Author(s)
|
Aberle, Oliver (CERN) ; Ahdida, Claudia (CERN) ; Arrutia, Pablo (CERN) ; Balazs, Kincso (CERN) ; Bernhard, Johannes (CERN) ; Brugger, Markus (CERN) ; Calviani, Marco (CERN) ; Dutheil, Yann (CERN) ; Ximenes, Rui Franqueira (CERN) ; Fraser, Matthew (CERN) ; Galleazzi, Frederic (CERN) ; Gilardoni, Simone (CERN) ; Grenard, Jean-Louis (CERN) ; Griesemer, Tina (CERN) ; Jacobsson, Richard (CERN) ; Kain, Verena (CERN) ; Lafarge, Damien (CERN) ; Marsh, Simon (CERN) ; Martin Ruiz, Jose Maria (CERN) ; Andrade, Ramiro Francisco Mena (CERN) ; Muttoni, Yvon (CERN) ; Navascues Cornago, Angel (CERN) ; Ninin, Pierre (CERN) ; Osborne, John (CERN) ; Ramjiawan, Rebecca (CERN) ; Santos Diaz, Pablo (CERN) ; Sanchez Galan, Francisco ; Vincke, Heinz (CERN) ; Vojtyla, Pavol (CERN) |
Abstract
| As part of the main focus of the BDF Working Group in 2021, this document reports on the study of alternative locations and possible optimisation that may accompany the reuse of existing facilities with the aim of significantly reducing the costs of the facility. Building on the BDF/SHiP Comprehensive Design Study (CDS), the assessment rests on the generic requirements and constraints that allow preserving the physics reach of the facility by making use of the $4\times 10^{19}$ protons per year at 400\,GeV that are currently not exploited at the SPS and for which no existing facility is compatible. The options considered involve the underground areas TCC4, TNC, and ECN3. Recent improvements of the BDF design at the current location (referred to as `TT90-TCC9-ECN4') are also mentioned together with ideas for yet further improvements. The assessments of the alternative locations compiled the large amount of information that is already available together with a set of conceptual studies that were performed during 2021. |