 2 jets at NLO) + \PYTHIA8 (blue dots), \minnlo (green diamonds) and \MGaMC (1 jet at NLO)+ PB (\cascade) (red triangles). Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0} caption.

Comparison of the differential cross sections in \PTll to predictions in various invariant mass ranges for the one or more jets case. The measurement is compared with \MGaMC (0, 1, and 2 jets at NLO) + \PYTHIA8 (upper left), \minnlo (upper right) and \MGaMC (1 jet at NLO) + PB (\cascade) (lower). Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0a} caption.

Comparison of the differential cross sections in \PTll to predictions in various invariant mass ranges for the one or more jets case. The measurement is compared with \MGaMC (0, 1, and 2 jets at NLO) + \PYTHIA8 (upper left), \minnlo (upper right) and \MGaMC (1 jet at NLO) + PB (\cascade) (lower). Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0a} caption.

Comparison of the differential cross sections in \PTll to predictions in various invariant mass ranges for the one or more jets case. The measurement is compared with \MGaMC (0, 1, and 2 jets at NLO) + \PYTHIA8 (upper left), \minnlo (upper right) and \MGaMC (1 jet at NLO) + PB (\cascade) (lower). Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0a} caption.

Comparison of the differential cross sections in \PTll to predictions in various invariant mass ranges for the one or more jets case. The measurement is compared with \GE-$\tau$ (left) and \GE-\qt (right) predictions. Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0c} caption.

Comparison of the differential cross sections in \PTll to predictions in various invariant mass ranges for the one or more jets case. The measurement is compared with \GE-$\tau$ (left) and \GE-\qt (right) predictions. Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0c} caption.

Ratios of differential cross sections in \PTll for one or more jets in various invariant mass ranges with respect to the peak region \mrangeb: \mrangea (upper left), \mrangec (upper right), and \mranged (lower). The measurement is compared with \MGaMC (0, 1, and 2 jets at NLO) + \PYTHIA8 (blue dots), \minnlo (green diamonds) and \MGaMC (1 jet at NLO)+ PB (\cascade) (red triangles). Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0} caption.

Ratios of differential cross sections in \PTll for one or more jets in various invariant mass ranges with respect to the peak region \mrangeb: \mrangea (upper left), \mrangec (upper right), and \mranged (lower). The measurement is compared with \MGaMC (0, 1, and 2 jets at NLO) + \PYTHIA8 (blue dots), \minnlo (green diamonds) and \MGaMC (1 jet at NLO)+ PB (\cascade) (red triangles). Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0} caption.

Ratios of differential cross sections in \PTll for one or more jets in various invariant mass ranges with respect to the peak region \mrangeb: \mrangea (upper left), \mrangec (upper right), and \mranged (lower). The measurement is compared with \MGaMC (0, 1, and 2 jets at NLO) + \PYTHIA8 (blue dots), \minnlo (green diamonds) and \MGaMC (1 jet at NLO)+ PB (\cascade) (red triangles). Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0} caption.

Comparison of the ratios of differential cross sections in \PTll for one or more jets in various invariant mass ranges with respect to the peak region \mrangeb. The measured ratio is compared with \MGaMC (0, 1, and 2 jets at NLO) + \PYTHIA8 (upper left), \minnlo (upper right) and \MGaMC (1 jet at NLO) + PB (\cascade) (lower). Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0a} caption.

Comparison of the ratios of differential cross sections in \PTll for one or more jets in various invariant mass ranges with respect to the peak region \mrangeb. The measured ratio is compared with \MGaMC (0, 1, and 2 jets at NLO) + \PYTHIA8 (upper left), \minnlo (upper right) and \MGaMC (1 jet at NLO) + PB (\cascade) (lower). Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0a} caption.

Comparison of the ratios of differential cross sections in \PTll for one or more jets in various invariant mass ranges with respect to the peak region \mrangeb. The measured ratio is compared with \MGaMC (0, 1, and 2 jets at NLO) + \PYTHIA8 (upper left), \minnlo (upper right) and \MGaMC (1 jet at NLO) + PB (\cascade) (lower). Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0a} caption.

Comparison of the ratios of differential cross sections in \PTll for one or more jets in various invariant mass ranges with respect to the peak region \mrangeb. The measured ratio is compared with \GE-$\tau$ (left) and \GE-\qt (right) predictions. Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0c} caption.

Comparison of the ratios of differential cross sections in \PTll for one or more jets in various invariant mass ranges with respect to the peak region \mrangeb. The measured ratio is compared with \GE-$\tau$ (left) and \GE-\qt (right) predictions. Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0c} caption.

Differential cross sections in $\phistar(\Pell\Pell)$ in various invariant mass ranges: \mrangea (upper left), \mrangeb (upper right), \mrangec (middle left), \mranged (middle right), and \mrangee (lower). The measurement is compared with \MGaMC (0, 1, and 2 jets at NLO) + \PYTHIA8 (blue dots), \minnlo (green diamonds) and \MGaMC (0 jet at NLO)+ PB (\cascade) (red triangles). Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0} caption.

Differential cross sections in $\phistar(\Pell\Pell)$ in various invariant mass ranges: \mrangea (upper left), \mrangeb (upper right), \mrangec (middle left), \mranged (middle right), and \mrangee (lower). The measurement is compared with \MGaMC (0, 1, and 2 jets at NLO) + \PYTHIA8 (blue dots), \minnlo (green diamonds) and \MGaMC (0 jet at NLO)+ PB (\cascade) (red triangles). Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0} caption.

Differential cross sections in $\phistar(\Pell\Pell)$ in various invariant mass ranges: \mrangea (upper left), \mrangeb (upper right), \mrangec (middle left), \mranged (middle right), and \mrangee (lower). The measurement is compared with \MGaMC (0, 1, and 2 jets at NLO) + \PYTHIA8 (blue dots), \minnlo (green diamonds) and \MGaMC (0 jet at NLO)+ PB (\cascade) (red triangles). Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0} caption.

Differential cross sections in $\phistar(\Pell\Pell)$ in various invariant mass ranges: \mrangea (upper left), \mrangeb (upper right), \mrangec (middle left), \mranged (middle right), and \mrangee (lower). The measurement is compared with \MGaMC (0, 1, and 2 jets at NLO) + \PYTHIA8 (blue dots), \minnlo (green diamonds) and \MGaMC (0 jet at NLO)+ PB (\cascade) (red triangles). Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0} caption.

Differential cross sections in $\phistar(\Pell\Pell)$ in various invariant mass ranges: \mrangea (upper left), \mrangeb (upper right), \mrangec (middle left), \mranged (middle right), and \mrangee (lower). The measurement is compared with \MGaMC (0, 1, and 2 jets at NLO) + \PYTHIA8 (blue dots), \minnlo (green diamonds) and \MGaMC (0 jet at NLO)+ PB (\cascade) (red triangles). Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0} caption.

Comparison of the differential cross sections in $\phistar(\Pell\Pell)$ to predictions in various \Mll ranges. The measurement is compared with \MGaMC (0, 1, and 2 jets at NLO) + \PYTHIA8 (upper left), \minnlo (upper right) and \MGaMC + PB (\cascade) (lower). Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0a} caption.

Comparison of the differential cross sections in $\phistar(\Pell\Pell)$ to predictions in various \Mll ranges. The measurement is compared with \MGaMC (0, 1, and 2 jets at NLO) + \PYTHIA8 (upper left), \minnlo (upper right) and \MGaMC + PB (\cascade) (lower). Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0a} caption.

Comparison of the differential cross sections in $\phistar(\Pell\Pell)$ to predictions in various \Mll ranges. The measurement is compared with \MGaMC (0, 1, and 2 jets at NLO) + \PYTHIA8 (upper left), \minnlo (upper right) and \MGaMC + PB (\cascade) (lower). Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0a} caption.

Comparison of the differential cross sections in $\phistar(\Pell\Pell)$ to predictions in various \Mll ranges. The measurement is compared with \GE-$\tau$ (left) and \GE-\qt (right) predictions. Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0c} caption.

Comparison of the differential cross sections in $\phistar(\Pell\Pell)$ to predictions in various \Mll ranges. The measurement is compared with \GE-$\tau$ (left) and \GE-\qt (right) predictions. Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0c} caption.

Ratios of differential cross sections in $\phistar(\Pell\Pell)$ for invariant mass ranges with respect to the peak region \mrangeb: \mrangea (upper left), \mrangec (upper right), \mranged (lower left), and \mrangee (lower right). The measurement is compared with \MGaMC (0, 1, and 2 jets at NLO) + \PYTHIA8 (blue dots), \minnlo (green diamonds) and \MGaMC (0 jet at NLO)+ PB (\cascade) (red triangles). Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0} caption.

Ratios of differential cross sections in $\phistar(\Pell\Pell)$ for invariant mass ranges with respect to the peak region \mrangeb: \mrangea (upper left), \mrangec (upper right), \mranged (lower left), and \mrangee (lower right). The measurement is compared with \MGaMC (0, 1, and 2 jets at NLO) + \PYTHIA8 (blue dots), \minnlo (green diamonds) and \MGaMC (0 jet at NLO)+ PB (\cascade) (red triangles). Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0} caption.

Ratios of differential cross sections in $\phistar(\Pell\Pell)$ for invariant mass ranges with respect to the peak region \mrangeb: \mrangea (upper left), \mrangec (upper right), \mranged (lower left), and \mrangee (lower right). The measurement is compared with \MGaMC (0, 1, and 2 jets at NLO) + \PYTHIA8 (blue dots), \minnlo (green diamonds) and \MGaMC (0 jet at NLO)+ PB (\cascade) (red triangles). Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0} caption.

Ratios of differential cross sections in $\phistar(\Pell\Pell)$ for invariant mass ranges with respect to the peak region \mrangeb: \mrangea (upper left), \mrangec (upper right), \mranged (lower left), and \mrangee (lower right). The measurement is compared with \MGaMC (0, 1, and 2 jets at NLO) + \PYTHIA8 (blue dots), \minnlo (green diamonds) and \MGaMC (0 jet at NLO)+ PB (\cascade) (red triangles). Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0} caption.

Ratios of differential cross sections in $\phistar(\Pell\Pell)$ for invariant \Mll with respect to the peak region \mrangeb. Compared to model predictions from \MGaMC (0, 1, and 2 jets at NLO) + \PYTHIA8 (upper left), \minnlo (upper right) and \MGaMC (0 jet at NLO) + PB (\cascade) (lower). Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0a} caption.

Ratios of differential cross sections in $\phistar(\Pell\Pell)$ for invariant \Mll with respect to the peak region \mrangeb. Compared to model predictions from \MGaMC (0, 1, and 2 jets at NLO) + \PYTHIA8 (upper left), \minnlo (upper right) and \MGaMC (0 jet at NLO) + PB (\cascade) (lower). Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0a} caption.

Ratios of differential cross sections in $\phistar(\Pell\Pell)$ for invariant \Mll with respect to the peak region \mrangeb. Compared to model predictions from \MGaMC (0, 1, and 2 jets at NLO) + \PYTHIA8 (upper left), \minnlo (upper right) and \MGaMC (0 jet at NLO) + PB (\cascade) (lower). Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0a} caption.

Ratios of differential cross sections in $\phistar(\Pell\Pell)$ for invariant \Mll with respect to the peak region \mrangeb. Compared to model predictions from \GE-$\tau$ (left) and \GE-\qt (right). Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0c} caption.

Ratios of differential cross sections in $\phistar(\Pell\Pell)$ for invariant \Mll with respect to the peak region \mrangeb. Compared to model predictions from \GE-$\tau$ (left) and \GE-\qt (right). Details on the presentation of the results are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:UnfCombPt0c} caption.

The ratio of \MGaMC (0, 1, 2 and 3 jets at LO) + PB (\cascade) predictions to the measured differential cross sections in \PTll (upper left), in \PTll for the one or more jets case (upper right), and in \phistar (bottom) are presented for various \Mll ranges. The error bars correspond to the statistical uncertainty of the measurement and the shaded bands to the total experimental uncertainty. The light color band around \cascade prediction corresponds to the statistical uncertainty of the simulation.

The ratio of \MGaMC (0, 1, 2 and 3 jets at LO) + PB (\cascade) predictions to the measured differential cross sections in \PTll (upper left), in \PTll for the one or more jets case (upper right), and in \phistar (bottom) are presented for various \Mll ranges. The error bars correspond to the statistical uncertainty of the measurement and the shaded bands to the total experimental uncertainty. The light color band around \cascade prediction corresponds to the statistical uncertainty of the simulation.

The ratio of \MGaMC (0, 1, 2 and 3 jets at LO) + PB (\cascade) predictions to the measured differential cross sections in \PTll (upper left), in \PTll for the one or more jets case (upper right), and in \phistar (bottom) are presented for various \Mll ranges. The error bars correspond to the statistical uncertainty of the measurement and the shaded bands to the total experimental uncertainty. The light color band around \cascade prediction corresponds to the statistical uncertainty of the simulation.

The ratio of \MGaMC (0, 1, 2 and 3 jets at LO) + PB (\cascade) predictions to the ratios of differential cross sections for \Mll ranges with respect to the peak region in \PTll (upper left), in \PTll for the one or more jets case (upper right), and in \phistar (bottom). The error bars correspond to the statistical uncertainty of the measurement and the shaded bands to the total experimental uncertainty. The light color band around \cascade prediction corresponds to the statistical uncertainty of the simulation.

The ratio of \MGaMC (0, 1, 2 and 3 jets at LO) + PB (\cascade) predictions to the ratios of differential cross sections for \Mll ranges with respect to the peak region in \PTll (upper left), in \PTll for the one or more jets case (upper right), and in \phistar (bottom). The error bars correspond to the statistical uncertainty of the measurement and the shaded bands to the total experimental uncertainty. The light color band around \cascade prediction corresponds to the statistical uncertainty of the simulation.

The ratio of \MGaMC (0, 1, 2 and 3 jets at LO) + PB (\cascade) predictions to the ratios of differential cross sections for \Mll ranges with respect to the peak region in \PTll (upper left), in \PTll for the one or more jets case (upper right), and in \phistar (bottom). The error bars correspond to the statistical uncertainty of the measurement and the shaded bands to the total experimental uncertainty. The light color band around \cascade prediction corresponds to the statistical uncertainty of the simulation.