CERN Accelerating science

The centrality dependence of SC($m$,$n$) (a) and NSC($m$,$n$) (b) with flow harmonics for m = 3--5 and n = 2,3 in $\PbPb$ collisions at $\snn=2.76$~TeV. The lower order harmonic correlations (SC(3,2), SC(4,2), NSC(3,2) and NSC(4,2)) are taken from \cite{ALICE:2016kpq} and shown as bands. The systematic and statistical errors are combined in quadrature for these lower order harmonic correlations. The SC(4,2) and SC(3,2) are downscaled by a factor of 0.1. Systematic uncertainties are represented with boxes for higher order harmonic correlations.

The centrality dependence of SC($m$,$n$) (a) and NSC($m$,$n$) (b) with flow harmonics for m = 3--5 and n = 2,3 in $\PbPb$ collisions at $\snn=2.76$~TeV. The lower order harmonic correlations (SC(3,2), SC(4,2), NSC(3,2) and NSC(4,2)) are taken from \cite{ALICE:2016kpq} and shown as bands. The systematic and statistical errors are combined in quadrature for these lower order harmonic correlations. The SC(4,2) and SC(3,2) are downscaled by a factor of 0.1. Systematic uncertainties are represented with boxes for higher order harmonic correlations.

SC(3,2) and SC(4,2) ((a) and (c)) as a function of minimum $p_{\rm T}$ cuts in $\PbPb$ collisions at $\snn=2.76$~TeV are shown in the left panels. The NSC(3,2) and NSC(4,2) ((b) and (d)) are shown in the right panels. Systematic uncertainties are represented with boxes.

The individual flow harmonics $v_n$ for $n$ = 2--5 in $\PbPb$ collisions at $\snn=2.76$~TeV are shown in the left panels ((A), (B) and (C)). $v_4$ and $v_5$ are shown in the same panel (C). The $p_{\rm T, min}$ dependence of $v_n$ for $n$ = 2--4 is shown in the right panels ((a), (b) and (c)).

The centrality dependence of SC($m$,$n$) and NSC($m$,$n$) in $\PbPb$ collisions at $\snn=2.76$~TeV. Results are compared to the event-by-event EKRT+viscous hydrodynamic calculations~\cite{Niemi:2015qia}. The lines are hydrodynamic predictions with two different $\eta/s(T)$ parameterizations. Left (right) panels show SC($m$,$n$) (NSC($m$,$n$)).

The centrality dependence of SC($m$,$n$) and NSC($m$,$n$) in $\PbPb$ collisions at $\snn=2.76$~TeV. Results are compared to various VISH2+1 calculations~\cite{Zhu:2016puf}. Three initial conditions from AMPT, MC-KLN and MC-Glauber are drawn as different colors and markers. The $\eta/s$ parameters are shown as different line styles, the small shear viscosity ($\eta/s=0.08$) are shown as solid lines, and large shear viscosities ($\eta/s=0.2$ for MC-KLN and MC-Glauber and 0.16 for AMPT) are drawn as dashed lines. Left (right) panels show SC($m$,$n$) (NSC($m$,$n$)).

The centrality dependence of SC($m$,$n$) and NSC($m$,$n$) in $\PbPb$ collisions at $\snn=2.76$~TeV. Results are compared to various AMPT models. Left (right) panels show SC($m$,$n$) (NSC($m$,$n$).

The $\chisqndf$ values calculated by Eq.~\ref{Eq:chisq} are shown for SC($m$,$n$) (a), NSC($m$,$n$) (b) and individual harmonics $v_n$ (c). Results are for model calculations which are best in describing the SC observables for each of the three different types of models.

NSC(3,2) as a function of the minimum $p_{\rm T}$ cut in $\PbPb$ collisions at $\snn=2.76$~TeV. Results are compared to various AMPT configurations and event-by-event EKRT+viscous hydrodynamic calculations~\cite{Niemi:2015qia}.

NSC(4,2) as a function of the minimum $p_{\rm T}$ cut in $\PbPb$ collisions at $\snn=2.76$~TeV. Results are compared to various AMPT configurations and event-by-event EKRT+viscous hydrodynamic calculations~\cite{Niemi:2015qia}.

The individual flow harmonics $v_n$ for $n$ = 2--4 in $\PbPb$ collisions at $\snn=2.76$~TeV~\cite{Adam:2016izf}. Results are compared to the event-by-event EKRT+viscous hydrodynamic calculations~\cite{Niemi:2015qia} for two different $\eta/s(T)$ parameterizations, labeled in the same way as in ~\cite{Niemi:2015qia}.

The individual flow harmonics $v_n$ for $n$ = 2--4 in $\PbPb$ collisions at $\snn=2.76$~TeV~\cite{Adam:2016izf}. Results are compared to the event-by-event EKRT+viscous hydrodynamic calculations~\cite{Niemi:2015qia} for two different $\eta/s(T)$ parameterizations, labeled in the same way as in ~\cite{Niemi:2015qia}.

The individual flow harmonics $v_n$ for $n$ = 2--4 in $\PbPb$ collisions at $\snn=2.76$~TeV~\cite{Adam:2016izf}. Results are compared to the event-by-event EKRT+viscous hydrodynamic calculations~\cite{Niemi:2015qia} for two different $\eta/s(T)$ parameterizations, labeled in the same way as in ~\cite{Niemi:2015qia}.

The individual flow harmonics $v_n$ for $n$ = 2--4 in $\PbPb$ collisions at $\snn=2.76$~TeV~\cite{Adam:2016izf}. Results are compared to various VISH2+1 calculations~\cite{Zhu:2016puf}. Three initial conditions from AMPT, MC-KLN and MC-Glauber are shown in different colors. The results for different $\eta/s$ values are shown as different line styles, the small shear viscosity ($\eta/s = 0.08$) are shown as solid lines, and large shear viscosities ($\eta/s = 0.2$ for MC-KLN and MC-Glauber and, 0.16 for AMPT) are drawn as dashed lines.

The individual flow harmonics $v_n$ for $n$ = 2--4 in $\PbPb$ collisions at $\snn=2.76$~TeV~\cite{Adam:2016izf}. Results are compared to various VISH2+1 calculations~\cite{Zhu:2016puf}. Three initial conditions from AMPT, MC-KLN and MC-Glauber are shown in different colors. The results for different $\eta/s$ values are shown as different line styles, the small shear viscosity ($\eta/s = 0.08$) are shown as solid lines, and large shear viscosities ($\eta/s = 0.2$ for MC-KLN and MC-Glauber and, 0.16 for AMPT) are drawn as dashed lines.

The individual flow harmonics $v_n$ for $n$ = 2--4 in $\PbPb$ collisions at $\snn=2.76$~TeV~\cite{Adam:2016izf}. Results are compared to various VISH2+1 calculations~\cite{Zhu:2016puf}. Three initial conditions from AMPT, MC-KLN and MC-Glauber are shown in different colors. The results for different $\eta/s$ values are shown as different line styles, the small shear viscosity ($\eta/s = 0.08$) are shown as solid lines, and large shear viscosities ($\eta/s = 0.2$ for MC-KLN and MC-Glauber and, 0.16 for AMPT) are drawn as dashed lines.

The individual flow harmonics $v_n$ ($n$ = 2, 3 and 4) in $\PbPb$ collisions at $\snn=2.76$~TeV~\cite{Adam:2016izf}. Results are compared to various AMPT models.

The individual flow harmonics $v_n$ ($n$ = 2, 3 and 4) in $\PbPb$ collisions at $\snn=2.76$~TeV~\cite{Adam:2016izf}. Results are compared to various AMPT models.

The individual flow harmonics $v_n$ ($n$ = 2, 3 and 4) in $\PbPb$ collisions at $\snn=2.76$~TeV~\cite{Adam:2016izf}. Results are compared to various AMPT models.

The individual flow harmonics $v_n$ for $n$ = 2--4 in $\PbPb$ collisions at $\snn=2.76$~TeV~\cite{Adam:2016izf}. Results are compared with selected calculations from three different types of models which are best in describing $v_n$ coefficients.

The individual flow harmonics $v_n$ for $n$ = 2--4 in $\PbPb$ collisions at $\snn=2.76$~TeV~\cite{Adam:2016izf}. Results are compared with selected calculations from three different types of models which are best in describing $v_n$ coefficients.

The individual flow harmonics $v_n$ for $n$ = 2--4 in $\PbPb$ collisions at $\snn=2.76$~TeV~\cite{Adam:2016izf}. Results are compared with selected calculations from three different types of models which are best in describing $v_n$ coefficients.